Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in SWAN.

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women has unique features, including associations with reproductive factors that are incompletely understood. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS), the classic menopausal symptom, are linked to CVD risk factors and subclinical CVD. Evidence linking VMS to CVD events is limited. We tested whether frequent and/or persistent VMS were associated with increased risk for fatal and nonfatal CVD events in SWAN (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation). Methods and Results A total of 3083 women, aged 42 to 52 years at baseline, underwent up to 16 in-person visits over 22 years. Assessments included questionnaires on VMS frequency (0, 1-5, or ≥6 days/2 weeks), physical measures, phlebotomy, and reported CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and revascularization). A subset of events was adjudicated via medical record. Death certificates were obtained. Relationships between baseline VMS or persistent VMS over the follow-up (proportion of visits with frequent VMS) with combined incident nonfatal and fatal CVD were tested in Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics, medication use, and CVD risk factors. Participants experienced 231 CVD events over the follow-up. Women with frequent baseline VMS had an elevated risk of subsequent CVD events (relative to no VMS; ≥6 days: hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 1.51 [1.05-2.17], P=0.03; 1-5 days: HR [95% CI], 1.02 [0.75-1.39], P=0.89, multivariable). Women with frequent VMS that persisted over time also had an increased CVD event risk (>33% versus ≤33% of visits: HR [95% CI], 1.77 [1.33-2.35], P<0.0001, multivariable). Conclusions Frequent and persistent VMS were associated with increased risk of later CVD events. VMS may represent a novel female-specific CVD risk factor.

Death and Myocardial Infarction Following Initial Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndromes With Myocardial Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background In chronic coronary syndromes, myocardial ischemia is associated with a greater risk of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to compare the effect of initial revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) with OMT alone in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and myocardial ischemia on long-term death and nonfatal MI. Methods and Results Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of PCI or CABG plus OMT versus OMT alone for patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Studies were screened and data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Random-effects models were used to generate pooled treatment effects. The search yielded 7 randomized controlled trials that randomized 10 797 patients. Median follow-up was 5 years. Death occurred in 640 of the 5413 patients (11.8%) randomized to revascularization and in 647 of the 5384 patients (12%) randomized to OMT (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09; P=0.60). Nonfatal MI was reported in 554 of 5413 patients (10.2%) in the revascularization arms compared with 627 of 5384 patients (11.6%) in the OMT arms (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99; P=0.04). In subgroup analysis, nonfatal MI was significantly reduced by CABG (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.59; P<0.001) but was not reduced by PCI (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75-1.13; P=0.43) (P-interaction <0.001). Conclusions In patients with chronic coronary syndromes and myocardial ischemia, initial revascularization with PCI or CABG plus OMT did not reduce long-term mortality compared with OMT alone. CABG plus OMT reduced nonfatal MI compared with OMT alone, whereas PCI did not.

Troponin and Cardiac Events in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin concentrations are used to identify patients who would benefit from urgent revascularization for acute coronary syndromes. We hypothesized that they might be used in patients with stable ischemic heart disease to identify those at high risk for cardiovascular events who might also benefit from prompt coronary revascularization. METHODS: We measured the cardiac troponin T concentration at baseline with a high-sensitivity assay in 2285 patients who had both type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease and were enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes trial. We tested for an association between the troponin T concentration and a composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke; we then evaluated whether random assignment to prompt revascularization reduced the rate of the composite end point in patients with an abnormal troponin T concentration (≥14 ng per liter) as compared with those with a normal troponin T concentration (<14 ng per liter). RESULTS: Of the 2285 patients, 2277 (99.6%) had detectable (≥3 ng per liter) troponin T concentrations and 897 (39.3%) had abnormal troponin T concentrations at baseline. The 5-year rate of the composite end point was 27.1% among the patients who had had abnormal troponin T concentrations at baseline, as compared with 12.9% among those who had had normal baseline troponin T concentrations. In models that were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, severity of diabetes, electrocardiographic abnormalities, and coronary anatomy, the hazard ratio for the composite end point among patients with abnormal troponin T concentrations was 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.32; P<0.001). Among patients with abnormal troponin T concentrations, random assignment to prompt revascularization, as compared with medical therapy alone, did not result in a significant reduction in the rate of the composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac troponin T concentration was an independent predictor of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients who had both type 2 diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease. An abnormal troponin T value of 14 ng per liter or higher did not identify a subgroup of patients who benefited from random assignment to prompt coronary revascularization. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Roche Diagnostics; BARI 2D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006305.).

Direct stenting compared to balloon predilation in drug-eluting stents: one-year outcomes from the DEScover Registry.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the determinants and outcomes of direct stenting (DS) compared to predilation with drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest that DS with DES is feasible and may reduce restenosis compared to predilation. Whether DS improves clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with DES is unknown. METHODS: DEScover is a prospective, multicenter, observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention that enrolled patients in 2005. The analysis cohort included 4,210 patients who received a DES and had a single lesion treated with DS (n = 1,651) or predilation (n = 2,559) at the discretion of the operator. Multivariable analysis was performed for 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: DS was performed in 39.2% of patients. The direct stent patients were younger, less often male, and had a lesser extent of CAD. DS was performed less often in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and more often in stable angina and elective procedures. Lesion characteristics differed with DS performed less often for calcified lesions, high-grade stenoses (>90%), and bifurcation lesions. Lesion postdilation was less common in direct stent patients (42.1% vs. 50.7%, P = 0.0001). Complete procedural success was similar (99.8% vs. predilation 99.7%, P = 0.46). At 1 year, there was no difference in the adjusted hazard ratios of death (0.67, 0.44-1.04, P = 0.08), MI (1.05, 0.66-1.67, P = 0.83), stent thrombosis (0.38, 0.13-1.14, P = 0.08), TLR (0.75, 0.48-1.17, P = 0.21), TVR (0.89, 0.64-1.23, P = 0.47), and major adverse coronary event (0.88, 0.71-1.09, P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: DS with DES is commonly performed in clinical practice and results in similar long-term outcomes as predilation.