Antiplatelets versus anticoagulants in the treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in 1-3% of blunt traumas and is associated with stroke, disability, and mortality if unrecognized and untreated. Early detection and treatment are imperative to reduce the risk of stroke, however, there is significant variation amongst centers and trauma care providers in the specific medical management strategy used. This study compares antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants to determine BCVI-related stroke risk and bleeding complications to better understand the efficacy and safety of various treatment strategies. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian. The search was supplemented with manual review of the literature. Included studies reported treatment-stratified risk of stroke following BCVI. All studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and data was extracted in duplicate. Meta-analysis was conducted using pooled estimates of odds ratios (OR) with a random-effects model using Mantel-Haenszel methods. RESULTS: A total of 3315 studies screened yielded 39 studies for inclusion, evaluating 6552 patients (range 8 - 920 per study) with a total of 7643 BCVI. Stroke rates ranged from 0% to 32.8%. Amongst studies included in the meta-analysis, there were a total of 405 strokes, with 144 (35.5%) occurring on therapy, for a total stroke rate of 4.5 %. Meta-analysis showed that stroke rate after BCVI was lower for patients treated with antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33-0.96, p = 0.04); when evaluating only the 9 studies specifically comparing ASA to heparin, the stroke rate was similar between groups (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.15-1.20, p = 0.11). Eleven studies evaluated bleeding complications and demonstrated lower risk of bleeding with antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.63, p = 0.002); 5 studies evaluating risk of bleeding complications with ASA vs. heparin showed lower rates of bleeding complications with ASA (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.58, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with BCVI with antiplatelets is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding complications compared to treatment with anticoagulants. Use of ASA vs. heparin specifically was not associated with differences in stroke risk, however, patients treated with ASA had fewer bleeding complications. Based on this evidence, antiplatelets should be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with BCVI.

Management of Rib Fractures in the Combat Environment.

Rib fractures in combat casualties are an under-appreciated injury, and their treatment may become more common as more patients survive because of modern body armor and point-ofinjury care. The combat environment has challenges such as equipment availability and sterility. A simple and thoughtful rib fracture treatment algorithm may be useful to reduce the morbidity and mortality of rib fractures in the combat environment. Intravenous lidocaine infusions for patients with traumatic rib fractures may have important combat applications. We propose an algorithm for the management of combat casualties with traumatic rib fractures.

Trauma resident exposure in Canada and operative numbers (TraumaRECON): a national multicentre retrospective review of operative and nonoperative trauma teaching.

BACKGROUND: General surgeons play an important role in the provision of trauma care in Canada and the current extent of their trauma experience during training is unknown. We sought to quantify the operative and nonoperative educational experiences among Canadian general surgery trainees. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of major operative exposures experienced by general surgery residents, as identified using institutional trauma registries and subsequent chart-level review, for 2008-2018. We also conducted a site survey on trauma education and structure. RESULTS: We collected data on operative exposure for general surgery residents from 7 programs and survey data from 10 programs. Operations predominantly occurred after hours (73% after 1700 or on weekends) and general surgery residents were absent from a substantial proportion (25%) of relevant trauma operations. The structure of trauma education was heterogeneous among programs, with considerable site-specific variability in the involvement of surgical specialties in trauma care. During their training, graduating general surgery residents each experienced around 4 index trauma laparotomies, 1 splenectomy, 1 thoracotomy, and 0 neck explorations for trauma. CONCLUSION: General surgery residents who train in Canada receive variable and limited exposure to operative and nonoperative trauma care. These data can be used as a baseline to inform the application of competency-based medical education in trauma care for general surgery training in Canada.

Prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) includes carotid and/or vertebral artery injury following trauma, and conveys an increased stroke risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive summary of prognostic factors associated with risk of stroke following BCVI. METHODS: We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from January 1946 to June 2023. We identified studies reporting associations between patient or injury factors and risk of stroke following BCVI. We performed meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) using the random effects method and assessed individual study risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. We separately pooled adjusted and unadjusted analyses, highlighting the estimate with the higher certainty. RESULTS: We included 26 cohort studies, involving 20,458 patients with blunt trauma. The overall incidence of stroke following BCVI was 7.7 %. Studies were predominantly retrospective cohorts from North America and included both carotid and vertebral artery injuries. Diagnosis of BCVI was most commonly confirmed with CT angiography. We demonstrated with moderate to high certainty that factors associated with increased risk of stroke included carotid artery injury (as compared to vertebral artery injury, unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] 1.94, 95 % CI 1.62 to 2.32), Grade III Injury (as compared to grade I or II) (uOR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.88 to 3.20), Grade IV injury (uOR 3.09, 95 % CI 2.20 to 4.35), polyarterial injury (uOR 3.11 (95 % CI 2.05 to 4.72), occurrence of hypotension at the time of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.32, 95 % CI 0.87 to 2.03) and higher total body injury severity (aOR 5.91, 95 % CI 1.90 to 18.39). CONCLUSION: Local anatomical injury pattern, overall burden of injury and flow dynamics contribute to BCVI-related stroke risk. These findings provide the foundational evidence base for risk stratification to support clinical decision making and further research.

Redefining Trauma Training in Canada: A National Delphi Study on Curriculum, Educational Resources, and Training Initiatives.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a set of curriculum recommendations to support trauma training in Canadian general surgery residency programs. DESIGN: A modified Delphi study was conducted with a panel of trauma and surgical education experts. Proposed curriculum components were developed from Canadian trauma surgery exposure and educational needs assessment data. Panelists were asked to rate each potential curriculum component for inclusion (mandatory or exemplary) or exclusion in the ideal and feasible trauma training curriculum. SETTING: This national Delphi study was conducted in the Canadian trauma education context. PARTICIPANTS: A panel of trauma experts and surgeons holding leadership positions in training programs and professional societies across Canada were invited to participate. RESULTS: Nineteen panelists representing all geographic regions of Canada achieved consensus on a set of curriculum components. The panel was largely in agreement with the RCPSC trauma competencies. At the end of the study, 71 items were considered mandatory for all programs (such as dedicated trauma rotations, trauma resuscitation and operative skills courses, structured trauma teaching within academic half day, and simulation experiences), and 21 items were considered exemplary (such as program funding for trauma courses, and opportunities to participate in trauma research and quality improvement projects). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a framework of education components for curricular reform for trauma training in Canadian general surgery residency programs. Such recommendations include rotations, formal courses and certifications, education resources, and simulation experiences to supplement limited clinical exposure.

Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night. BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute appendicitis who present at night frequently have surgery delayed until the after morning. METHODS: The delay trial is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 22 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Adults with imaging confirmed acute appendicitis who presented at night (8:00 pm -4:00 am ). Delaying surgery until after 6:00 am was compared with immediate surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications. An a prior noninferiority margin of 15% was deemed clinically relevant. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven of the planned 140 patients were enrolled in the Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy (DELAY) trial (59 in the delayed group and 68 in the immediate group). The two groups were similar at baseline. The mean time between the decision to operate and surgery was longer in the delayed group (11.0 vs 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001). The primary outcome occurred in 6/59 (10.2%) of those in the delayed group versus 15/67 (22.4%) of those in the immediate group ( P = 0.07). The difference between groups met the a priori noninferiority criteria of +15% (risk difference -12.2%, 95% CI: -24.4% to +0.4%, test of noninferiority P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The DELAY study is the first trial to assess delaying appendectomy in those with acute appendicitis. We demonstrate the noninferiority of delaying surgery until the after morning.

When is it safe to start venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after blunt solid organ injury? A prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) after blunt solid organ injury remains controversial, as VTE mitigation must be balanced against bleeding promulgation. Evidence from primarily small, retrospective, single-center work suggests that VTEp ≤48 hours is safe and effective. This study was undertaken to validate this clinical practice. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients presenting to 19 participating trauma centers in North America were screened over a 1-year study period beginning between August 1 and October 1, 2021. Inclusions were age older than 15 years; ≥1 liver, spleen, or kidney injury; and initial nonoperative management. Exclusions were transfers, emergency department death, pregnancy, and concomitant bleeding disorder/anticoagulation/antiplatelet medication. A priori power calculation stipulated the need for 1,158 patients. Time of VTEp initiation defined study groups: Early (≤48 hours of admission) versus Late (>48 hours). Bivariate and multivariable analyses compared outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1,173 patients satisfied the study criteria with 571 liver (49%), 557 spleen (47%), and 277 kidney injuries (24%). The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range, 25-49 years), and 67% (n = 780) were male. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 14-29) with Abbreviated Injury Scale Abdomen score of 3 (interquartile range, 2-3), and the median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). Early VTEp patients (n = 838 [74%]) had significantly lower rates of VTE (n = 28 [3%] vs. n = 21 [7%], p = 0.008), comparable rates of nonoperative management failure (n = 21 [3%] vs. n = 12 [4%], p = 0.228), and lower rates of post-VTEp blood transfusion (n = 145 [17%] vs. n = 71 [23%], p = 0.024) when compared with Late VTEp patients (n = 301 [26%]). Late VTEp was independently associated with VTE (odd ratio, 2.251; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Early initiation of VTEp was associated with significantly reduced rates of VTE with no increase in bleeding complications. Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis initiation ≤48 hours is therefore safe and effective and should be the standard of care for patients with blunt solid organ injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic and Care Management; Level III.

Resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography during the acute resuscitation of trauma: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an emerging POCUS modality that can be used to guide trauma resuscitation. METHODS: Trauma patients who underwent TEE within 24 h of admission from 2013 to 2022 were prospectively identified. We retrospectively analyzed resuscitative TEE reports and patient charts in duplicate. RESULTS: 29 providers performed TEE for 54 acute trauma patients. 28 (52%) died in hospital; 33 (61%) required operative intervention (<24 h). Median injury severity score was 29 [IQR 22-43]. The most common indications for TEE were hemodynamic instability (34, 63%), inadequate windows for transthoracic echocardiography (14, 26%) and cardiac arrest (11, 20%). There were no identified complications. A new diagnosis was made in 31 (57%) cases: most commonly right ventricular dysfunction (10, 19%), pericardial effusion (9, 17%), and hypovolemia (6, 11%). TEE ruled out major cardiac injury in 83% of cases. TEE changed resuscitative strategy, in 17 (32%) patients, diagnostic imaging approach in 6 (11%) patients, procedural or operative approach in 5 (9%) patients and disposition from the trauma bay in 4 (7%) patients. CONCLUSION: Resuscitative TEE during acute trauma care has an additional diagnostic yield to existing diagnostic pathways and may impact definitive management for some patients in the trauma bay.

Association Between Complications after Vascular Surgery and Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have looked at the long-term risk of opioid use following major vascular surgery and no study has investigated the potential association between major complications and prolonged opioid use. We analyzed a population-based database linked to a prescription database to investigate factors associated with prolonged opioid use following major vascular surgery. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all adults who underwent open lower extremity revascularization (LER) or nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (open [AAA] and endovascular [EVAR]) in the province of Ontario, Canada, between 2013 and 2018. Prolonged opioid use was defined as 2 or more opioid prescriptions filled 6-12 months following surgery. Potential predictors of prolonged use were explored using modified Poisson regression with a generalized estimating equation approach to account for the clustering of patients within physicians and institutions. RESULTS: This study included a total of 11,104 patients with 5,652 patients undergoing open LER, 3,285 patients undergoing EVAR, and 2,167 patients undergoing AAA. The rates of prior opioid use were 35.4% for LER, 15.8% for AAA and 14.3% for EVAR. Major complication rates following each procedure were 59.5% for AAA, 35.1% for LER, and 21.0% for EVAR. Following surgery, prolonged opioid use was identified in 26.1% of LER, 13.2% of AAA, and 11.6% of EVAR patients. The strongest predictor of prolonged opioid use was prior use with an odds ratio (OR) of 13.27 (95% CI: 10.63-16.57) for AAA, 11.24 (95% CI: 9.18-13.75) for EVAR, and 4.69 (95% CI: 4.16-5.29) for LER. The occurrence of a major complication was only associated with prolonged opioid use for patients undergoing LER (OR 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.19), while it had a protective effect on patients undergoing EVAR (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-0.99) and no association for patients undergoing open AAA repair (OR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.95-1.29). Older age was also protective with a reduced rate of prolonged opioid use for every 10 years of age increase: AAA (OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.99); EVAR (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91); and LER (OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.87-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged opioid use is common following major vascular surgery, occurring in over 10% of patients undergoing either open or endovascular aneurysm repair and over 25% of patients undergoing open LER. Prior opioid use is the strongest predictor for prolonged use, while the occurrence of postoperative complications is associated with a slight increased risk of prolonged use in patients undergoing LER. These patient populations should be targeted for multimodal methods of opioid reduction following their procedures.

Who are the trauma team leaders across Canada? A national survey evaluating the profession in adult and pediatric level one trauma centres.

OBJECTIVES: Trauma Team Leaders (TTLs) are critical for coordinating and leading trauma resuscitations. This survey sought to characterize the demographics and professional practices of Canadian TTLs at level one trauma centres. As a secondary objective, this information will be utilized to inform the operational goals of the Trauma Association of Canada (TAC) TTL Committee. METHODS: A detailed survey, developed by the TAC board of directors and TTL committee leads, was sent to 225 TTLs across Canada's level one trauma centres. TTLs were identified via contacting trauma directors at each level one centre, in addition to public registry searches. This survey captured demographics, professional background, resuscitation practices, trauma team composition, and TTL involvement in trauma responses. RESULTS: The response rate was 41.7%. Mean respondent age was 42 (SD 7.4) and 71.0% were male. Most TTLs trained in emergency medicine (53.1%) or general surgery (25.5%); 63.8% underwent TTL training: either via a trauma surgery fellowship or TTL fellowship. All centres have a massive hemorrhage protocol implemented, and there is no large variation between the rates of use of cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen, nor the ratio of blood products transfused (2:1 vs 1:1). Most TTL respondents intend to participate in a TTL group associated with TAC (85.1%). CONCLUSION: The results of this survey will contribute to the recognition of TTLs as a crucial role in the initial phase of care of severely injured trauma patients and serves as the first publication to document professional backgrounds and practices of Canadian TTLs at level one trauma centres. All the information gathered via this survey will be used by the TAC TTL Committee, which will focus on several initiatives such as the dissemination of best practice guidelines and creation of a TTL stream at the TAC Annual Conference.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les chefs d'équipe de traumatologie (TTL) sont essentiels pour coordonner et diriger les réanimations traumatiques. Cette enquête visait à caractériser la démographie et les pratiques professionnelles des TTL canadiens dans les centres de traumatologie de niveau 1. À titre d'objectif secondaire, cette information sera utilisée pour éclairer les objectifs opérationnels du Comité TTL de l'Association canadienne de traumatologie (ATC). MéTHODES: Un sondage détaillé, élaboré par le conseil d'administration de l'ATC et les responsables des comités de TTL, a été envoyé à 225 TTL dans les centres de traumatologie de niveau 1 du Canada. Les TTL ont été identifiés en contactant les directeurs de traumatologie de chaque centre de niveau 1, en plus des recherches dans le registre public. Cette enquête a porté sur la démographie, les antécédents professionnels, les pratiques de réanimation, la composition de l'équipe de traumatologie et la participation de la TTL aux réponses traumatologiques. RéSULTATS: Le taux de réponse était de 41,7 %. L'âge moyen des répondants était de 42 ans (ET 7,4) et 71,0 % étaient des hommes. La plupart des TTL ont suivi une formation en médecine d'urgence (53,1%) ou en chirurgie générale (25,5%); 63,8% ont suivi une formation TTL : soit via une bourse en chirurgie traumatologique ou une bourse TTL. Tous les centres ont mis en œuvre un protocole d'hémorragie massive, et il n'y a pas de grande variation entre les taux d'utilisation du cryoprécipité et du fibrinogène, ni entre le rapport des produits sanguins transfusés (2:1 vs 1:1). La plupart des répondants TTL ont l'intention de participer à un groupe TTL associé au TAC ( 85,1 %). CONCLUSION: Les résultats de ce sondage contribueront à la reconnaissance des TTL comme un rôle crucial dans la phase initiale des soins aux patients ayant subi un traumatisme grave et serviront de première publication pour documenter les antécédents et les pratiques professionnelles des TTL canadiens au niveau un centres de traumatologie. Toutes les informations recueillies dans le cadre de cette enquête seront utilisées par le Comité TAC TTL, qui se concentrera sur plusieurs initiatives telles que la diffusion de lignes directrices sur les meilleures pratiques et la création d'un flux TTL à la conférence annuelle TAC.

Defining major surgical complications using administrative data in Ontario: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: Although surgical complications are often included as an outcome of surgical research conducted using administrative data, little validation work has been performed. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an algorithm designed to capture major surgical complications using health administrative data. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent high-risk elective general surgery at a single institution in Ontario, Canada, from Sept. 1, 2016, to Sept. 1, 2017. Patients were identified for inclusion using the local operative database. Medical records were reviewed by trained clinicians to abstract postoperative complications. Data were linked to administrative data holdings, and a series of code-based algorithms were applied to capture a composite indicator of major surgical complications. We used sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy to evaluate the performance of our administrative data algorithm, as compared with data abstracted from the institutional charting system. RESULTS: The study included a total of 270 patients. According to the data from the chart audit, 55% of patients experienced at least 1 major surgical complication. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for the composite outcome was 72%, 80%, 82%, 70% and 76%, respectively. Diagnostic performance was poor for several of the individual complications. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that administrative data holdings can be used to capture a composite indicator of major surgical complications with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Additional work is required to identify suitable algorithms for several specific complications.

Child restraint systems: Understanding confidence in proper use and addressing the need for education.

Objective: To quantify the extent of proper local child restraint system (CRS) use and to better understand changes to the level of self-reported confidence with increased CRS installations. With the goal being to improve safety for children travelling in personal vehicles across London, ON and the region. Methods: Public CRS clinics were initiated by Injury Prevention staff after they obtained the Child Passenger Safety Technician certification. Additionally, an online survey was commissioned targeting Ontario parents who had installed at least one CRS in the last five years. Results: From September 2018 to September 2019, 96 comprehensive CRS checks were performed, with 29% of systems found to be installed correctly. Survey results showed a high level of reported confidence with CRS installation (N = 514, 70% female, 43% one child). Parents who had installed only one CRS reported higher confidence in their first install, compared to parents who had installed two or more systems. Conclusions: The error rate with CRS installation and use seen in London, Ontario and the region, is similar to that reported in previous research. Survey results showed high levels of self-reported confidence in CRS use, especially for parents who have installed only one CRS. There presents a need to better understand the root cause of the discrepancy between level of confidence and proper CRS use and to expand our understanding of CRS knowledge retention and transferability to subsequent systems.

Establishing a core outcome set for blunt cerebrovascular injury: an EAST modified Delphi method consensus study.

Objectives: Our understanding of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) has changed significantly in recent decades, resulting in a heterogeneous description of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the literature which is not suitable for data pooling. Therefore, we endeavored to develop a core outcome set (COS) to help guide future BCVI research and overcome the challenge of heterogeneous outcomes reporting. Methods: After a review of landmark BCVI publications, content experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study. For round 1, participants submitted a list of proposed core outcomes. In subsequent rounds, panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to score the proposed outcomes for importance. Core outcomes consensus was defined as >70% of scores receiving 7 to 9 and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds, and four rounds of deliberation were performed to re-evaluate the variables not achieving predefined consensus criteria. Results: From an initial panel of 15 experts, 12 (80%) completed all rounds. A total of 22 items were considered, with 9 items achieving consensus for inclusion as core outcomes: incidence of postadmission symptom onset, overall stroke incidence, stroke incidence stratified by type and by treatment category, stroke incidence prior to treatment initiation, time to stroke, overall mortality, bleeding complications, and injury progression on radiographic follow-up. The panel further identified four non-outcome items of high importance for reporting: time to BCVI diagnosis, use of standardized screening tool, duration of treatment, and type of therapy used. Conclusion: Through a well-accepted iterative survey consensus process, content experts have defined a COS to guide future research on BCVI. This COS will be a valuable tool for researchers seeking to perform new BCVI research and will allow future projects to generate data suitable for pooled statistical analysis with enhanced statistical power. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Readmission Rates Following Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic placed increased pressure to discharge patients early; this could have resulted in rushed discharges requiring patients to return to hospital. The impact of the pandemic on readmission after colorectal surgery is unknown. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to compare patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in 2019 and 2020, prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine variables associated with readmission. Propensity score matching was then used to compare patients in the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 72,874 colorectal cases were included. There were 17.7% less cases in 2020. Rate of readmission was similar in both groups (9.6% vs. 9.4%). There were fewer patients discharged to a facility such as nursing facility or rehabilitation center in 2020, with more patients discharged home. Year was not associated with readmission on multivariable analysis. In the matched cohort, readmission rates did not differ (9.7% vs. 9.3% p = 0.129) nor did mortality (0.8% vs. 0.8% p = 0.686). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in readmission rates before or during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed; suggesting increased pressure to keep patients out of hospital in the COVID-19 pandemic did not result in patients being rushed home requiring repeat admission. More patients were discharged home with fewer to rehabilitation or nursing facilities in 2020, suggesting success with avoiding transitional services in the right setting.

Do patient outcomes differ when the trauma team leader is a surgeon or non-surgeon? A multicentre cohort study.

PURPOSE: Trauma team leaders (TTLs) have traditionally been general surgeons; however, some trauma centres use a mixed model of care where both surgeons and non-surgeons (primarily emergency physicians) perform this role. The objective of this multicentre study was to provide a well-powered study to determine if TTL specialty is associated with mortality among major trauma patients. METHODS: Data were collected from provincial trauma registries at six level 1 trauma centres across Canada over a 10-year period. We included adult trauma patients (age ≥ 18 yrs) who triggered the highest-level trauma activation. The primary outcome was the difference in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for trauma patients receiving initial care from a surgeon versus a non-surgeon TTL. RESULTS: Overall, 12,961 major trauma patients were included in the analysis. Initial treatment was provided by a surgeon TTL in 57.8% (n = 7513) of cases, while 42.2% (n = 5448) of patients were treated by a non-surgeon TTL. Unadjusted mortality occurred in 11.6% of patients in the surgeon TTL group and 12.7% of patients in the non-surgeon TTL group (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = 0.02). Risk-adjusted mortality was not significantly different between patients cared for by surgeon and non-surgeon TTLs (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06, p = 0.23). Furthermore, we did not observe differences in risk-adjusted mortality for any of the subgroups evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, there was no difference in mortality between trauma patients treated by surgeon or non-surgeon TTLs. Our study supports emergency physicians performing the role of TTL at level 1 trauma centres.

ABSTRAIT: OBJECTIF: Les chefs d'équipe de traumatologie (CET) sont traditionnellement des chirurgiens généralistes; cependant, certains centres de traumatologie utilisent un modèle mixte de soins où des chirurgiens et des non-chirurgiens (principalement des médecins d'urgence) qui jouent ce rôle. L'objectif de cette étude multicentrique était de fournir une étude bien menée pour déterminer si la spécialité CET est associée à la mortalité chez les patients traumatisés majeurs. MéTHODES: Les données ont été recueillies à partir des registres provinciaux de 6 niveau 1 centres de traumatologie au Canada sur une période de 10 ans. Nous avons inclus des patients adultes traumatisés (âge ≥ 18 ans) qui ont provoqué l'activation traumatique de niveau le plus haut. Le primaire résultat était la différence de mortalité hospitalière ajustée en fonction du risque pour les patients traumatisés qui ont reçu des soins primaires d'un chirurgien par rapport à un CET non chirurgien. RéSULTATS: En totale, 12 961 patients traumatisés majeurs ont été la partie de cette analyse. Le soin primaire a été assuré par un chirurgien CET dans 57,8 % (n=7 513) des cas, alors que 42,2 % (n=5 448) des patients ont été traités par un CET non chirurgien. Une mortalité non ajustée s'est produit chez 11,6 % des patients du groupe de chirurgien CET et 12,7 % des patients du groupe de non chirurgien CET (OR 0,87, IC à 95 % 0,78 à 0,98, p = 0,02). La mortalité ajustée en fonction du risque n'était pas significativement différente entre les patients pris en charge par des CET chirurgiens et non-chirurgiens (RC 0,92, IC à 95 % 0,80 à 1,06, p = 0,23). De plus, nous ne pouvons pas observer de différences de mortalité ajustée au risque pour aucun des sous-groupes évalués. CONCLUSIONS: Après avoir ajusté du risque, il n'y avait pas de différence de mortalité entre les patients traumatisés traités par des chirurgiens ou non chirurgiens CET. Notre étude soutient les médecins d'urgences jouent le rôle de CET dans les centres de traumatologie de niveau 1.

A qualitative study of older adult trauma survivors' experiences in acute care and early recovery.

BACKGROUND: Older adults (aged ≥ 65 yr) account for a substantial proportion of hospital admissions for severe injury, yet little is known about their care experiences and views regarding outcomes. We sought to characterize the acute care and early recovery experiences of older adults who had been discharged after traumatic injury, with a long-term goal to inform the selection of patient-centred process and outcome measures in geriatric trauma. METHODS: From June 2018 to September 2019, we conducted telephone interviews with adults aged 65 years or older who had been discharged after traumatic injury within 6 months from Sunnybrook or London Health Sciences Centres in Ontario, Canada. Using interpretive description and thematic analysis, we drew on social science theories of illness and aging for data interpretation. We analyzed data to the point of theoretical saturation. RESULTS: We interviewed 25 trauma survivors aged 65-88 years. Most were injured in a fall. Four themes characterized participants' experiences, as follows: "I don't feel like a senior" (i.e., participants disliked being viewed as a senior or as needing senior-specific care); "don't bother telling him anything" (i.e., participants perceived ageist assumptions and treatment in acute care processes); getting back to normal (i.e., participants emphasized their active lifestyles and functional recovery as goals of care); "I have lost control of my life" (i.e., substantial social and personal losses linked to participants' experiences and adaptations to aging generally). INTERPRETATION: Findings suggest that older adults experience social and personal loss after injury, and underscore how implicit age bias may influence care experiences and outcomes. This can inform improvements in injury care and guide providers in the selection of patient-centred outcome measures.

Efficacy of high dose tranexamic acid (TXA) for hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Standard dose (≤ 1 g) tranexamic acid (TXA) has established mortality benefit in trauma patients. The role of high dose IV TXA (≥2 g or ≥30 mg/kg as a single bolus) has been evaluated in the surgical setting, however, it has not been studied in trauma. We reviewed the available evidence of high dose IV TXA in any setting with the goal of informing its use in the adult trauma population. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and unpublished sources from inception until July 27, 2022 for studies that compared standard dose with high dose IV TXA in adults (≥ 16 years of age) with hemorrhage. Screening and data abstraction was done independently and in duplicate. We pooled trial data using a random effects model and considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies separately. We assessed the individual study risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational cohort studies. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). RESULTS: We included 20 studies with a combined total of 12,523 patients. Based on pooled RCT data, and as compared to standard dose TXA, high dose IV TXA probably decreases transfusion requirements (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.97, moderate certainty) but with possibly no effect on blood loss (mean difference [MD] 43.31 ml less, 95% CI 135.53 to 48.90 ml less, low certainty), and an uncertain effect on thromboembolic events (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.04, very low certainty) and mortality (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.32, very low certainty). CONCLUSION: When compared to standard dose, high dose IV TXA probably reduces transfusion requirements with an uncertain effect on thromboembolic events and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review and meta-analysis, level IV.

Transfer status may not be associated with worse outcomes in elderly trauma patients.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of elderly patients who arrive directly to a lead trauma centre to those who are transferred from a peripheral hospital. METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort design and data obtained from the local trauma registry. The study population was patients 65 years and older who presented with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 12 or greater, or for whom the trauma team was activated, over a 10-year period. Patients were excluded from the study if they arrived direct from the scene and died within 3 hours of arrival, they were found to have no injuries, or they were directly admitted more than 2 days from the time of injury. Following the use of multiple imputation, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between in-hospital mortality and directness of transport, while adjusting for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 1619 patients included in the analyses over half (54.2%) were transported directly from the scene of injury to the lead trauma hospital (LTH). The remaining 45.8% initially presented to a non-tertiary hospital and were later transferred to the LTH. Crude mortality was 18.7% in the direct group and 14.0% in the transfer group (p = 0.015). The unadjusted odds of death for patients arriving to LTH by referral was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.54, 0.93), compared to patients arriving to the LTH directly. After adjustment for age, ISS, presence of severe head injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index, shock, initial GCS, and ICU admission from the emergency department, the mortality risk did not differ significantly for transferred patients compared to those arriving directly (OR = 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.54, 1.09). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between elderly patients transported directly to the trauma centre and those who were transferred from peripheral hospitals.

The next frontier of acute care general surgery: fellowship training.

Acute care surgery (ACS) is an area of surgical specialization within general surgery and a model for clinical care delivery that has proliferated over the last 2 decades. Models of ACS in Canada exist in both academic and community settings and are used to manage patients in need of emergency general surgery (EGS) care, with or without the provision of trauma care. The implementation of the ACS model has changed the landscape of patient care, surgical education and the workforce, providing an option for some general surgeons to exclude EGS care from their regular practice. The rise of ACS as a concentration of surgical skill and content expertise has resulted in the establishment of dedicated ACS fellowship training programs. This is a landmark in the evolution of general surgery, as well as a stepping stone on the path to improving patient care, surgical education and scholarly endeavour in this field.