Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 100(2): 127-135, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33529402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is recommended to detect sight-threatening complications prior to visual loss. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) seven standard field (7SF) retinal imaging has traditionally been regarded the gold standard for DR classification, but other methods are often preferred clinically. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether 7SF is the most optimal screening method for DR grading, or if similar results can be achieved by other methods using a smaller field of view (<7SF) or ultra-wide field (UWF) imaging. METHODS: Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent reviewers initially identified 7167 publications in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases. Of these, 16 publications were included based on predefined inclusion criteria. RESULTS: 7SF was used as reference standard in 12 studies (compared with < 7SF in five studies and UWF in seven studies), and four studies compared other reference standards. Compared to 7SF, studies using < 7SF and UWF images both reported of similar agreement. A lower rate of ungradable images was reported for mydriatic and non-mydriatic UWF as compared to non-mydriatic < 7SF modalities. CONCLUSION: Retinal imaging of <7SF and UWF both provide acceptable performance compared to 7SF. Given the time-consuming nature of the latter, these methods could be reasonable options in DR screening, even though a high number of ungradable images in non-mydriatic < 7SF may pose a clinical challenge.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Fluorescein Angiography/standards , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Hormones (Athens) ; 19(4): 497-504, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000452

ABSTRACT

Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) has a prevalence of approximately 1 in 500 males. It is a condition characterized by an extra X chromosome and is an underdiagnosed clinical entity. Inactivation of genes enables their escape from regulatory mechanisms, which can result in such classic physical manifestations as hypogonadism, gynecomastia, infertility, and various hormonal and physical abnormalities. While the endocrine manifestations of 47,XXY are well-known, the oncologic manifestations have received less attention. An association between cancer and 47,XXY has not as yet been clearly defined, with variability noted in the prevalence of different malignancies in 47,XXY patients. The mechanisms underlying these altered oncologic risks are still under debate. Some of the proposed explanations include hormone imbalance, developmental malfunctions, and failed DNA repair mechanisms. However, the recognition of the oncological associations linked to 47,XXY could be helpful. Screening measures in certain malignancies may enable an earlier diagnosis of 47,XXY and the implementation of more customized care in 47,XXY and the mosaic variants.. The data for this review was compiled from relevant PubMed articles published within the last three decades and organized based on cancer type.


Subject(s)
Klinefelter Syndrome/complications , Neoplasms/etiology , Humans , Klinefelter Syndrome/diagnosis , Klinefelter Syndrome/genetics , Klinefelter Syndrome/metabolism , Male , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...