Scaphoid Fractures Requiring Bone Graft: Does Graft Source Matter?

Background: Treatment of scaphoid fractures often requires bone grafting. In such cases, bone graft is traditionally harvested from the iliac crest, but utilizing the distal radius carries less morbidity and is becoming more popular. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of treatment of scaphoid waist fractures with the use of distal radius and iliac crest bone grafts. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing repair of a scaphoid waist fracture with bone graft at our institution between 2010 and 2020 was completed. Bone graft was used in patients with nonunion, humpback deformity, or for correction of scaphoid alignment. The primary outcome was rate of union as determined by postoperative X-ray or computed tomography scan. Fisher exact tests, Student t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients were treated with distal radius bone graft, and 10 were treated with an iliac crest graft. There was no statistical difference in union rate between the distal radius and iliac crest cohorts (97% vs 80%, P = .16). There was no significant difference for complication rates, rate of unplanned secondary surgery, time to union, postoperative scapholunate angle, or duration of immobilization. Conclusions: In the fixation of scaphoid waist fractures with bone graft, there is no significant difference in union rate between distal radius and iliac crest grafts. With the well-documented morbidity associated with iliac crest grafts, surgeons should consider using distal radius grafts instead of iliac crest grafts.

Which Pre-Operative, Modifiable Risk Factors are Most Predictive of Complications in orthopedic Upper Extremity Surgery?

Objectives: Identification of modifiable comorbid conditions in the preoperative period is important in optimizing outcomes. We evaluate the association between such risk factors and postoperative outcomes after upper extremity surgery using a national database. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2006-2016 database was used to identify patients undergoing an upper extremity principle surgical procedure using CPT codes. Modifiable risk factors were defined as smoking status, use of alcohol, obesity, recent loss of >10% body weight, malnutrition, and anemia. Outcomes included discharge destination, major complications, bleeding complications, unplanned re-operation, sepsis, and prolonged length of stay. Chi square and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify significant predictors of outcomes. Significance was defined as P<0.01. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 53,780 patients were included in the final analysis. Preoperative malnutrition was significantly associated with non-routine discharge (OR=4.75), major complications (OR=7.27), bleeding complications (OR=7.43), unplanned re-operation (OR=2.44), sepsis (OR=10.22), and prolonged length of stay (OR=5.27). Anemia was associated with non-routine discharge (OR=2.67), bleeding complications (OR=13.27), and prolonged length of stay (OR=3.26). In patients who had a weight loss of greater than 10%, there was an increase of non-routine discharge (OR=2.77), major complications (OR=2.93), and sepsis (OR=3.7). Smoking, alcohol use, and obesity were not associated with these complications. Conclusion: Behavioral risk factors (smoking, alcohol use, and obesity) were not associated with increased complication rates. Malnutrition, weight loss, and anemia were associated with an increase in postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing upper limb orthopaedic procedures and should be addressed prior to surgery, suggesting nutrition labs should be part of the initial blood work.

Retainment of U.S. Orthopaedic Surgeons in Academia from 2016 to 2022.

Background: Academic medical centers greatly benefit from retaining their physicians; that ensures continuity in patient care, enhances resident education, and maintains a pool of experienced clinicians and researchers. Despite its importance, little research has been published on the retainment of academic faculty in orthopaedics. To address this gap, this study investigates the demographic trends of academic orthopaedic surgeons from 2016 to 2022. By analyzing data pertaining to gender distribution, years of practice, research productivity, and institutional rankings, we aimed to gain insights into the factors influencing faculty retainment, institution changes, and new entrants into academic orthopaedics. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of U.S. academic orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with programs under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2016 and 2022 was performed. Faculty present in both the 2016 and the 2022 data were classified as being "retained" in academia; those present only in 2016, as having "left" academia; and those present only in 2022, as being "new" to academia. The retained group was then divided into movers (those who moved to other institutions) and non-movers. Results: Retained orthopaedists had fewer years of practice, a higher h-index (Hirsch index), and more publications. Non-fellowship-trained orthopaedists had less retainment in academia, and orthopaedists with fellowships in oncology had more retainment in academia. Additionally, movers also had fewer years in practice but an equal level of scholarly productivity when compared with non-movers. Lastly, higher-ranked academic programs retained a greater proportion of orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusions: Over the study period, a majority of orthopaedists (56.99%) chose to remain in academia. Those retained tended to be in the earlier stages of their careers, yet demonstrated higher research output. Notably, the representation of female orthopaedists in academic orthopaedics is on the rise. Conversely, lower-ranked programs faced higher turnover rates, highlighting the challenges that they encounter in retaining faculty members. Clinical Relevance: Academic medical centers benefit from retaining orthopaedic surgeons by maintaining patient relationships, having consistency in resident education, and building on clinical and research expertise. Likewise, orthopaedists benefit from understanding the trends in current academic employment, in order to optimize career planning decisions.

"Top 20" residency-trained academic orthopaedic surgeons have higher academic productivity and funding in their careers.

"Top 20" status on Doximity, an online networking service for medical professionals, is an indicator of the reputation of a residency program. The study assesses how training at a Top 20 (T20) orthopaedic residency program impacts career productivity and funding. Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used in 2022 to identify active orthopaedic residency programs. Demographic and training data was collected for each orthopaedic surgeon using institutional websites and Doximity. The Residency Navigator feature on Doximity was used to rank residency programs by "reputation." Programs were categorized as either T20 or non-T20. The relative citation ratio (RCR) was calculated using the NIH iCite tool and Hirsch index (h-index) was calculated using Scopus. Industry funding was collected from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Program (CMS) for all available years (2014-2020). A total of 2812 academic orthopaedic surgeons were included in the study. Among academic orthopaedic surgeons in the United States, T20 trained orthopedists had more publications and citations (p < 0.001), along with higher h-indices (p < 0.001), RCR (p < 0.001), and industry funding (p = 0.043). Additionally, T20 trained orthopedists were 1.375 times more likely to obtain professor status (95% confidence interval: 1.150-1.645, p < 0.001). Even after propensity-matched analysis, T20 trained orthopedists maintained these differences. Training at a T20 residency program is associated with promotion, productivity, and funding. These findings are especially of concern to medical students who must consider the importance of a residency program's reputation when deciding where to apply for residency.

Resident involvement in hand and upper extremity surgery: An analysis of 30-day complications.

Background: Rotations in hand and upper extremity surgery are a core component of the Orthopaedic and Plastic Surgery resident training curriculums. This study compares short-term outcomes in hand and upper extremity procedures with and without resident involvement. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from years 2005-2012 for all procedures distal to the shoulder. Patients were stratified based on whether a resident scrubbed for the procedure. Outcome measures were 30-day mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, major complications, and length of stay (LOS). Chi-squared tests were used to determine significant variables. Significant variables were included in a binomial multivariate logistic regression model. Results: A total of 7697 patients were included in the study. Of those, 4509 (59 %) had no resident, and 3188 (41 %) had a resident. Patients with resident involvement were less likely to be Caucasian, ASA classification 3 or higher, and outpatient. Cohorts were similar with respect to age, sex, and emergent status. Operative time was 15 min longer in resident cases. Work relative value units were higher in resident cases. In the multivariate logistic regression model, resident involvement had no statistically significant impact on LOS, mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, or major complications. Subgroup analysis showed increased odds of superficial surgical site infections in resident cases, although this was statistically insignificant (OR 1.35, p = 0.24). Conclusions: Hand and upper extremity procedures with resident involvement do not have any increase in overall adverse short-term outcomes. In appropriately selected cases, residents can participate without compromising patient safety.

Cephalomedullary Nailing has a Higher Reoperation Rate Compared to Sliding Hip Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.

Objectives: Intertrochanteric hip fractures are a common orthopaedic injury in the United States. Complications of surgical treatment include nonunion, lag screw cutout, implant failure, post-operative pain, risk of refracture or reoperation, and infection. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of complications of sliding hip screw fixation (SHS) compared to cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) for the treatment of closed intertrochanteric femur fractures in adult patients. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing SHS to CMN in the treatment of closed intertrochanteric femur fractures in adults. Data were compiled to observe the rate of nonunion, cutout failure, infection, refracture, perioperative blood loss, reoperation, postoperative pain, pulmonary embolism/deep venous thrombosis (DVT), length of hospital stay, and mortality. Results: Seventeen studies were included comprising 1,500 patients treated with SHS and 1,890 patients treated with CMN. Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures with SHS demonstrated significantly fewer refractures and reoperations. There was no significant difference in other variables between SHS and CMN treated groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that the only notable difference in outcomes is patients treated with CMN have a higher rate of refracture and reoperation. With new advances in the development of both CMNs and SHS, further studies will be required to see if these differences persist in the coming years.

Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics.

INTRODUCTION: Quantification of a researcher's productivity relies on objective bibliometric measurements, such as the Hirsch index (h-index). However, h-index is not field and time-normalized and possesses bias against newer researchers. Our study is the first to compare the relative citation ratio (RCR), a new article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health, with h-index in academic orthopaedics. METHODS: Academic orthopaedic programs in the United States were identified using the 2022 Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Available demographic and training data for surgeons were collected. RCR was calculated using the National Institutes of Health iCite tool, and h-index was calculated using Scopus. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred twelve academic orthopaedic surgeons were identified from 131 residency programs. H-index, weighted RCR (w-RCR), and mean RCR (m-RCR) all significantly differed by faculty rank and career duration. However, while h-index and w-RCR varied between sexes (P < 0.001), m-RCR did not (P = 0.066), despite men having a longer career duration (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We propose that m-RCR be used in conjunction with w-RCR or h-index to promote a fairer, comprehensive depiction of an orthopaedic surgeon's academic effect and productivity. Use of m-RCR may reduce the historic bias against women and younger surgeons in orthopaedics, which has implications in employment, promotion, and tenure.

Comparison of Treatment Options for Chronic Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament (SLIL): A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) is an important contributor to wrist stability and functionality. SLIL injury is debilitating and therefore many surgical techniques have been proposed, but the optimal treatment modality remains debated.This meta-analysis reviews the available literature comparing surgical techniques used in the treatment of chronic SLIL to determine the best approach. Methods: An electronic search of the literature was conducted to identify all randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published before January 2019 that evaluated clinical outcomes of capsulodesis reconstruction, the modified Brunelli technique, and the reduction and association of the scaphoid and lunate (RASL) procedure for treatment of chronic SLIL. A chi-square analysis was performed to identify possible differences between each technique for several outcome measures. Results: A total 20 studies encompassing 409 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age among patients was 36.7 years, and 68.2% of patients were male. Reductions in visual analog scale pain scale; Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores; and increases in grip strength and range of motion were observed for all techniques. Capsulodesis was superior to the modified Brunelli technique regarding preserved range of motion. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed among any of the techniques for pain, DASH score, and grip strength outcomes. Capsulodesis, modified Brunelli, and RASL surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic SLIL injuries may all be seen as reliable methods of treatment of chronic SLIL injuries. While future trials directly comparing these methods are needed, this study suggests there is no superiority of one technique over another.

The use of virtual interviews and new trends in orthopedic surgery residency match.

This retrospective cross-sectional study sought to determine if there was a change in geographical trends in the orthopedic surgery residency match with the use of virtual interviews. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, visiting rotations at outside institutions were restricted and all residency interviews were conducted virtually for the 2021 match. Given these restrictions, it was hypothesized that applicants would match at a higher rate to their medical school-affiliated residency programs, or geographically nearby their medical school. Data was collected from residency program website and social media accounts to determine if the use of virtual interviews correlated with a decreased rate of matching at outside institutions. During the 2021 match, applicants who applied to orthopedic surgery in 2021 were more likely to match at their medical school-affiliated institution (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18-1.80; p < 0.01) compared to applicants during previous years. However, match rates were not different in terms of geographical regions. Virtual interviews are more cost-effective for both applicants and programs, however, this study demonstrates there are associated changes with this new interview structure. The utility of virtual interviews as a standard method in the future should take this change in trend into consideration.

Intraoperative Nerve Conduction Studies During Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Pilot Study.

Background: Operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) involves release of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) and often the volar antebrachial fascia (VAF). Evidence of a difference between TCL and TCL+VAF release is limited. We conducted a pilot study to measure changes of intraoperative nerve conduction velocity (NCV) after CTS surgery and compared outcomes of variable degrees of decompression. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 65 years diagnosed with idiopathic CTS that failed to respond to conservative management were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had prior surgical release, diabetes, acute CTS, trauma, or cervical spine radiculopathy. Outcomes included motor and sensory amplitude and latency. Electrodes were placed on the skin intraoperatively along the abductor pollicis brevis, index finger, and forearm. Outcome data were recorded at baseline, after TCL release, and after TCL+VAF release. Data were compared using a single-tail t test. Results: A total of 10 patients were included in this study. There were no significant changes in mean motor or sensory amplitude and latency from baseline to TCL release, TCL to VAF release, or from baseline to TCL+VAF release measured intraoperatively. Conclusions: This pilot study shows there is no immediate detectable difference in NCV following release of TCL or TCL+VAF. This suggests that NCV may not be useful for assessing intraoperative improvement. We highlight the need for future research in the form of case-control studies to determine the utility of intraoperative NCV. These studies should be conducted with larger numbers of patients and involve multiple hand specialists.

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The two techniques most utilized in the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures are open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). Although there have been multiple comparative clinical studies comparing outcomes for these two treatments, studies have not suggested one approach to be superior to the other. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with either ORIF or intramedullary nail. Methods: We conducted this meta-analysis utilizing stricter inclusion and broader exclusion criteria to examine these two common approaches. We examined those articles which have compared first-time, closed fractures of the humeral diaphysis in adults in fracture patterns that could be treated equivalently by intramedullary nail or plate fixation. The primary outcome of interest was nonunion, and studies that did not report nonunion rates were excluded. Results: There were a total of 1,926 abstracts reviewed and a total of three articles were included in the final analysis after screening. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nonunion between plating (2/111, 1.8%) and nailing (4/104, 3.9%) (P>0.05). The mean difference in average time to union for plated fractures and nailed fractures was 1.11 weeks (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40) which was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidence of radial nerve palsy (12/111, 10.8%) for plating compared to nailing (0/104, 0%) (P=0.0004). There was no difference in incidence of post-operative infection between the two groups intramedullary nailing (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this analysis demonstrate an increased risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, and a significantly shorter time to union when treating humeral shaft fractures with plating as compared to intramedullary nailing. There was no difference in the rates of nonunion or delayed union. Based on the evidence, both plating and nailing can achieve a similar treatment effect on humeral shaft fractures.

Identifying Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolic Events After Isolated Upper Extremity Trauma: A Predictive Scale.

Previous studies have defined risk factors for development of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) among patients with lower extremity orthopedic trauma. Limited data exist on this risk after upper extremity orthopedic trauma. A total of 269,137 incidents of upper extremity orthopedic trauma (fractures of the clavicle, scapula, humerus, elbow, or lower arm) were identified in the State Inpatient Database for 4 states included in the analysis (California, Florida, New York, and Washington) from 2006 to 2014. These patients were split into 2 cohorts, a derivation cohort (California and New York) and a validation cohort (Florida and Washington). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors for VTE within 90 days of discharge in the derivation group were used to develop the Thromboembolic Risk after Upper Extremity Trauma (TRUE-T) scale. Linear regression was used to determine fit of the TRUE-T scale to the 2 cohorts. We found that 2.61% of patients in the derivation cohort and 2.72% of patients in the validation cohort had a VTE within 90 days of discharge. Risk factors associated with increased rates of VTE were age older than 40 years, Medicare payer, anemia, chronic lung disease, coagulopathy, heart failure, malignancy, obesity, renal failure, head injury, chest injury, abdominal injury, rib fracture, humerus fracture, elbow fracture, and closed reduction. Application of the TRUE-T scale to the validation cohort showed an R2 value of 0.88. The patient factors, concomitant injuries, and fracture treatment modalities included in the TRUE-T scale can be used to identify patients at increased risk for VTE after upper extremity orthopedic trauma. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):345-352.].

Radiographic Scoring of Humeral Shaft Fractures Helps Identify Patients at Risk of Surgery for Delayed Union.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing external validity and clinical relevance of modified radiographic union score (mRUS) to predict delayed union in closed humeral shaft fractures initially treated with conservative management. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single urban academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing initial nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture with a minimum of 3 months follow-up and at least one set of follow-up orthogonal x-rays within 12-weeks of injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the (mRUS) system for humeral shaft fractures, and establishing an mRUS threshold at 6 and 12 weeks postinjury to predict surgery for delayed union. RESULTS: mRUS demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement on all assessments. Intraobserver agreement was nearly perfect for all reviewers on repeat assessment. mRUS of ≤7 at 6 ± 1 weeks follow-up was associated with surgery for delayed union with an odds ratio of 4.88 (95% CI, 2.52-9.44, P < 0.01), sensitivity of 0.286, and specificity of 0.924. At 12 ± 1 weeks follow-up, the same threshold demonstrated a stronger association with an odds ratio of 14.7 (95% CI, 4.9-44.1, P < 0.01), sensitivity of 0.225, and specificity of 0.981. CONCLUSIONS: The mRUS for humeral shaft fractures is reliable and reproducible providing an objective way to track subtle changes in radiographs over time. An mRUS of ≤7 at 6 or 12 weeks postinjury is highly specific for delayed union. This can be helpful when counseling patients about the risk of nonunion and potential early surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association of Bacterial Etiology With Rates of Reoperation in Patients With Septic Tenosynovitis of the Hand.

Background: The anatomy of the hand makes it uniquely sensitive to complications after bacterial infection. The causative organism has been implicated as a predictor of complications after surgery. We hypothesize that bacterial etiology is associated with different operation and reoperation rates in patients with flexor tenosynovitis. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2013 database was queried for cases of tenosynovitis by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic codes 727.04 and 727.05. The pathogen cultured was also identified with ICD-9 codes, and surgical intervention was determined using ICD-9 procedural codes. χ2 analysis and logistic regression were used to determine predictors of outcomes. Outcomes included initial surgery and the need for additional surgery, which was defined as records having ICD-9 procedural codes repeated for the same patient. Results: A total of 17,476 cases were included. The most common bacterial etiology was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus followed by Streptococcus species. Infections with gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S aureus, unspecified Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus species were significantly associated with higher rates of initial surgery for tenosynovitis. Patients receiving Medicaid and Hispanic patients had a statistically significant lower likelihood of surgery. Higher rates of reoperation were reported in patients aged 30 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, 61 to 79 years, and ≥80 years; other factors associated with higher reoperation rates were Streptococcus and Staphylococcus infections and use of Medicare. Conclusions: The data show that cultures of Streptococcus and certain species of Staphylococcus in patients with septic tenosynovitis are predictive of operation and reoperation rates. Patients with these infectious etiologies may have more severe presentations that warrant operative intervention. This data may allow for more informed decision-making in the preoperative period.

Distal Humerus Traction Radiographs: Is the Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Comparable With Computed Tomography?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of traction radiographs with 2-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) in distal humerus fracture classification and characterization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled radiographic review of retrospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Skeletally mature patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures with both traction radiographs and CT scans were reviewed by 11 orthopaedists from different subspecialties and training levels. INTERVENTION: The intervention involved traction radiographs and 2D CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measurements included interobserver and intraobserver reliability of fracture classification by the OTA/AO and Jupiter-Mehne and determination of key fracture characteristics. RESULTS: For the OTA/AO and Jupiter-Mehne classifications, we found a moderate intraobserver agreement with both 2D CT and traction radiographs (κ = 0.70-0.75). When compared with traction radiographs, 2D CT improved the interobserver reliability of the OTA/AO classification from fair to moderate (κ = 0.3 to κ = 0.42) and the identification of a coronal fracture from slight to fair (κ = 0.2 to κ = 0.34), which was more pronounced in a subgroup analysis of less-experienced surgeons. When compared with 2D CT, traction radiographs improved the intraobserver reliability of detecting stable affected articular fragments from fair to substantial (κ = 0.4 to κ = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Traction radiographs provide similar diagnostic characteristics as 2D CT in distal humerus fractures. For less-experienced surgeons, 2D CT may improve the identification of coronal fracture lines and articular comminution.

A Review of Orthopaedic Resident Case Logs to Identify Fluctuations in Exposure to Adult Orthopaedic Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery resident case exposure is an important component of surgical training and is monitored by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to ensure resident readiness for graduation. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in exposure to adult orthopaedic surgical procedures and analyze the impact of the 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations. METHODS: A retrospective review of ACGME case log data was conducted for adult orthopaedic procedures performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents from 2012 to 2020. Trends in the number of cases logged and the case share by anatomical location were investigated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze changes in case number over the 9-year period. RESULTS: For all surgical categories, there was stability in the average case number per resident from 2012 to 2013, followed by a precipitous decrease from 2013 to 2014. From 2014 to 2020, there has been a gradual increase in case number for all categories except "other musculoskeletal (MSK)," resulting in a total 46% recovery since the 2014 decline. Concomitant with the decline, there was a relative increase in pelvis/hip and femur/knee procedures and decrease in shoulder, other MSK, and spine procedures. From 2014 to 2020, shoulder, humerus/elbow, pelvis/hip, leg/ankle, foot/toes, and spine cases have gradually accounted for a larger proportion of total cases while femur/knee and "other MSK" cases have accounted for less. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations was associated with a significant decrease in case number. This is likely a reflection of residents correctly entering 1 primary Current Procedural Terminology code for each surgical case. Programs should be aware of a general increase in case number since 2014 and acknowledge the fact that some procedure types may be given priority from a logging standpoint when multiple Current Procedural Terminology codes apply.

Orthopaedic trauma during COVID-19: Is patient care compromised during a pandemic?

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) placed unprecedented pressure on the healthcare system. Many institutions implemented a government-mandated restructured set of safety and administrative protocols to treat urgent orthopaedic trauma patients. The objective of this study was to compare two cohorts of patients, a COVID group and non-COVID control group, and to evaluate the effectiveness of safety measures outlined in the Rutgers Orthopaedic Trauma Patient Safety Protocol (ROTPSP). Secondary outcomes were to elucidate risk factors for complications associated with fractures and COVID-19. METHODS: Patients treated for orthopaedic traumatic injuries were retrospectively identified between March and May 2020, and compared to a series of patients from the same time period in 2018. Main outcome measures included surgical site infections (SSI), length of stay (LOS), post-operative LOS (poLOS), presentation to OR time (PORT), and length of surgery. RESULTS: After review, 349 patients (201 non-COVID, 148 COVID) undergoing 426 surgeries were included. Average LOS (11.91 days vs. 9.27 days, p = 0.04), poLOS (9.68 days vs. 7.39 days, p = 0.03), and PORT (30.56 vs. 25.59 h, p < 0.01) was significantly shorter in the COVID cohort. There were less SSI in the COVID group (5) compared to the non-COVID group (14) (p = 0.03). Overall complications were significantly lower in the COVID group. Patients receiving Cepheid tests had significantly shorter LOS and poLOS compared to patients receiving the RNA and DiaSorin tests (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). The Cepheid test carried the best benefit-to-cost ratio, 0.10, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The restructuring of care protocols caused by COVID-19 did not negatively impact perioperative complication rates, PORT or LOS. Cepheid COVID test type administered upon admission plays an integral role in a patient's hospital course by reducing both length of stay and hospital costs. This information demonstrates we can continue to treat orthopaedic trauma patients safely during the COVID-19 pandemic by utilizing strict safety protocols.

A simplified preoperative risk assessment tool as a predictor of complications in the surgical management of forearm fractures.

PURPOSE: Frailty is a well-known predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes and is often considered in the preoperative planning stage of surgery. In recent years, the modified frailty index (mFI), a novel metric used to quantify frailty, has become increasingly used in the orthopedic literature as a risk assessment tool. In this study, we analyze the utility of the mFI in predicting unplanned repeat operations and morbidity in the surgical treatment forearm fractures. METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2006-2014 dataset to identify patients undergoing open fixation of forearm fractures. The mFI was calculated based on 5 possible comorbid conditions. Demographic and predictor variables were analyzed for associations with each outcome. In order to assess frailty in both the general and elderly population, two analyses were completed: one for the entire population and one for a population of age 65 or older. The primary outcome of interest was unplanned repeat operation. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination and major post-operative complications. Chi square and logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations. RESULTS: A total of 4641 patients were included in our final analysis. There was a higher prevalence of females and patients between the ages of 61 and 80 compared to other age groups. An mFI score ≥2 was a positively associated with unplanned repeat operation in the general population. An mFI score ≥2 was also positively associated with a discharge destination other than home and major post-operative complications. In the elderly population, mFI ≥2 was similarly associated with a discharge destination other than the patient's home. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open treatment of forearm fractures were at an increased likelihood of having an unplanned repeat operation and having major complications as frailty score increased, demonstrating that the mFI may be clinically applicable risk assessment tool for these patients.

Differences in the Predictive value of Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and the Charlson Comorbidity indices in patients with hand infections.

PURPOSE: Hand infections are a common source of potentially debilitating morbidity, particularly in patients with comorbid disease. We hypothesize that there is a difference in predictive value between two commonly used comorbidity indices for the prognosis of hand infections, which may have clinical implications in the management of these conditions. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2013 database was queried for hand infections using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The Elixhauser (ECI) and Charlson (CCI) comorbidity scores were calculated based on validated sets of ICD-9 codes. Primary outcomes included mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS, defined as >95 percentile), discharge destination, and postoperative complications. Indices were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the curve (AUC). If confidence intervals overlapped, significance was determined using the DeLong method for correlated ROC curves. This is a validated, non-parametric comparison used for the calculation of the difference between two AUCs. RESULTS: A weighted total of 1,511,057 patients were included in this study. The majority were Caucasian (57.1%) males (61.4%). Complication rates included 0.9% mortality, 5.3% prolonged length of stay, 25.3% discharges to non-home destinations, and 5.3% post-operative complications. The ECI and CCI each demonstrated good predictive value for mortality, but poor predictive value for non-routine discharge, prolonged LOS, and post-operative complications. There was a significantly increased likelihood of each complication with increasing comorbidity score for both indices, with the greatest odds ratio in the ECI ≥4 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The CCI was superior in predicting mortality while the ECI was superior in predicting non-routine discharge, prolonged length of stay, and postoperative complications, but these indices may not be clinically relevant. While both represent good predictive models, a score specifically designed for patients with hand infections may have superior prognostic value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.