Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rom J Intern Med ; 53(1): 50-3, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colon polypectomy decreases the incidence of colorectal cancer and related mortality. Several factors such as the size, location and type of polyp as well as endoscopist experience have been shown to correlate with the risk of ensuing procedure-related complications. This study aims to evaluate the impact of polyp and endoscopist-related factors on the rate of postpolypectomy complication in a real-life setting. METHODS: During the study period all polypectomies performed in our unit were reported on a standard form that included data on polyp type (flat, sessile, pedunculated), size, location in the colon, resection method, endoscopist volume and procedure-related complications arising up to 30 days. The main outcome was the complication rate of polypectomies. The factors that associated with a higher risk of complications were assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 244 polyp resections from 95 patients were included in the analysis. 199 polyps were resected by low-volume endoscopists (44.7%) and 135 polypectomies were performed by high-volume endoscopists (55.3%). On multivariate analysis only polyp size correlated with the risk of procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: Polyp size is the most important risk factor for procedure-related complications. Both high and low-volume endoscopists have a low overall rate of serious complications.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Rom J Intern Med ; 52(3): 151-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25509558

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Colonoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer-related mortality and incidence. However, many patients are reluctant to undergo colonoscopy or return for follow-up because of the investigation's cumbersome and unpleasant nature. We aimed to identify patient-related factors significantly influencing comfort and quality of colonoscopy analyzing responses to a self-administered validated questionnaire. METHODS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation in two high-volume endoscopy units were invited to answer a short prevalidated questionnaire regarding preprocedure anxiety, satisfaction with information provided, most worrisome aspect of the procedure and knowledge of the benefits of colonoscopy. Self-reported comfort during colonoscopy as graded on a 10 point visual analog scale was the main variable considered. Univariate analysis identified factors possibly associated with a higher degree of comfort during colonoscopy that were then tested through multivariate logistical regression. RESULTS: 452 questionnaires were returned. Most patients reported an acceptable degree of discomfort during colonoscopy but 70.2% of the respondents considered the information provided prior to the procedure to be insufficient. On multivariate analysis older age, higher degree of satisfaction with information provided (p = 0.04), lower preprocedure anxiety levels (p < 0.01) and endoscopy center (p < 0.01) were shown to correlate with increased comfort during colonoscopy. Education level, previous colonoscopy, gender and bowel prep quality did not influence patient comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Patient comfort during colonoscopy is dependent on satisfaction with the information provided before the procedure. Higher availability of the physician and better interaction with the patient might decrease patient perceived burden of colonoscopy and lead to higher return rates in the screening and surveillance setting.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Aged , Cathartics , Colonoscopy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pain Measurement , Polyethylene Glycols , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Rom J Intern Med ; 52(4): 256-62, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25726628

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a complex, heterogeneous, idiopathic, inflammatory, chronic entity with common clinical, endoscopical and histological features including some well-defined diseases (UC and CD), but also a group of indeterminate colitis. Ulcerative colitis is the most frequent and prominent member of IBD. The current study is trying to evaluate the impact of various histologic features on UC's evolution and outcome--an issue that has generated considerable interest in the academical environment. We gathered a cohort of 20 consecutive patients with positive clinical, endoscopical, histologic and imagistic diagnosis of UC who were prospectively enrolled for close clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and histologic surveillance. Every patient underwent an ileo-colonoscopy and multiple biopsies were taken from inflamed and normal areas of the mucosa. All these procedures were repeated after a year (12 months) of follow-up. This study is presenting the correlation between Mayo score for assessment of ulcerative colitis activity and several histologic features: Geboes histologic score for ulcerative colitis, basal plasmacytosis and vascular lesions using Pearson correlation test. The most promising prognosis value has basal plasmacytosis, confirming previous studies. These data emphasize the need of a more complex, clinical, endoscopic and histologic system of semi-quantitative assessment of UC lesions in order to stratify patients according to their risk to relapse.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Colon/pathology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...