A Latin American survey on demographic aspects of hospitalized, decompensated cirrhotic patients and the resources for their management.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Liver cirrhosis is a major cause of mortality worldwide. Adequate diagnosis and treatment of decompensating events requires of both medical skills and updated technical resources. The objectives of this study were to search the demographic profile of hospitalized cirrhotic patients in a group of Latin American hospitals and the availability of expertise/facilities for the diagnosis and therapy of decompensation episodes. METHODS: A cross sectional, multicenter survey of hospitalized cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: 377 patients, (62% males; 58±11 years) (BMI>25, 57%; diabetes 32%) were hospitalized at 65 centers (63 urbans; 57 academically affiliated) in 13 countries on the survey date. Main admission causes were ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis/other infections. Most prevalent etiologies were alcohol-related (AR) (40%); non-alcoholic-steatohepatitis (NASH) (23%), hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) (7%) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (6%). The most frequent concurrent etiologies were AR+NASH. Expertise and resources in every analyzed issue were highly available among participating centers, mostly accomplishing valid guidelines. However, availability of these facilities was significantly higher at institutions located in areas with population>500,000 (n=45) and in those having a higher complexity level (Gastrointestinal, Liver and Internal Medicine Departments at the same hospital (n=22). CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiological etiologic profile in hospitalized, decompensated cirrhotic patients in Latin America is similar to main contemporary emergent agents worldwide. Medical and technical resources are highly available, mostly at great population urban areas and high complexity medical centers. Main diagnostic and therapeutic approaches accomplish current guidelines recommendations.

Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Initial Management of Acute Variceal Bleeding and Hepatorenal Syndrome in Patients with Cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis is a serious and life-threatening condition which imposes a significant socioeconomic burden on affected individuals and healthcare systems. Cirrhosis can result in portal hypertension, which may lead to major complications, including acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome. Without prompt treatment, these complications may be life-threatening. Over the past 2 decades, new treatment modalities and treatment strategies have been introduced, which have improved patients' prognosis, but the initial management of these severe complications continues to present a challenge. The present recommendations aim to increase clinicians' knowledge on the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, and to provide evidence-based management strategies to potentially, further improve patient outcomes. Special attention was given to the role of terlipressin. A comprehensive non-systematic literature search was undertaken to evaluate the evidence for the diagnosis and initial management of acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis. Recommendations on the diagnosis and initial management of acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis have been developed based on the best available evidence and the expert opinion of the consensus panel following a comprehensive review of the available clinical data. Prompt identification and timely treatment of acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome are essential to reduce the burden.

Prevention of portal hypertension: from variceal development to clinical decompensation.

Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension (PH) has been exclusively devoted to gastroesophageal varices-related events at different frameworks, including prophylactic, emergency, or preventive therapy. The goals of treatment are to avoid the first bleeding episode, stop active bleeding, and prevent bleeding recurrence, respectively. The objective of preprimary prophylaxis (PPP) is to avoid variceal development, and therefore it necessarily deals with patients with cirrhosis at earlier stages of the disease. At these earlier stages, nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) have been ineffective in preventing the development of varices and other complications of PH. Therefore, treatment should not rely on NSBB. It is possible that, at these earlier stages, etiological treatment of liver disease itself could prevent progression of PH. This review will focus mainly on early treatment of PH, because, if successful, it may translate into histological-hemodynamic improvements, avoiding not only variceal development, but also other PH-related complications, such as ascites and portosystemic encephalopathy. Moreover, the advent of new therapies may allow not only the prevention of the complications of PH, but also the chance of a substantial degree of regression in the cirrhotic process, with the possible prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement in pre-primary and primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage.

Pharmacological therapy of portal hypertensión can be accomplished according to different objectives. Among them, pre-primary prophylaxis aims to avoid / delay esophageal varices development while the target of primary prophylaxis is protection against first variceal bleeding. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement closely reflects portal pressure in most liver diseases whith predominant sinusoidal network involvement. Clinical-hemodynamic correlations have been demonstrated in both pre-primary and primary prophylatic therapy, allowing to establish HVPG measurement as a predictive parameter, not only regarding variceal growth and bled but also of liver disease evolution and other portal hypertensive related complications.

Hepatic venous pressure in practice: how, when, and why.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement has evolved into an extremely useful procedure for the assessment of portal hypertensive patients and in the prediction and management of portal hypertension-related events. Although invasive and not widely available, its safety and reproducibility can be warranted when performed in referral centers and following accepted guidelines. Well-established manometric HVPG cut off are reliable targets in the therapy of portal hypertension. When adequately indicated and performed, HVPG measurement provides valuable information allowing to establish diagnosis, elaborate prognosis, evaluate therapy and, most importantly, to make therapeutic decisions in portal hypertensive patients.

Octreotide enhances portal pressure reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In vitro, octreotide potentiates vasoconstriction in isolated, preconstricted, mesenteric arterial vessels. In cirrhotic patients, portal pressure (HVPG) reduction induced by propranolol is partly due to splanchnic vasoconstriction. AIM: To evaluate HVPG effects of octreotide administration in cirrhotic patients receiving long-term propranolol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial. First study: a total of 28 patients were studied at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide (200 mug) (N = 14) or placebo (N = 14) and then treated with propranolol for approximately 30 days (106 +/- 5 mg/day). Second study: after baseline evaluation patients received octreotide or placebo as they were assigned to in the first study and measurements repeated 30 and 60 minutes later. RESULTS: In the first study baseline HVPG was 18.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg and decreased to 17.1 +/- 1.1 mmHg and 17.1 +/- 1.0 mmHg (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Eight patients decreased their HVPG after octreotide. In the second study baseline HVPG was 15.6 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.01 vs baseline HVPG in first study) and decreased to 14.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg and 14.1 +/- 1.3 mmHg (25.7 +/- 5% lower than baseline HVPG in the first study, P < 0.01) (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Nine patients (2 responders/7 nonresponders to propranolol) decreased their HVPG after octreotide. Octreotide effects may be mediated by potentiation and additive mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide enhances HVPG reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhotic patients.

Measurement of portal pressure: when, how, and why to do it.

Many of the clinical complications of cirrhosis are the direct consequences of the evaluation of portal venous pressure (PVP). The degree of portal hypertension has been shown to correlate with the severity of liver disease, both functionally and histologically. Direct measurement of PVP, however, is invasive and cannot be routinely performed. As a surrogate, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) has been widely accepted as a measurement of PVP. The ease, accuracy, and safety of HVPG measurement has made it a valuable tool in the research arena and, increasingly, in clinical practice.

Effects of long-term propranolol and octreotide on postprandial hemodynamics in cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Postprandial increases in portal pressure may influence esophageal variceal rupture. The effects of chronic propranolol and octreotide (100 and 200 microg subcutaneously in a single dose) on postprandial hemodynamics were evaluated. METHODS: FIRST STUDY: 36 cirrhotic patients were studied at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after a standard meal and then treated with propranolol (139 +/- 9 mg/d during 39 +/- 2 days). SECOND STUDY: After baseline measurements, patients were randomized into 3 groups: (1) placebo, (2) octreotide (100 microg), or (3) octreotide (200 microg) (n = 12 for each group). Thirty minutes postinjection a new baseline was established and measurements were repeated 30 and 60 minutes after the meal. RESULTS: First study: Baseline portal pressure was 18.1 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, 30 and 60 minutes after the meal it was 21.5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg and 20.5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg, respectively (both P < 0.01 vs. baseline). Cardiac index (CI) was 4.5 +/- 0.2, 4.8 +/- 0.2, and 4.9 +/- 0.2 L x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively (both P < 0.05 vs. baseline). Peripheral vascular resistance was 1012 +/- 56, 902 +/- 51 (P = NS), and 884 +/- 49 dynes x sec x cm(-5) (P< 0.05 vs. baseline), respectively. Second study: Propranolol and placebo did not blunt postprandial increase in portal pressure. Octreotide (100 microg) partially ameliorated postprandial increase in portal pressure. Octreotide (200 microg) significantly enhanced the portal hypotensive effect of propranolol and blunted the postprandial increase in portal pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide blunts postprandial increase in portal pressure not prevented by long-term propranolol administration.