Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 123: 104936, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905779

ABSTRACT

Skin sensitisation is a key adverse health effect to be addressed in the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. Regulatory demands have urged the development of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) using New Approach Methodologies (NAM) and Defined Approaches (DA) instead of animal models. An illustrative NGRA case study shall demonstrate if the use of propyl paraben at 0.2% in a face cream was safe for consumers. A sequential stacking tier testing DA based on NAM data predicted propyl paraben to be a non-sensitiser, while some NAM input data showed positive results. To increase confidence, structurally related parabens were considered, which revealed NAM and DA hazard predictions similar to those of propyl paraben, non-sensitiser classifications in animal models and very rare cases of human skin allergy. Based on a weight of evidence it was decided that propyl paraben should be considered a non-sensitiser leading to a favourable NGRA conclusion, in line with traditional risk assessment. Examination of an ab initio NGRA based on NAM and metabolism data resulted in a more conservative weak sensitiser consideration as point of departure, which still led to a favourable conclusion.


Subject(s)
Parabens/toxicity , Skin/drug effects , Animals , Cosmetics , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Models, Animal , Risk Assessment
2.
Altern Lab Anim ; 30 Suppl 2: 115-8, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12513661

ABSTRACT

Until now, no in vitro methods for determining neurotoxic effects, on Phase I and Phase II biotransformation-driven metabolite formation or for the evaluation of the metabolism-mediated hazard of a chemical, have been validated. The current test guidelines are based on studies in vivo, involving animals exposed to the test substance. Novel in vitro testing instead of animal testing is required by Directive 86/609/EEC. In the EU White Paper on a Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy, which may result in up to 20,000 chemicals being screened for toxicity, the use of non-animal test methods is seen as essential and is encouraged. The aim of the present work was to demonstrate the significance of novel technologies, including the use of genetically engineered cell lines and three-dimensional cell culture techniques for direct application in the regulatory hazard-assessment process. Furthermore, attempts were made to make in vitro toxicity tests for specific applications more-readily available for inclusion in the chemical hazard-assessment process, by exploiting advances made in the life sciences.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives , Genetic Engineering , Nervous System Diseases , Nervous System/drug effects , Nervous System/metabolism , Organoids , Xenobiotics/metabolism , Xenobiotics/toxicity , Animals , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , European Union , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/metabolism , Nervous System Diseases/pathology , Organoids/drug effects , Organoids/metabolism , Organoids/pathology , PC12 Cells , Rats , Reproducibility of Results , Xenobiotics/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...