Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Patients After Prior Prostate Biopsy-Does It Really Make a Difference? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Introduction: Before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), many patients have undergone short-term prostate biopsy (PB) to rule out the presence of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short-term PB before HoLEP has an impact on the perioperative outcomes or complications of HoLEP. Methods: In total, 734 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP at a tertiary care university hospital between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who had PB within 6 months before HoLEP were matched to patients who underwent PB more than 6 months or had no PB before HoLEP using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgeon. Perioperative parameters, such as operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EF), as well as complications according to the Satava classification, the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) were evaluated. Results: In total, 206 patients were matched. Age, PV, PSA, as well as the presence of a preoperative UTI and surgeons did not differ significantly between both groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in mean OT (75 vs. 81 minutes, p = 0.28) and EF (2.13 vs. 2.13 g/min, p = 0.99). No differences were noted regarding intraoperative (16 vs. 25, p = 0.16) or postoperative complications graded by CDC (p = 0.53) and CCI (p = 0.92). Conclusion: PB within 6 months preoperatively before HoLEP showed no effect on perioperative outcomes or intra- and postoperative complications.

Peritoneal Flap for Lymphocele Prophylaxis Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Lymph Node Dissection: The Randomised Controlled Phase 3 PELYCAN Trial.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lymphoceles (SLCs) after transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are common. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of peritoneal flaps (PFs) on lymphocele (LC) reduction is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To show that addition of PFs leads to a reduction of postoperative SLCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, adaptive, phase 3 RCT was conducted. Recruitment took place from September 2019 until December 2021; 6-month written survey-based follow-up was recorded. Stratification was carried out according to potential LC risk factors (extended PLND, diabetes mellitus, and anticoagulation) and surgeons; 1:1 block randomisation was used. Surgeons were informed about allocation after completion of the last surgical step. INTERVENTION: To create PFs, the ventral peritoneum was incised bilaterally and fixated to the pelvic floor. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was SLCs. Secondary endpoints included asymptomatic lymphoceles (ALCs), perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 860 men were screened and 551 randomised. Significant reductions of SLCs (from 9.1% to 3.7%, p = 0.005) and ALCs (27.2% to 10.3%, p < 0.001) over the follow-up period of 6 mo were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operating time was 11 min longer (p < 0.001) in the intervention group; no significant differences in amount (80 vs 103, p = 0.879) and severity (p = 0.182) of postoperative complications (excluding LCs) were observed. The survey-based follow-up might be a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest RCT evaluating PF creation for LC prevention and met its primary endpoint, the reduction of SLCs. The results were consistent among all subgroup analyses including ALCs. Owing to the subsequent reduction of burden for patients and the healthcare system, establishing PFs should become the new standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: A new technique-creation of bilateral peritoneal flaps-was added to the standard procedure of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for lymph node removal. It was safe and decreased lymphocele development, a common postoperative complication and morbidity. Hence, it should become a standard procedure.

Determinants of physical activity during cancer treatment: a longitudinal exploration of psycho-cognitive variables and physician counseling.

Individuals with cancer are recommended to engage in regular physical activity (PA) even during cancer therapy. The aim of this study was to explore how patient-reported physician PA counseling influences their PA intention and behavior in addition to psycho-cognitive determinants derived from the theory of planned behavior (TPB). A longitudinal study during cancer treatment was conducted among N = 115 patients with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer (Mage = 58.0, SD = 11.5; 55.7% female). The median time since diagnosis was 2 months, and 19.1% were diagnosed with metastases. Participants provided information on PA counseling by their physicians and on psycho-cognitive variables of the TPB at three measurement points. Additionally, they wore accelerometers for seven days at baseline and three months later. Nearly half of participants (48%) reported basic PA counseling and 30% reported in-depth PA counseling. Patients in poorer health and with lower education reported significantly less in-depth counseling. In addition to patient self-efficacy in performing PA, only in-depth physician PA counseling, but not basic physician counseling, predicted intention for PA four weeks later. Patients' PA three months after baseline was predicted by patients' PA at baseline and their intention for PA. Overall, the PA level at baseline was identified as the most important predictor of PA three months later. Nevertheless, physicians seem to have the ability to increase their cancer patients' intention for PA by in-depth counseling.

A Matched-pair Analysis Comparing Systematic Prostate Biopsy by Conventional Transrectal Ultrasound-guidance Versus Software-based Predefined 3D-Guidance.

OBJECTIVE: To compare software-based three-dimensional-guided systematic prostate biopsy (3D-GSB) with conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TGSB) regarding prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates (CDR). METHODS: In total, 956 patients (200 TGSB patients and 756 3D-GSB patients) without prior positive biopsies and with a prostate-specific antigen value ≤20 ng/ml were eligible for analysis. TGSB and 3D-GSB cases were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching with age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, previous biopsy status, and suspicious palpatory finding as confounders. 3D-GSB was conducted with the semi-robotic prostate fusion-biopsy system Artemis. For each patient in both groups, SB was conducted in a similar pattern with 12 cores. All cores in 3D-GSB were automatically planned and mapped on a 3D-model as well as on the real-time transrectal ultrasound imaging. Primary end points were the clinically significant (cs) and overall CDR. Secondary end point was the cancer-positive core rate. RESULTS: After matching, the csCDR was not significantly different between the 3D-GSB and the TGSB groups (33.3% vs 28.8%, P = .385). Overall CDR was significantly higher for 3D-GSB compared to TGSB (55.6% vs 39.9%, P = .002). 3D-GSB detected significantly more non-significant PCa than TGSB (22.2% vs 11.1%, P = .004). In patients with PCa, the number of cancer-positive SB cores was significantly higher by TGSB (42% vs 25%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: 3D-GSB was associated with a higher CDR than TGSB. However, no significant difference was shown in detection of csPCa between both techniques. Therefore, currently, 3D-GSB does not appear to add value to conventional TGSB.

Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions: A High-volume International Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Decision of performing prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 findings in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging as they have a low but still relevant risk of harboring significant prostate cancer (sPC). OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical predictors of sPC in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions in prostate MRI and to analyze the hypothetical effect of incorporating prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) into biopsy decision. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed a retrospective multinational cohort from ten academic centers comprising 1476 men who underwent a combined prostate biopsy (MRI targeted plus systematic biopsy) between February 2012 and April 2021 due to a PI-RADS 3 lesion in prostate MRI. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the detection of sPC (ISUP ≥2) in a combined biopsy. Predictors were identified by a regression analysis. Descriptive statistics were applied to evaluate the hypothetical effect of involving PSAD into biopsy decision. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of all patients, 273/1476 (18.5%) were diagnosed with sPC. MRI-targeted biopsy diagnosed fewer sPC cases than combined strategy: 183/1476 (12.4%) versus 273/1476 (18.5%), p < 0.01. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.10 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.05-1.15], p < 0.001), prior negative biopsy (OR 0.46 [0.24-0.89], p = 0.022), and PSAD (p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of sPC. Applying a PSAD cutoff of 0.15, 817/1398 (58.4%) biopsies would have been avoided at the cost of missing sPC in 91 (6.5%) men. Limitations were the retrospective design, heterogeneity of the study cohort due to the long inclusion period, and no central revision of MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Age, previous biopsy status, and PSAD were found to be independent predictors of sPC in men with equivocal prostate MRI. Implementation of PSAD into biopsy decision can avoid unnecessary biopsies. Clinical parameters such as PSAD need validation in a prospective setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we looked for clinical predictors of significant prostate cancer in men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 lesions in prostate magnetic resonance imaging. We identified age, previous biopsy status, and especially prostate-specific antigen density as independent predictors.

Medium-term Oncological Efficacy and Patient-reported Outcomes After Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: The FOXPRO Trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a focal treatment option for MRI-visible localized prostate cancer (PCa). High-quality evidence regarding the clinical efficacy remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess medium-term oncological efficacy along with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective single-center cohort study was performed from 2014 to 2020. Patients with primary International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade group (GG) ≤2 by combined MRI/TRUS fusion and systematic prostate biopsy and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng/ml were included. INTERVENTION: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided focal HIFU therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the cancer-free rate of the HIFU-treated lesion by biopsy after 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included salvage treatment-free survival (STFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and PROMs according to International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement recommendations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Fifty patients were included (median [range] age 68 [48-80] yr; median PSA 6.5 [1.2-9.9] ng/ml; GG 1 54% [n = 27], and GG 2 46% [n = 23]). The median (range) PSA decrease from baseline to 12 mo was 51% (35.9-72.7%). In total, 37/50 patients (74%) underwent a 1-yr biopsy. PCa was detected in 23 patients (46%; GG 1 20% [n = 10]; GG >1 26% [n = 13]; infield 40% [n = 20]). At a median follow-up of 42 (13-73) mo, PCa was detected in 30 men (60%). Among all patients, 19 (38%) underwent salvage treatments (median [95% confidence interval] STFS 53 [44.3-61.7] mo). MFS and OS were 100% and 98%, respectively. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 sexual domain decreased by 20.8 points (p = 0.372). CONCLUSIONS: MRI/TRUS-guided focal HIFU therapy results in complete cancer ablation in only half of the treated patients after 1 yr, with further recurrences at medium-term follow-up. A decline of potency occurs in a subset of patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: Focal image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy controls cancer in one of two patients. Its impact on urinary continence and erectile function is low.

Integrin Expression in Localized Prostate Cancer: A TCGA and MSKCC Cohort-based Exploratory In Silico Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in localized prostate cancer (PC) are insufficient. Treatment stratification relies on prostate-specific antigen, clinical tumor staging and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading, whereas molecular profiling remains unused. Integrins (ITG) have an important function in bidirectional signaling and are associated with progression, proliferation, perineural invasion, angiogenesis, metastasis, neuroendocrine differentiation, and a more aggressive disease phenotype in PC. However, ITG subunit expression in localized PC and their utility as prognostic biomarkers has not yet been analyzed. This study aimed to fill this gap and provide a comprehensive overview of ITG expression as well as ITG utility as biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prostate adenocarcinoma cohorts were analyzed regarding ITG expression in correlation to ISUP, N- and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical tests used included the Mann-Whitney U-test, logrank test and uni- and multivariable cox regression analyses. RESULTS: After grouping for ISUP (1 and 2 vs. 3-5), N0 vs. N1 and AJCC stage (≤2 vs. ≥3), multiple ITGs showed significant expression differences. The most consistent results were observed for ITGα4, ITGαX, ITGα11, ITGß2 and ITGα2. In multivariable cox regression, ITGα2, ITGα10, ITGαD, ITGαB2 (TCGA), ITGα11 and ITGß4 (MSKCC) were independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSION: The utility of ITGs as PC biomarkers was herein shown.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in fourth or later line of therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Multi-institutional real-world experience in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Since multiple oncological treatment options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are available, optimal sequencing of therapies are under investigation. However, the efficacy of Cabazitaxel (CAB) in fourth and later lines of therapy is rarely investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty three patients with mCRPC treated with CAB in fourth line or later were included in our retrospective study, which involved eight uro-oncology centers in Germany. Clinical and tumor characteristics, as well as PSA-response rates were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier plots addressed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression models predicted risk factors of overall mortality (OM). RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 79% (n=42), 19% (n=10) and 2% (n=1) received CAB in fourth, fifth and sixth line. A median of 4 cycles of CAB were administered. Median PSA at start of CAB was 199ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 70-869). In total, 89% had bone and 40% visceral metastases prior to the start of CAB. Moreover, 30% of patients received Docetaxel in first line therapy for mCRPC. Most frequent sequence of therapy was abiraterone followed by docetaxel and followed by enzalutamide. Overall, median PSA-response rate was -20% (IQR -80 to +10%). Patients with docetaxel in first line had a significantly better median PSA-response on CAB (-80 vs. 20%, P=0.03). Median OS, radiographic PFS and overall PFS were 14.8 (Confidence interval (CI): 11.0-20.8), 3.0 (CI: 2.9-4.0) and 2.9 (CI: 2.0-3.3) months, respectively. In multivariable analyses, visceral metastases, PSA >100ng/ml, ISUP4+5 and later administration of Docetaxel were predictors of OM. CONCLUSION: Real-world experiences indicate that favorable oncologic outcomes can be achieved with CAB especially regarding PSA-response and OS even in the fourth line or later in patients with mCRPC.

Switching Lasers: Learning Curve of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Surgeons Experienced in Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Objective: To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in surgeons with experience in thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). Materials and Methods: The learning curves for HoLEP of the first 50 consecutive patients of two surgeons experienced in ThuLEP were analyzed. In addition, demographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Results: Mean operation time was 70.9 ± 29.7 minutes (standard deviation) (Surgeon 1) and 74.4 ± 35.4 minutes (Surgeon 2), the mean enucleation efficiency was 1.5 ± 0.6 g/min (Surgeon 1) and 1.5 ± 0.7 g/min (Surgeon 2). The hemoglobin loss was 0.9 ± 0.8 and 0.8 ± 0.8 g/dL. For both surgeons, there was a significant learning curve in enucleation efficiency within the first 50 cases (Surgeon 1: p = 0.034, Surgeon 2: p = 0.006, both: p = 0.0003, Spearman's ρ = 0.351). Both surgeons started with an enucleation efficiency of around 1 g/min in their first 10 cases. No significant correlation between hemoglobin loss and experience could be found (p = 0.823, ρ = 0.025). While there was no significant learning curve for morcellation efficiency (p = 0.785, ρ = 0.028), a significant progress was found for one of the two surgeons regarding laser energy efficiency (p = 0.014). The overall incidence of all grade treatment-related AEs was low at 10.0%, and extremely low for significant complications with Clavien-Dindo Grade >II at 1%. Conclusions: In our analysis, switching to HoLEP is uncomplicated and safe for experienced ThuLEP surgeons. The enucleation efficiency was high from the beginning, but a learning curve was present for both surgeons. No learning curve was noticeable in hemoglobin loss and the incidence of complications, both of which were low throughout the study.

[Immunotherapy in urologic oncology : Response and treatment interruptions due to adverse events in a bicentric real-world analysis]. / Immuntherapien in der Uroonkologie : Ansprechen und Therapieunterbrechungen durch Nebenwirkungen in einer bizentrischen Real-world-Analyse.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in uro-oncology for a few years. Real-world experience regarding benefits and risks with novel side effects are rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, all patients who received ICI therapy due to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (NCC) or urothelial carcinoma (UCA) were enrolled at two maximum care hospitals in Germany between July 2016 and May 2021. Radiologic response, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events leading to treatment interruption were collected. Oncologic response was compared to randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: In all, 1185 ICI cycles were administered to 145 patients (111 men [77%] and 34 women [23%]): 64 (44.1 %) patients with NCC and 81 (55.9%) patients with UCA received ICI therapy. Of 141 patients with radiological follow-up, an objective response was observed in 21.3% (n = 13) of patients with NCC and 20.0% (n = 16) with UCA (median duration of response 14.9 months [3.0-51.3]). Median PFS was 5.3 months in patients with NCC and 4.8 months with UCA. ICI-associated adverse events requiring treatment interruption were observed in 17.2% patients with NCC and 20.9% with UCA. These were most commonly renal (5.5%: nephritis) and gastrointestinal (4.8%: colitis, diarrhea) adverse events. Hospitalization was required for 22 (15.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: This real-world experience may support patient-centered consultation in treatment decision-making. Further studies on prognostic factors are needed. Therapy interruptions are frequent and the spectrum of side effects requires interdisciplinary treatment.

Baseline Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) Predicts Radiologic Response and Overall Survival in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the baseline inflammatory markers modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as pragmatic tools for predicting response to chemohormonal therapy (docetaxel plus ADT) and prognosis in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male patients who received docetaxel at a tertiary university care center between 2014 and 2019 were screened for completion of 6 cycles. NLR, SII, mGPS, overall survival (OS), three-year survival, and radiologic response were assessed. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) were analyzed alone and in combination. RESULTS: Thirty-six mHSPC-patients were included. In thirty patients, baseline mGPS was assessed and was either 0 (n=22) or 2 (n=8). In Cochran-Armitage Trend Test, mGPS showed significant association with the combined radiologic endpoint of "CR, PR, or SD" (p=0.01), three-year survival (p=0.02), and OS (p<0.01). Next to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (HR per 100 units 1.16, 95%CI=1.04-1.30, p<0.01), NLR (HR=1.31, 95%CI=1.03-1.66, p=0.03), and mGPS (2 vs. 0, HR=6.53, 95%CI=1.6-27.0, p<0.01) at baseline showed significant association with OS in univariable cox regression. However, mGPS remained the only independent predictor for OS in multivariable cox regression (p<0.01) and for the combined radiologic endpoint of "CR, PR or SD" (p=0.01) in multivariable logistic regression. SII showed no statistical relevance. CONCLUSION: Baseline mGPS seems to be a pragmatic tool for clinical decision-making in patients with mHSPC in daily routine.

Rayleigh-Bénard convection with thermal boundary inhomogeneities.

Rayleigh-Bénard convection with nonhomogeneous thermal boundaries (sinusoidal temperature patterns set in-phase at the top and bottom plates) is numerically studied in three- and two-dimensional domains. Two spatial convective scales occur: the one due to the self-organized clustering of plumes-which is known to appear in homogeneous conditions-and the scale induced by the boundary heterogeneities. The latter drives the convection patterning, both in 3D and 2D, when the wavelength of the perturbation is comparable with the self-organized one.

Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy vs Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials.

Context: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are two minimally invasive alternatives to simple prostatectomy, which is considered the standard treatment in large prostate glands. It remains unclear which of the two is superior in terms of outcome and complications. Objective: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes of RASP vs EEP. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and in line with the PRISMA criteria. The database search included clinicaltrials.gov, Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL, and Web of Science and was using the PICO criteria. All comparative trials were considered. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised ROBINS-I tool. Evidence Synthesis: Seven hundred sixty studies were identified, 4 of which were eligible for qualitative and quantitative analysis, reporting on a total of 901 patients with follow-up up to 24 months. Hemoglobin drop (mean difference [MD] confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 g/dL [0.09-0.58]), the rate of blood transfusions (odds ratio [OR] [CI]: 5.01 [1.60-15.61]) catheterization time (MD [CI]: 3.26 days [1.30-5.23]), and length of hospital stay (LoS) (MD [CI]: 1.94 days [1.11-2.76]) were significantly lower in EEP. No significant differences were seen in operating time and enucleation weight. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative urinary retention, postoperative transient incontinence, and complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Functional results were similar, with no significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum urinary flow rate at follow-up. Conclusion: Both EEP and RASP offer excellent improvement of symptoms due to prostatic hyperplasia. EEP has lower blood loss, shorter catheterization time, and LoS and should be the first choice if available. RASP remains an attractive alternative for extremely large glands, in concomitant diseases, or whenever EEP is not available. Review Registration Number (PROSPERO): CRD42021226901.

Long-term Reinterventions after Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: 12-Year Experience with more than 1000 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) is an established treatment option for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), but long-term outcomes have not yet been reported. OBJECTIVE: To prove the durability of ThuLEP by investigating its long-term efficacy and morbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent ThuLEP at a German tertiary referral center between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively followed up for reinterventions for persistence or regrowth of prostate adenoma (ReIP) or long-term complications (ReIC). INTERVENTION: ThuLEP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We calculated the cumulative incidence for ReIP and ReIC at 10 yr. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were constructed to identify predictors of ReIP and ReIC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 1097 patients underwent ThuLEP. The median overall follow-up was 6.0 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 2.4-9.2). For one-third of patients (n = 369), median follow-up of 10 yr (IQR 9.1-11.2) was available. A total of 42 patients (3.8%) underwent ReIP after a median of 2 yr (IQR 0.3-4.9). The rate of long-term ReIC was 2.6% (n = 29) and the median time to ReIC was 0.5 yr (IQR 0.3-1.7). The most frequent ReIC was urethrotomy (n = 16, 1.5%). The cumulative incidence of ReIP and ReIC at 10 yr was estimated at 5.6% and 3.4%, respectively. Enucleation weight ≥60 g was a significant predictor of ReIP (hazard ratio 1.2, p = 0.014). The retrospective study design and the lack of functional outcomes are the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS: ThuLEP is a durably effective and safe procedure with low reintervention rates within 12 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study investigated long-term outcomes of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign enlargement of the prostate (BPE). Low rates of repeat treatment for BPE recurrence or for other complications were observed. Our results show the safety and efficacy of this treatment over a period of 12 years.

Holmium Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

CONTEXT: Holmium (HoLEP) and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) are the two methods most commonly applied for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. It remains unclear which of the two is superior in terms of outcome and complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes between HoLEP and ThuLEP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and in line with the PRISMA criteria. A comprehensive database search including MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CENTRAL was conducted according to the PICO criteria. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. All review steps were conducted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool for RCTs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search identified 556 studies, of which four were eligible for qualitative and quantitative analysis, reporting on a total of 579 patients with follow-up of up to 18 months. No significant differences in operating time, enucleation weight, catheterization time, or hospital stay were observed between ThuLEP and HoLEP. The decrease in hemoglobin was significantly lower for ThuLEP (mean difference -0.54 g/dl, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.93 to -0.15; p < 0.001), but with low certainty of evidence. Transient urinary incontinence was more common for HoLEP (odds ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.99; p = 0.045), again with low certainty of evidence. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed for other complications or for functional measures and symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: ThuLEP and HoLEP offer comparable improvement in symptoms and postoperative voiding parameters. Both procedures are safe and major complications are rare. ThuLEP showed minor advantages for blood loss and the incidence of transient incontinence. This should be interpreted with caution owing to the low certainty of evidence. Therefore, treatment choice should be based on surgeon expertise and local conditions. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed four clinical trials that compared holmium and thulium lasers for treatment to reduce the size of the prostate gland. Our review assessed outcomes and complications. We found that both laser techniques are safe and suitable for reducing symptoms due to an enlarged prostate. Blood loss and short-lasting urinary incontinence were slightly lower after thulium compared to holmium laser treatment.

Onset and burden of lower limb lymphedema after radical prostatectomy: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore men's onset and burden of lower limb lymphedema (LLL) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted nation-wide and web-based in Germany. Part 1 included 15 multidisciplinary compiled questions with three questions from the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) and the WHO activity recommendation and part 2 included the validated German Lymph-ICF-Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-LL). Subgroup comparisons and simple regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with therapy and burden of LLL, followed by multiple regression analyses to explain variance in impairment in the patients' daily life. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed the survey. Median time of LLL-onset was reported with 2.0 (0.5-9.75) months after RP. Nineteen patients (35.2%) reported bilateral lymphedema, 28 (51.9%) the use of individually fitted compression stockings (CS), 25 (46.3%) of manual lymphatic drainage (LD), and 26 (48.1%) complete regression. The Lymph-ICF-LL revealed a higher total burden for patients with an active LLL compared to complete regression (total score: 25.5 vs. 11.9, p = 0.01) especially for "physical function" (28.3 vs. 12.9, p < 0.01) and "mental function" (26.2 vs. 6.7, p < 0.01). In multiple linear regression analysis, a higher BMI (ß = 0.28), lower subjective general health (ß = -0.48), and active lymphedema (ß = 0.28) were significant predictors of higher reported impairments in the Lymph-ICF-LL, accounting for 45.4% of variance. CONCLUSION: Men with LLL after RP with PLND report a significant burden in daily life. Basic therapy needs to be offered early. Postoperative onset of LLL is variable, which should be considered when assessing complications after RP.

Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583-1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4-72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7-68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. CONCLUSIONS: Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria.

A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound-fusion prostate biopsy (FB) comprises multiple steps each of which can cause alterations in targeted biopsy (TB) accuracy leading to false-negative results. The aim was to assess the inter-operator variability of software-based fusion TB by targeting the same MRI-lesions by different urologists. METHODS: In this prospective study, 142 patients eligible for analysis underwent software-based FB. TB of all lesions (n = 172) were carried out by two different urologists per patient (n = 31 urologists). We analyzed the number of mismatches [overall prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and non-significant PCa (nsPCa)] between both performed TB per patient. In addition we evaluated factors contributing to inter-operator variability by uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In 11.6% of all MRI-lesions (10.6% of all patients) there was a mismatch between TB1 and TB2 in terms of overall prostate cancer (PCa detection. Regarding csPCa, patient-based mismatch occurred in 14.8% (n = 21). Overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of TB1 and TB2 did not differ significantly on a per-patient and per-lesion level. Analyses revealed a smaller lesion size as predictive for mismatches (OR 9.19, 95% CI 2.02-41.83, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility and precision of targeting particularly small lesions is still limited although using software-based FB. Further improvements in image-fusion, segmentation, needle-guidance, and automatization are necessary.

[MRI-guided minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer]. / MRT-gestützte minimal-invasive Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and local staging of primary prostate cancer. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Image-guided biopsy techniques such as MRI-ultrasound fusion not only allow guidance for targeted tissue sampling of index lesions for diagnostic confirmation, but also improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Minimally invasive, focal therapies of localized prostate cancer complement the treatment spectrum, especially for low- and intermediate-risk patients. PERFORMANCE: In patients of low and intermediate risk, MR-guided, minimally invasive therapies could enable local tumor control, improved functional outcomes and possible subsequent therapy escalation. Further study results related to multimodal approaches and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) by machine and deep learning algorithms will help to leverage the full potential of focal therapies for prostate cancer in the upcoming era of precision medicine. ACHIEVEMENTS: Completion of ongoing randomized trials comparing each minimally invasive therapy approach with established whole-gland procedures is needed before minimally invasive therapies can be implemented into existing treatment guidelines. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: This review article highlights minimally invasive therapies of prostate cancer and the key role of mpMRI for planning and conducting these therapies.