Global cardiovascular risk, COVID-19 severity and post-COVID-19 syndrome: a clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Post-COVID-19 is a syndrome defined by signs and symptoms present until 12 weeks after COVID-19, lasting for more than 8 weeks, not explained by an alternative diagnosis. The present study aimed to assess whether the cardiovascular risk (CVR) of patients with COVID-19 correlates with symptoms and changes in respiratory function parameters in post-COVID-19. The association between CVR and the severity of acute disease was also considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 21/04/21-01/09/21, we enrolled 1,782 consecutive patients with COVID-19. We divided these subjects into (i) 4 levels, based on the severity of COVID-19 (home care; hospitalized/no oxygen therapy; hospitalized/oxygen therapy; hospitalized/NIV-ICU), (ii) 2 levels, according to CVR calculated with the European Society of Cardiology SCORE tables (low-intermediate risk; high or very high risk). All subjects underwent a 3-month follow-up considering post-COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: In post-COVID-19 patients, high or very-high CVR was associated with (i) increased risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 (p<0.0001), (ii) higher prevalence of severe clinical manifestations and ICU admission (p<0.0001), (iii) development of post-COVID-19 (p<0.0001) and (iv) increased risk of a larger post-COVID-19 burden of disease. CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant association between CVR, severity of COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 syndrome three months after the end of acute disease.

The value of admission Troponin I to predict outcomes in suspected infections in elderly patients admitted in Internal Medicine: results from the SOFA-T collaboration, a multi-center study.

Elderly patients affected by suspected infection and declining clinical conditions can be admitted to stepdown units (SDU), but a risk stratification is necessary to optimize their management. Admission troponin I (aTnI) has a prognostic role, however, one of the most commonly used stratification tools, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA), does not consider myocardial injury. With this paper, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of a new score, named SOFA-T, considering both SOFA score and aTnI in a cohort of elderly patients admitted to the stepdown beds of two Internal Medicine departments. Patients aged > 65 years admitted in SDU of two different hospitals of the same region in a 12-months timeframe were retrospectively assessed obtaining age, sex, days of admission, in-hospital death, SOFA, aTnI and comorbidities. The best aTnI cutoff for in-hospital death was calculated with ROC curve analysis; dichotomous variables were compared with chi-squared test; continuous variables were compared with t test or Mann-Whitney test. We obtained a cohort of 390 patients. The best aTnI cutoff was 0.31 ng/ml: patients with increased aTnI had higher risk of in-hospital death (OR: 1.834; 95% CI 1.160-2.900; p = 0.009), and higher SOFA (6.81 ± 2.71 versus 5.97 ± 3.10; p = 0.010). Adding aTnI to SOFA increased significantly the area under the curve (AUCSOFA = 0.68; 95% CI 0.64-0.73; AUCSOFA-T = 0.71; 95% CI 0.65-0.76; p = 0.0001), with a slight improvement of the prognostic performance. In elderly patients admitted to SDU for suspected infection, sepsis or septic shock, aTnI slightly improves the accuracy of SOFA score of the in-hospital death prediction.

Sleep quality can influence the outcome of patients with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Sleep plays a role in some oligodendrocyte processes, including myelination. This study aimed to analyze the possible correlations between sleep quality and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) course. METHODS: Forty patients with Relapsing-Remitting MS were admitted. Based on the score obtained by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), they were divided into good sleepers (<5) and bad sleepers (≥5). A set of data was collected retrospectively for each patient to investigate whether PSQI scores correlated with EDSS score changes, the number and the duration of each relapse and the cumulative day-number of MS reactivations over a three-year period. RESULTS: In a multivariate model, a PSQI score ≥5 independently and significantly correlated with an increase in number and duration of relapses (p = 0.000) and number of days of MS activity (p = 0.000) during the three-year retrospective observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the course of MS may be influenced by sleep quality. Assessment of sleep quality could be used to obtain reliable prognostic information in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate whether the correction of sleep disorders may be effective in improving the prognosis of MS patients.

Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a population of patients with transient global amnesia.

OBJECTIVE: The etiology of transient global amnesia (TGA) is largely undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), a condition associated with subtle changes in brain structures involved in memory processes, increases in subjects who have previously experienced a TGA episode. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who had had a TGA episode were included. A case-control model was used, matching cases with controls by sex, age, and body mass index category. Diagnosis of OSAS was based on the results of the Berlin Questionnaire, which was later confirmed by means of an all-night polysomnography recording. RESULTS: The prevalence of OSAS among TGA patients was significantly higher with respect to that in controls (44.8% vs 13.8%, p = 0.020, χ2 test). At logistic regression model, subjects with TGA had an odds ratio of 8.409 (95% confidence interval = 1.674-42.243; p = 0.010) of having OSAS when compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, an accurate investigation of sleep disturbances could be considered for a complete assessment of patients with TGA. The subtle cerebral anatomo-functional damage induced by the repeated nocturnal apneic episodes may be a pathophysiologic link between OSAS and TGA.

Triptan use among hospital workers affected by migraine.

Triptans represent the most specific and effective treatment for migraine attacks. Nevertheless, in clinical practice, they are often underused. Hospital workers, in particular physicians, are expected to be more aware of the correct use of specific drugs, especially for a very common disease such as migraine. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether different hospital workers affected by migraine are able to correctly manage the most suitable therapy for their migraine attacks. During a 1-year period, we submitted hospital employees to a structured interview with a questionnaire to investigate the presence of headache and its characteristics. In particular, in the subpopulation of subjects affected by migraine, we took information regarding their usual treatment for the control of attacks. The type of drug and the category of the working activity were synthesized as two different ordinal variables. Difference in the distribution of the different drug categories was evaluated with Chi squared test. Statistics was performed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows systems. We enrolled 1250 consecutive subjects: 20.3 % of the population (254 patients) was affected by migraine. Triptans use was significantly lower than that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The distribution of the use of the drugs was significantly different (p < 0.0001) at Chi squared test. Among migraineur physicians, only 10.7 % used triptans. Even in this subgroup, we observed a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the distribution of the use of the drugs at Chi squared test. Our findings show a reduced use of triptans among hospital workers. These data reflect the unsatisfactory dissemination of knowledge regarding the correct management of migraine attacks and the advantages of treatment with triptans. An incorrect therapeutic approach to migraine contributes to the risk of the most important complications, such as drugs abuse or illness chronicization. These findings suggest that an insufficient awareness of migraine-related therapeutic options also involves hospital workers, including physicians.

Migraine in health workers: working in a hospital can be considered an advantage?

Migraine is the most common form of headache, and is one of the most diffused pathologies in the world. Moreover, patients often lose years before obtaining a correct diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether diagnostic delay differs between hospital workers, in theory more sensible to health problems, and common people. We compared our cohort of patients attending the headache center on which we put a diagnosis of migraine with and without aura with a sample of hospital workers investigated about headache presence and characteristics. Particularly, hospital workers were evaluated by ID-migraine test, a three-question test validated to formulate a migraine diagnosis. Continuous variables (age and diagnostic delay) were compared with t test for independent samples. Dichotomous and categorical variables were compared with Chi squared test. The mean difference between in-hospital workers and outpatients was analyzed with a GLM/multivariate model accounting for age and sex. The difference between the single subcategory of workers affected by migraine was explored with a GLM/multivariate model accounting of age and sex. Five hundred and ninety-nine patients affected by migraine with and without aura were enrolled. Demographical characteristics were comparable in the two study populations. In-hospital workers (99 patients) had a mean longer diagnostic delay (14.89 years; 95 % CI: 7.85-21.93 years) with respect to the outpatients (12.13 years; 95 % CI: 5.37-18.89 years). The difference resulted statistically significant at the multivariate model (p < 0.05). Single subpopulations of in-hospital workers did not have a statistically significant different delay in diagnosing migraine. Diagnostic delay was significantly longer in hospital workers with respect to outpatients. Then, we can conclude that our population of hospital workers did not present a particular attention to their headache, probably because of a tendency to self-treating. Moreover, we did not find differences among different typology of workers, underlining that different job experience and education did not contribute to a best management of headache. More information and informative initiatives are necessary to sensitize people about migraine, especially among hospital workers.

Headache in a population of hospital workers.

Headache prevalence is very high, especially during working life. Hospital workers are expected to be particularly careful with health problems. Few data are available about the dimension of the headache-related problems among hospital workers, including disease awareness and diagnostic delay. 502 subjects employed in our hospital (doctors, nurses, technicians, administrative employees) were enrolled over a 3-month period and submitted to a questionnaire about the presence of headache, its characteristics and time spent from disease onset to diagnosis. We used the ID-migraine test, a validated tool, to obtain a correct migraine diagnosis based on a three-question test. Age and education were collected as continuous variables while the other variables (sex, presence of headache, presence of migraine, diagnosis put by the general practitioners) were encoded as binary. The difference of the distribution of the analyzed variables in tables was evaluated with χ (2) test. The data were analyzed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows systems. In the analyzed population (mean age 40.15 ± 11.0 years; males 60.7 %), 216 patients complained of headache (43.1 %) and 77 (15.4 %) were diagnosed as migraineous at the in-hospital evaluation. Among the 216 cephalalgic patients, the majority (59.7 %, p < 0.0001 at χ (2) test) did not refer to their general practitioner. Of the 77 patients affected by migraine, 55.8 % referred to their general practitioner, but only 27 (35.1 %) received a definite migraine diagnosis. Fifty subjects (64.9 %) were still undiagnosed and unevaluated at the moment of our survey (p < 0.0001 at χ (2) test). Headache prevalence was very high in this population of hospital workers. Diagnostic errors and delays were frequent. Unexpectedly, self-awareness of the headache was very low. Headache, particularly migraine, is a relevant cause of loss of working days and low productivity. Our findings suggest the necessity to program initiatives aimed to raise the awareness of headache in order to improve diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities.

Diagnostic delay in migraine with aura.

Migraine with aura (MWA) is a common headache, characterized by short-lasting neurological signs preceding an headache attack with migraine characteristics. We have recently performed several investigations about time-delay for migraine without aura diagnosis (MWoA). Aim of this study was to compare the time necessary to obtain a correct diagnosis in MWA and MWoA patients. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients affected by MWA and 62 age- and sex-matched patients affected by MWoA. All subjects were submitted to a face-to-face interview about the time-delay from symptoms' onset and a correct migraine typology diagnosis, the number of specialists consulted and the instrumental examinations performed. Independent samples and repeated measures t test, Mann-Whitney U were performed to compare the variables of the cases with the matched controls. No significant differences were found among the collected variables. Diagnostic delay was significantly different (p < 0.05), resulting lower in patients affected by MWA than in those with MWoA. In fact, subjects affected by MWA had a mean diagnostic delay of 6.70 years (SE ± 1.5), while patients affected by MWoA had a mean interval of 10.7 years (SE ± 1.20). Patients affected by MWA present a significant lower delay for the formulation of a correct diagnosis with respect to subjects with MWoA. This could be probably due to the fact that MWA patients develop major alarm reactions related to visual symptoms and look for an earlier appointment with a specialist medical center.

The real usefulness and indication for migraine diagnosis of neurophysiologic evaluation.

According to IHS criteria, a correct clinical history is fully adequate for a diagnosis of migraine. Patients usually perform many useless instrumental and laboratoristic exams and specialistic evaluations. In particular, electroencephalogram (EEG) is often prescribed as a first-line study in migraine patients. The objective is to analyze the indications of EEG in migraine and to evaluate whether its performance may negatively influence the time necessary to obtain a correct diagnosis. In particular, we compared the effects of EEG performance with those related to neuroradiological examinations in terms of time necessary to obtain a migraine diagnosis. 400 consecutive patients affected by migraine without aura were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected. We used an ordinal regression model considering diagnostic delay as the main outcome and EEG and radiological examinations (in particular brain CT) as predictors. Delay was defined as a time to diagnosis greater than 1-year. Age, sex, number of specialists and examinations were included in the model as covariates. EEG represented the most often performed non-radiologic examination in our sample (20 %). It was associated with a significant risk of diagnostic delay [OR 1.66 (95 % CI 1.65-1.66, p < 0.001)]. An appropriate workup, including CT scan and early referral to a headache center was the most time-saving approach, being associated to the lowest probability of diagnostic delay [OR 0.72 (95 % CI 0.63-0.82, p < 0.001)]. EEG is a frequently prescribed exam in migraine. Our data show that it can contribute to diagnostic delay, highlighting only uncertain and unspecific elements. These data confirm the usefulness of a wide application of IHS guidelines, not recommending this exam for migraine detection.

The role of instrumental examinations in delayed migraine diagnosis.

Patients affected by migraine without aura very often consult different specialists who, misunderstanding the correct diagnosis, submit them to different instrumental examinations. The objective of the study was to assess if each instrumental examination was really useful for a faster migraine definition, or on the contrary, it increased the time delay for a correct diagnosis. We enrolled 300 consecutive patients referring to our Headache Center with a first diagnosis of migraine without aura and submitted them to a face-to-face interview about time from disease's onset to a correct diagnosis. In each patient, the first instrumental examination performed to specifically investigate migraine-related symptoms was defined. Brain MRI, brain CT, sinus CT, sinus X-rays, cervical spine X-rays and EEG were the most often performed examinations. All the exams, with the exception of brain CT, determined a significant increase of time delay in migraine diagnosis (p < 0.05). Brain CT was significantly associated with a higher probability to obtain a correct diagnosis in less than 1 year. Migraine without aura patients are usually addressed to perform radiological and other instrumental examinations. This attitude may increase the risk of time delay to obtain a correct diagnosis. The performance of a careful clinical history evaluation and neurological examination, with the addition of a brain CT when appropriate, is the best approach for a rapid and correct diagnosis of migraine without aura.

Foreign accent syndrome as the initial sign of primary progressive aphasia.

Foreign accent syndrome (FAS) is a rare speech disorder characterised by the emergence of a new accent, perceived by listeners as foreign. FAS has usually been described following focal brain insults, such as stroke. We describe the unusual case of a woman presenting with FAS as the earliest symptom of progressive degenerative brain disease. At presentation, she showed no language or other cognitive impairment, and functional and structural brain imaging were normal. Follow-up 1 year later revealed the emergence of mild expressive language problems. Repeat functional neuroimaging showed mild hypoperfusion of the perisylvian speech area of the left hemisphere, and structural imaging showed mild left perisylvian atrophy. We interpret the case as an unusual presentation of primary progressive non-fluent aphasia. The case provides further evidence of the variable and circumscribed nature of the clinical presentation of focal cerebral degeneration.