Targeted treatment reverses increased left cardiac work in unilateral versus bilateral primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cardiovascular complications may be higher in unilateral than in bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). We compared non-invasive hemodynamics before and after targeted therapy of bilateral versus unilateral PA. METHODS: Adrenal vein sampling was performed, and cardiovascular variables were recorded using radial artery pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography (n=114). In a subset of 40 patients (adrenalectomy n=20, spironolactone-based treatment n=20), hemodynamic recordings were again performed after 33 months of targeted PA treatment. RESULTS: In initial cross-sectional analysis, 51 patients had bilateral and 63 had unilateral PA. The mean ages were 50.6 and 54.3 years (p=0.081), and body mass indexes were 30.3 and 30.6 kg/m2 (p=0.724), respectively. Aortic blood pressure and cardiac output did not significantly differ between the groups, but evaluated left cardiac work was ~10% higher in unilateral PA (p=0.022). In the followup study, initial and final blood pressure levels in the aorta were not significantly different, while initial cardiac output (+13%, p=0.015) and left cardiac work (+17%, p=0.009) were higher in unilateral than in bilateral PA. After a median treatment time of 33 months, the differences in cardiac load were abolished, and extracellular water volume was reduced by 1.3 and 1.4 liters in bilateral versus unilateral PA, respectively (p=0.814). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that unilateral PA burdens the heart more than bilateral PA, providing a possible explanation for the higher incidence of cardiac complications in unilateral disease. A similar reduction in aldosterone-induced volume excess was obtained with targeted surgical and medical treatment of PA.

Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The therapeutic options include surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy. Several guidelines and recommendations on treatment algorithms and follow-up exist. However, not all recommendations are strictly evidence-based. To evaluate consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries. METHODS: A Delphi process was used to map the landscape of acromegaly management in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. An expert panel developed 37 statements on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. Dedicated endocrinologists (n = 47) from the Nordic countries were invited to rate their extent of agreement with the statements, using a Likert-type scale (1-7). Consensus was defined as ≥80% of panelists rating their agreement as ≥5 or ≤3 on the Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 41% (15/37) of the statements. Panelists agreed that pituitary surgery remains first line treatment. There was general agreement to recommend first-generation somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment after failed surgery and to consider repeat surgery. In addition, there was agreement to recommend combination therapy with first-generation SSA and pegvisomant as second- or third-line treatment. In more than 50% of the statements, consensus was not achieved. Considerable disagreement existed regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, and treatment with pasireotide and dopamine agonists. CONCLUSION: This consensus exploration study on the management of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries revealed a relatively large degree of disagreement among experts, which mirrors the complexity of the disease and the shortage of evidence-based data.

Volume overload is a major characteristic in primary aldosteronism: a 3-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: We examined haemodynamics, focusing on volume balance and forward and backward wave amplitudes, before and after 2.8 years of targeted treatment of primary aldosteronism. Patients with essential hypertension and normotensive individuals were examined for comparison ( n  = 40 in each group). METHODS: Recordings were performed using radial artery pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography. Unilateral aldosteronism was treated with adrenalectomy ( n  = 20), bilateral aldosteronism with spironolactone-based medication ( n  = 20), and essential hypertension with standard antihypertensive agents. RESULTS: Aortic SBP and DBP, forward and backward wave amplitudes, and systemic vascular resistance were equally elevated in primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension. All these haemodynamic variables were similarly reduced by the treatments. Primary aldosteronism presented with 1 litre (∼10%) extracellular water excess ( P  < 0.001) versus the other groups, and this excess was normalized by treatment. Initial pulse wave velocity (PWV) was similarly increased in primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension, but final values remained higher in primary aldosteronism ( P  < 0.001). In regression analyses, significant explanatory factors for treatment-induced forward wave amplitude reduction were decreased systemic vascular resistance ( ß â€Š= 0.380) and reduced extracellular water volume ( ß â€Š= 0.183). Explanatory factors for backward wave amplitude reduction were changes in forward wave amplitude ( ß â€Š= 0.599), heart rate ( ß â€Š= -0.427), and PWV ( ß â€Š= 0.252). CONCLUSION: Compared with essential hypertension, the principal haemodynamic difference in primary aldosteronism was higher volume load. Volume excess elevated forward wave amplitude, which was subsequently reduced by targeted treatment of primary aldosteronism, along with normalization of volume load. We propose that incorporating extracellular water evaluation alongside routine diagnostics could enhance the identification and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

Clinical significance of CYP11B2 immunostaining in unilateral primary aldosteronism.

Objective: The associations between adrenal histopathology, lateralization studies, and surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism remain poorly characterized. We examined the value of immunohistochemical analysis of CYP11B2 for evaluation of adrenalectomy outcomes after anatomical versus functional subtyping. Design: A retrospective multicenter study of 277 patients operated for primary aldosteronism who had an adrenalectomy sample available in the Finnish biobanks from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. Adrenal slides from biobanks were analyzed centrally after CYP11B2 and CYP11B1 staining. Clinical data were obtained from patient registries. Histopathological diagnosis and cure after surgery were assessed as outcome measures. Results: Re-evaluation with CYP11B2 staining changed the histopathological diagnosis in 91 patients (33%). The presence of a CYP11B2-positive adenoma and the use of functional subtyping independently predicted clinical cure of primary aldosteronism. CYP11B2-positive <7 mm nodules were more frequent in patients without clinical cure, whereas CYP11B2-positive micronodules were common in all patients and had no impact on adrenalectomy outcomes. Small CYP11B2-positive nodules and micronodules were equally prevalent regardless of the subtyping method applied. Clinical cure rates were lower and CYP11B2-negative adenomas more common after adrenalectomy based on anatomical imaging than functional studies. Conclusions: Incorporating CYP11B2 staining in histopathological diagnosis enhances the prediction of surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism. A finding of CYP11B2-positive adenoma is indicative of cure of primary aldosteronism, whereas smaller CYP11B2-positive nodules associate with poorer results at postoperative evaluation. Functional subtyping methods decrease the operations of CYP11B2-negative adenomas and are superior to anatomical imaging in identifying unilateral primary aldosteronism.

Lateralization in 11 C-Metomidate PET and outcome of adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism.

INTRODUCTION: Subtype classification method is essential when considering adrenalectomy as a possible treatment for primary aldosteronism. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate surgical outcomes of primary aldosteronism in patients who had undergone 11 C-metomidate positron emission tomography (11 C-MTO-PET) for subtype classification. METHODS: Postoperative clinical and biochemical cure and histopathological diagnosis from biobank samples were retrospectively evaluated in 44 patients who had all undergone preoperative 11 C-MTO-PET with or without adrenal venous sampling (AVS). We compared those operated based on 11 C-MTO-PET alone and those with concordant or discordant lateralization in 11 C-MTO-PET and AVS studies according to postoperative immunohistochemical findings and biochemical and clinical cure. RESULTS: Adrenalectomy side was based on 11 C-MTO-PET alone in 14 cases and on AVS in 30 cases of whom 42 achieved complete and two partial biochemical cures. Among those who underwent AVS and were operated according to it, the two lateralization methods were concordant in 22 cases and discordant in 8 cases. Similar immunohistochemical profiles and cure rates were seen after 11 C-MTO-PET alone or AVS-based operations. Respectively, those with concordant or discordant 11 C-MTO-PET and AVS lateralization did not differ in surgical outcome. Together, we found errors of lateralization diagnostics with 11 C-MTO-PET in 18% and with AVS in 3% among those eligible for adrenal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of adrenalectomy based on clinically significant lateralization in 11 C-MTO-PET alone correspond to those based on 11 C-MTO-PET with concordant AVS lateralization. However, our results suggest that diagnosis of unilateral PA should be performed with caution with 11 C-MTO-PET in case of discordant lateralization studies.

Adrenal androgens versus cortisol for primary aldosteronism subtype determination in adrenal venous sampling.

OBJECTIVE: We examined if measurement of adrenal androgens adds to subtype diagnostics of primary aldosteronism (PA) under cosyntropin-stimulated adrenal venous sampling (AVS). DESIGN: A prospective pre-specified secondary endpoint analysis of 49 patients with confirmed PA, of whom 29 underwent unilateral adrenalectomy with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Concentrations of androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) were measured during AVS in addition to aldosterone and cortisol. Subjects with lateralisation index (LI) of ≥4 were treated with unilateral adrenalectomy, and the immunohistochemical subtype was determined with CYP11B2 and CYP11B1 stains. The performance of adrenal androgens was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses in adrenalectomy and medical therapy groups. RESULTS: During AVS, the correlations between cortisol and androstenedione, DHEA and DHEAS for LI and selectivity index (SI) were highly significant. The right and left side SIs for androstenedione and DHEA were higher (p < .001) than for cortisol. In ROC analysis, the optimal LI cut-off values for androstenedione, DHEA and DHEAS were 4.2, 4.5 and 4.6, respectively. The performance of these LIs for adrenal androgens did not differ from that of cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: Under cosyntropin-stimulated AVS, the measurement of androstenedione and DHEA did not improve the cannulation selectivity. The performance of cortisol and adrenal androgens are confirmatory but not superior to cortisol-based results in lateralisation diagnostics of PA.

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio is related to arterial stiffness when the screening criteria of primary aldosteronism are not met.

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a screening tool for primary aldosteronism (PA), but the significance of ARR when the PA criteria are not met remains largely unknown. In this cross-sectional study we investigated the association of ARR with haemodynamic variables in 545 normotensive and never-medicated hypertensive subjects (267 men, 278 women, age range 19-72 years) without suspicion of PA. Supine haemodynamic data was recorded using whole-body impedance cardiography and radial tonometric pulse wave analysis. In sex-adjusted quartiles of ARR, determined as serum aldosterone to plasma renin activity ratio, the mean values were 282, 504, 744 and 1467 pmol/µg of angiotensin I/h, respectively. The only difference in haemodynamic variables between the ARR quartiles was higher pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the highest quartile versus other quartiles (p = 0.004), while no differences in blood pressure (BP), heart rate, wave reflections, cardiac output or systemic vascular resistance were observed between the quartiles. In linear regression analysis with stepwise elimination, ARR was an independent explanatory factor for PWV (ß = 0.146, p < 0.001, R2 of the model 0.634). In conclusion, ARR was directly and independently associated with large arterial stiffness in individuals without clinical suspicion of PA. Therefore, ARR could serve as a clinical marker of cardiovascular risk.Trial registration: ClinicalTrails.gov: NCT01742702.