Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression and Relationship with Biology of NSCLC.

Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death (PD-1), such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, has significantly improved the survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to determine the subset of patients that can benefit most from these therapies, biomarkers such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have been proposed. However, the predictive and prognostic role of the use of PD-L1 is controversial. Anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry may not represent the actual status of the tumour because of individual variability and tumour heterogeneity. Additionally, there may be analytical variability due to the use of different assays and antibodies to detect PD-L1. Moreover PD-L1 expression is also regulated by oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) fusion with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS). Preclinical studies have shown the potential role of targeted therapy in immune escape mechanisms in NSCLC cells. This review summarizes current literature data on the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the relationship with such factors and with clinicopathological features of NSCLC.

Histologic and genetic advances in refining the diagnosis of "undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma".

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is an inclusive term used for sarcomas that defy formal sub-classification. The frequency with which this diagnosis is assigned has decreased in the last twenty years. This is because when implemented, careful histologic assessment, immunohistochemistry, and ultra-structural evaluation can often determine lineage of differentiation. Further attrition in the diagnostic frequency of UPS may arise by using array-comparative genomic hybridization. Gene expression arrays are also of potential use as they permit hierarchical gene clustering. Appraisal of the literature is difficult due to a historical perspective in which specific molecular diagnostic methods were previously unavailable. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification has changed with different inclusion criteria. Taxonomy challenges also exist with the older term "malignant fibrous histiocytoma" being replaced by "UPS". In 2010 an analysis of multiple sarcoma expression databases using a 170-gene predictor, re-classified most MFH and "not-otherwise-specified" (NOS) tumors as liposarcomas, leiomyosarcomas or fibrosarcomas. Interestingly, some of the classifier genes are potential molecular therapeutic targets including Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), Nerve growth factor ß (NGF ß) and Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR).

Fibroblast growth factor receptors, developmental corruption and malignant disease.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGF) are a family of ligands that bind to four different types of cell surface receptor entitled, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and FGFR4. These receptors differ in their ligand binding affinity and tissue distribution. The prototypical receptor structure is that of an extracellular region comprising three immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains, a hydrophobic transmembrane segment and a split intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Alternative gene splicing affecting the extracellular third Ig loop also creates different receptor isoforms entitled FGFRIIIb and FGFRIIIc. Somatic fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations are implicated in different types of cancer and germline FGFR mutations occur in developmental syndromes particularly those in which craniosynostosis is a feature. The mutations found in both conditions are often identical. Many somatic FGFR mutations in cancer are gain-of-function mutations of established preclinical oncogenic potential. Gene amplification can also occur with 19-22% of squamous cell lung cancers for example having amplification of FGFR1. Ontologic comparators can be informative such as aberrant spermatogenesis being implicated in both spermatocytic seminomas and Apert syndrome. The former arises from somatic FGFR3 mutations and Apert syndrome arises from germline FGFR2 mutations. Finally, therapeutics directed at inhibiting the FGF/FGFR interaction are a promising subject for clinical trials.

Differential gene expression profile of first-generation and second-generation rapamycin-resistant allogeneic T cells.

BACKGROUND AIMS: We completed a phase II clinical trial evaluating rapamycin-resistant allogeneic T cells (T-rapa) and now have evaluated a T-rapa product manufactured in 6 days (T-rapa(6)) rather than 12 days (T-Rapa(12)). METHODS: Using gene expression microarrays, we addressed our hypothesis that the two products would express a similar phenotype. The products had similar phenotypes using conventional comparison methods of cytokine secretion and surface markers. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis of 34,340 genes revealed that T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products clustered together, distinct from culture input CD4(+) T cells. Statistical analysis of T-rapa(6) products revealed differential expression of 19.3% of genes (n = 6641) compared with input CD4(+) cells; similarly, 17.8% of genes (n = 6147) were differentially expressed between T-rapa(12) products and input CD4(+) cells. Compared with input CD4(+) cells, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products were similar in terms of up-regulation of major gene families (cell cycle, stress response, glucose catabolism, DNA metabolism) and down-regulation (inflammatory response, immune response, apoptosis, transcriptional regulation). However, when directly compared, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products showed differential expression of 5.8% of genes (n = 1994; T-rapa(6) vs. T-rapa(12)). CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation T-rapa(6) cells possess a similar yet distinct gene expression profile relative to first-generation T-rapa(12) cells and may mediate differential effects after adoptive transfer.

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of 5-Fluorouracil degradation rate by intact peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a major chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of tumors. It is catabolized mainly by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and patients with a complete or partial deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity are at risk of developing severe 5-FU-associated toxicity. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that intact peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) can be an effective model to evaluate the degradation rate of 5-FU. We developed a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to measure in vitro the rate of 5-FU degradation by intact PBMC. 5-FU degradation rate was determined by measuring the decrease of a fixed amount of 5-FU (10 microg/mL) added to a solution of PBMC, after 2 hours incubation, expressed as nanogram per milliliter of 5-FU degraded per minute x 10(6) cells. Freshly prepared intact PBMC can degrade efficiently in vitro-added 5-FU. The assay consists of 3 steps: (1) PBMC isolation from peripheral blood, (2) PBMC incubation with 5-FU in vitro for different times, and (3) determination of 5-FU amount to calculate the degradation rate. 5-FU was analyzed by a Q Trap 2000 triple quadrupole/ion trap mass spectrometer in the multiple-reaction-monitoring modes. The chromatographic separation was accomplished using a C18 column with a run time of 16 minutes. By analyzing samples from 39 patients with no 5-FU toxicity, the mean 5-FU degradation rate was 1.85 +/- 0.50 ng x mL(-1) x min(-1) x 10(6) cells. The assessment of a test to measure 5-FU degradation rate in PBMC of patients before 5-FU administration could represent a prescreening method for evaluating the possible toxicity of this drug as an aid to set up a personalized medicine approach for each patient.