Applicability of a single 5 color cytoplasmic markers tube as primary panel for immunophenotyping of acute leukemia: A Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute experience.

INTRODUCTION: Flow cytometry is highly sensitive for detection and quantitative analysis of surface and intracellular antigens in malignant hemopoietic cells. Immunophenotyping is a routine practice for classification and lineage assignment of acute leukemia. In the present study, our aim is to identify the role of a single 5 color, CD45, myeloperoxidase (MPO), cCD79a, cCD3, and Tdt, cytoplasmic markers combination as a primary tube. We compared with final diagnosis on the basis of morphology, cytochemistry, and primary and secondary panels of immunophenotyping and also with other study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have included 455 new cases of acute leukemias with applied primary and secondary panels of markers for immunophenotyping. We analyzed sensitivity and specificity of different subsets with combination of positive and negative markers. RESULTS: MPO was positive in 61.4% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. All 184 (100%) cases of the AML were negative for cCD3 and cCD79a co-expression. cCD79a expression was highly sensitive as 98.5% B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) expressed it. cCD3 expression was detected in 100% cases of T-ALL, and its co-expression was not seen in B-ALL and AML. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that there was very good correlation of 5-color cytoplasmic tube-based diagnosis versus final diagnosis based on morphology, cytochemistry, and flow cytometry. We can use this 5-color cytoplasmic tube method to make immunophenotyping cost-effective.

Overexpression of Bcl2 protein predicts chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia: its correlation with FLT3.

Potential prognostic biomarkers in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be identified by understanding the cellular pathway and molecular changes underlying leukemogenesis. Deregulation of apoptosis is one of the important features of AML and to understand the molecular mechanism underlying apoptosis and its contribution to tumor progression, this study aimed to evaluate anti-apoptotic Bcl2 protein expression in AML and correlate with FLT3 parameters for their role in prognosis of disease.Bcl2 and FLT3 protein expression was quantified by flow cytometry on leukemic blasts in total 174 de novo AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and aplastic anemia patients. FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), Tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) point mutations and quantification of mRNA level was carried out using PCR and RT-PCR methods. The incidence of Bcl2 positivity was 71% in AML patients. Bcl2 positivity was significantly associated with CD34+ and CD117+ AML. Bcl2 positivity tended to be associated with reduced DFS while Bcl2 positivity with FLT3 protein positivity was significantly associated with reduced DFS. In multivariate analysis, Bcl2+ and combined Bcl2+/FLT3 protein+ along with high WBC count emerged as poor prognostic factors for reduced DFS and high blast count for predicting reduced OS. In MDS patients, the incidence of Bcl2 expression was high while in aplastic anemia patients, incidence of Bcl2 expression was low.Patients with Bcl2 and FLT3 protein positivity showed significantly reduced DFS suggesting parallel role of these proteins in imparting chemoresistance to the leukemic cells.

Cytoplasmic localization of BAG-1 in leukoplakia and carcinoma of the tongue: correlation with p53 and c-erbB2 in carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the clinical significance of BAG-1, an antiapoptotic protein, in leukoplakia and carcinoma of the tongue. METHODS: BAG-1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded tissues of leukoplakia (n=25) and carcinoma of the tongue (n=61). RESULTS: Cytoplasmic expression was predominantly seen in 80% and 70% of patients with leukoplakia and carcinoma, respectively. BAG-1 expression was found to be significantly lower in tobacco users than in non-tobacco users. BAG-1 expression in tobacco-using leukoplakia and carcinoma patients was compared by grouping the carcinoma patients according to lymph node status and disease stage. Carcinoma patients with tumor-positive lymph nodes had significantly lower BAG-1 expression than patients with negative lymph nodes and leukoplakia. Further, a trend towards an inverse correlation was observed with p53 and c-erbB2. In univariate and multivariate survival analysis, patient subgroups with 2+ or 3+ marker positivity (BAG-1 negativity, p53 and c-erbB2 positivity) had a reduced overall survival compared with patient subgroups with 1+ marker positivity or negativity. CONCLUSION: BAG-1 negativity in association with p53 and c-erbB2 positivity identified a subgroup of tongue cancer patients with an aggressive phenotype. Hence, an antiapoptotic protein, BAG-1, was found to be down-regulated in chewing-tobacco-mediated tongue carcinogenesis.

p53 expression in leukoplakia and carcinoma of the tongue.

There is growing interest in assessing multistep carcinogenesis and predicting its course using different molecular markers. TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene and appears to be one of the molecular targets of tobacco-related carcinogens in oral cancer. The present study evaluated the role of p53 expression in patients with leukoplakia and carcinoma of the tongue. p53 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry. All patients with leukoplakia of the tongue were male tobacco users. Nuclear staining of p53 was observed in 79% of those patients. Fifty percent, 25% and 4% of the patients expressed 1+, 2+ and 3+ nuclear staining, respectively. When leukoplakia patients were graded according to histopathology, 67% had hyperplasia and 33% had dysplasia. Nuclear p53 accumulation was 88% in hyperplasia and 62% in dysplasia. In patients with tongue cancer, nuclear accumulation of p53 was seen in only 19% of the tumors, with a staining intensity of 1+ in 13%, 2+ in 2% and 3+ in 4% of the tumors. The prevalence of nuclear p53 positivity (79%) was significantly higher in patients with leukoplakia than in patients with tongue cancer (19%; chi2 = 34.32, r = -0.45, df = 1, p = 0.0001; odds ratio (OR) = 16.66, 95% CI, 5.25-52.86). Therefore, leukoplakia patients who show p53 expression have a higher risk of developing tongue cancer than those who do not show p53 expression. As the percentage of positivity of nuclear p53 was very low, none of the clinicopathological parameters or disease status showed any significant association with it. The interesting finding is that none of the female cancer patients showed nuclear p53 expression. Therefore, p53 accumulation is believed to be an early event in neoplastic progression of the tongue.

Telomerase activity in breast cancer in Western India (Gujarat).

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of telomerase activity with clinical and histopathological prognostic variables in primary breast cancer (n=64). Telomerase activity in breast cancer was also compared with that in benign (n=10) and non-malignant tissues (n=8; post-lumpectomy tissues histopathologically defined as containing no residual tumor). The parameter was assessed using the Telomerase PCR ELISA kit. Values above OD 0.120 were considered positive. Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) were assayed by the dextran-coated charcoal method and levels >10 fmol/mg cytosol protein were taken as positive. Telomerase activity was detected in 20% and 50% of the patients with benign lesions and primary breast cancer, respectively, and in 50% of post-lumpectomy breast tissues histopathologically defined as containing no residual tumor. Telomerase activity was present in all stages of breast carcinoma and showed a significant inverse correlation with lymph node status (p=0.006), lymphatic invasion (p=0.035) and necrosis (p=0.033). Moreover, when stage II patients were grouped according to nodal involvement, a trend towards significance was observed (p=0.055). No correlation was observed with ER and PgR. The results of our study suggest that telomerase activity might be associated with the presence of cancer cells. Furthermore, telomerase activation may occur early in breast cancer and may be periodically downregulated during subsequent tumor progression.

Molecular markers are predictors of recurrence and survival in patients with Dukes B and Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The goal was to investigate the prognostic value of various molecular markers like CEA, Cyclin D1, Bcl-2, c-Myc, p53, p21ras, Ki-67, CD44, Factor VIII-related antigen, cytokeratin-19, adenoma antigen, and prolactin in patients with Dukes B and Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: These molecular markers were localized immunohistochemically in nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 98) diseases of the colorectum. Data were analyzed statistically using the SPSS software program. The patients with colorectal cancer were followed for a period of five years or their death within that period. RESULTS: The expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyclin D1, Bcl-2, CD44, cytokeratin-19 and prolactin was significantly higher in malignant diseases (P < 0.05), whereas, p21ras was found to be significantly higher in nonmalignant diseases (P = 0.002) as compared with their respective counterparts. Besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis indicated a significantly reduced relapse-free survival in patients expressing CD44 and cytokeratin-19 (P < 0.005). Similarly, besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis indicated a significantly poor overall survival in patients expressing CD44, cytokeratin-19 and prolactin (P < 0.01). In patients with Dukes B disease, only cytokeratin-19 and CD44 expression attained statistical significance (P < 0.05), whereas in patients with Dukes C disease, CD44, p21ras- and c-Myc expression attained statistical significance (P < 0.018). Also, a multivariate analysis in relation to treatment given was performed using CD44 and cytokeratin-19. CONCLUSION: Besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis of all the studied molecular markers showed that patients expressing CD44 and cytokeratin-19 had a significantly reduced relapse-free and poor overall survival. Moreover, patients expressing both these markers (CD44 and cytokeratin-19) had the lowest significant relative risk for developing recurrence than patients with both markers negative when treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy as compared with patients treated with surgery alone. Thus, in patients with colorectal cancer, immunohistochemical localization of CD44 and cytokeratin-19 may be included as a part of routine pathologic evaluation along with conventional prognostic factors.

Ectopic production of prolactin by colorectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the role of prolactin in patients with Dukes B and C colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Circulating prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen were assayed using immunoradiometric assay and radioimmunoassay kits, respectively, in preoperative blood (n = 98) and tumor-draining venous blood (n = 34) samples of colorectal carcinoma patients. Immunohistochemical localization of prolactin (n = 98), carcinoembryonic antigen (n = 98), and prolactin receptors (n = 56) was performed. The expression of prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid (n = 50) and prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (n = 50) was studied by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Further, prolactin amplimer was sequenced. RESULTS: Preoperative prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly higher in patients with colorectal carcinoma than in controls (prolactin, P = 0.001; carcinoembryonic antigen, P = 0.0001). Univariate survival analysis showed that Dukes stage, histologic grade, and circulating prolactin were significant prognostic factors for determining overall survival (Dukes stage, P = 0.00001; histologic grade, P = 0.005; prolactin, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, besides Dukes stage, circulating prolactin emerged as the most significant independent prognostic factor influencing overall survival. Preoperative prolactin levels showed excellent significant correlation with response to therapy and progression of disease. A significant tenfold higher mean concentration of prolactin was observed in tumor-draining venous blood than in peripheral blood (P = 0.0001). Diffuse cytoplasmic staining for prolactin was seen in 51 percent (50/98) of the colorectal carcinomas. Prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid expression was seen in 88 percent (44/50) of the colorectal carcinomas. Sequence analysis of the 234-bp prolactin amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to exon 5 of pituitary prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid. CONCLUSION: These multiple approaches confirmed that prolactin is produced by colorectal carcinoma cells. Looking at its prognostic value and correlation with disease activity, it may provide new insights into treatment for patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Prolactin as a local growth promoter in patients with breast cancer: GCRI experience.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-operative prolactin (PRL) in conjunction with established prognosticators, and the risk of disease relapse in patients with early and advanced breast cancer. To confirm the hypothesis that PRL is produced by breast tumours molecular analysis of PRL, using immunohistochemistry, mRNA by RT-PCR and direct sequencing, was performed. Furthermore, presence of prolactin receptors (PRLR) was evaluated by immunohistochemical localization in these patients. METHODS: In 111 breast cancer patients, pre-operative PRL was determined by an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) method. Immunohistochemical localization of PRL (IHL-PRL) and PRLR was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Expression of PRL mRNA was carried out by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR PRL amplimer was sequenced and compared with human pituitary PRL amplimer. RESULTS: Fifty-eight per cent (64/111) of the patients had hyperprolactinaemia (PRL520.0 ng/ml). With increasing tumour size, a higher incidence of hyperprolactinaemia was noted which was statistically significant (r=0.34, P=0.0001). In stage III patients, and in node positive patients, the incidence of hyperprolactinaemia was significantly higher compared to their respective counterparts (stage II vs stage III, r=0.37, P=0.00006; node negative vs node positive, r=0.30, P=0.001). Hyperprolactinaemic patients had a significantly higher risk of developing recurrent/metastatic disease and a higher mortality risk as compared to patients with PRL <20.0 ng/ml. The multivariate survival analysis indicated that apart from disease stage, prognosis of patients with pre-operative hyperprolactinaemia was poorer than that of patients with PRL <20.0 ng/ml. Seventy-eight per cent (87/111) of the tumours showed positive immunoreactivity with PRL antibody indicating that PRL, or a similar molecule, is produced ectopically by breast tumours. PRL mRNA expression using RT-PCR confirmed the de novo synthesis of PRL. PRL mRNA expression was seen in 52% (33/63) of tumours. Sequence analysis of the 234 bp PRL amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to the sequence of exon 5 of human pituitary PRL mRNA. Furthermore, PRLR were present in 80% of tumours detected by immunohistochemical localization. A significant positive correlation was noted between IHL-PRL and PRLR (r=0.26, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted study of PRL suggests that breast cancer cells produce PRL and that this ectopically produced PRL may act as a major local growth promoter via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. It may provide new insights into endocrine treatment of breast cancer.

Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage II and stage III breast cancer: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the expression of a panel of biomarkers such as prolactin (PRL), p53, Bcl-2, c-erb B2, Ki-67, CD44, and factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA) in primary tumors of stage II and stage III breast cancer and its correlation with disease prognostication. METHODS: The streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex technique was used for the detection of these antigens. Cytoplasmic staining pattern was observed for PRL, Bcl-2, and Ki-67. Staining pattern for p53 was nuclear. Membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining was noted for c-erb B2 and CD44. Microvessel staining was noted for FVIII-RA. RESULTS: Of the 93 primary breast tumors analyzed, positivity for PRL was noted in 82%, for p53 in 56%, for Bcl-2 in 73%, for c-erb B2 in 68%, and for Ki-67 and CD44 in 78% each. The microvessel count (MVC) for FVIII-RA ranged from 0.0 to 29.0, with a median of 6.0, which was used as a cutoff. MVC > or = 6.0 was noted in 51% of breast tumors. With increasing tumor size, the higher frequency of positivity of MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0001), CD44 (P = .001), PRL (P = .002), and c-erb B2 (P = .008), and higher frequency of Bcl-2 negativity (P = .033), was noted. In stage III patients, a higher positivity of the following biomarkers was noted, compared with stage II patients: MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0004), PRL (P = .0002), c-erb B2 (P = .001), and CD44 (P = .005). Further, Bcl-2 positivity was significantly lower in patients with stage III disease compared with those with stage II disease (P = .024). In patients with nodal involvement, the frequency of c-erb B2 (P = .006), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .011), and PRL (P = .032) was higher than in those without nodal involvement. Moreover, in these patients, with the increase in the number of involved lymph nodes, there was a significant increase in frequency of CD44+ (P = .0004) and PRL+ (P = .013) tumors. Abnormal expression of one biomarker was seen in 7% of tumors, of two biomarkers in 4%, of three in 15%, of four in 19%, of five in 28%, of six in 20%, and of all seven biomarkers in 7% of tumors. The frequency of an increasing number of biomarkers coexpressed was higher in stage III patients compared with stage II patients (P = .00003). In the total number of patients (n = 93), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .00001), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .001), PRL positivity (P = .02), and CD44 positivity (P = .034) had a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared with their respective counterparts. In stage II patients (n = 40), only p53 expression was significantly associated with reduced relapse-free survival (P = .009) and OS (P = .040). In multivariate analysis, p53 expression was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival (P = .034) of stage II breast cancer patients. However, it failed to attain statistical significance for OS. In stage III patients (n = 53), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .0005) and MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .039) had a significantly poorer OS compared with their respective counterparts. In multivariate analysis of stage III patients, Bcl-2 was the only independent prognostic factor (P = .001) for predicting OS. There was a significant association between coexpression of the biomarkers and OS (P = .001). The OS rates decreased with the increase in number of abnormally expressed biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: p53 expression in primary tumors was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival in patients with stage II disease. In stage III patients, lack of Bcl-2 expression was independently associated with a poor prognosis and, thus, may be an indicator of aggressive phenotype.

Prolactin as a local growth promoter in patients with locally advanced tongue cancer: GCRI experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of prolactin (PRL) in men with locally advanced tongue cancer. METHODS: Circulating PRL was assayed immunoradiometrically in pretherapeutic and sequential blood samples of 99 patients with locally advanced tongue cancer. Patients were followed for 3 years or until their death within a stipulated time. Immunohistochemical localization of PRL was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tumoral prolactin receptors (PRLR) were estimated by ligand binding assay; the expression of PRL mRNA and PRLR mRNA were carried out by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Furthermore, PRL amplimer was sequenced and compared with human pituitary PRL amplimer. RESULTS: Pretherapeutic PRL levels were significantly higher in patients with locally advanced tongue cancer compared with controls (p =.01). Thirty-four percent (34 of 99) of the patients had hyperprolactinemia (PRL >/=15.0 ng/mL). Univariate survival analysis showed that patients with pretherapeutic hyperprolactinemia had a significantly shorter overall survival than patients with pretherapeutic PRL <15.0 ng/mL serum (p =.0009). In multivariate analysis, PRL emerged as the most significant independent prognostic factor influencing overall survival. Furthermore, changes in serial PRL levels showed excellent correlation with response to therapy and progression of disease. Forty-four percent (24 of 54) of the tumors showed positive immunoreactivity with PRL antibody, indicating that PRL or a molecule similar to it is produced by tongue tumors. PRL mRNA expression was seen in 85% (43 of 50) of the tumors and confirmed the de novo synthesis of PRL. Sequence analysis of the 234 bp PRL amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to exon 5 of pituitary PRL mRNA. The action of PRL is mediated by PRLR, and it was observed that the PRLR positivity by ligand binding assay was 33%. The expression of PRLR mRNA by RT-PCR showed two forms of PRLR mRNA (ie, intermediate form [500-600 bp] seen in 82% (41 of 50 ) of the tumors and the long form [800-900 bp] seen in 36% (18 of 50) of the tumors. In 82% (41 of 50) of the tumors, either the intermediate or long form was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted study of PRL suggests that tongue cancer cells produce PRL, and this ectopically produced PRL might be acting as a major local growth promoter by means of autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Looking at its prognostic value and correlation with disease activity, it may provide new insights into treatment of tongue cancer.

Overexpression of CD44: a useful independent predictor of prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: The goal was to investigate the potential correlation between overexpression of CD44, high microvessel count (MVC), and p21ras with length of relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: CD44, factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA), and p21ras were localized immunohistochemically in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps (n = 8) and adenocarcinomas (n = 98). The correlation between the expression of CD44, MVC in the areas with highest density, and p21ras with relapse-free and overall survival time was investigated. Data were analyzed statistically using univariate and multivariate systems. RESULTS: In patients with adenomatous polyps, the positivity of CD44, FVIII-RA, and p21ras was 75%, 62%, and 88%, respectively. In patients with colorectal carcinomas the positivity of CD44 was 55%, and for p21ras it was 52%. The median of FVIII-RA was 4 MVC (range, 0.0 to 32.33). MVC was greater than 4 in 53% of the patients with colorectal carcinomas. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer relapse-free time (CD44: P = .0004; FVIII-RA: P = .0006) and overall survival time (CD44: P = .0001; FVIII-RA: P = .001) were observed for patients with CD44-negative tumors and MVC below 4 as compared to those with CD44-positive tumors and MVC greater than 4. Similar observations were noted in patients with Dukes B and C disease and the rectum as the site of tumor. In multivariate analysis, only CD44 correlated significantly with both relapse-free (P = .0003) and overall survival (P = .00001). CONCLUSION: Univariate analysis showed CD44 and MVC to be independent predictors of prognosis in colorectal carcinomas. Multivariate analysis showed that CD44 positivity was the most important indicator of an unfavorable prognosis for relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Thus, it can be deduced that whether CD44 is positive or negative in patients with colorectal cancer may have prognostic importance and in the future may be used as a factor in the pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens. This hypothesis needs to be tested prospectively in a larger number of patients.

Prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors in patients with colon/rectal cancer: correlation with plasma prolactin.

Prognostic value of IGF-1 receptors (IGF-1R) was evaluated and compared with circulating prolactin (PRL) in 59 patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer. IGF-1R was estimated by radioligand binding assay and PRL was estimated by immunoradiometric assay. Eighty-five percent (50/59) of patients had IGF-1R- tumours while IGF-1R positivity was observed in only 15% (9/59) of patients. None of the clinicopathological parameters showed any association with IGF-1R status. No significant difference was observed in overall survival period between patients with IGF-1R+ tumours and those with IGF-1R- tumours. However, a significant difference in overall survival time was observed between patients with PRL < 20.0 and > 20.0 ng/ml plasma (X2 = 4.70, df = 1, P < 0.05). In bivariate analysis, patients with IGF-1R- tumours and concomitant hyperprolactinemia had unfavourable prognosis compared to their counterpart (X2 = 4.21, df = 1, P < 0.05). We conclude that there was a trend of better overall survival in patients with IGF-1R+ tumours, and PRL < 20.0 ng/ml plasma when compared to patients with IGF-1R- tumours, and PRL > 20.0 ng/ml plasma. Further, IGF-1R negativity in conjunction with hyperprolactinemia could be used as an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer.

Prolactin: its role in advanced tongue cancer.

Serum prolactin was measured pretherapeutically and sequentially thereafter using immunoradiometric assay method in 37 male patients with advanced tongue cancer and compared with 23 healthy, age-matched controls. Prolactin levels were correlated with age, various clinicopathologic parameters, overall survival, and patients with response and those with progressive disease. Patients with advanced tongue cancer had higher prolactin levels than controls (P < 0.02), but intergroup variation in prolactin was not observed when considering the age, site of the lesion, disease stage, histologic grade, and keratin. Of the patients, 30% had hyperprolactinemia (prolactin > 15.0 ng/ml). To assess the prognostic significance of pretherapeutic prolactin level, the patients were divided according to the cutoff level of prolactin (15.0 ng/ml). Hyperprolactinemic patients had more unfavourable prognosis than patients with prolactin < 15.0 ng/ml (X2 = 2.91, df = 1, P < 0.0037). In monitoring disease course, patients who responded to treatments had decreased prolactin levels at the end of 18 months as compared to their pretherapeutic levels (P < 0.01). In patients who subsequently developed progressive disease within 18 months, prolactin levels reduced initially at response, whereas with disease progression, prolactin levels increased significantly (P < 0.05). The positive and negative predictive value of prolactin was 100%. Immunohistochemical localization confirmed the ectopic production of prolactin by tongue tumors. In conclusion, our data indicate that hyperprolactinemia may be an independent predictor of short-term prognosis; circulating prolactin may be used as a marker for monitoring disease course in patients with advanced tongue cancer, and prolactin is produced ectopically by tongue tumors.

Can plasma prolactin predict tamoxifen resistance in patients with advanced breast cancer?

The antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is an effective therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, its use is limited by the eventual development of acquired TAM resistance in many patients. There is now strong evidence to suggest that prolactin plays an important role in advanced breast cancer. We have measured plasma prolactin (PRL) and estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PR) in post-menopausal patients with breast cancer (Stage III, n = 44). The blood samples were collected pre-operatively and sequentially thereafter for a minimum period of 3 years or until the death of the patients. The ER and PR were estimated in breast tumor samples by dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) method. The patients were treated with surgery and radiotherapy followed by TAM (10 mg, 1 BD). Based on the response to treatments, the patients were divided into two groups: (1) TAM sensitive (n = 19) and (2) TAM resistant (n = 25). In the TAM sensitive group, patients responded to the treatment and did not develop progressive disease within a period of 3 years. On the contrary, in the group of TAM resistant, patients developed progressive disease within a period of 3 years. The development of progressive disease clearly indicated TAM resistance. Plasma PRL correlated well with the disease progression. This study clearly demonstrated that plasma prolactin accurately indicated the response and development of resistance to TAM in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Circulating prolactin and tumoral prolactin receptors in men with tongue cancer: a preliminary study.

Pre-therapeutic circulating prolactin levels and tumoral prolactin receptors (PRLR) were determined in 25 male patients with tongue cancer. The patients were divided into PRLR positive (PRLR+) and PRLR negative (PRLR-) groups. The overall survival was statistically non-significant between these two groups of PRLR as well as when considering 2% as the cut-off level. Moreover, no correlation was observed between PRLR status and clinicopathologic prognosticators. Furthermore, patients with < 2% PRLR had significantly higher levels of circulating prolactin than their counterparts (P < 0.05). Patients with PRLR- tumors having hyperprolactinemia (prolactin > 15.0 ng/ml) had unfavourable overall survival (chi 2 = 4.08, df = 1, P < 0.04) than those with normoprolactin (prolactin < 15.0 ng/ml). From this pilot study, it seems that PRLR negativity with hyperprolactinemia could be used as an independent predictor of short-term prognosis in cancer tongue patients.

Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer. Value in follow-up and as a prognosticator.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative plasma prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were assessed to monitor disease recurrence and to identify low-risk and high-risk patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. METHODS: Prolactin and CEA were estimated by radioimmunoassay method. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and sequentially thereafter from patients with colorectal cancer (N = 114); the samples were compared with samples from age-matched healthy control subjects (smokers and nonsmokers, N = 45). For rest of the analysis, patients with Dukes A disease (N = 7) were not included because of the small number. In monitoring recurrences, the criteria for positive test for the two markers was a continual increase in the marker level after an initial decrease or persistent high level of the marker. These were the indicators of relapse or no response to treatment. To determine the efficacy of the preoperative markers, the patients were grouped according to disease status at the end of 3 years, i.e., patients who had response to the treatment modalities (N = 52) and patients who later had progressive disease (N = 55). To determine the prognostic significance of preoperative marker levels, the patients were divided according to the cutoff levels (upper normal limits); for prolactin the cutoff level was 20.0 ng/ml plasma, and for CEA it was 5.0 ng/ml plasma. RESULTS: Both of the markers were significantly high in patients with colorectal cancer compared with the markers of their respective control subjects (P < 0.0001). In monitoring disease course, the predictive power of prolactin was 100%, whereas that of CEA was 66%. Prolactin showed a lead time of 2-3 months. Preoperative prolactin levels were significantly higher in patients who later had progressive disease (P < 0.001) than in patients who had response to the treatments. However, such an intergroup variation was not observed for CEA. Patients with preoperative levels of prolactin greater than 20.0 ng/ml had shorter overall survival times than did those with prolactin levels less than 20.0 ng/ml plasma; such a trend was not observed for patients with CEA levels less than 5.0 ng/ml and those with CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/ml plasma. CONCLUSION: Prolactin is a better overall marker than is CEA in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. The authors recommend the use of plasma prolactin levels to help identify low-risk and high-risk patient subgroups so that high-risk patients may be followed up more intensely and treated accordingly. Hyperprolactinemic patients with Dukes B or C disease have shortened survival time.

Tumor markers in patients with advanced breast cancer as prognosticators: a preliminary study.

A retrospective study was performed on 69 breast cancer patients (stage II, N = 18; advanced disease, N = 51) in order to assess the prognostic value of circulating prolactin (PRL), CEA, CA 15-3, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) by RIA/IRMA. These markers were compared with short-term prognosis (two years). Significant difference was observed only for PRL ( < 20.0 ng/ml vs. > 20.0 ng/ml), which provide an independent predictor of short-term prognosis in advanced breast cancer.

Levels of circulating peptide and steroid hormones in men with lung cancer.

Levels of circulating peptide (FSH, LH, prolactin, ACTH, calcitonin, gastrin and insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1]) and steroid (estradiol, progesterone, DHEA-S and testosterone) hormones were estimated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in male patients with lung cancer (n = 37) pre-therapeutically and compared with 25 age matched healthy controls. In this retrospective study, FSH, LH, prolactin, ACTH, calcitonin, gastrin and IGF-1 were significantly higher with concomitant lower levels of DHEA-S and testosterone, while the difference was statistically non-significant for estradiol and progesterone in patients with lung cancer when compared with controls. Early stage patients (Stage II) exhibited higher levels of gastrin as compared to advanced stage patients (Stages III and IV). It is suggested that hormonal imbalance might play an important role in the development and progression in male patients with lung cancer.

Prognostic significance of plasma prolactin in breast cancer: comparison with the expression of c erb B-2 oncoprotein.

Having established prolactin to be an indicator of disease progression and hyperprolactinemia as an independent predictor of short term prognostication, we have in this report compared plasma prolactin with the expression of c erb B-2 oncoprotein, ER and PR. c erb B-2 oncoprotein, ER and PR are determinants of breast cancer biology. This is a retrospective study of 47 breast cancer patients. When patients were grouped according to the stage of the disease, plasma prolactin was higher in patients with advanced disease than those with stage II disease. The patients were sub-grouped according to prolactin < 20.0 ng/ml and > 20.0 ng/ml. The expression of c erb B-2, ER and PR did not differ in these two sub-groups. The overall survival differed significantly between the two sub-groups of prolactin. The patients were sub-grouped according to c erb B-2 positivity or negativity, there was no significant difference in survival. c erb B-2 expression did not differ between the three grades of the tumor, nodal and receptor positivity or negativity. Hence, the present study reinforces the positive association between hyperprolactinemia and unfavourable prognosis and finds c erb B-2 expression as a weak prognosticator in advanced breast cancer patients.

Usefulness of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as prognosticator in leukemia patients.

Peripheral blood samples from 55 previously untreated leukemia patients (33 males, 22 females) were analysed for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) activity. TdT was significantly higher in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML; P < 0.001), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML; P < 0.05) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; P < 0.001) when compared with controls. One patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) had undetectable TdT. Among leukemic patients, ALL patients had higher concentration of TdT than CML and AML patients. Females had higher TdT activity than males, although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. 68% TdT+ and 32% TdT- patients were in blastic crisis. Patients with more than 10% of blasts in the circulation had significantly higher TdT than blast-negative patients (P < 0.001). No difference in survival was observed between TdT+ and TdT- group. From these results, we conclude that the absolute TdT concentration is of little prognostic value in leukemia patients.