Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 66(11): 3151-9, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25047592

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Disease relapses are frequent in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes in patients with AAV who are re-treated with rituximab (RTX) and prednisone for severe disease relapses. METHODS: The Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the rates of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) (n = 98). Prednisone was tapered to discontinuation after 5.5 months. After remission was achieved, patients who experienced a severe disease relapse between months 6 and 18 were eligible to receive RTX and prednisone on an open-label basis according to a prespecified protocol. Investigators remained blinded with regard to the original treatment assignment. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received RTX for disease relapse after remission had initially been achieved with their originally assigned treatment. Fifteen of these patients were initially randomized to receive RTX and 11 to receive CYC/AZA. Thirteen (87%) of the patients originally assigned to receive RTX and 10 (91%) originally assigned to receive CYC/AZA achieved remission again with open-label RTX (an overall percentage of 88%). In half of the patients treated with open-label RTX, prednisone could be discontinued entirely. Patients in this cohort experienced fewer adverse events compared to the overall study population (4.7 adverse events per patient-year versus 11.8 adverse events per patient-year). CONCLUSION: Re-treatment of AAV relapses with RTX and glucocorticoids appears to be a safe and effective strategy, regardless of previous treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/drug therapy , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/prevention & control , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Remission Induction/methods , Rituximab , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arthritis Rheum ; 65(9): 2441-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23754238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons that complete remission is not achieved or maintained with original treatment in some patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated with rituximab (RTX) or with cyclophosphamide/azathioprine (CYC/AZA). METHODS: The Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the rate of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with CYC followed by AZA (n = 98). Glucocorticoids were tapered over a period of 5 months. The primary outcome measure was lack of disease activity without glucocorticoid treatment at 6 months. To determine the most important reason for failure to achieve the primary outcome, 7 hierarchical categories of reasons were defined retrospectively (uncontrolled disease, adverse event leading to therapy discontinuation, severe flare, limited flare, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis >0, prednisone treatment at any dosage, and other). RESULTS: Although remission (lack of disease activity) was achieved in 170 of the 197 patients (86%) in the first 6 months, the primary outcome measure was not achieved in 42%. There were 3 deaths. Twenty-four percent of the patients failed to achieve the primary end point due to active disease: 10 (5%) experienced uncontrolled disease in the first month and 37 (19%) experienced flares after initial improvement. In the majority of such patients, treatment with blinded crossover or according to best medical judgment led to disease control. Ninety-one percent of patients who had uncontrolled disease or experienced a severe flare had proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA. When patients with uncontrolled disease were excluded from analysis, those who were PR3-ANCA positive were found to experience fewer flares when treated with RTX compared to CYC/AZA (8 of 59 [14%] versus 20 of 62 [32%]; P = 0.02). Neither ANCA titers nor B cell counts predicted disease flare. CONCLUSION: Current treatment regimens are largely successful in controlling AAV, but in approximately one-fourth of patients, active disease persists or recurs in the first 6 months despite treatment. PR3-ANCA positivity is a risk factor for recurrence or persistence of severe disease. ANCA titers and B cell detectability are poor predictors of both disease relapse and disease quiescence in the first 6 months.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Microscopic Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Remission Induction/methods , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/administration & dosage , Azathioprine/administration & dosage , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Rituximab , Treatment Outcome
3.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 29(3 Suppl): 749-51, 2007.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18409939

ABSTRACT

In Italy in the last ten years tetanus incidence has been considerably decreased. It is a result first of the application of national laws that make compulsory the tetanus vaccine for some workers' group and for the population in general, and on the other hand for the working class as a consequence of D.Lgs 626/94. It was carried out by the U.O.O.M.L. of Garbagnate an activity of sanitary surveillance towards the working class with a tetanus biological risk (i.g. builder, metalworker, cleaning staff policemen, health visitors, cooks, etc.). During this activity it was considered the possibility of a tetanus vaccine cycle for those people that couldn't provide any certification about previous tetanus vaccine. The justification for this propose is to reduce the risk of side effects due to iperimmunization in case of close vaccinations and the safety and low cost of the tritation test of antibody anti-tetanus toxin method. Therefore it was decided to determine the personal condition of tetanus immunization for all those people without a valid certification. It resulted that 38% of people subject to sanitary surveillance were not protected and 55 years people resulted to be the group with highest risk. This result was also confirmed by the Ministry of Health that considers older population the highest risk group. It becomes clear that the vaccination for working purposes protects the population in general too. In conclusion we firmly think the procedure we followed completely accomplish the general principle of healthcare for infectious risk on the application of the tit. VIII of D.Lgs. 626/94.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Occupational Medicine , Tetanus Toxoid , Tetanus/prevention & control , Vaccination , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Physician's Role , Population Surveillance , Tetanus Toxoid/immunology
4.
Neurol Sci ; 24(5): 361-4, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14716534

ABSTRACT

The aim of our study was to analyze the dropout rate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) under long-term treatment with the three commercially available interferon beta (IFNbeta) preparations. According to the drug taken, we divided 122 RRMS patients into 4 groups: Betaferon group, 56 patients taking INFbeta-1b (24 MIU weekly, subcutaneous injections); Avonex group, 38 patients taking IFNbeta-1a (6 MIU weekly, intramuscularly); Rebif group, 18 patients taking INFbeta-1b (18 MIU subcutaneously). Ten patients who shifted from Betaferon to Avonex were included in a fourth group. Dropouts were registered every trimester with the related cause. Data were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. During the observation period of five years, 48 patients (39.9%) dropped out: 48% of the patients in Betaferon group withdrew at a median of 758 days, 26% of the Avonex group at 356 days; 38% of the Rebif group at 421 days, and 40% of those who shifted from Betaferon to Avonex at 259 days. The differences between groups were not significant on survival analysis. Patients receiving higher dose treatment (Betaferon and Rebif groups) dropped out mainly for clinical adverse events; conversely, patients receiving lower dose therapy (Avonex group) dropped out most often for inefficacy. Patients who shifted to a lower dose treatment (fourth group) had a dropout rate similar to that of the initial treatment. Our data showed that one-third of the patients stopped the therapy, mostly for adverse events and then for inefficacy, while the remaining two-thirds were still on treatment without problems up to 5 years of follow-up. Compliance seems related to the dose of the drug, but further analysis is needed to confirm our data.


Subject(s)
Interferon-beta/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Routes , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Interferon beta-1a , Interferon beta-1b , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Time , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...