Creating a culture that supports food security and health equity at higher education institutions.

Food insecurity on college campuses is a major public health problem and has been documented for the last decade. Sufficient food access is a crucial social determinant of health, thus campuses across the country have implemented various programmes, systems and policies to enhance access to food which have included food pantries, campus gardens, farmers' markets, meal share or voucher programmes, mobile food applications, campus food gleaning, food recovery efforts, meal deliveries and task force/working groups. However, little is understood about how to best address food insecurity and support students who are struggling with basic needs. The impact of food insecurity on students' academic and social success, in addition to their overall well-being, should be investigated and prioritised at each higher education institution. This is especially true for marginalised students, such as minority or first-generation students, who are at heightened risk for food insecurity. In order to create a culture of health equity, in which most at-risk students are provided resources and opportunities to achieve optimal well-being, higher education institutions must prioritise mitigating food insecurity on the college campus. Higher education institutions could benefit from adopting comprehensive and individualised approaches to promoting food security for marginalised students in order to facilitate equal opportunity for optimal scholastic achievement among students of all socio-demographic backgrounds.

Campus-based programmes to address food insecurity vary in leadership, funding and evaluation strategies.

College food insecurity is a known detriment to student success, but little is known about the implementation of campus-based programmes to help address this issue on campus in the United States. The objective of this research study was to determine the types of food insecurity initiatives implemented and assess how such programmes are managed, funded, and evaluated. A cross-sectional, 23-item online survey was administered among individuals involved with campus food insecurity initiatives identified through professional networks. Food pantries were the most common (97.1%) and mobile food sharing applications were the least common (14.7%) food security initiatives. A majority of respondents (69.7%) stated that at least one programme on their campus was evaluated, although the methods varied and uncertainty about the methods used was common. An allocated budget was provided at some institutions (38.9%), but funding mechanisms varied. Student Life Offices were most commonly reported as being responsible for programme management. Most respondents (75.3%) reported there had been programme changes due to COVID-19. This research confirmed that food insecurity programmes are widely available, although the type, funding, and leadership of these programmes vary. A coordinated approach on campus to align programming efforts is needed.

Food sovereignty and sustainability mid-pandemic: how Michigan's experience of Covid-19 highlights chasms in the food system.

This paper offers observations on people's lived experience of the food system in Michigan during the early Covid-19 pandemic as an initial critical foray into the everyday pandemic food world. The Covid-19 crisis illuminates a myriad of adaptive food behaviors, as people struggle to address their destabilized lives, including the casual acknowledgement of the pandemic, then anxiety of the unknown, the subsequent new dependency, and the possible emergence of a new normal. The pandemic makes the injustices inherent in the food system apparent across communities, demonstrating that food injustice destabilizes all members of the food system, regardless of their social location. The challenges of eating in a pandemic also reinforce the importance of building a sustainable food system; the challenges of food sovereignty and food sustainability are inextricably linked, and the pandemic lays this bare.

Dietetic Workforce Capacity Assessment for Public Health Nutrition and Community Nutrition.

Worldwide, there is a continued rise in malnutrition and noncommunicable disease, along with rapidly changing dietary patterns, demographics, and climate and persistent economic inequality and instability. These trends have led to a national and global focus on nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions to improve population health. A well-trained public health and community nutrition workforce is critical to manage and contribute to these efforts. The study describes the current public health and community nutrition workforce and factors influencing registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) to work in these settings and characterizes RDN preparedness, training, and competency in public health and community nutrition. The study was comprised of a cross-sectional, online survey of mostly US RDNs working in public health/community nutrition and semistructured telephone interviews with US-based and global public health and community nutrition experts. RStudio version 1.1.442 was used to manage and descriptively analyze survey data. Thematic analysis was conducted to evaluate expert interviews. Survey participants (n = 316) were primarily women (98%) and White (84%) with the RDN credential (91%) and advanced degrees (65%). Most reported that non-RDNs are performing nutrition-related duties at their organizations. Respondents generally rated themselves as better prepared to perform community nutrition vs public health functions. Interviews were conducted with 7 US-based experts and 5 international experts. Experts reported that non-RDNs often fill nutrition-related positions in public health, and RDNs should more actively pursue emerging public health opportunities. Experts suggested that RDNs are more desirable job candidates if they have advanced public health degrees or prior experience in public health or community nutrition and that dietetic training programs need to more rigorously incorporate public health training and experience. Significant opportunity exists to improve the preparedness and training of the current dietetic workforce to increase capacity and meet emerging needs in public health and community nutrition.

Making nutrition sense from OASIS.

Assessing nutrition is an integral part of the comprehensive assessment for each patient. Although OASIS does not have a specific section or identified items labeled for nutrition, there are numerous nuances of nutritional status imbedded in the OASIS-B1. This article will identify the many OASIS items that contribute to the nutritional assessment and point out when OASIS responses should trigger a referral to a registered dietitian.

Medical nutrition therapy for the prevention and treatment of unintentional weight loss in residential healthcare facilities.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the rate of unintentional weight loss (UWL) in adults following their admission into residential healthcare facilities, assess the effectiveness of a new medical nutrition therapy (MNT) protocol for the prevention and treatment of UWL, and describe nutrition assessment and intervention activities of dietitians. DESIGN: Prospective intervention study in which volunteer dietitians were randomly assigned to usual nutrition care (UC) or MNT protocol care (MNT-PC) groups. Dietitians recruited newly admitted residents and tracked their weights for up to 6 months using standardized weighing procedures. Data on weight outcomes and nutrition care activities were abstracted from medical records and compared between study groups. Subjects/settings Thirty-one dietitians from 29 facilities completed the field test (16 MNT-PC, 13 UC). Medical record data were available for 394 residents (223 MNT-PC, 171 UC), and complete weight trend data were available for 364 residents (200 MNT-PC, 164 UC). INTERVENTION: The new MNT protocol for UWL in residential facilities emphasized assessment; intervention (including weighing frequency); communication with staff, medical doctor, family, and resident; and reassessment. Main outcome measures Rate of UWL and weight status 90 days after admission and weight status 90 days after identification of UWL. Statistical analyses Chi;(2), Independent t test, analysis of variance, and multiple regression using the general linear model. RESULTS: Fourteen of 364 residents (4%) were admitted with significant preexisting weight loss, which was successfully treated in eight residents during the first 90 days. Substantial unintentional weight loss (>or=5% in any 30 days) developed in 78 residents (21%). MNT-PC dietitians were more likely to identify UWL. When UWL was identified, and, after providing nutrition care to these residents for an additional 90 days, 32 of 61 residents (52%) maintained or gained weight. Dietitians in UC and MNT-PC groups were equally successful in treating preexisting or postadmission unintentional weight loss when it was identified. Differences were found in nutrition care activities. MNT-PC dietitians reported more nutrition assessment activities, whereas UC dietitians reported more intervention activities. Conclusions/applications Nutrition care protocols with standardized weighing procedures can increase the identification of UWL in the residential healthcare environment. Improved identification supports the additional assessment activities used by MNT-PC dietitians. Similar outcomes for UC and MNT-PC groups when UWL was identified indicate that usual nutrition care was already a high standard of care for intervention.

Using special foods and supplements as alternative cancer treatments.

This column investigates the harm/benefit issues involved in coupling alternative methods of cancer treatment with traditional cancer therapy.