Discrepancy in diagnoses of diabetes and prediabetes using fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin and the underdiagnosis by ICD-10 coding: data from a tertiary hospital in Thailand.

Background: Early detection of prediabetes and diabetes better prevents long-term health complications. FPG and HbA1c levels are some common laboratory tests utilized as tools to diagnose diabetes and prediabetes, but the agreement rate between these two diagnostic tests varies, which could lead to underdiagnosis and thus undertreatment. This study aimed to analyze the agreement rate between FPG and HbA1c, as well as the physicians' accuracy of using these results to make a prediabetes or diabetes diagnosis through ICD-10 coding at a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using secondary data collected in a tertiary hospital's check-up clinic from August 16, 2019 to June 30, 2022 to study the prevalence and diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes, determined through FPG and HbA1c laboratory results. We analyzed the two laboratory tests' diagnosis agreement rate and the physicians' accuracy of diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes in ICD-10 coding using the FPG and HbA1c results. Results: Among 8,024 asymptomatic participants, the period prevalence diagnosed through laboratory results was 5.8% for diabetes and 19.8% for prediabetes. Diabetes and prediabetes prevalence based on laboratory data differs from that of ICD-10 coding data. Specifically, 79.6% of diabetes patients and 32.3% of prediabetes patients were coded using the ICD-10 coding system. 4,094 individuals had both FPG and HbA1c data. The agreement rate for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes between the two laboratory results is 89.5%, with Kappa statistics of 0.58. Using only one of the two laboratory results would have missed a substantial number of patients. Conclusion: Our findings highlight screening test discrepancies and underdiagnosis issues that impede diagnostic accuracy enhancement and refined patient management strategies. Early diagnoses of prediabetes and diabetes, especially before symptoms arise, could increase health consciousness in individuals, thereby enabling the implementation of lifestyle modifications and prevention of serious health complications. We emphasize the importance of diagnosing these conditions using both FPG and HbA1c, along with subsequent accurate ICD-10 coding. Even though some hospitals lack certified HbA1c testing, we suggest enhancing the availability of HbA1c testing, which could benefit many people in Thailand.Clinical trial registration:https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org, identifier [TCTR20230824003].

Predictive validity of three home fall hazard assessment tools for older adults in Thailand.

This study aimed to examine the predictive validity of two internationally well-known instruments, the Modified Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (Modified HOME FAST) and the Modified Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool-Self Report (Modified HOME FAST-SR), and the newly developed Thai Home Falls Hazard Assessment Tool (Thai-HFHAT) (69 items) in predicting falls among older Thai adults. It also aimed to examine the predictive validity of the two abbreviated versions (44 and 27 items) of the Thai-HFHAT, which were developed post hoc to accommodate older adults' limited literacy and poor vision and to facilitate the identification of high-impact home fall hazards that are prevalent in the Thailand context. A prospective cohort study was conducted among 450 participants aged 60 years and above who were assessed by the aforementioned tools at baseline, for which data on fall incidence were then collected during the one-year follow-up. The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs); then, Harrell's C-statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to identify the best cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity for each instrument. The results showed that the fall hazard rate was 2.04 times per 1,000 person-days. Taking into account both the predictive validity and applicability, the Thai-HFHAT (44 items) was found to be the most suitable screening tool due to its highest sensitivity and specificity (93% and 72%) at the cutoff score of 18. In conclusion, our study showed that these internationally validated home fall hazard assessment tools were quite applicable for Thailand, but further tailoring the tools into a specific local context yielded even more highly valid tools in predicting fall risk among older Thai adults. Although these findings were well reproducible by inferring from the internal validation results, further external validation in the independent population is necessary.

Implementation of hepatitis B vaccine in high-risk young adults with waning immunity.

Universal hepatitis B (HB) vaccination among Thai newborns was initiated in 1992. The first dose of the monovalent HB vaccine was given at birth, then at months 2 and 6 simultaneously with the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis whole-cell (DTPw) vaccine. In 2008, Thailand replaced the monovalent HB vaccine at months 2 and 6 with a combined DTP-HB given at months 2, 4, and 6, with an added monovalent HB vaccine at month 1 for infants whose mothers were HBV carriers. Despite this rigorous HB vaccination schedule, vaccinated infants who are now adolescents do not possess a protective level of anti-HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) (≥10 mIU/ml). Thus, many young adults may be rendered susceptible to HB infection. Our objective was to determine how HB booster vaccination may benefit high-risk adolescents. We evaluated the serological records of a cohort of medical students (n = 291), which showed that 271 students (93.1%) possessed anti-HBs less than the accepted protective level (<10 mIU/ml) and subsequently received the HB vaccine booster prior to medical school enrollment. We then examined the anti-HB surface antibody (anti-HBs) in 216 individuals six weeks after they were immunized. We found that 61%, 88%, and 94% of individuals with pre-booster anti-HBs of <1 mIU/ml, 1-<3 mIU/ml, and 3-<10 mIU/ml achieved protective anti-HBs, respectively. Post-booster geometric mean titers were 305, 513, and 1,929 mIU/ml in these groups and correlated with pre-booster anti-HBs titers. These data suggest that medical students with known anti-HBs <1 mIU/ml will benefit from 3 doses of HB vaccine at 0, 1, and 6 months. Students with anti-HBs 1-<10 mIU/ml would benefit from an HB vaccine booster without further anti-HBs evaluation.