ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The weak point of the country-wide perinatal/neonatal quality surveillance as a tool for evaluation of achievements of a distinct clinic, is the ignorance of interhospital differences in the case-mix of patients. Therefore, that approach can not result in a reliable bench marking. OBJECTIVE: To adjust the results of quality assessment of different hospitals according to their risk profile of patients by multivariate analysis. METHOD: The perinatal/neonatal data base of 12.783 newborns of the saxonian quality surveillance from 1998 to 2000 was analyzed. 4 relevant quality indicators of newborn outcome -- a) severe intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants < 1500 g, b) death in hospital of preterm infants < 1500 g, c) death in newborns with birth weight > 2500 g and d) hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy -- were targeted to find out specific risk predictors by considering 26 risk factors. A logistic regression model was used to develop the risk predictors. RESULTS: Risk predictors for the 4 quality indicators could be described by 3 - 9 out of 26 analyzed risk factors. The AUC (ROC)-values for these quality indicators were 82, 89, 89 and 89 %, what signifies their reliability. Using the new specific predictors for calculation the risk adjusted incidence rates of quality indicator yielded in some remarkable changes. The apparent differences in the outcome criteria of analyzed hospitals were found to be much less pronounced. CONCLUSION: The application of the proposed method for risk adjustment of quality indicators makes it possible to perform a more objective comparison of neonatal outcome criteria between different hospitals or regions.
Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance/methods , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Registries , Risk Adjustment/methods , Databases, Factual , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Because of the trend for premature birth, multifetal pregnancies are at high risk for neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study presents our perinatal management scheme and the outcome of triplet pregnancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2001 we studied 31 triplet pregnancies. Their management consisted of cervical measurement at 20 weeks, admission from 25 weeks onwards, regular ultrasound examinations, intravenous tocolysis with preterm contractions or cervical shortening, promotion of fetal lung maturation, antibiotic therapy with evidence of vaginal infection, delivery by caesarean section ideally at 33 weeks. RESULTS: In the studied group 4 triplet pregnancies were monochorionic, 6 dichorionic, and 21 (68 %) trichorionic. 2/31 triplet pregnancies finalized in late abortions. Furthermore, a single and a double intrauterine death occured in two triplet pregnancies. 6 (21 %) of triplet pregnancies were delivered before the 30th week and 23 (79 %) after the 30th week of gestation (median gestational age 31.5 weeks, median birth weight 1545g). Neonates of trichorionic pregnancies in comparison to those of mono- and dichorionic pregnancies were delivered two to three weeks later and presented with significantly higher birth weights (1660 g vs. 1245 g vs. 1240 g; p = 0.001 and 0.0009, respectively). 13/84 (15.5 %) of the neonates showed growth retardation. In 4/84 (4.1 %) children brochopulmonary dysplasia or cerebral haemorrhage was observed. Only one child developed enterocolitis. 19 % (16/84) of neonates showed evidence of retinopathy. No intrauterine death occured after 28 weeks and no child died after delivery. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: With our well defined management of triplet pregnancies from 20 weeks onwards we reach similar gestational ages at delivery but remarkably lower neonatal complication rates compared to previous studies.
