Auditory Brainsteam Response Testing in Children with Speech and Language Pathology: A Non-Randomized Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare ABR findings of normal hearing preschool children with different types of speech and language pathology. METHODS: This retrospective, non-randomized, cohort study was conducted at a tertiary speech and hearing rehabilitation institution according to STROBE guidelines. The study enrolled 123 preschool children diagnosed with speech language pathology and normal hearing. The participants included children with developmental language disorder, autism spectrum disorder, isolated articulation pathology, organic brain lesions, cognitive delay and a group of very young children with clinically significant speech development delay. All patients underwent standard ABR procedures. RESULTS: The latencies were the longest in the group of children with organic lesion, followed by the group of children with ASD, then the group with DLD, and the young children group. In the group of children with articulation pathology and the cognitive delay group, the latencies were the shortest. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study showed a connection between several groups of children with language pathology that include comprehension problems and prolongation of ABR latencies.

Health related quality of life in parents of children with speech and hearing impairment.

OBJECTIVES: Hearing impairment and specific language disorder are two entities that seriously affect language acquisition in children and reduce their communication skills. These children require specific treatment and higher levels of care than healthy children. Their language abilities also strongly influence parent-child interactions. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the parents of hearing-impaired children and the parents of children with speech difficulties (specific language disorder). METHODS: Our study subjects included 349 parents (182 mothers and 167 fathers) of preschool-aged children with receptive expressive language disorder and 131 parents (71 mothers and 60 fathers) of children with severe hearing impairment. A control group was composed of 146 parents (82 mothers and 64 fathers) of healthy children of the same age. HRQOL was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: For all groups of parents, the mothers had poorer scores compared with the fathers, but large differences were apparent depending on the child's impairment. In the control group, the scores of the mothers were significantly lower than the fathers' scores in only two (of eight) health domains. In contrast, the scores were lower in three domains for the mothers of speech-impaired children and in six domains for the mothers of hearing-impaired children, representing the greatest difference between the parents. When compared with the control group, both the mothers and fathers of speech-impaired children scored significantly worse in five health domains. Fathers of hearing-impaired children scored significantly worse than controls in three health domains. The lowest scores, indicating the poorest HRQOL, were observed for mothers of hearing-impaired children, who obtained significantly lower scores than the control mothers in all health domains except the emotional role. CONCLUSIONS: The parents of preschool-aged speech-and hearing-impaired children experience poorer HRQOL than parents of healthy children of the same age. Mothers of hearing-impaired children are especially affected, demonstrating a negative impact in almost all health domains.

Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the differences in the NRT measures, behavioral measures, and their relationship between the group of congenitally deaf children operated in the first years of life and the group of children operated in the school age. METHODS: The study included 40 congenitally deaf children with cochlear implants divided into two groups. Group 1 was composed of 20 children (mean age at operation 2.3 years, range 1.4-4.6 years) and Group 2 was composed of 20 children (mean age at operation 11.3 years, range 7.0-17.1 years). The ECAP was recorded using the Nucleus 24 neural response telemetry (NRT) system. In each child, the responses were evoked by the apical, middle and basal electrodes. The analyzed parameters were: the ECAP threshold (T-NRT), N1P2 amplitude, N1 latency, slope of the amplitude growth function, response morphology, threshold (T-) level, maximum comfort (C-) level, dynamic range (DR), T-NRT as a percentage of the map DR, the correlation between the T-NRT and the T- and C-levels. The recordings of parameters were performed two years after implantations. RESULTS: The T-NRT, DR, T-NRT as a percentage of the map DR and the correlation between T-NRT and C-levels were significantly different between both groups of children. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to the amplitude, latency, slope and morphology recorded using the same electrodes. However, intragroup differences regarding NRT measures and behavioral measures with respect to the position of stimulating electrode were more prominent in Group 2 than in the Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study have also found a great variability of NRT and MAP measures within and across patients in both groups of children, but it was still more pronounced in the group of school children. NRT profile across electrodes follows MAP profiles better in the Group 1 then in the Group 2. Overall findings of NRT and MAP measures are not consistent and unambiguous as we expected, but still suggest potential differences between results in children operated in first years of life, and those operated in school age.

The influence of potentially limiting factors on paediatric outcomes following cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Children with isolated hearing impairment who have received cochlear implant at the optimal age mostly achieve remarkable results that are assessed by objective speech perception and production measurements. Different outcomes may be expected in case of conditions which may have a negative impact on postoperative performance. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of potentially limiting factors on postimplant outcomes. METHODS: Four groups of examinees (11 in total) were involved by the study: (A) four children with additional disabilities, (B) three children with cochlear malformation and/or ossification, (C) three reimplanted children, (D) a child with retrocochlear (cochlear nerve) pathology. Hearing, speech perception and production were examined by pure tone audiogram, speech audiogram, categories of auditory performance, speech intelligibility rating, listening progress profile, and monosyllabic trochee polysyllable test. Postoperative positive life changes were assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Group A: perception skills better than expected, less satisfactory speech development. Group B: good sound perception, poor understanding. Group C: after reimplantation undisturbed conditions for continuation of optimal rehabilitation course. Group D: unsatisfactory results of pure tone hearing as well as speech perception and production. CONCLUSION: In spite of unfavourable conditions all examinees, except a child with retrocochlear pathology, were found to have a considerable benefit after cochlear implantation (with regard to obvious heterogeneity within each group). Evaluation of success, especially in children with multiple handicaps, also has to include subjective indicators of positive life changes, even those not directly associated with hearing.