Neonatal neurologic emergencies requiring access to paediatric emergency units: a retrospective observational study.

Herein, authors present a retrospective, multi-center study to determine the number of accesses to Pediatric Emergency Unit (PEU) of patients within 28 days of life, admitted to (1) the Acute and Emergency Pediatric Unit, San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy; (2) Garibaldi Hospital for Emergency Care, Catania, Italy; (3) Cannizzaro Hospital for Emergency Care, Catania, Italy. We included neonates admitted for neurologic problems, from January 2015 to December 2020, to the 1-Acute and Emergency Access of the San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy [observation center 1 (OC1)]; 2-Garibaldi Hospital for Emergency Care, Catania, Italy (Observation Center 2-OC2); 3-Cannizzaro Hospital for Emergency Care, Catania, Italy (Observation Center 3-OC3). For each patient, we evaluated the severity of urgency, by studying the admission triage-coloured codes, the clinical data at admission and the discharge diagnosis. Neonates who had access to PEU were 812 in the OC1, 3720 in the OC2, and 748 in the OC3 respectively; 69 (8.4%), 138 (3.7%), and 55 (7.4%) was the proportion of neonatal accesses for neurological conditions. We observed that in the study period, the three hospitals had an important decrease of pediatric accesses to their PEU, but the proportion of neonates who had access to the OC1 for neurologic diseases, with respect to the total neonatal accesses, remained stable. We found that the most frequent neurologic disease for which newborns had access to PEU was Cyanosis, (46.1% of all neonatal accesses). Apnea was the second most frequent cause, with a number of 76 accesses (29%). In the literature there are numerous studies on the assessment of diseases that most frequently concern the pediatric patient in an emergency room, but there are very few references on neonatal accesses for urgent neurologic diseases. Therefore, appropriate training is required to avoid unnecessary tests without overlooking potentially serious conditions.

Randomized Comparison of Helmet CPAP Versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Pediatric Respiratory Distress.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 noninvasive respiratory support methods, which included helmet CPAP and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in children with respiratory distress admitted to a pediatric intermediate care unit. METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study conducted on children with respiratory distress (age 1-24 months) who were admitted to our acute and emergency operative unit. All included subjects were randomly treated with helmet CPAP or HFNC in a 1:1 fashion until their clinical picture, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters resolved. The efficiencies of helmet CPAP and HFNC were evaluated by breathing frequency, SpO2 , ABG pH, ABG PaCO2 , ABG PaO2 , and PaO2 /FIO2 , recorded once at baseline and then after 1 and 6 h of treatment. Both noninvasive respiratory support modalities were compared with a control group of subjects with respiratory distress under standard therapeutic pharmaceutical protocols. RESULTS: We found that both helmet CPAP and HFNC were efficient in improving the clinical conditions of subjects with mild-to-moderate respiratory distress, although clinical response to helmet CPAP was more efficient and rapid compared with HFNC. Children who received respiratory support had a better clinical course in terms of hospitalization, days of intravenous rehydration therapy, and days of drug administration compared with the control group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our knowledge, the present study is the first research comparing the effects of CPAP and HFNC in respiratory distress resolution in a pediatric intermediate care setting. It aims to identify the most efficient treatment to avoid pediatric ICU admissions and endotracheal intubation and reduce the administration of drugs and days of hospitalization.