What do women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) understand about their chance of IVF success?

STUDY QUESTION: How well informed are Australian women who undergo IVF about their chances of having a baby? SUMMARY ANSWER: Only one in four women estimated their individual chance of success with IVF accurately, with most women overestimating their chance. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Limited knowledge about infertility and infertility treatment in the general population is well-documented. The few studies that have investigated patients' knowledge about the chance of IVF success suggest that while IVF patients are aware of average success rates, they tend to be unrealistic about their own chance of success. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted an anonymous online survey of 217 women who had started IVF since 2018 in Australia. The survey was advertised on social media, enabling women from across Australia to participate. Responses were collected in June 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The survey included questions on demographic characteristics and IVF history. It asked what participants thought their chance of having a baby from one IVF treatment cycle was, how they rated their knowledge about chance of success, and about their experience of receiving IVF-related information. Participants' estimations of their chance of success were compared with their chance as calculated by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology's (SART) online calculator. Responses to a free-text question about what information women wished they had been given when they started treatment were analysed thematically. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Only about a quarter (58/217, 27%) of participants accurately estimated their chance of having a baby within 20% relative to their SART calculated chance, with more than half (118/217, 54%) overestimating their chance. Ninety percent of women indicated that their preferred source of treatment information was a consultation with their doctor, despite less than half (44%) reporting that doctors explained the probability of having a baby with IVF well (mean 5.9/10). In free-text responses, many women also reported that they wished they had been given more realistic information about IVF and their chance of success. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The dissemination method precludes calculation of response rate, and it is not possible to know if participants are representative of all women undergoing IVF. Additionally, we only surveyed women undergoing IVF, while those who decided not to have IVF were not included. Therefore, women who overestimated their chance may have been overrepresented. There is also inherent imprecision in the way understanding of chance of success was estimated. The potential impact of recall bias could neither be quantified nor excluded. It is difficult to determine to what extent women's lack of understanding of what is possible with IVF is due to poor information-provision by clinicians and the clinic, and how much can be explained by optimism bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The finding of poor understanding of personal chance of success amongst women undergoing IVF in Australia requires further investigation to determine potential reasons for this. The findings can be used by clinics to develop strategies for improvement in the information-provision process to ensure that women can make informed decisions about their fertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study received no external funding. S.L. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1195189). R.W. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP2009767). B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (GNT1176437). B.W.M. reports consultancy for Merck and ObsEva and has received research funding and travel funding from Merck. The other authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Successful pregnancy rates amongst patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation for non-malignant indications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is a fertility preservation method that has been clinically applied for almost 30 years. Studies specifically evaluating patients presenting with non-malignant indications for OTC and their subsequent pregnancy rates are limited. OBJECTIVE: To summarise the evidence on the rates of successful pregnancy amongst women who have undergone OTC for non-malignant indications. METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration CRD42022307925) was conducted to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation for non-malignant indications. Articles published in EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE before October 2022 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: original human studies pertaining to OTC with a defined non-malignant cohort and pregnancy outcomes. The successful pregnancy rates were pooled with a random-effects model of double-arcsine transformed proportions. Sensitivity analysis involved pooling the results of studies with a low risk of bias after being assessed with NIH tools. RESULTS: The database search retrieved 3,225 results, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled successful pregnancy rate was 23.52 % (16 studies, 95 % CI 6.48 to 44.79 %). When subgroup analysis of study types was performed, the successful pregnancy rate was higher amongst case series (47.02 %, 9 studies, 95 % CI 6.98 to 89.00 %) than cohort studies (14.64 %, 7 studies, 95 % CI 3.59 to 29.78 %). Sensitivity analysis limited to studies at low risk of bias revealed a similar pooled successful pregnancy rate of 23.35 % (12 studies, 95 % CI 2.50 to 51.96 %). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one quarter of women who underwent OTC for non-malignant indications had a successful pregnancy. These findings are clinically important for fertility preservation counselling by providing greater evidence for more informed care.

Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the present performance of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support during embryo selection compared to the standard embryo selection by embryologists? SUMMARY ANSWER: AI consistently outperformed the clinical teams in all the studies focused on embryo morphology and clinical outcome prediction during embryo selection assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The ART success rate is ∼30%, with a worrying trend of increasing female age correlating with considerably worse results. As such, there have been ongoing efforts to address this low success rate through the development of new technologies. With the advent of AI, there is potential for machine learning to be applied in such a manner that areas limited by human subjectivity, such as embryo selection, can be enhanced through increased objectivity. Given the potential of AI to improve IVF success rates, it remains crucial to review the performance between AI and embryologists during embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The search was done across PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and IEEE Xplore from 1 June 2005 up to and including 7 January 2022. Included articles were also restricted to those written in English. Search terms utilized across all databases for the study were: ('Artificial intelligence' OR 'Machine Learning' OR 'Deep learning' OR 'Neural network') AND ('IVF' OR 'in vitro fertili*' OR 'assisted reproductive techn*' OR 'embryo'), where the character '*' refers the search engine to include any auto completion of the search term. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: A literature search was conducted for literature relating to AI applications to IVF. Primary outcomes of interest were accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the embryo morphology grade assessments and the likelihood of clinical outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy after IVF treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Down and Black Checklist. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty articles were included in this review. There was no specific embryo assessment day across the studies-Day 1 until Day 5/6 of embryo development was investigated. The types of input for training AI algorithms were images and time-lapse (10/20), clinical information (6/20), and both images and clinical information (4/20). Each AI model demonstrated promise when compared to an embryologist's visual assessment. On average, the models predicted the likelihood of successful clinical pregnancy with greater accuracy than clinical embryologists, signifying greater reliability when compared to human prediction. The AI models performed at a median accuracy of 75.5% (range 59-94%) on predicting embryo morphology grade. The correct prediction (Ground Truth) was defined through the use of embryo images according to post embryologists' assessment following local respective guidelines. Using blind test datasets, the embryologists' accuracy prediction was 65.4% (range 47-75%) with the same ground truth provided by the original local respective assessment. Similarly, AI models had a median accuracy of 77.8% (range 68-90%) in predicting clinical pregnancy through the use of patient clinical treatment information compared to 64% (range 58-76%) when performed by embryologists. When both images/time-lapse and clinical information inputs were combined, the median accuracy by the AI models was higher at 81.5% (range 67-98%), while clinical embryologists had a median accuracy of 51% (range 43-59%). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings of this review are based on studies that have not been prospectively evaluated in a clinical setting. Additionally, a fair comparison of all the studies were deemed unfeasible owing to the heterogeneity of the studies, development of the AI models, database employed and the study design and quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: AI provides considerable promise to the IVF field and embryo selection. However, there needs to be a shift in developers' perception of the clinical outcome from successful implantation towards ongoing pregnancy or live birth. Additionally, existing models focus on locally generated databases and many lack external validation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by Monash Data Future Institute. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021256333.

Exposure to corticosteroids in the first trimester is associated with an increased risk of urogenital congenital anomalies.

STUDY QUESTION: Does maternal exposure to first trimester corticosteroids in IVF/ICSI treatment result in an increased risk of congenital anomalies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Children born with the aid of IVF/ICSI whose mothers were treated with adjuvant corticosteroids during the first trimester had an increased risk of cryptorchidism, hypospadias and talipes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Maternal exposure to corticosteroids may increase the risk of congenital anomalies such as cleft palate and neural tube defects. However, the existing studies have conflicting outcomes, are underpowered, and do not study a population undergoing IVF/ICSI, a group known to be at increased risk of abnormalities. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort analysis covering Monash IVF fertility clinics in Melbourne, Australia assessed the outcomes of 12 426 live births from both fresh and frozen embryo transfers between 2010 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: There were 618 live births included in our study group of mothers exposed to corticosteroids (oral prednisolone or dexamethasone) during their IVF/ICSI treatment, with the remainder of births not exposed to steroids (control, n = 11 808). The primary outcome measured was the presence of congenital anomalies and secondary outcomes were birth weight and gestation length. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to assess the independent effects of corticosteroid exposure and the freezing of embryos, with adjustment for maternal age at oocyte retrieval, smoking status, number of cycles taken, BMI, etiology of the infertility and the use of ICSI. Results are presented as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Amongst 12 426 live births, and 597 birth defects, multivariate logistic regression demonstrated there was an increased incidence in talipes equinovarus (1.33% vs 0.32%, adjusted IRR = 4.30, 95% CI = 1.93, 9.58; P < 0.001), hypospadias (0.66% vs 0.18%, adjusted IRR = 5.90, 95% CI = 2.09, 16.69; P = 0.001) and cryptorchidism (0.83% vs 0.19%, adjusted IRR = 5.53, 95% CI = 1.91, 15.42; P = 0.001) in the offspring of mothers exposed to corticosteroids compared to those who were unexposed. The incidence of neither neural tube defects nor cleft palate were significantly increased in babies exposed to corticosteroids. The sex ratio of infants exposed to corticosteroids during a fresh embryo transfer cycle significantly favored males but reverted to the normal sex ratio in infants conceived in frozen embryo transfer cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a retrospective observational cohort study using administrative datasets with the potential for measurement error and unobserved confounding. Missing outcome data were obtained from patients using self-report leading to possible ascertainment bias. Given the rare incidence of some of the anomalies assessed, the study was underpowered to identify differences in abnormality rates for some specific anomalies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings of this study, the largest of its kind, suggest that caution should be heeded when prescribing corticosteroids to women undergoing IVF/ICSI, given that this study has now identified three previously unassociated serious neonatal complications (talipes, hypospadias and cryptorchidism), plus a potential alteration in sex ratio. Physicians should be careful in using corticosteroids in the critical first trimester and should counsel patients regarding the potential risks of this treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding sought or obtained for this study. K.T., V.T., B.V. and D.Z.-F. are employees or contractors to Monash IVF and hold a minority stock position in Monash IVF. R.J.W. reports no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

DNA repair and response to sperm DNA damage in oocytes and embryos, and the potential consequences in ART: a systematic review.

Sperm DNA damage is considered a predictive factor for the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ART. Laboratory evidence suggests that zygotes and developing embryos have adopted specific response and repair mechanisms to repair DNA damage of paternal origin. We have conducted a systematic review in accordance with guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to identify and review the maternal mechanisms used to respond and repair sperm DNA damage during early embryonic development, how these mechanisms operate and their potential clinical implications. The literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases until May 2021. Out of 6297 articles initially identified, 36 studies were found to be relevant through cross referencing and were fully extracted. The collective evidence in human and animal models indicate that the early embryo has the capacity to repair DNA damage within sperm by activating maternally driven mechanisms throughout embryonic development. However, this capacity is limited and likely declines with age. The link between age and decreased DNA repair capacity could explain decreased oocyte quality in older women, poor reproductive outcomes in idiopathic cases and patients who present high sperm DNA damage. Ultimately, further understanding mechanisms underlying the maternal repair of sperm DNA damage could lead to the development of targeted therapies to decrease sperm DNA damage, improved oocyte quality to combat incoming DNA insults or lead to development of methodologies to identify individual spermatozoa without DNA damage.

Female ageing affects the DNA repair capacity of oocytes in IVF using a controlled model of sperm DNA damage in mice.

STUDY QUESTION: Does female ageing have a negative effect on the DNA repair capacity of oocytes fertilised by spermatozoa with controlled levels of DNA damage? SUMMARY ANSWER: Compared to oocytes from younger females, oocytes from older females have a reduced capacity to repair damaged DNA introduced by spermatozoa. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The reproductive lifespan in women declines with age predominantly due to poor oocyte quality. This leads to decreased reproductive outcomes for older women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments, compared to young women. Ageing and oocyte quality have been clearly associated with aneuploidy, but the range of factors that influence this change in oocyte quality with age remains unclear. The DNA repair activity prior to embryonic genomic activation is considered to be of maternal origin, with maternal transcripts and proteins controlling DNA integrity. With increasing maternal age, the number of mRNAs stored in oocytes decreases. This could result in diminished efficiency of DNA repair and/or negative effects on embryo development, especially in the presence of DNA damage. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Oocytes from two age groups of 30 super-ovulated female mice (young: 5-8 weeks old, n = 15; old: 42-45 weeks old, n = 15) were inseminated with sperm from five males with three different controlled DNA damage levels; control: ≤10%, 1 Gray (Gy): 11-30%, and 30 Gy: >30%. Inseminated oocytes (young: 125, old: 78) were assessed for the formation of zygotes (per oocyte) and blastocysts (per zygote). Five replicates of five germinal vesicles (GVs) and five MII oocytes from each age group were analysed for gene expression. The DNA damage response (DDR) was assessed in a minimum of three IVF replicates in control and 1 Gy zygotes and two-cell embryos using γH2AX labelling. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Swim-up sperm samples from the cauda epididymidis of C57BL6 mice were divided into control (no irradiation) and 1- and 30-Gy groups. Treated spermatozoa were irradiated at 1 and 30 Gy, respectively, using a linear accelerator Varian 21iX. Following irradiation, samples were used for DNA damage assessment (Halomax) and for insemination. Presumed zygotes were cultured in a time-lapse incubator (MIRI, ESCO). Gene expression of 91 DNA repair genes was assessed using the Fluidigm Biomark HD system. The DNA damage response in zygotes (6-8 h post-fertilisation) and two-cell embryos (22-24 h post-fertilisation) was assessed by immunocytochemical analysis of γH2AX using confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1200) and 3D volumetric analysis using IMARIS software. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The average sperm DNA damage for the three groups was statistically different (control: 6.1%, 1 Gy: 16.1%, 30 Gy: 53.1%, P < 0.0001), but there were no significant differences in fertilisation rates after IVF within or between the two age groups [(young; control: 86.79%, 1 Gy: 82.75%, 30 Gy: 76.74%) (old; control: 93.1%, 1 Gy: 70.37%, 30 Gy: 68.18%) Fisher's exact]. However, blastocyst rates were significantly different (P < 0.0001) among the groups [(young; control: 86.95%, 1 Gy: 33.33%, 30 Gy: 0.0%) (old; control: 70.37%, 1 Gy: 0.0%, 30 Gy: 0.0%)]. Between the age groups, 1-Gy samples showed a significant decrease in the blastocyst rate in old females compared to young females (P = 0.0166). Gene expression analysis revealed a decrease in relative expression of 21 DNA repair genes in old GV oocytes compared to young GV oocytes (P < 0.05), and similarly, old MII oocytes showed 23 genes with reduced expression compared to young MII oocytes (P < 0.05). The number of genes with decreased expression in older GV and MII oocytes significantly affected pathways such as double strand break (GV: 5; MII: 6), nucleotide excision repair (GV: 8; MII: 5) and DNA damage response (GV: 4; MII: 8). There was a decreased DDR in zygotes and in two-cell embryos from old females compared to young regardless of sperm treatment (P < 0.05). The decrease in DNA repair gene expression of oocytes and decreased DDR in embryos derived from older females suggests that ageing results in a diminished DNA repair capacity. LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Ionising radiation was used only for experimental purposes, aiming at controlled levels of sperm DNA damage; however, it can also damage spermatozoa proteins. The female age groups selected in mice were intended to model effects in young and old women, but clinical studies are required to demonstrate a similar effect. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Fertilisation can occur with sperm populations with medium and high DNA damage, but subsequent embryo growth is affected to a greater extent with aging females, supporting the theory that oocyte DNA repair capacity decreases with age. Assessment of the oocyte DNA repair capacity may be a useful diagnostic tool for infertile couples. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funded by the Education Program in Reproduction and Development, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to report.

Male ageing is negatively associated with the chance of live birth in IVF/ICSI cycles for idiopathic infertility.

STUDY QUESTION: Is male age associated with the clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles for idiopathic infertility after adjustment for female age? SUMMARY ANSWER: Male ageing is negatively associated with clinical IVF/ICSI outcomes in couples with idiopathic infertility independent of female age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The effect of male age on the outcomes of infertility treatments is controversial and poorly explored. In contrast, fertility is known to decline significantly with female age beyond the mid-30s, and reduced oocyte quality plays an important role. The negative effect of male age on sperm quality is largely associated with an increasing susceptibility to sperm DNA damage. Although increasing maternal age has been linked with poorer oocyte quality, studies on the effect of male age have disregarded the need to control for female age making it difficult to define clearly the role of male age in infertile couples. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study analysed 2425 cycles of couples with idiopathic infertility selected from a total of 24 411 IVF/ICSI cycles performed at Monash IVF in Australia between 1992 and 2017. The primary outcome was live birth and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Couples with primary/secondary infertility who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles with male partners classified as normozoospermic were selected (inclusion criteria). Couples in which the female partner had endometriosis, tubal factors, polycystic ovarian syndrome, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, poor responders (≤3 mature oocytes retrieved) and couples with more than 15 cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved or who used cryopreserved gametes were excluded. Binary logistic multilevel modelling was used to identify the effect of male age and female age on clinical outcomes after controlling for confounding factors. Male age and female age were examined as continuous and categorical (male age: <40, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, ≥55; female age:<30, 30-34, 35-39, ≥40) predictors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was a negative effect of male age and female age on live birth as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI for each additional year of age (OR-male age: 0.96 [0.94-0.98]; OR-female age: 0.90 [0.88-0.93] P < 0.001). Potential interactions with male age such as type of treatment (IVF/ICSI), embryo transfer day (Day 3/Day 5) and female age did not have significant associations with outcomes (P > 0.05). Secondary outcomes showed a significant reduction in the odds of clinical pregnancy (OR-male age: 0.97 [0.96-0.99]; OR-female age: 0.92 [0.89-0.94] P < 0.001) and an increase in the odds of miscarriage with older age: male age (OR: 1.05 [1.01-1.08]; P = 0.002); female age (OR: 1.11 [1.05-1.18]; P < 0.001). Worse outcomes were associated with more cycles (clinical pregnancy-OR: 0.96 [0.93-0.99] P = 0.03; live birth-OR: 0.96 [0.92-0.99] P = 0.023) while more inseminated oocytes were associated with better outcomes (clinical pregnancy-OR: 1.06 [1.03-1.06] P < 0.001; live birth-OR: 1.07 [1.04-1.11] P < 0.001). Analyses for age categories showed a gradual worsening of clinical outcomes with increasing male age, with a significantly worse live birth and clinical pregnancy outcomes in males aged older than 50 years compared to males younger than 40 years (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited to the information on confounding factors included. The study may also be limited in its generalizability to a wider population due the strict selection criteria. Age as a category could potentially result in residual confounding due to categorizing a continuous variable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study provides information for counselling of couples with idiopathic infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funded by the Education Program in Reproduction and Development, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Fertility preservation in women with cancer and afterward.

Women are surviving cancer in greater numbers. For this population, fertility becomes an important issue to be discussed before treatment to ensure maximal chances of fertility after treatment completion. Options for fertility preservation include egg or embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, as well as gonadotropin releasing hormone analogs. The option for each individual patient will depend on the type of cancer, its aggressiveness and the time before treatment needs to commence, the type of treatment, the health of the patient, and whether the patient has a male partner.

Survey of Reproductive Experiences and Outcomes of Cancer Survivors Who Stored Reproductive Material Before Treatment.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the reproductive experiences and outcomes of people who store reproductive material before cancer treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Of respondents who had tried to achieve pregnancy since completing cancer treatment almost all had succeeded, in most cases through natural conception. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: People of reproductive age who are diagnosed with cancer can cryopreserve reproductive material to guard against the adverse effects on fertility of gonadotoxic treatment. Little is known about the reproductive outcomes of people who undergo fertility preservation before cancer treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women and men who had stored reproductive material before cancer treatment at two private and one public fertility clinics up to June 2014 and were at least 18 years old at the time were identified from medical records and invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire about their reproductive experiences. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 870 potential respondents 302 (171 female and 131 male) returned completed questionnaires yielding a response rate of 34.5% (39.5% and 29.7% for female and male respondents, respectively). Current age was similar for women and men (37.2 years) but men had been diagnosed with cancer significantly earlier in life than women (28.2 versus 30.3 years, P = 0.03). Almost two-thirds of respondents wished to have a child or another child in the future, some of whom knew that they were unable to. One in ten respondents was a parent before the cancer diagnosis and around one-third had had a child since diagnosis or was pregnant (or a partner in pregnancy) at the time of the survey. Of those who had tried to conceive since completing cancer treatment (N = 119) 84% (79% of women and 90% of men) had had a child or were pregnant (or a partner in pregnancy). Most of the pregnancies since the diagnosis of cancer occurred after natural conception (58/100, 58%). Of the 22 women (13% of all women) and 35 men (27% of all men) who had used their stored reproductive material four women (18%) and 28 men (80%) had had a child or were pregnant or a partner in pregnancy at the time of completing the survey. The most commonly stated reason for not using the stored material was not being ready to try for a baby. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The relatively low response rate, particularly among men, means that participation bias may have influenced the findings. As type of cancer was self-reported and we did not ask questions about respondents' cancer treatments, it is not possible to link reproductive outcomes to type of cancer or cancer treatment. Also, there is no way of comparing the sample with the populations they were drawn from as data on reproductive outcomes of people who store reproductive material before cancer treatment are not collected routinely. This might have led to over- or underestimates of the reproductive experiences and outcomes reported in this paper. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings add to the limited evidence about the reproductive outcomes of this growing group of people and can be used to inform the advice given to those contemplating fertility preservation in the context of cancer. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1042347). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Increased detection of co-morbidities with evaluation at a dedicated adult Turner syndrome clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Turner syndrome (TS), resulting from complete/partial X chromosomal monosomy, is associated with multiple co-morbidities and increased mortality. Although multidisciplinary management is recommended, TS women's health care is sub-optimal. This study evaluates a multidisciplinary adult TS service. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 82 patients attending the quarterly TS clinic from December 2003 to December 2014. Evaluation included (1) demographics, (2) TS standardized co-morbidity screening, and (3) estrogen therapy use. Data analysis involved frequency statistics, T tests and polychoric correlation analysis. RESULTS: Median age at TS diagnosis was 14 years (range 0-65 years), with 12% of women aged >18 years. Median age at initial consultation was 31 years (range 16-65 years). Only 14% of patients were transition program referrals. XO karyotype occurred in 30%. Primary amenorrhea predominated; however, 37% of TS women were not taking estrogen therapy. The proportion of patients not previously screened (44-76%) and those with positive screening diagnoses (5-53%) varied according to co-morbidity. The mean (± standard deviation) number of co-morbidities identified increased following TS clinic screening (7.0 ± 2.6 post-screening vs. 4.4 ± 2.3 pre-screening; p < 0.0001). Polychoric correlation analysis identified particular co-morbidity groupings (including metabolism-related) and increased co-morbidities with primary amenorrhea. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary adult TS clinic improves health surveillance with increased identification of co-morbidities and initiation of estrogen therapy.

Night sweats: it may be hemochromatosis.

The aim of this case report is to show that hemochromatosis can present, unusually, with night sweats. At presentation, hemochromatosis often tends to have non-specific symptoms, making it easy to misdiagnose, especially if it presents with rare symptoms. Misdiagnosis of hemochromatosis can lead to lethal outcomes, given it can cause multiple organ dysfunctions if left untreated and hence the need to identify it early on. The case we present is a 41-year-old woman with previously undiagnosed hemochromatosis complaining of night sweats. She thought she was menopausal. The diagnosis of hemochromatosis was made solely on investigations given that she did not have any other symptoms other than night sweats. Her serum iron concentrations were within the normal range due to menstruation. It is uncommon for women to present with symptoms of hemochromatosis during their reproductive life since their iron concentration is kept within normal range through monthly menstrual bleeding.

Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy prevents vitamin D deficiency in the newborn: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal vitamin D supplementation, in the vitamin D deficient mother, prevents neonatal vitamin D deficiency. DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, tertiary hospital routine antenatal outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-eight women with singleton pregnancies with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency (serum 25-OH Vit D < 75 nmol/l) at their first antenatal appointment at 12-16-week gestation were recruited. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to vitamin D supplementation (2000-4000 IU cholecalciferol) orally daily until delivery or no supplementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was neonatal serum 25-OH vit D concentration at delivery. The secondary outcome was maternal serum 25-OH vit D concentration at delivery. RESULTS: Baseline mean maternal serum 25-OH vit D concentrations were similar (P = 0·9) between treatment (32 nmol/l, 95% confidence interval 26-39 nmol/l) and control groups (33 nmol/l, 95% CI 26-39 nmol/l). Umbilical cord serum 25-OH vit D concentrations at delivery were higher (P < 0·0001) in neonates of treatment group mothers (81 nmol/l, 95% CI; 70-91 nmol/l) compared with neonates of control group mothers (42 nmol/l, 95% CI; 34-50 nmol/l) with a strongly positive correlation between maternal serum 25-OH Vit D and umbilical cord serum 25-OH vit D concentrations at delivery (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0·88; P < 0·0001). Mean maternal serum 25-OH Vit D concentrations at delivery were higher (P < 0·0001) in the treatment group (71 nmol/l, 95% CI; 62-81 nmol/l) compared with the control group (36 nmol/l, 95% CI; 29-42 nmol/l). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation of vitamin D deficient pregnant women prevents neonatal vitamin D deficiency.

Live birth rates after combined adjuvant therapy in IVF-ICSI cycles: a matched case-control study.

The effectiveness of combined co-treatment with aspirin, doxycycline, prednisolone, with or without oestradiol patches, was investigated on live birth (LBR) rates after fresh and frozen embryo transfers (FET) in IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Cases (n = 485) and controls (n = 485) were extensively matched in a one-to-one ratio on nine physical and clinical parameters: maternal age, body mass index, smoking status, stimulation cycle number, cumulative dose of FSH, stimulation protocol, insemination method, day of embryo transfer and number of embryos transferred. No significant differences were found in fresh cycles between cases and controls for the pregnancy outcomes analysed, but fewer surplus embryos were available for freezing in the combined adjuvant group. In FET cycles, LBR was lower in the treatment group (OR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.95). The lower LBR in FET cycles seemed to be clustered in patients receiving combined adjuvant treatment without luteal oestradiol (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.80). No difference was found in LBR between cases and controls when stratified according to the number of previous cycles (<3 or ≥3). There is no benefit of this combined adjuvant strategy in fresh IVF cycles, and possible harm when used in frozen cycles.

Differences between the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal uterine fibroid vasculature.

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively examine differences in microvascular density between fibroid and myometrial tissue from fibroid uteri removed at hysterectomy, both before and after the menopause, and with hormone replacement therapy. METHODS: Factor VIII immunostaining of formalin fixed tissues was used to identify blood vessels, and the vessels counted by an investigator blinded to tissue type or menopausal status. RESULTS: The mean myometrial: fibroid MVD ratio was 2.38 higher in the post-menopausal group (95% CI: 0.12, 4.65, p=0.0474) than in the pre-menopausal group, with the hormone therapy (HT)-using post-menopausal group lying in between. An increase in microvascular density in the myometrium after the menopause was responsible for most of the change in ratios seen between the pre and post-menopausal pairs. There was a trend to increasing myometrial MVD with increasing number of years post-menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Myometrial microvascular density increases markedly after the menopause, while fibroid microvascular density does not alter. Thus, the difference between myometrial and fibroid vasculature becomes greater after the menopause. The implications of this for the treatment of fibroids in post-menopausal women is discussed.

Determining zygosity in early pregnancy by ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: First-trimester ultrasound can reliably determine chorionicity but not zygosity. We set out to investigate whether it may be possible to determine zygosity using ultrasound by noting the number of corpora lutea (CLs), structures which reflect ovulation. In the presence of a dichorionic twin pregnancy, the identification of one CL would suggest that twins are monozygotic whereas two CLs implies dizygosity. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of predominantly spontaneous twin pregnancies presenting for an early pregnancy ultrasound at 5-8-completed weeks of gestation. Placentation was correlated with presumed zygosity as predicted by the number of CLs present. RESULTS: Of 33 twin gestations, chorionicity was compatible in all cases with the predicted zygosity. In 15 cases one CL was seen and these were designated monozygotic. Of these, four were of monochorionic placentation and 11 dichorionic. The remaining 18 cases had two CLs and were presumed dizygotic; all were of dichorionic placentation. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel technique of zygosity determination during very early pregnancy which may have implications both clinically and in genetic research involving twins. However, this study requires further verification by comparing ultrasound results with DNA evidence taken after birth.

Surgical or medical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: a cost-benefit analysis.

With the availability of laparoscopic ovarian cautery, there has been a resurgence in interest in the surgical treatment of clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Comparison of ovulation and pregnancy rates has found no difference in success rates between ovarian cautery and gonadotropin ovulation induction for such women. We have therefore compared the cost of laparoscopic ovarian cautery with that of a typical cycle of gonadotropin ovulation induction, and also found that there is little difference. Because of the potential advantages of ovarian cautery, we recommend this surgery as the next line of treatment if clomiphene citrate fails to induce ovulation in PCOS patients, before gonadotropins are introduced.

Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids, smooth muscle tumours of the uterus, are found in at least 25 to 35% of women over the age of 35 years. Although some of these tumours are asymptomatic, up to 50% cause symptoms severe enough to warrant therapy and surgery is the standard treatment. Fibroid growth is stimulated by oestrogen and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) which induce a state of hypoestrogenism have been investigated as a potential treatment. GnRHa treatment causes fibroids to shrink but cannot be used long term because of unacceptable symptoms and bone loss. Therefore, GnRHa may be useful pre-operatively both to reduce fibroid and uterine volume and control bleeding. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of pre-treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues prior to a major surgical procedure, either hysterectomy or myomectomy, for uterine fibroids. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches for relevant randomised controlled trials of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the National Research Register, the National Library of Medicine's Clinical Trials Register and Current Contents were performed. Attempts were also made to identify published trials from citation lists of review articles and direct contact with drug companies for unpublished trials. In most cases, the first author of each included trial was contacted for additional information. The search was updated in October 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of GnRH analogue treatment versus placebo, no treatment, or other medical therapy prior to surgery, either myomectomy or hysterectomy, for uterine fibroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-six RCTs were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review. The reviewers extracted the data independently and odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the data of fourteen trials where GnRH analogue treatment was compared with no pre-treatment and six trials where GnRH analogue treatment was compared with placebo. Three trials are awaiting assessment because the data were not in a suitable form for extraction or they are awaiting translation. Two trials have been excluded because the data were not in a suitable form for extraction and the authors were not able to provide additional information. One RCT compared GnRHa pre-treatment with lynestrenol pre-treatment. Results from pre-operative outcomes were combined for both types of surgery but results from intra- and post-operative outcomes were reported separately for myomectomy and hysterectomy. Subgroup analysis was performed according to type of control group, no pre-treatment or placebo, and for some outcomes there were additional subgroup analyses according to size of the uterus in gestational weeks. MAIN RESULTS: Pre- and post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (HCT) were significantly improved by GnRH analogue therapy prior to surgery, and uterine volume, uterine gestational size and fibroid volume were all reduced. Pelvic symptoms were also reduced but some adverse events were more likely during GnRH analogue therapy. Hysterectomy appeared to be easier after pre-treatment with GnRH analogue therapy; there was reduced operating time and a greater proportion of hysterectomy patients were able to have a vaginal rather than an abdominal procedure. Duration of hospital stay was also reduced. Blood loss and rate of vertical incisions were reduced for both myomectomy and hysterectomy. Evidence of increased risk of fibroid recurrence after GnRH analogue pre-treatment in myomectomy patients was equivocal and few data were available to assess change in post-operative fertility. Lynestrenol did not offer any advantage over GnRH analogue therapy before fibroid surgery. The increased costs associated with GnRH analogue therapy were not assessed. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of GnRH analogues for 3 to 4 months prior to fibroid surgery reduce both uterine volume and fibroid size. They are beneficial in the correction of pre-operative iron deficiency anaemia, if present, and reduce intra-operative blood loss. If uterine size is such that a mid-line incision is planned, this can be avoided in many women with the use of GnRH analogues. For patients undergoing hysterectomy, a vaginal procedure is more likely following the use of these agents.