Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomed Rep ; 20(3): 42, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343657

ABSTRACT

Combining chemotherapy and hormone therapy is a prevalent approach in breast cancer treatment. While the cytotoxic impact of numerous chemotherapy drugs stems from DNA damage, the exact role of these DNA alterations in modulating estrogen receptor α (ERα) machinery remains elusive. The present study aimed to analyze the impact of DNA damage agents on ERα signaling in breast cancer cells and assess the signaling pathways mediating the influence of DNA damage drugs on the ERα machinery. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT method, while the expression of signaling proteins was analyzed by immunoblotting. ERα activity in the cells treated with various drugs (17ß-estradiol, tamoxifen, 5-fluorouracil) was assessed through reporter gene assays. In vitro experiments were conducted on MCF7 breast cancer cells subjected to varying durations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment. Two distinct cell responses to 5-FU were identified based on the duration of the treatment. A singular dose of 5-FU induces pronounced DNA fragmentation, temporally suppressing ERα signaling while concurrently activating AKT phosphorylation. This suppression reverses upon 5-FU withdrawal, restoring normalcy within ten days. However, chronic 5-FU treatment led to the emergence of 5-FU-resistant cells with irreversible alterations in ERα signaling, resulting in partial hormonal resistance. These changes mirror those observed in cells subjected to UV-induced DNA damage, underscoring the pivotal role of DNA damage in shaping estrogen signaling alterations in breast cancer cells. In summary, the results of the present study suggested that the administration of DNA damage agents to cancer cells can trigger irreversible suppression of estrogen signaling, fostering the development of partial hormonal resistance. This outcome may ultimately impede the efficacy of combined or subsequent chemo- and hormone therapy strategies.

2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(16)2022 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36012470

ABSTRACT

Guanine-rich DNA sequences tending to adopt noncanonical G-quadruplex (G4) structures are over-represented in promoter regions of oncogenes. Ligands recognizing G4 were shown to stabilize these DNA structures and drive their formation regulating expression of corresponding genes. We studied the interaction of several plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) with G4s and their effects on gene expression in a cellular context. The binding of PSMs with G4s formed by the sequences of well-studied oncogene promoters and telomeric repeats was evaluated using a fluorescent indicator displacement assay. c-MYC G4 folding topology and thermal stability, as well as the PMS influence on these parameters, were demonstrated by UV-spectroscopy and circular dichroism. The effects of promising PSMs on c-MYC expression were assessed using luciferase reporter assay and qPR-PCR in cancer and immortalized cultured cells. The ability of PMS to multi-targeting cell signaling pathways was analyzed by the pathway-focused gene expression profiling with qRT-PCR. The multi-target activity of a number of PSMs was demonstrated by their interaction with a set of G4s mimicking those formed in the human genome. We have shown a direct G4-mediated down regulation of c-MYC expression by sanguinarine, quercetin, kaempferol, and thymoquinone; these effects being modulated by PSM's indirect influence via cell signaling pathways.


Subject(s)
G-Quadruplexes , Genes, myc , Humans , Oncogenes , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/metabolism , Telomere/metabolism
3.
Molecules ; 26(23)2021 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34885910

ABSTRACT

Novel indolocarbazole derivatives named LCS were synthesized by our research group. Two of them were selected as the most active anticancer agents in vivo. We studied the mechanisms of anticancer activity in accordance with the previously described effects of indolocarbazoles. Cytotoxicity was estimated by MTT assay. We analyzed LCS-DNA interactions by circular dichroism in cholesteric liquid crystals and fluorescent indicator displacement assay. The effect on the activity of topoisomerases I and II was studied by DNA relaxation assay. Expression of interferon signaling target genes was estimated by RT-PCR. Chromatin remodeling was analyzed-the effect on histone H1 localization and reactivation of epigenetically silenced genes. LCS-induced change in the expression of a wide gene set was counted by means of PCR array. Our study revealed the cytotoxic activity of the compounds against 11 cancer cell lines and it was higher than in immortalized cells. Both compounds bind DNA; binding constants were estimated-LCS-1208 demonstrated higher affinity than LCS-1269; it was shown that LCS-1208 intercalates into DNA that is typical for rebeccamycin derivatives. LCS-1208 also inhibits topoisomerases I and IIα. Being a strong intercalator and topoisomerase inhibitor, LCS-1208 upregulates the expression of interferon-induced genes. In view of LCSs binding to DNA we analyzed their influence on chromatin stability and revealed that LCS-1269 displaces histone H1. Our analysis of chromatin remodeling also included a wide set of epigenetic experiments in which LCS-1269 demonstrated complex epigenetic activity. Finally, we revealed that the antitumor effect of the compounds is based not only on binding to DNA and chromatin remodeling but also on alternative mechanisms. Both compounds induce expression changes in genes involved in neoplastic transformation and target genes of the signaling pathways in cancer cells. Despite of being structurally similar, each compound has unique biological activities. The effects of LCS-1208 are associated with intercalation. The mechanisms of LCS-1269 include influence on higher levels such as chromatin remodeling and epigenetic effects.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Carbazoles/pharmacology , Glycosides/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Carbazoles/chemistry , Cell Line, Tumor , Epigenesis, Genetic/drug effects , Glycosides/chemistry , Humans , Indoles/chemistry , Indoles/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...