Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 24(2): 124-134, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30853351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke Shoulder Pain (PSSP) is a common stroke-related syndrome that prolongs hospitalization and diminishes quality of life. PSSP studies were unsuccessful in clarifying pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, cohort's studies with greater variety of the sample and larger follow-up period could provide additional clinical data and may improve medical care. OBJECTIVE: To classify people with PSSP and identify intergroup clinical differences, providing additional data useful for therapeutic care planning. METHODS: One thousand individuals with stroke were selected from all levels of one health Area and followed up during one year. Demographic data, stroke clinical characteristics, stroke-related symptoms and rehabilitation parameters were collected. The shoulder muscle impairment was used to group participants into three clinical profiles: severe muscular impairment, moderate muscular impairment and low muscular impairment groups. RESULTS: A total of 119 individuals were diagnosed with PSSP. The suggested classification criteria showed two groups that differed significantly in relation to the onset and duration of PSSP, presence of sensory and speech impairment, and spasticity. The outcomes did not firmly support the existence of a third suggested PSSP subtype. CONCLUSIONS: PSSP may vary in onset, clinical manifestations, severity and syndrome duration. These results highlight the course of different clinical profiles and require multidisciplinary management approaches.


Subject(s)
Shoulder Pain/physiopathology , Stroke/physiopathology , Exercise Therapy/standards , Humans , Physical Examination , Quality of Life
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 92(8): 1202-10, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21807139

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare 2 different protocols of physiotherapy (land or water therapy) for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) focused on postural stability and self-movement, and to provide methodological information regarding progression within the program for a future larger trial. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, open-label pilot trial. SETTING: Outpatients, Parkinson's disease Center of Ferrol-Galicia (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=11) with idiopathic PD in stages 2 or 3 according to the Hoehn and Yahr Scale completed the investigation (intervention period plus follow-up). INTERVENTIONS: After baseline evaluations, participants were randomly assigned to a land-based therapy (active control group) or a water-based therapy (experimental group). Participants underwent individual sessions for 4 weeks, twice a week, for 45 minutes per session. Both interventions were matched in terms of exercise features, which were structured in stages with clear objectives and progression criteria to pass to the next phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants underwent a first baseline assessment, a posttest immediately after 4 weeks of intervention, and a follow-up assessment after 17 days. Evaluations were performed OFF-dose after withholding medication for 12 hours. Functional assessments included the Functional Reach Test (FRT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the UPDRS, the 5-m walk test, and the Timed Up and Go test. RESULTS: A main effect of both therapies was seen for the FRT. Only the aquatic therapy group improved in the BBS and the UPDRS. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, physiotherapy protocols produced improvement in postural stability in PD that was significantly larger after aquatic therapy. The intervention protocols are shown to be feasible and seem to be of value in amelioration of postural stability-related impairments in PD. Some of the methodological aspects detailed here can be used to design larger controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Hydrotherapy/methods , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Aged , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Postural Balance/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
3.
Sleep Med ; 11(8): 759-65, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20674489

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A recent report indicates repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves sleep in Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of 10days rTMS on sleep parameters in PD patients. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Eighteen idiopathic PD patients completed the study. Sleep parameters were evaluated through actigraphy and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS), along with depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HDS), and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Evaluations were carried out before treatment with rTMS (pre-evaluation, PRE), after the rTMS treatment programme (post-evaluation, POST), and one week after POST (POST-2). Nine PD patients received real rTMS and the other 9 received sham rTMS daily for 10days, (100 pulses at 1Hz) applied with a large circular coil over the vertex. RESULTS: Stimulation had no effect over actigraphic variables. Conversely PDSS, HDS, and UPDRS were significantly improved by the stimulation. Notably, however, these changes were found equally in groups receiving real or sham stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: rTMS, using our protocol, has no therapeutic value on the sleep of PD patients, when compared to appropriate sham controls. Future works assessing the possible therapeutic role of rTMS on sleep in PD should control the effect of placebo.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/therapy , Sleep/radiation effects , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Actigraphy , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Placebos , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Treatment Failure
4.
Mov Disord ; 25(12): 1830-8, 2010 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20669300

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor signs in Parkinson's disease (PD), under a double-blind placebo-controlled trial design. PD patients were randomly assigned to received either real (n = 9) or sham (n = 9) rTMS for 10 days. Each session comprises two trains of 50 stimuli each delivered at 1 Hz and at 90% of daily rest motor threshold using a large circular coil over the vertex. The effect of the stimulation, delivered during the ON-period, was evaluated during both ON and OFF periods. Tests were carried out before and after the stimulation period, and again 1 week after. The effect of the stimulation was evaluated through several gait variables (cadence, step amplitude, velocity, the CV(stride-time), and the turn time), hand dexterity, and also the total and motor sections of the UPDRS. Only the total and motor section of the UPDRS and the turn time during gait were affected by the stimulation, the effect appearing during either ON or OFF evaluation, and most importantly, equally displayed in both real and sham group. The rest of the variables were not influenced. We conclude the protocol of stimulation used, different from most protocols that apply larger amount of stimuli, but very similar to some previously reported to have excellent results, has no therapeutic value and should be abandoned. This contrasts with the positive reported effects using higher frequency and focal coils. Our work also reinforces the need for sham stimulation when evaluating the therapeutic effect of rTMS.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Motor Cortex , Patient Selection , Treatment Outcome
5.
Mov Disord ; 24(6): 891-8, 2009 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19199362

ABSTRACT

In the search of new strategies to improve the quality of life of Parkinson's disease patients, recent work has reported an amelioration of Parkinsonian symptoms using Whole Body Vibration (WBV). A double-blinded, placebo controlled design was used to evaluate the effect of a 12 WBV sessions-programme on a number of motor and clinical tests in 23 Parkinson's disease patients. Patients were assigned to one of two groups, one receiving WBV and the other a placebo group. At the end of the programme as well as during intra-session evaluation, there was no difference between the experimental (vibration) and placebo groups in any outcomes. These results suggest that reported benefits of vibration are due to a placebo response.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Vibration/therapeutic use , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gait/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity , Postural Balance/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...