ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The economic impact of Patient blood management (PBM) must be assessed beyond the acquisition cost of blood products alone. The estimate of indirect costs may vary depending on the organization and the elements taken into account. The transposition of data from the literature into a specific local context is therefore delicate. The objective of this work was to evaluate the overall cost of red blood cell concentrate (RBC) transfusion from a French healthcare establishment point of view. METHODS: We carried out an activity based costing analysis in our hospital for the year 2018. The steps of the transfusion process and additional costs were detailed and cumulated (resource consumption, labor time, frequency) to populate the ABC model. Several scenarios were developed focusing either on RBC, all blood products or the surgical activity, and a univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The average total cost of transfusion, including acquisition cost, was 339,64 euros per RBC transfused. The cost of administration was 138.41 euros/RBC. Focusing only on surgical activities increased this cost (152.43 euros) while taking all blood products into account reduced it (92.49 euros). CONCLUSION: The difference in our results with the literature confirms the local variability in the cost of transfusion, which may affect the economic impact of PBM. Our study related to the specific context of a single French institution has limitations that a multicenter study would clarify in order to carry out economic modelling of transfusion optimization and alternatives and to guide the choice of PBM strategies at the national level.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Costs and Cost Analysis , Hospitals , HumansABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Drug eluting beads (DEBs) theoretically improve the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, their economic profile has not been assessed. Our retrospective before/after study aimed to compare efficacy, safety and economic profile of two strategies of TACE without (Period 1) or with the possibility of using DEBs (Period 2). METHODS: All HCC patients treated by TACE in our hospital between March 2006 and May 2013 were included. Economic analyses were performed from the French Public Health Insurance point of view according to the French Diagnosis-Related Group prospective payment system and from the analytic accountability. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred and sixty-one patients were included. Median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 13.1 and 23.8 months in Period 1 vs. 14.1 and 30.2 months in Period 2 (P = 0.45 and P = 0.40). Mean hospital durations and tariffs were 14.9 ± 7.7 days and 11 472 ± 5901 in Period 1 vs. 12.4 ± 8.4 days and 7654 ± 4625 in Period 2 (P = 0.03 and P < 10(-4) ). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The possibility of using DEBs did not improve the prognosis in HCC patients treated by TACE. Nonetheless, it had a better medico-economic profile.
