Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study to assess the ocular safety of mirabegron in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the effect of mirabegron on ocular safety in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting adults aged ≥18 years with a normal intraocular pressure (IOP, ≥10 to ≤21 mmHg) were eligible to enter the study. Of the 321 randomized subjects, 305 completed the study. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a supratherapeutic dose of oral mirabegron 100 mg or placebo once daily for 56 days. The IOP was measured at screening, baseline, day 10, and day 56/end of treatment using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Visual acuity and biomicroscopy were also evaluated. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the IOP at 56 days or end of treatment with mirabegron versus placebo. Secondary outcome variables included change from baseline to day 10 in the IOP, and increases in the IOP of ≥6 mmHg and ≥10 mmHg in either eye from baseline to day 10 and day 56. RESULTS: The mean (standard error, SE) IOP at baseline was 15.3 (0.16) mmHg for mirabegron and 15.4 (0.16) mmHg for placebo; values at day 56 were 15.0 (0.16) mmHg and 15.2 (0.17) mmHg, respectively. The adjusted mean IOP change from baseline to day 56 was -0.3 mmHg for mirabegron and -0.2 mmHg for placebo (-0.1 mmHg difference [95% confidence interval, CI, -0.4 to 0.3]). For the primary endpoint, mirabegron was noninferior to placebo, based on the prespecified limit of 1.5 mmHg. No statistically significant treatment effects on the IOP were seen at day 10. No subject discontinued due to increased IOP. Clinically significant increases from baseline in the IOP occurred rarely and only with placebo treatment. Changes in the visual acuity and biomicroscopy were not suggestive of a mirabegron effect. No treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) of glaucoma was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron 100 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks of treatment does not increase the IOP, and was generally safe and well tolerated.

Investigation of oral fenretinide for treatment of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Excessive accumulation of retinol-based toxins has been implicated in the pathogenesis of geographic atrophy (GA). Fenretinide, an orally available drug that reduces retinol delivery to the eye through antagonism of serum retinol-binding protein (RBP), was used in a 2-year trial to determine whether retinol reduction would be effective in the management of geographic atrophy. METHODS: The efficacy of fenretinide (100 and 300 mg daily, orally) to slow lesion growth in geographic atrophy patients was examined in a 2-year, placebo-controlled double-masked trial that enrolled 246 patients at 30 clinical sites in the United States. RESULTS: Fenretinide treatment produced dose-dependent reversible reductions in serum RBP-retinol that were associated with trends in reduced lesion growth rates. Patients in the 300 mg group who achieved serum retinol levels of ≤ 1 µM (≤ 2 mg/dL RBP) showed a mean reduction of 0.33 mm in the yearly lesion growth rate compared with subjects in the placebo group (1.70 mm/year vs. 2.03 mm/year, respectively, P = 0.1848). Retinol-binding protein reductions <2 mg/dL correlated with further reductions in lesion growth rates (r = 0.478). Fenretinide treatment also reduced the incidence of choroidal neovascularization (approximately 45% reduction in incidence rate in the combined fenretinide groups vs. placebo, P = 0.0606). This therapeutic effect was not dose dependent and is consistent with anti-angiogenic properties of fenretinide, which have been observed in other disease states. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study and the established safety profile of fenretinide in chronic dosing regimens warrant further study of fenretinide in the treatment of geographic atrophy.

Durezol (Difluprednate Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05%) compared with Pred Forte 1% ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of endogenous anterior uveitis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of difluprednate ophthalmic solution 0.05% (Durezol; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) compared with prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1% (Pred Forte; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for endogenous anterior uveitis. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, 90 patients with endogenous anterior uveitis [>10 anterior chamber (AC) cells and an AC flare score of ≥2 in at least 1 eye] received either difluprednate 4x /day (QID) (n=50) or prednisolone 8x/day (n=40) for 14 days, followed by a 2-week tapering regimen. The main outcome measure was change from baseline in AC cell grade on day 14. RESULTS: At day 14, mean AC cell grade improvement for difluprednate-treated patients was similar to prednisolone-treated patients (2.1 vs. 1.9, respectively), proving noninferiority. At day 14, 68.8% of difluprednate patients had AC cell clearing (grade 0:≥ 1cell) compared with 61.5% of prednisolone patients. In the prednisolone-treated group, 12.5% of patients were withdrawn because of investigator-determined lack of efficacy; no difluprednate-treated patients were withdrawn for this reason (P=0.01). Clinically significant intraocular pressure elevation occurred in 3 difluprednate-treated patients (6.0%) and 2 prednisolone-treated patients (5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Difluprednate administered QID is at least as effective as prednisolone administered 8x/day in resolving the inflammation and pain associated with endogenous anterior uveitis. Difluprednate provides effective treatment for anterior uveitis and requires less frequent dosing than prednisolone acetate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial NCT00501579 was registered at the National Institutes of Health Registry in July 2007 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00501579?term=sirion&rank=4 ).

Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol) administered two times daily for managing ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol(®)) versus placebo administered before surgery for managing inflammation and pain following cataract extraction. METHODS: Eligible subjects (N = 121) were randomized 2:1 to topical treatment with 1 drop difluprednate or placebo administered twice daily for 16 days, followed by a 14-day tapering period. Dosing was initiated 24 hours before unilateral ocular surgery. Clinical signs of inflammation (anterior chamber [AC] cell and flare grade, bulbar conjunctival injection, ciliary injection, corneal edema, and chemosis), ocular pain/discomfort, intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Clearing of inflammation on day 14 (primary endpoint), defined as an AC cell grade of 0 (≤5 cells) and a flare grade of 0 (complete absence), was achieved in a significantly greater percentage of subjects treated with difluprednate, compared with placebo (74.7% vs 42.5%; P = 0.0006). A significantly greater percentage of difluprednate-treated subjects were free of ocular pain/discomfort on day 14 than placebo-treated subjects (64.6% vs 30.0%; P = 0.0004). Three subjects (3.7%) in the difluprednate group had a clinically significant IOP rise (defined as ≥21 mmHg and a change from baseline ≥10 mmHg at same visit). CONCLUSIONS: Difluprednate, administered 2 times daily starting 24 hours before cataract surgery, was highly effective for managing ocular inflammation and relieving pain and discomfort postoperatively. Difluprednate was well tolerated and provides a convenient twice-daily option for managing postoperative ocular inflammation.

Pharmacologic treatment of atrophic age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and compare the various therapeutic platforms, investigational drugs, and clinical trials targeting geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. RECENT FINDINGS: Investigational agents based on hypothesized causes are being developed to treat geographic atrophy. These platforms are designed to attack the disease on several different fronts. SUMMARY: As knowledge of geographic atrophy pathophysiology advances, targeted pharmacotherapies may well be able to mitigate the retinal damage and vision loss associated with geographic atrophy.

Demonstration of efficacy in the treatment of dry eye disease with 0.18% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (vismed, rejena).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.18% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (Rejena, Vismed) compared with its vehicle for the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 444 subjects with dry eye disease were randomized 1:1 to active study drug (n = 221) or vehicle control (n = 223) in this multicenter, double-masked trial. Subjects instilled 1 to 2 drops, 3 to 6 times daily for 14 days, with evaluations at Days 7 and 14. The study's 2 primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline at Day 7 in lissamine green staining scores (objective) and in global symptom frequency scores (subjective). Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student t test in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with last observation carried forward (LOCF). RESULTS: At Day 7, the differences between the active and vehicle groups in change from baseline for lissamine green staining score (P = .050, Wilcoxon; P = .029, t test) and global symptom frequency score (P = .050, Wilcoxon; P = .017, t test) were both statistically significant. There were no clinically relevant safety findings related to the use of Rejena. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the clinical efficacy of Rejena in the treatment of dry eye disease in both a primary objective endpoint and a primary subjective endpoint when compared to its vehicle. The study results also supported the well-known safety profile of Rejena.

A comparative clinical evaluation of arthroscopic single-row versus double-row supraspinatus tendon repair.

Cadaveric studies and commercial pressure have initiated a strong trend towards double-row repair in arthroscopic cuff surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the biomechanical advantages of a double-row supraspinatus tendon repair would result in superior clinical outcome and higher abduction strength. A retrospective study of two groups of 32 single-row and 33 double-row repairs of small to medium cuff tears was performed. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and a visual analog scale for pain were used to evaluate the outcome. The participation rate was 100%. A subset of patients was further investigated with the Constant Score (CS) including electronic strength measurement. The double-row repair patients had significantly more (p = 0.01) yes answers in the SST than the single-row group, and pain reduction was slightly better (p = 0.03). No difference was found for the relative CS (p = 0.86) and abduction strength (p = 0.74). Patient satisfaction was 100% for double-row and 97% for single-row repair. Single- and double-row repairs both achieved excellent clinical results. Evidence of superiority of double-row repair is still scarce and has to be balanced against the added complexity of the procedure and higher costs.

Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for postoperative inflammation and pain.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol) 2 or 4 times a day compared with those of a placebo in the treatment of inflammation and pain associated with ocular surgery. SETTING: Twenty-six clinics in the United States. METHODS: One day after unilateral ocular surgery, patients who had an anterior chamber cell grade of 2 or higher (>10 cells) were treated with 1 drop of difluprednate 2 times or 4 times a day or with a placebo (vehicle) 2 times or 4 times a day in the study eye for 14 days. This was followed by a 14-day tapering period and a 7-day safety evaluation. Outcome measures included cleared anterior chamber inflammation (grade 0, or=10 mm Hg and >or=21 mm Hg from baseline, respectively) versus 1% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Difluprednate given 2 or 4 times a day cleared postoperative inflammation and reduced pain rapidly and effectively. There were no serious ocular adverse events. Fewer adverse events were reported in the difluprednate-treated groups than in the placebo group.

A phase III study of subconjunctival human anti-transforming growth factor beta(2) monoclonal antibody (CAT-152) to prevent scarring after first-time trabeculectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CAT-152 (lerdelimumab), a monoclonal antibody to transforming growth factor-beta2 (TGF-beta2), in preventing the progression of fibrosis in patients undergoing first-time trabeculectomy for primary open-angle (POAG) or chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with a diagnosis of POAG, CACG, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG), or pigmentary glaucoma (PG), with a recorded intraocular pressure (IOP) of more than 21 mmHg, visual field or optic disc changes characteristic of glaucoma, and taking the maximum tolerated dose of medication. INTERVENTION: Patients received unilateral trabeculectomy with either 4 subconjunctival injections of CAT-152 (100 microg in 100 microl phosphate buffer) or 4 placebo injections, administered immediately before and on completion of trabeculectomy, and on the first day and at 1 week after surgery. Patients were followed up for 12 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was treatment success in the study eye (unmedicated IOP of 6-16 mmHg inclusive), at the 6- and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of postoperative intervention with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); incidence of surgical failure; time to surgical failure; and incidence of vascularity, microcysts, and encapsulation or demarcation of the bleb site. RESULTS: Of the 388 patients evaluated in the trial, 81% (n = 274) had either POAG or CACG, combined into a single set (POAG/CACG) analyzed by intent-to-treat (ITT) criteria. Separate ITT analyses were carried out for all participants (+PEXG/PG group), with similar results. The treatment success rate was 60% in the CAT-152 group and 68% in the placebo group (P = 0.23). No statistically significant differences emerged in the secondary end points. Patients requiring 5-FU for postsurgical management were more likely to be treatment failures (P = 0.0003). Patients with a primary diagnosis of PG (n = 49) had a higher success rate than those with other diagnoses (P = 0.0077). Administration of CAT-152 was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. The immunogenicity of CAT-152 was very low. CONCLUSIONS: At the dose level and regimen studied, there was no difference between CAT-152 and placebo in preventing the failure of primary trabeculectomy. The safety profile of CAT-152 was similar to that of placebo.

Factors affecting the outcome of trabeculectomy: an analysis based on combined data from two phase III studies of an antibody to transforming growth factor beta2, CAT-152.

PURPOSE: To determine the factors affecting trabeculectomy success. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials comparing an antibody against transforming growth factor beta2 (TGF-beta2) with vehicle (placebo) for prevention of fibrosis after trabeculectomy, in which there was no significant difference between the treatment groups. PARTICIPANTS: Data were from patients (n = 726) with a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma, chronic angle-closure glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma (PG) who had an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg and visual field or optic disc changes characteristic of glaucoma and were taking the maximum tolerated dose of medication before trabeculectomy. METHODS: Patients had trabeculectomy and 4 subconjunctival injections of a human monoclonal antibody to TGF-beta2 (CAT-152) or a placebo. The definition of trabeculectomy success in the protocols was an IOP between 6 and 16 mmHg inclusive at months 6 and 12. Analyses of success used factors identified by ophthalmic experts. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Covariates analyzed included patient age, black race, gender, time since diagnosis, primary diagnosis, country, diabetes, mean defect, cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio, suture type, anesthetic, flap type, IOP at listing for surgery, suture release/lysis, needling, reformed anterior chamber, wound leak, severe bleb vascularity, and bleb microcysts. RESULTS: A stepwise logistic regression model found the following predictors of treatment success: PG (odds ratio [OR], 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-11.99), high C/D ratio (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.15-6.99), and use of a corneal traction suture (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.09-2.56). A negative relationship was found for black race (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.62); treatment in France (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.70), Sweden (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.58), Spain (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.68), Poland (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88), or Hungary (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34); and suture release/lysis (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53). The effect of needling was marginally statistically significant (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Successful trabeculectomy outcome was associated with PG, higher C/D ratio, and corneal traction suturing. Factors associated with surgical failure were black race and suture release/lysis. Intercountry differences also were observed.

Feasibility of an antiviral clinical trial requiring cross-country shipment of conjunctival adenovirus cultures and recovery of infectious virus.

PURPOSE: Accurate and timely laboratory diagnosis of adenovirus from conjunctival cultures is essential to ensure appropriate enrollment, and detection of residual infectious virus is essential to evaluate antiviral efficacy in any multicenter national clinical trial. As part of a feasibility study, we investigated those variables that might affect the successful recovery of infectious adenovirus from patient conjunctival cultures after cross-country shipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated adenovirus conjunctival cultures were prepared in viral transport media to evaluate the effect of four variables (adenovirus serotype, initial concentration, initial storage temperature [-20 degrees C, 0 degrees C, 20 degrees C], and preshipment storage times [1-5 days]) on the recovery of infectious adenovirus by a central laboratory in St. Paul, MN, following air shipment from Pittsburgh, PA. Upon arrival, the internal temperatures of the containers were recorded, and the samples were cultured on A549 cells using standard tube and/or shell vial culture. RESULTS: Overall, adenovirus was recovered in 352/354 (99.4%) of the samples when the initial titer was greater than 1.0 PFU/ml. Adenovirus serotype, initial storage temperature, and preshipment storage times had no adverse effect on virus recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated conjunctival samples could successfully be shipped cross-country at ambient temperatures to a commercial laboratory for adenovirus isolation by culture. Having demonstrated feasibility, a clinical trial was subsequently carried out that confirmed the ease of shipment and recovery of infectious adenovirus from conjunctival cultures.

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparison of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, and placebo for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with delayed tear clearance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic 0.5% suspension, versus placebo for treatment of the inflammatory component of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with delayed tear clearance. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and delayed tear clearance were randomly assigned to receive either loteprednol or vehicle 4 times a day for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at weeks 2 and 4 of treatment and 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued. Symptoms were scored using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 1 to 100. Corneal fluorescein staining was scored 0 to 4 in five areas. Conjunctival injection was graded 0 to 3 in the inferior bulbar, nasal bulbar, and inferior tarsal areas. Lid margin injection was graded 0 to 3. Safety was assessed by funduscopy, lens examination, biomicroscopy, visual acuity, and Goldmann tonometry, and by monitoring adverse events and changes in symptoms. RESULTS: In subsets of patients with at least moderate clinical inflammation, there was a significant difference between the loteprednol-treated group and vehicle-treated group after 2 weeks of therapy. The differences did not reach statistical significance at 4 weeks, although the loteprednol-treated patients retained their improvement compared with the vehicle-treated group. Safety evaluations showed both treatments to be well tolerated and similar in the frequency and type of adverse event reported. CONCLUSION: The use of topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5% 4 times a day may be beneficial in patients who have keratoconjunctivitis sicca with at least a moderate inflammatory component.