Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
World J Cardiol ; 16(5): 217-220, 2024 May 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817649

ABSTRACT

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Kong et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Cardiology. In this interesting case, the authors present the challenges faced in managing a 13-year-old patient with Down syndrome (DS) and congenital heart disease (CHD) associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In this distinct population, the Authors underscore the need for early diagnosis and management as well as the need of a multidisciplinary approach for decision making. It seems that the occurrence of CHD in patients with DS adds layers of complexity to their clinical management. This editorial aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the intricate interplay between DS and congenital heart disorders, offering insights into the nuanced diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for physicians.

2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791409

ABSTRACT

Heart failure (HF) poses a significant world health challenge due to the increase in the aging population and advancements in cardiac care. In the pathophysiology of HF, the inflammasome has been correlated with the development, progression, and complications of HF disease. Discovering biomarkers linked to inflammasomes enhances understanding of HF diagnosis and prognosis. Directing inflammasome signaling emerges as an innovative therapeutic strategy for managing HF. The present review aims to delve into this inflammatory cascade, understanding its role in the development of HF, its potential role as biomarker, as well as the prospects of modulating inflammasomes as a therapeutic approach for HF.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Heart Failure , Inflammasomes , Humans , Inflammasomes/metabolism , Heart Failure/metabolism , Heart Failure/immunology , Animals , Signal Transduction , Inflammation/metabolism , Inflammation/immunology
3.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 26(2): 25-34, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180642

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiometabolic diseases, which include obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, constitute a worldwide health crisis of unparalleled proportions. The human gut microbiota has emerged as a prominent topic of inquiry in the search for novel treatment techniques. This review summarizes current research on the potential of addressing the gut microbiota to treat cardiometabolic disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have highlighted a complex link between the gut microbiota and host physiology, shedding light on the several processes through which gut microorganisms impact metabolic health, inflammation, and cardiovascular function. Furthermore, a growing corpus of research is available on microbiome-based therapies such as dietary interventions, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. These therapies show promise as methods for reshaping the gut microbiota and, as a result, improving cardiometabolic outcomes. However, hurdles remain, ranging from the intricacies of microbiome research to the necessity for tailored treatments that take individual microbial variations into consideration, emphasizing the significance of furthering research to bridge the gap between microbiome science and clinical practice. The gut microbiome is a beacon of hope for improving the management of cardiometabolic disease in the age of precision medicine, since its association with their pathophysiology is constantly being unraveled and strengthened. Available studies point to the potential of gut microbiome-based therapeutics, which remains to be tested in appropriately designed clinical trials. Further preclinical research is, however, essential to provide answers to the existing obstacles, with the ultimate goal of enhancing patient care.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Probiotics , Humans , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Prebiotics , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy
4.
J Cardiol ; 83(5): 313-317, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a rhythm control strategy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) while catheter ablation has been shown to be a safer and more efficacious approach than antiarrhythmic medications. METHODS: HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. In this sub-study, we included 276 cases who had a history of AF, particularly on the rhythm strategy, and catheter ablation procedures had been performed before the index admission. RESULTS: Among 276 AF patients (mean age: 76.4 ±â€¯11.5 years, 58 % male), 60.9 % (N = 168) had persistent AF and 39.1 % (N = 108) had paroxysmal AF. Heart failure was the main cause of admission in 54.3 % (N = 145) of the patients, while 14.1 % (N = 39) were admitted due to paroxysmal AF, 7.3 % (N = 20) due to bradyarrhythmic reasons, and 6.5 % (N = 18) suffered from acute coronary syndrome. Most importantly, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was present in 76 (27 %) patients. Only 10 patients out of the total (3 %, mean age 59.7 years) had undergone AF ablation while electrical cardioversion had been attempted in 37 (13.4 %) patients. Interestingly, in this AF population with heart failure, 3.6 % (N = 10) had a defibrillator implanted (4 single-chamber), and only 1.5 % (N = 4) had a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). CONCLUSION: High prevalence of persistent AF was detected in hospitalized patients, with heart failure being the leading cause of admission and main co-morbidity. Rhythm control strategies are notably underused, along with CRT-D implantation in patients with AF and heart failure.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Heart Failure , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Electric Countershock , Prevalence , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Angiology ; : 33197231218331, 2023 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995282

ABSTRACT

Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) encompass a spectrum of life-threatening cardiovascular conditions, including unstable angina (UA) and myocardial infarction. While significant progress has been made in the understanding and management of ACS over the years, it has become increasingly evident that sex-based differences play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology, presentation, and outcomes of these conditions. Despite this recognition, the majority of clinical research in the field has historically focused on male populations, leading to a significant knowledge gap in understanding the unique aspects of ACS in women. This review article aims to comprehensively explore and synthesize the current body of literature concerning the sex-specific characteristics of ACS, shedding light on the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, treatment strategies, and prognosis in women. By elucidating the distinct aspects of ACS in women, this review intends to foster greater awareness and improved clinical management, ultimately contributing to enhanced cardiovascular care for female patients.

6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(10)2023 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37893599

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The proper use of oral anticoagulants is crucial in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with AF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment. We aimed to assess anticoagulation status and LAAC indications in patients with AF from the HECMOS (Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot) survey. Materials and Methods: The HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. HECMOS used an electronic platform to collect demographic and clinically relevant information from all patients hospitalized on 3 March 2022 in 55 different cardiology departments. In this substudy, we included patients with known AF without mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral valve stenosis. Patients with prior stroke, previous major bleeding, poor adherence to anticoagulants, and end-stage renal disease were considered candidates for LAAC. Results: Two hundred fifty-six patients (mean age 76.6 ± 11.7, 148 males) were included in our analysis. Most of them (n = 159; 62%) suffered from persistent AF. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.28 ± 1.7, while the mean HAS-BLED score was 1.47 ± 0.9. Three out of three patients with a a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 or 1 (female) were inappropriately anticoagulated. Sixteen out of eighteen patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 or 2 (if female) received anticoagulants. Thirty-one out of two hundred thirty-five patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1 or 2 (if female) were inappropriately not anticoagulated. Relative indications for LAAC were present in 68 patients with NVAF (63 had only one risk factor and 5 had two concurrent risk factors). In detail, 36 had a prior stroke, 17 patients had a history of major bleeding, 15 patients reported poor or no adherence to the anticoagulant therapy and 5 had an eGFR value < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for a total of 73 risk factors. Moreover, 33 had a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3. No LAAC treatment was recorded. Conclusions: Anticoagulation status was nearly optimal in a high-thromboembolic-risk population of cardiology patients who were mainly treated using NOACs. One out of four AF patients should be screened for LAAC.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiology , Stroke , Male , Humans , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Administration, Oral , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Morbidity , Treatment Outcome
7.
Curr Pharm Des ; 29(35): 2780-2786, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641987

ABSTRACT

Pharmacologic therapies remain the treatment of choice for patients with essential hypertension, as endorsed by international guidelines. However, several cases warrant additional modalities, such as invasive antihypertensive therapeutics. The major target of these interventions is the modulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which is a common pathophysiologic mechanism in essential hypertension. In this narrative review, we elaborate on the role of invasive antihypertensive treatments with a focus on renal denervation, stressing their potential as well as the drawbacks that prevent their widespread implementation in everyday clinical practice. In the field of renal denervation, several trials have shown significant and sustained reductions in the level of office and ambulatory blood pressure, regardless of the type of energy that was used (radiofrequency or ultrasound). Critically, renal denervation is considered a safe intervention, as evidenced by follow-up data from large clinical trials. Baroreflex activation therapy may result in enhanced parasympathetic nervous system activation, thus lowering blood pressure levels. Along the same lines, carotid body ablation could also produce a significant antihypertensive effect, which has not been tested in appropriately designed randomized trials. Moreover, cardiac neuromodulation therapy could prove efficacious by altering the duration of the atrioventricular interval in order to regulate the preload of the left ventricle and, therefore, lower blood pressure.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Hypertension , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Sympathectomy , Kidney , Blood Pressure , Essential Hypertension/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Clin Med ; 12(12)2023 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37373655

ABSTRACT

Pharmacologic cardioversion is a well-established alternative to electric cardioversion for hemodynamically stable patients, as it skips the risks associated with anesthesia. A recent network meta-analysis identifies the most effective antiarrhythmics for pharmacologic cardioversion with flecainide exhibiting a more efficacious and safer profile towards faster cardioversion. Moreover, the meta-analysis of class Ic antiarrhythmics revealed an absence of adverse events when used for pharmacologic cardioversion of AF in the ED, including patients with structural heart disease. The primary goals of this clinical trial are to prove the superiority of flecainide over amiodarone in the successful cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the Emergency Department and to prove that the safety of flecainide is non-inferior to amiodarone in patients with coronary artery disease without residual ischemia, and an ejection fraction over 35%. The secondary goals of this study are to prove the superiority of flecainide over amiodarone in the reduction in hospitalizations from the Emergency Department due to atrial fibrillation in the time taken to achieve cardioversion, and in the reduction in the need to conduct electrical cardioversion.

9.
Cureus ; 15(3): e35827, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37033500

ABSTRACT

Syncope in patients with bundle branch block (BBB) is often due to advanced atrioventricular (AV) block. The objective of the present "real-world" study was to evaluate the optimal management in patients with unexplained syncope and BBB and to identify factors that predict the recurrence of syncope. This is a single-center observational prospective registry of 131 consecutive patients undergoing invasive electrophysiology study (EPS) for recurrent unexplained presyncope or syncope attacks and BBB. When the EPS-derived diagnosis was reached, a decision to proceed with a permanent pacemaker was offered to the patient. An implantable loop recorder was inserted in the rest of the population. A total of 131 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and BBB (67.2% male; age 63.7 ± 16.5 years) underwent EPS during the study period. The distribution of conduction disturbance patterns was as follows: isolated left bundle branch block (LBBB): 23.7%; LBBB with first AV block: 8.4%; isolated right bundle branch block (RBBB): 10.7%; RBBB with first AV block: 8.4%; isolated left anterior/posterior fascicular block: 13%; left anterior/posterior fascicular block with first AV block: 5.3%; isolated bifascicular block: 16.8%; and bifascicular block with first AV block: 13.7%. In the multivariate analysis, the only predictors of recurrent syncope were bifascicular block (hazard ratio (HR): 4.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29, 13.41, P: 0.017) and HV interval ≥ 60 msec (HR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.12, 11.46, P: 0.032). An EPS-based strategy identifies a subset of patients who will benefit from permanent pacing. HV interval ≥ 60 msec and the presence of a bifascicular block were strongly related to syncope recurrence.

10.
J Pers Med ; 12(11)2022 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36573711

ABSTRACT

Electrocardiogram (ECG) still remains a very useful diagnostic method in modern cardiology. Its broad availability, noninvasiveness and good sensitivity explain why it plays a capital role in the very beginning of the process of diagnosis for every patient, with or without cardiac-related complaints. For the practitioner, good training in ECG interpretation is mandatory. Sometimes, the ECG trace reveals particular aspects that may cause confusion and complicate decision-making. In this article, we present several less common situations underlying the general context and ECG features. The syndromes studied have a high pathological significance and may range from acute emergencies that call for a rapid therapeutical response to chronic syndromes that require prolonged observation, monitoring and risk stratification.

12.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 79(4): 407-419, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35385440

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: In recent years, the management of complex lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constitutes a field of high interest and concern for the interventional cardiology. As more and more studies demonstrate the increased hazard of ischemic events in this group of patients, it is of paramount importance for the physicians to choose the optimal periprocedural (pre-PCI, during-PCI and post-PCI) antithrombotic treatment strategies wisely. Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of current anticoagulation recommendation, the possible beneficial role of the pretreatment with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor in the subgroup of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with complex lesions, and the impact of a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor in individuals with stable coronary artery disease undergoing complex PCI are needed. This will provide and serve as a guide to clinicians to deploy the maximum efficacy of the current choices of antithrombotic therapy, which will lead to an optimal balance between safety and efficacy in this demanding clinical scenario.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Clin Exp Med ; 21(2): 161-165, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417084

ABSTRACT

Thousands of articles have been published regarding the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Most of them are not original research articles but reviews and editorials, and therefore, the absence of evidence-based guidelines has been evident. In parallel, the quality of manuscripts is questionable since the number of preprints has increased due to the need of fast publication of COVID-19-related articles. Furthermore, the number of retracted articles during the pandemic is exceptionally high. Media have an important role in the distribution of incorrect information, nevertheless individual people and policy makers are also responsible. As misinformation thrives in crisis periods, well-designed studies are needed to flatten the infodemic curve regarding prevention, diagnosis, and long-term complications of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communication , Peer Review, Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Biomedical Research/methods , Editorial Policies , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Social Media
14.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(4): 809-813, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734526

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a public health emergency of international concern. During this time, the management of people with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and COVID-19 has become a global issue, especially since preexisting cardiovascular disease is a risk factor for the presence and the severity of COVID-19. The number of people with ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has decreased during the pandemic and delays in the time looking for medical care have been reported. In addition, the diagnosis of ACS may have been difficult due to possible underlying myocarditis or other clinical entities. Regarding management of people with STEMI, although the superiority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over thrombolysis is well established, the notable exposure risks due to absence of negative pressure in catheterization rooms and the increased difficulty in fine manipulation on guidewires under proper protection equipment may contribute to the relatively secondary role of PCI during the COVID-19 pandemic; thus, fibrinolytic therapy or robotic-assisted PCI in early presenting STEMI patients may have an alternative role during this period if prevention measures cannot be taken. Healthcare stuff should take the proper measures to avoid the spread of and their exposure to the virus.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Robotics , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Infection Control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Motor Activity , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pandemics , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...