Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Arch Toxicol ; 84(12): 919-38, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20871980

ABSTRACT

Selenium (Se) is an essential dietary component for animals including humans and is regarded as a protective agent against cancer. Although the mode of anticancer action of Se is not fully understood yet, several mechanisms, such as antioxidant protection by selenoenzymes, specific inhibition of tumor cell growth by Se metabolites, modulation of cell cycle and apoptosis, and effect on DNA repair have all been proposed. Despite the unsupported results of the last SELECT trial, the cancer-preventing activity of Se was demonstrated in majority of the epidemiological studies. Moreover, recent studies suggest that Se has a potential to be used not only in cancer prevention but also in cancer treatment where in combination with other anticancer drugs or radiation, it can increase efficacy of cancer therapy. In combating cancer cells, Se acts as pro-oxidant rather than antioxidant, inducing apoptosis through the generation of oxidative stress. Thus, the inorganic Se compound, sodium selenite (SeL), due to its prooxidant character, represents a promising alternative for cancer therapy. However, this Se compound is highly toxic compared to organic Se forms. Thus, the unregulated intake of dietary or pharmacological Se supplements mainly in the form of SeL has a potential to expose the body tissues to the toxic levels of Se with subsequent negative consequences on DNA integrity. Hence, due to a broad interest to exploit the positive effects of Se on human health and cancer therapy, studies investigating the negative effects such as toxicity and DNA damage induction resulting from high Se intake are also highly required. Here, we review a role of Se in cancer prevention and cancer therapy, as well as mechanisms underlying Se-induced toxicity and DNA injury. Since Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven a powerful tool for addressing some important questions regarding Se biology, a part of this review is devoted to this model system.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/prevention & control , Selenium/administration & dosage , Selenium/pharmacology , Selenium/toxicity , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/genetics , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Cycle/genetics , DNA Damage , DNA Repair/drug effects , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/genetics , Reactive Oxygen Species/pharmacology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Selenium Compounds/pharmacology , Sodium Selenite/pharmacology
2.
Mutagenesis ; 25(2): 155-62, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19955329

ABSTRACT

Selenium (Se) belongs to nutrients that are essential for human health. Biological activity of this compound, however, mainly depends on its dose, with a potential of Se to induce detrimental effects at high doses. Although mechanisms lying behind detrimental effects of Se are poorly understood yet, they involve DNA damage induction. Consequently, DNA damage response and repair pathways may play a crucial role in cellular response to Se. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae we showed that sodium selenite (SeL), an inorganic form of Se, can be toxic and mutagenic in this organism due to its ability to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Moreover, we reported that a spectrum of mutations induced by this compound in the stationary phase of growth is mainly represented by 1-4 bp deletions. Consequently, we proposed that SeL acts as an oxidizing agent in yeast producing oxidative damage to DNA. As short deletions could be anticipated to arise as a result of action of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and oxidative damage to DNA is primarily coped with base excision repair (BER), a contribution of these two pathways towards survival, DSB induction, mutation frequency and types of mutations following SeL exposure was examined in present study. First, we show that while NHEJ plays no role in repairing toxic DNA lesions induced by SeL, cells with impairment in BER are sensitized towards this compound. Of BER activities examined, those responsible for processing of 3'-blocking DNA termini seem to be the most crucial for manifestation of the toxic effects of SeL in yeast. Second, an impact of NHEJ and BER on DSB induction after SeL exposure turned to be inappreciable, as no increase in DNA double-strand breakage in NHEJ and BER single or NHEJ BER double mutant upon SeL exposure was observed. Finally, we demonstrate that impairment in both these pathways does not importantly change mutation frequency after SeL exposure and that NHEJ is not responsible for generation of short deletions after SeL treatment, as these were comparably induced in the wild-type and NHEJ-defective cells.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded/drug effects , DNA Repair/drug effects , Recombination, Genetic/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Sodium Selenite/toxicity , Amino Acid Transport Systems, Basic/genetics , Cell Survival/drug effects , Mutation/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/growth & development , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
3.
Phytother Res ; 24(1): 90-5, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19585477

ABSTRACT

The potential genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of non-photoactivated hypericin was investigated in five experimental models. Hypericin was non-mutagenic in the Ames assay, with and without metabolic activation. It did not exert a protective effect against mutagenicity induced by 9-aminoacridine. In a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) assay, hypericin did not increase the frequency of mitotic crossovers or total aberrants at the ade(2) locus, the number of convertants at the trp5 locus, or the number of revertants at the ilv1 locus. In combined application with 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, it significantly enhanced the number of revertants at the ilv1 locus at the highest concentration used. Hypericin was not mutagenic in the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. However, in combined application with methyl methane sulfonate, toxicity and mutagenicity were slightly reduced. In a chromosome aberration assay using three mammalian cell lines, hypericin did not alter the frequency of structural chromosome aberrations, and in the DPPH radical scavenging assay, it did not exert any antioxidant effects.


Subject(s)
Antimutagenic Agents/pharmacology , DNA Damage , Perylene/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Anthracenes , Cell Line, Tumor , Chlamydomonas reinhardtii/drug effects , Chromosome Aberrations/chemically induced , Cricetinae , Humans , Mutagenicity Tests , Perylene/pharmacology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects
4.
Mutat Res ; 652(2): 198-203, 2008 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18424227

ABSTRACT

Selenium (Se) is a chemo-preventive agent that has been shown to have a protective role against cancer. The inorganic form of Se, sodium selenite (Na2SeO3), has frequently been included in various chemo-prevention studies, and this commercially available form of Se is used as dietary supplement by the public. Because high doses of this Se compound can be toxic, the underlying molecular mechanisms of sodium selenite toxicity need to be elucidated. Recently, we have reported that sodium selenite is acting as an oxidizing agent in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, producing oxidative damage to DNA. This pro-oxidative activity of sodium selenite likely accounted for the observed DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and yeast cell death. In this study we determine the genetic factors that are responsible for repair of sodium selenite-induced DSB. We report that the Rad52 protein is indispensable for repairing sodium selenite-induced DSB, suggesting a fundamental role of homologous recombination (HR) in this repair process. These results provide the first evidence that HR may have a fundamental role in the repair of sodium selenite-induced toxic DNA lesions.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Damage , DNA Repair/drug effects , Rad52 DNA Repair and Recombination Protein/pharmacology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Sodium Selenite/toxicity , Cell Survival , DNA, Fungal
5.
Toxicology ; 227(1-2): 1-14, 2006 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16935405

ABSTRACT

Selenium (Se) is a dietary essential trace element with important biological roles. Accumulating evidence indicates that Se compounds possess anticancer properties. Se is specifically incorporated into proteins in the form of selenocysteine and non-specifically incorporated as selenomethionine in place of methionine. The effects of Se compounds on cells are strictly compositional and concentration-dependent. At supranutritional dietary levels, Se can prevent the development of many types of cancer. At higher concentrations, Se compounds can be either cytotoxic or possibly carcinogenic. The cytotoxicity of Se is suggested to be associated with oxidative stress. Accordingly, sodium selenite, an inorganic Se compound, was reported to induce DNA damage, particularly DNA strand breaks and base damage. In this review we summarize the various activities of Se compounds and focus on their relation to DNA damage and repair. We discuss the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for identification of the genes involved in Se toxicity and resistance.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents , DNA Damage , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Selenium , Animals , Anticarcinogenic Agents/administration & dosage , Anticarcinogenic Agents/adverse effects , Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Selenium/administration & dosage , Selenium/adverse effects , Selenium/pharmacokinetics , Selenium/pharmacology
6.
DNA Repair (Amst) ; 5(5): 602-10, 2006 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16515894

ABSTRACT

Oxidative damage to DNA seems to be an important factor in developing many human diseases including cancer. It involves base and sugar damage, base-free sites, DNA-protein cross-links and DNA single-strand (SSB) and double-strand (DSB) breaks. Oxidative DSB can be formed in various ways such as their direct induction by the drug or their generation either through attempted and aborted repair of primary DNA lesions or through DNA replication-dependent conversion of SSB. In general, two main pathways are responsible for repairing DSB, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), with both of them being potential candidates for the repair of oxidative DSB. We have examined relative contribution of HR and NHEJ to cellular response after oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Therefore, cell survival, mutagenesis and DSB induction and repair in the rad52, yku70 and rad52 yku70 mutants after hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), menadione (MD) or bleomycin (BLM) exposure were compared to those obtained for the corresponding wild type. We show that MD exposure does not lead to observable DSB induction in yeast, suggesting that the toxic effects of this agent are mediated by other types of DNA damage. Although H(2)O(2) treatment generates some DSB, their yield is relatively low and hence DSB may only partially be responsible for toxicity of H(2)O(2), particularly at high doses of the agent. On the other hand, the basis of the BLM toxicity resides primarily in DSB induction. Both HR and NHEJ act on BLM-induced DSB, although their relative participation in the process is not equal. Based on our results we suggest that the complexity and/or the quality of the BLM-induced DSB might represent an obstacle for the NHEJ pathway.


Subject(s)
DNA Repair , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Bleomycin/pharmacology , DNA Damage , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Mutation , Oxidants/pharmacology , Oxidative Stress , Recombination, Genetic , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Vitamin K 3/pharmacology
7.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 20(5): 649-57, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16413741

ABSTRACT

Using four experimental model systems, it was demonstrated that glucomannan (GM) isolated from the cell wall of the industrial yeast Candida utilis revealed a broad range of protective activities. This effect depended on the nature and mode of action of the counteracting genotoxic compound as well as on the experimental model system used. In the Saccharomyces bioprotectivity assay, GM increased resistance towards ofloxacin-induced toxicity in the wild type and recombination repair-deficient yeast strains significantly enhancing survival of the cells. In the chromosomal aberration assay, GM exerted anticlastogenic effect against maleic hydrazide induced clastogenicity in Vicia faba L. In the DNA-topology assay, GM protected plasmid DNA from the breaks induced by Fe(2+) ions, but enhanced damage induced by bleomycin and hydrogen peroxide. In the cell-revitalization assay, it enhanced cytotoxic/cytostatic effect of teniposide applied to mouse leukemia cells. Thus, depending on the experimental model, GM acted as antimutagen, anticlastogen, DNA breaks inhibitor or inducer, and as cytotoxic/cytostatic effect enhancer. Several possible mechanisms of bioprotective action underlying the observed activities are suggested including iron chelation and free radical scavenging. The results imply that GM is a polysaccharide with marked biological activities and suggest its potential biomedical application, especially in combination with other bioactive compounds.


Subject(s)
Candida/chemistry , Mannans/pharmacology , Animals , Bleomycin/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Chromosome Aberrations , DNA Damage , Leukemia P388/pathology , Mannans/isolation & purification , Mice , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16601818

ABSTRACT

Nowadays naturally occurring compounds with the potential antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic effects are of great importance for their prospective use in cancer chemoprevention and treatment. The new water soluble derivative of microbial polysaccharide beta-D-glucan-carboxymethyl glucan (CMG) belongs to such a category of natural substances. CMG isolated from the cell wall of baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is included into the class of biopolymers known as biological response modifiers (BRMs) with a broad range of activities, above all ones interfering with cancer therapy. It was demonstrated on four experimental model systems that biological and consequential medicinal importance of CMG is based on the combined application with another active compound. In the Saccharomyces cerevisiae antimutagenicity assay CMG significantly reduced ofloxacin-induced mutagenicity in the yeast strain D7. CMG exerted bioprotective (anti-toxic and antimutagenic) effect after its simultaneos application with methyl methanesulphonate on the repair-deficient strain uvs10 of the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. In the Vicia sativa simultaneous phytotoxicity and anticlastogenicity assay CMG exerted statistically significant anticlastogenic efect against maleic hydrazide-induced clastogenicity in Vicia sativa L. Only in the Salmonella/microsome assay CMG did not exert statistically significant antigenotoxic effect, despite of the fact that it reduced 9-aminoacridine-induced mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA97, but his(+) revertants decreasing was statistically significant only at the highest CMG concentration used. The data presented unambiguously documented that even biopolysaccharides (e.g., derivatives of beta-glucan) belonging to the most abundant class of natural biopolymers may contribute to cancer prevention and therapy.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacology , Antimutagenic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinogenicity Tests , Mutagenicity Tests , beta-Glucans/pharmacology
9.
Curr Genet ; 46(6): 317-30, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15614491

ABSTRACT

DNA-damaging agents constantly challenge cellular DNA; and efficient DNA repair is therefore essential to maintain genome stability and cell viability. Several DNA repair mechanisms have evolved and these have been shown to be highly conserved from bacteria to man. DNA repair studies were originally initiated in very simple organisms such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bacteria being the best understood organism to date. As a consequence, bacterial DNA repair genes encoding proteins with well characterized functions have been transferred into higher organisms in order to increase repair capacity, or to complement repair defects, in heterologous cells. While indicating the contribution of these repair functions to protection against the genotoxic effects of DNA-damaging agents, heterologous expression studies also highlighted the role of the DNA lesions that are substrates for such processes. In addition, bacterial DNA repair-like functions could be identified in higher organisms using this approach. We heterologously expressed three well characterized E. coli repair genes in S. cerevisiae cells of different genetic backgrounds: (1) the ada gene encoding O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase, a protein involved in the repair of alkylation damage to DNA, (2) the recA gene encoding the main recombinase in E. coli and (3) the nth gene, the product of which (endonuclease III) is responsible for the repair of oxidative base damage. Here, we summarize our results and indicate the possible implications they have for a better understanding of particular DNA repair processes in S. cerevisiae.


Subject(s)
DNA Repair , Escherichia coli Proteins/physiology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Genetic Variation , O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Cell Survival , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Gene Expression Regulation , Mutation , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology
10.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 81(3): 381-6, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12127240

ABSTRACT

The potential antimutagenic effect of the plant extract of Muscari racemosum bulbs, rich on 3-benzylidene-4-chromanones, was evaluated on three genetic model organisms. The mixture of three homoisoflavonoids was applied together with diagnostic mutagens in the Ames assay on four bacterial strains Salmonella typhimurium TA97, TA98, TA100, TA102, in the toxicity and mutagenicity/antimutagenicity assay on the yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae D7, and in the simultaneous phytotoxicity and clastogenicity/anticlastogenicity assay on Vicia sativa (L.). The extract exerted antimutagenic and anticlastogenic effects due to the presence of homoisoflavonoids, which may be included in the group of natural antimutagens. This genotoxicological study suggests that homoisoflavonoids from M. racemosum (L.) owing to antimutagenic and anticlastogenic properties are of great pharmacological importance, and might be beneficial for prevention of cancer.


Subject(s)
Antimutagenic Agents/pharmacology , Isoflavones/pharmacology , Liliaceae/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Antimutagenic Agents/chemistry , Isoflavones/chemistry , Molecular Structure , Mutagenicity Tests , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Structures , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Vicia sativa/drug effects , Vicia sativa/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...