Respiratory mechanics evaluation of mice submitted to intravenous methacholine: Bolus vs. continuous infusion.

IMPACT STATEMENT: Respiratory mechanics studies are associated with fundamental research and translational studies; the present work thus investigates this particular matter. Our current research describes differences and similarities between two different ways of administrating a very prevalent bronchoconstrictor (methacholine) in an aging process scenario. The core issue of our work is related with troubles we find with the bolus protocol and the application of the mathematical model used to assess the respiratory mechanics. Our findings reveal the continuous infusion as an alternative to these problems and we hope to provide the proper foundations to a more reliable assessment in the respiratory field.

Methacholine dose response curve and acceptability criteria of respiratory mechanics modeling.

Aim: This study aimed to analyze the Constant Phase Model (CPM) Coefficient of Determination (COD) and an index of harmonic distortion ([Formula: see text]) behavior in intravenous methacholine dose response curve. We studied the COD and [Formula: see text] behavior of Control and Lung Inflammation (OVA) groups of mice and we proposed an alternative for moments when the CPM should not be applied. Methods: 9-week female BALB/c mice were studied, 8 of the control group (23.11 ± 1.27 g) and 11 of the lung inflammation group (OVA) (21.45 ± 2.16 g). The COD values were obtained during the respiratory mechanics assessment via Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) and the [Formula: see text] was estimated a posteriori. Both control and OVA groups were submitted to 4 doses of Methacholine (MCh) protocol. Results: A strong correlation between COD and [Formula: see text] was present at the last two doses (0.3 mg/kg: r = -0.75, p = 0.0013 and 1 mg/kg: r = -0.91; p < 0.0001) in the OVA group. Differences were found in doses of 0.3 mg/kg between control and OVA for the maximum values of Rn (Newtonian Resistance) and G (tissue viscous); and between groups at PBS and doses of 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg for H (Elastance). A similar behavior was observed for the analysis of Area Under the Curve with the exclusion of the 3 first measurements of each dose. However, in this scenario, the comparison with the maximum value presented a higher discriminatory capacity of the parameters associated with the parenchyma. Conclusions: During severe bronchoconstriction there is a strong negative correlation between model goodness of fit and nonlinearities levels, reinforcing that COD is a robust acceptance criterion, whether still simple and easily obtained from the ventilator. We also pointed out the area under the CPM parameters dose response curve is a useful and can be used as a complementary analysis to peak comparison following bolus injections of methacholine.