ABSTRACT
Background: Intrabdominal hematoma can be managed with angioembolization, surgical drainage, or percutaneous drainage depending on the patient factors, underlying pathology, and size and stability of hematoma. During the past decades, advancements have been made in the percutaneous management of intrapleural fluid collections using fibrinolytics. However, intrabdominal hematoma resolution with the help of fibrinolytic-assisted percutaneous drainage has not been as widely studied as intrapleural fibrinolytics. Our case presents a scenario where effective percutaneous drainage of abdominal fluid collection using fibrinolytics avoided an operative intervention in a patient with a history of multiple abdominal surgeries. This case report in essence can help navigate future studies into exploring non-operative management options in patients with a history of multiple abdominal surgeries. Case Description: In this report, we present a 51-year-old female status post hiatal hernia repair with jejunostomy tube (J-tube) exchange complicated by walled off intraabdominal hematoma who presented with persistent abdominal pain and leakage around her J-tube. Due to her past history of multiple abdominal surgeries including multiple hiatal hernia repairs, distal esophagectomy with Roux-en-Y, and revision of the said Roux-en-Y complicated by wound dehiscence, surgical drainage was deferred in favor of trialing fibrinolytic administration via catheters. For this purpose, we employed the protocol for fibrinolytic administration used by the Second Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST2). Conclusions: Use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) as per MIST2 protocol was safely replicated for intrabdominal walled off hematoma and resulted in a near complete resolution of the hematoma in 1 week. The patient was eventually discharged with no complications. This case highlights safe and efficacious use of fibrinolytics for non-operative management of intrabdominal hematomas.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) are rare in children. Surgery with or without chemotherapy is the primary treatment approach. This study aimed to analyze the impact of primary and delayed surgery on surgical morbidity and outcomes. Second-look surgery after inadequate surgical staging and the various components of surgical staging were also evaluated. METHODS: Children below 15 years with MOGCT treated between 2006 and 2022 were analyzed. A comparison of patients undergoing primary, delayed, and second-look surgery was performed. RESULTS: 118 patients with a median age of 12 (0.11-15) years were eligible. Forty patients underwent primary, 51 delayed, and 27 second-look surgeries. Overall complications, including tumor rupture, blood loss, and adjacent organ removal, were significantly higher in the primary compared to the delayed surgery group (p = 0.0001). Second-look surgery conceded more blood loss (p = 0.0001), extended duration (p = 0.03), and complications (p = 0.004) than delayed surgery. The compliance with surgical guidelines was 100% for most components, with a positive yield rate of 10-80%. At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort are 86% and 89%, respectively. The OS and EFS did not differ by the timing of surgery, although the second-look surgery demonstrated relatively inferior outcomes consequential to initial suboptimal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MOGCT shows favorable outcomes. Delayed surgery after chemotherapy in appropriately selected patients minimizes the morbidity of surgery with similar outcomes compared to primary surgery. An optimal initial surgery is essential since second-look surgery produces significant morbidity. Prognosis Study, Level II evidence.
