1.
Comparison of the persistent activity of ivermectin, abamectin, doramectin and moxidectin in cattle.
Vet Rec
; 138(4): 91-2, 1996 Jan 27.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-8650895
Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Ivermectin/analogs & derivatives , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Animals , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Feces/parasitology , Female , Haemonchus , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/standards , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/pharmacology , Macrolides/standards , Male , Nematode Infections/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/prevention & control , Oesophagostomum , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Random Allocation , Trichostrongylus
2.
Ear Hear
; 3(1): 30-3, 1982.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-7060843
ABSTRACT
In three experiments, the predictability of the hearing aid gain actually used by clients was compared with that predicted by using data based upon hearing threshold level and data based upon most comfortable loudness level. At the frequencies tested, the mean difference between the predicted and obtained gain was smaller when based upon prediction from the hearing threshold level. It is concluded that from the standpoint of predicting user's gain, the hearing threshold level provides greater accuracy than does most comfortable loudness level.
