On dying alone in prison and the social responsibility of medicine: a pilot interview study of physicians caring for terminally ill incarcerated patients in Austria and the United States.

BACKGROUND: This group of physicians is difficult to reach and small in number. While studies of palliative care and end-of-life (EOL) issues in prison have increased, especially in the United States and since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, they are still limited due to the constraints of carrying out research in carceral contexts. At present, there is very little knowledge of the experiences of physicians providing EOL care in prisons. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the experiences of doctors caring for terminally ill patients inside prisons. METHODS: Three expert qualitative interviews were conducted in March and April 2021 with physicians working in carceral institutions in New York State and Austria. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis was used to examine the data. RESULTS: The following five themes were found: (I) a lack of training and support; (II) interrupted relationships; (III) limitations on visits and saying one's goodbyes; (IV) security as a main concern; and (V) the possibility of release. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals the difficulties physicians face when caring for dying incarcerated patients. Provider-patient relationships are hardly continuous. The findings represent a starting point for further research. Support from the medical and palliative care community is needed for adequate provision of EOL care within prisons, improved post-release conditions, and help for physicians working in existing structures.

Routine laboratory parameters to support decision on parenteral nutrition in palliative care.

Introduction: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in palliative care (PC), but there is limited evidence to support its use at the end of life (EOL). This aim of this was to investigate the relationship between routine laboratory parameters and survival in patients receiving PN, and to develop a decision tree model to support clinicians decide whether to start or forgo PN. Methods: The laboratory parameters of 113 patients with advanced diseases who were admitted to a specialized palliative care unit (PCU) were analyzed at two points in time: T0 = before PN, T1 = two weeks after initiation of PN. Univariate Mann-Whitney U-tests and multivariate linear regression models, as well as a decision tree analysis were computed; all in relation to survival time. Results: The final regression model was significant with p = 0.001 (adjusted R2 = 0.15) and included two predictors for survival time after PN initiation: the CRP/albumin ratio and urea at T1 (ps = 0.019). Decision tree analysis revealed three important predictors for classification of survival time after PN initiation: CRP, urea, and LDH (all at T0). Discussion: The decision tree model may help to identify patients likely to benefit from PN, thus supporting the clinical decision whether or not to start PN.

[Palliative care for patients over 80 years old with COVID­19 pneumonia on the intensive care unit-Is invasive ventilation effective?] / Palliative Care bei über 80-jährigen Patienten mit COVID­19-Pneumonie auf der Intensivstation ­ invasive Beatmung zielführend?

In February 2020 a new virus named-SARS-CoV­2 emerged. As a result many patients suffered from COVID­19-associated pneumonia and were in need of hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU). Especially at the beginning of this pandemic the mortality among intubated patients was very high. With ongoing experience in how to handle COVID­19-associated respiratory insufficiency the mortality rate was reduced but is still high among older patients. In this case report it is discussed if validated scores can support the decision between intubating patients or providing best supportive care.