ABSTRACT
Se presenta nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento de la hemoptisis con embolización bronquial en pacientes con bronquiectasias, desde el 2001 al 2008, en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Veinte pacientes fueron tratados con este método: 12 mujeres y 8 hombres con una edad media de 51 años (15-83 años). Las causas de bronquiectasias fueron secundarias a infecciones inespecíficas en el 40%; otro 40% secuelas de tuberculosis y 20% por enfermedad fibroquística. La indicación de embolización fue hemoptisis mayor a 300 ml/24 hs o hemoptisis persistentes durante más de 3 días consecutivos con requerimiento de hospitalización. En el 85% de los casos se efectuó embolización bronquial y en el resto (15%) bronquial y mamaria. Este procedimiento fue bilateral en el 60% de los pacientes, 20% solo en el lado derecho y 20% del lado izquierdo. En 18 pacientes se logró oclusión vascular completa de todos los territorios pulmonares patológicos. Control agudo del sangrado fue obtenido en todos los pacientes (100%) y sólo dos presentaron nuevo sangrado a los 8 y 12 meses respectivamente. Como efecto colateral al tratamiento se observó dolor torácico leve y transitorio en dos pacientes. Concluimos que la embolización de las arterias bronquiales constituye un tratamiento adecuado y seguro para el control agudo de la hemoptisis en pacientes con bronquiectasias.
We present our experience on arterial embolization for the treatment of hemoptysis in patients with bronchiectasis between 2001 and 2008 at the Hospital Italiano in Buenos Aires. Twenty patients were treated with this method: 12 women and 8 men with a median age of 51 years (15-83 years). Bronchiectasis was secondary to bacterial infections in 40% and secondary to tuberculosis infection in 40% of the patients; 20% of the patients had cystic fibrosis. Embolization was prescribed when the hemoptysis was above 300 ml/24 hours or the hemoptysis was persistent for more than 3 consecutive days and the patients hospitalization was required. In 85% of the cases embolization was done only in bronchial arteries and in the remaining 15% in bronchial and mammary arteries. The procedure was bilateral in 60% of the patients, only on the right side in 20% and only on the left side in 20%. In 18 patients complete occlusion was achieved. Complete control of the bleeding was obtained in 100% of patients. Only two patients had a new bleeding, 8 and 12 months later respectively. The treatment side effects were slight and transitory thoracic pain in two patients. We concluded that the embolization of the bronchial arteries is a suitable and safe treatment to control hemoptysis in patients with bronchiectasis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchiectasis , Hemoptysis/therapy , Bronchial Arteries/ultrastructure , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of sevoflurane on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) and compare them to changes in the encephalographic 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF95). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effect of sevoflurane on MLAEP and SEF95 was studied in 15 patients. Anesthetic induction was carried out with propofol, remifentanil, and cisatracurium. After anesthetic induction, the patients were ventilated to achieve different expired concentrations of sevoflurane (1%, 1.5%, and 2%) during 3 consecutive 10-minute periods before the start of surgery. SEF95 and the amplitude and latency of the Na, Pa and Nb MLAEP waves were recorded. All the parameters were measured at baseline and during the different expired fractions of sevoflurane. RESULTS: The increase in sevoflurane concentration was accompanied by a significant decrease in amplitude and a statistically significant increase in latency of the Na, Pa and Nb waves. Likewise, SEF95 decreased significantly. A linear relation was demonstrated between sevoflurane concentration and the variables Na, Pa, Nb and SEF95. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the effect of sevoflurane on the MLEAP of Na, Pa and Nb is similar to that of other anesthetic gases. Even though the amplitude of the Na, Pa and Nb waves decreased in a dose-dependent way, SEF95 correlated more strongly with sevoflurane concentration.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/drug effects , Methyl Ethers/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, General , Elective Surgical Procedures , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reaction Time/drug effects , Sevoflurane , Spectrum AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intraperitoneal administration of a local anaesthetic in combination with an opioid, for the relief of postoperative pain, has already been reported except after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was aimed at assessing the analgesic effect of the intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine and morphine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: At the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a double-blind, randomized manner, one of the following injections was given intraperitoneally. There were 30 patients in each group: Group 1, physiological saline 30 mL; Group 2, bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL; Group 3, bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL plus morphine 2 mg. In addition, Group 2 received 2 mg intravenous (i.v.) morphine in 2 mL saline, and Groups 1 and 3, 2 mL saline intravenously. Patients' postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and a verbal rating score. The postoperative analgesic requirement was assessed by the total dose of metamizol administered by an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Pain, vital signs, supplemental analgesic consumption and side-effects were recorded for all patients for 24 h. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups regarding pain scores (at rest and coughing) during the study except in the first 2 h, when scores were lower for patients receiving intraperitoneal bupivacaine plus i.v. morphine (P < 0.05). Supplemental consumption of metamizol was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in Group 3 than in Group 1 during the first 6 h after surgery. However, the cumulative doses of metamizol were also lower in Group 2 than in Groups 1 and 3 over the entire study (2025 +/- 1044 mg vs. 4925 +/- 1238 and 4125 +/- 1276mg; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the intraperitoneal administration of morphine plus bupivacaine 0.25% reduced the analgesic requirements during the first 6 postoperative hours compared with the control group. However, the combination of intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% and i.v. morphine was more effective for treatment of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
