Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutr Cancer ; 76(4): 364-371, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369888

ABSTRACT

Malnutrition significantly impacts the post-operative process of gynecological cancer patients. A prominent variable for determining perioperative morbidity is the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). To investigate PNI's predictive value on the risk of post-operative infections, we conducted a prospective cohort study involving women who underwent surgery for gynecological malignancies. Out of the 208 patients enrolled, 28 (13.5%) were malnourished and post-operative infections occurred in 43 patients. Notably, there was a significant difference in PNI between patients who developed infections and those who did not (p = 0.027), as well as between malnourished patients and those with normal nutritional status (p = 0.043). Univariate analysis showed that preoperative PNI predicts the risk of post-operative infections better than post-operative white blood cell count (AUC of 0.562 vs 0.375). However, the most accurate diagnostic results in the multivariate analysis were obtained from random forest and classification tree models (AUC of 0.987 and 0.977, respectively). Essentially, PNI and post-operative white blood cell count provided the best information gain according to rank probabilities. In conclusion, PNI appears to be a critical parameter that merits further investigation during the preoperative evaluation of gynecological malignancies.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female , Malnutrition , Humans , Female , Nutrition Assessment , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Biomarkers , Morbidity , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(1): 11-12, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403694

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the technique of discoid excision of bowel endometriosis followed by closure of the bowel defect using sutures, without the application of the transanal stapler device. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: Bowel endometriosis is a common pattern of deep endometriosis [1]. Discoid excision is 1 of the 3 surgical interventions applied to manage this pathologic entity, with shaving and segmental resection being the other 2 [2]. When discoid excision is performed, a transanal stapler device is used for bowel closure in most cases [3,4]. Only a few studies so far have reported the application of sutures for this purpose [5]. This video highlights the technique of bowel suturing after discoid excision. INTERVENTIONS: This video presents the technique of bowel discoid excision with the application of sutures to close the bowel defect (Supplemental Video 1). The key surgical steps are as follows: 1. Dissection of both ureters and development of pararectal spaces. 2. Recognition and preservation of the inferior hypogastric plexus and the hypogastric nerve. 3. Detachment of the nodule from the cervix. 4. Detachment of the nodule from the bowel, beginning with deep shaving and followed by discoid excision. 5. Thorough description of the bowel closure using 2 layers of Vicryl 3-0 sutures, the first being interrupted and the second continuous. CONCLUSION: The described technique of bowel closure using sutures may be a safe and effective alternative to the transanal stapler. Its advantage is that it can be performed when the pathology is located higher than 15 cm from the anal verge or the diameter of the nodule is more than 30 mm.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Rectal Diseases , Female , Humans , Rectum/surgery , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Endometriosis/surgery , Endometriosis/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Sutures , Treatment Outcome
3.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 62(3): 453-461, 2020 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009739

ABSTRACT

Advances in modern medicine have allowed patients with early stage cervical cancer (stages Ia - IIai) to preserve their fertility with oncologic efficacy comparable to previous radical treatments. A variety of conservative-fertility sparing procedures, also known as Fertility Sparing Surgeries (FSS) have been proposed. The present review aimed to provide the current evidence on obstetric outcomes and the prematurity rates as well as to discuss the management modalities of these high-risk pregnancies. Our review of the literature included 3042 women with early cervical cancer, of whom 2838 underwent FSS (204 excluded for oncologic reasons). Almost half of these patients attempted to become pregnant and about two thirds of them achieved at least one pregnancy either spontaneously or with the help of Assisted Reproduction Technologies. Data revealed that 63.9% of these pregnancies resulted in live births, whereas 37.6% of them were preterm. The main cause of preterm births in this subpopulation is the postoperative cervical length restriction that consequently leads to cervical incompetence and ascending infections that eventually lead to (clinical or subclinical) chorioamnionitis. Radical operations such as ART, VRT and MIRT presented with higher prematurity rates. The lack of standardized protocols for the management of pregnancies after FSS precluded reaching to firm results with regards to the efficacy of them in achieving favourable obstetrical outcomes. Further large volume studies are warranted with the intent to acquire standardized guidelines for pregnancies achieved after FSS for early stage cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pregnancy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...