Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
N Engl J Med ; 344(6): 410-7, 2001 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11172177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prospectively identifying patients whose renal function or blood pressure will improve after the correction of renal-artery stenosis has not been possible. We evaluated whether a high level of resistance to flow in the segmental arteries of both kidneys (indicated by resistance-index values of at least 80) can be used prospectively to select appropriate patients for treatment. METHODS: We evaluated 5950 patients with hypertension for renal-artery stenosis using color Doppler ultrasonography, and we measured the resistance index ([1 - end-diastolic velocity divided by maximal systolic velocity] x 100). Among 138 patients who had unilateral or bilateral renal-artery stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter and who underwent renal angioplasty or surgery, the procedure was technically successful in 131 (95 percent). Creatinine clearance and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were measured before renal-artery stenosis was corrected; 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure; and yearly thereafter. The mean (+/-SD) duration of follow-up was 32+/-21 months. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients (27 percent) who had resistance-index values of at least 80 before revascularization, the mean arterial pressure did not decrease by 10 mm Hg or more after revascularization in 34 (97 percent). Renal function declined (defined by a decrease in the creatinine clearance; of at least 10 percent) in 28 (80 percent); 16 (46 percent) became dependent on dialysis and 10 (29 percent) died during follow-up. Among the 96 patients (73 percent) with a resistance-index value of less than 80, the mean arterial pressure decreased by at least 10 percent in all but 6 patients (6 percent) after revascularization; renal function worsened in only 3 (3 percent), all of whom became dependent on dialysis; and 3 (3 percent) died (P<0.001 for the comparison with patients with a resistance-index value of at least 80). CONCLUSIONS: A renal resistance-index value of at least 80 reliably identifies patients with renal-artery stenosis in whom angioplasty or surgery will not improve renal function, blood pressure, or kidney survival.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Renovascular/diagnostic imaging , Kidney/blood supply , Renal Artery Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Angioplasty, Balloon , Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Blood Flow Velocity , Creatine/metabolism , Humans , Hypertension, Renovascular/physiopathology , Hypertension, Renovascular/therapy , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Renal Artery Obstruction/physiopathology , Renal Artery Obstruction/surgery , Renal Artery Obstruction/therapy , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stents , Vascular Resistance
2.
Clin Nephrol ; 53(5): 333-43, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11305806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Renal artery disease can cause both hypertension and renal failure, and color Doppler sonography (CDS) may be a good screening method to detect it. Presently reported techniques of Doppler sonography have either a high rate of technical failure (4-42%), or low sensitivity and specificity, or detect only stenoses greater than 70%, or exclude patients with renal failure from analysis. In previous studies Doppler detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS) was based either on increased intrastenotic velocity or on the detection of post-stenotic Doppler phenomena. In the present prospective study these two approaches were combined to detect RAS (> or = 50% diameter reduction) in 226 consecutive patients (144 with normal and 82 with impaired renal function). METHODS: Stenosis of 50% or more was diagnosed if the maximal systolic velocity in the main renal artery was more than 180 cm/sec and velocity in the distal renal artery less than one quarter of the maximum velocity. When these velocities could not be determined a diagnosis of RAS was made when the acceleration time in intrarenal segmental arteries exceeded 70 msec. All patients subsequently underwent arteriography as the gold standard for the detection of RAS. RESULTS: With this combined approach, the technical failure rate of CDS was 0% in both patients with normal and those with impaired renal function. The mean time required for the Doppler investigation was 17 minutes. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of a significant stenosis in a given vessel (including accessory arteries), as compared to angiography, were 96.7% and 98.0%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler sonography, evaluating both main renal and intrarenal arteries is an ideal screening method for detection of RAS of 50% or more because it allows accurate and rapid detection of stenosis in all patients, irrespective of renal function.


Subject(s)
Renal Artery Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Blood Flow Velocity , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Renovascular/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Renal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...