Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 70(2): 125-133, 2020.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prediction of difficult laryngoscopy is based on tests that assess anatomic characteristics of face and neck. We aimed to identify the most accurate tests and propose a multivariate predictive model. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 1134 patients. Thyromental Distance (TMD), Sternomental Distance (STMD), Ratio of Height-to-Thyromental Distance (R-H/TMD), Neck Circumference (NC), Ratio of Neck Circumference-to-Thyromental Distance (R-NC/TMD), Hyomental Distance with head in Neutral Position (HMD-NP) and at Maximal Extension (HMD-HE), Ratio of Hyomental Distance at Maximal head extension-to-hyomental distance in neutral position (R-HMD), Mallampati Class (MLC), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mouth Opening (MO) and Head Extension (HE) were assessed preoperatively. A Cormack-Lehane Grade ≥ 3 was defined as Difficult Laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed for all tests. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to create the predictive models. RESULTS: A model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD-HE and R-NC/TMD showed high prognostic accuracy; x2(5)=109.12, p <0.001, AUC=0.86, p <0.001). Its sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were 82.3%, 74.8% and 97.4%, respectively. A second model including two measurements not requiring patient's cooperation (R-NC/TMD and HMD-HE) exhibited good prognostic performance; x2(2)=63.5, p <0.001, AUC=0.77, p <0.001. Among single tests, HE had the highest sensitivity (78.5%) and negative predictive value (96%). CONCLUSIONS: A five-variable model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD-HE and R-NC/TMD showed satisfyingly high predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy. A model including R-NC/TMD and HMD-HE could be useful in incapable patients. The most accurate single predictor was HE.


Subject(s)
Laryngoscopy , Models, Statistical , Point-of-Care Testing , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 70(2): 125-133, Mar.-Apr. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1137156

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background and objectives: The prediction of difficult laryngoscopy is based on tests that assess anatomic characteristics of face and neck. We aimed to identify the most accurate tests and propose a multivariate predictive model. Methods: This prospective observational study included 1134 patients. Thyromental Distance (TMD), Sternomental Distance (STMD), Ratio of Height-to-Thyromental Distance (R-H/TMD), Neck Circumference (NC), Ratio of Neck Circumference-to-Thyromental Distance (R-NC/TMD), Hyomental Distance with head in Neutral Position (HMD-NP) and at Maximal Extension (HMD-HE), Ratio of Hyomental Distance at Maximal head extension-to-hyomental distance in neutral position (R-HMD), Mallampati Class (MLC), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mouth Opening (MO) and Head Extension (HE) were assessed preoperatively. A Cormack-Lehane Grade ≥ 3 was defined as Difficult Laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed for all tests. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to create the predictive models. Results: A model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD-HE and R-NC/TMD showed high prognostic accuracy; x2(5) = 109.12, p < 0.001, AUC = 0.86, p < 0.001). Its sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were 82.3%, 74.8% and 97.4%, respectively. A second model including two measurements not requiring patient's cooperation (R-NC/TMD and HMD-HE) exhibited good prognostic performance; x2(2) = 63.5, p < 0.001, AUC = 0.77, p < 0.001. Among single tests, HE had the highest sensitivity (78.5%) and negative predictive value (96%). Conclusions: A five-variable model incorporating MLC, ULBT, HE, HMD-HE and R-NC/TMD showed satisfyingly high predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy. A model including R-NC/TMD and HMD-HE could be useful in incapable patients. The most accurate single predictor was HE.


Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A previsão de laringoscopia difícil se baseia em testes que avaliam as características anatômicas da face e pescoço. Nosso objetivo foi identificar os testes mais precisos e propor modelo preditivo multivariado. Método: Estudo observacional prospectivo incluiu 1134 pacientes e avaliou no pré-operatório: Distância Tireomentoniana (DTM), Distância Esternomentoniana (DEM), razão Altura-Distância Tireomentoniana (A/DTM), Circunferência Cervical (CC), razão Circunferência Cervical-Distância Tireomentoniana (CC/DTM), Distância Hiomentoniana com a cabeça na Posição Neutra (DHM-PN) e em Extensão Máxima (DHM-EM), razão Distância Hiomentoniana com Cabeça em Extensão Máxima/Distância Hiomentoniana na posição Neutra (DHME/DHMN), Classe Mallampati (CML), Teste da Mordida do Lábio Superior (TMLS), Abertura da Boca (AB) e Extensão da Cabeça (EC). Grau Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3 foi definido como Laringoscopia Difícil. A sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivos positivo e negativo foram avaliados para todos os testes. A análise multivariada com regressão logística foi usada para criar modelos preditivos. Resultados: Um modelo incorporando CML, TMLS, EC, DHM-EM e CC/DTM demonstrou alta precisão prognóstica (x2(5) = 109,12, p < 0,001, AUC = 0,86, p < 0,001). A sensibilidade, especificidade e valor preditivo negativo foram 82,3%, 74,8% e 97,4%, respectivamente. Um segundo modelo incluindo duas medidas que não necessitavam da cooperação do paciente (CC/DTM e DHM-EM) demonstrou bom desempenho prognóstico (x2 (2) = 63,5; p < 0,001; AUC = 0,77, p < 0,001). Entre os testes individuais, EC teve a maior sensibilidade (78,5%) e valor preditivo negativo (96%). Conclusões: O modelo de cinco variáveis incorporando CML, TMLS, EC, DHM-EM e CC/DTM mostrou valor preditivo satisfatoriamente alto para laringoscopia difícil. Um modelo que incluísse CC/DTM e DHM-EM poderia ser útil em pacientes com incapacidade. O preditor individual mais preciso foi EC.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Models, Statistical , Point-of-Care Testing , Laryngoscopy , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Middle Aged
3.
Indian J Anaesth ; 58(2): 176-82, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24963183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Difficult airway assessment is based on various anatomic parameters of upper airway, much of it being concentrated on oral cavity and the pharyngeal structures. The diagnostic value of tests based on neck anatomy in predicting difficult laryngoscopy was assessed in this prospective, open cohort study. METHODS: We studied 341 adult patients scheduled to receive general anaesthesia. Thyromental distance (TMD), sternomental distance (STMD), ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) and neck circumference (NC) were measured pre-operatively. The laryngoscopic view was classified according to the Cormack-Lehane Grade (1-4). Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4. The optimal cut-off points for each variable were identified by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each test. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression, including all variables, was used to create a predictive model. Comparisons between genders were also performed. RESULTS: Laryngoscopy was difficult in 12.6% of the patients. The cut-off values were: TMD ≤7 cm, STMD ≤15 cm, RHTMD >18.4 and NC >37.5 cm. The RHTMD had the highest sensitivity (88.4%) and NPV (95.2%), while TMD had the highest specificity (83.9%). The area under curve (AUC) for the TMD, STMD, RHTMD and NC was 0.63, 0.64, 0.62 and 0.54, respectively. The predictive model exhibited a higher and statistically significant diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.68, P < 0.001). Gender-specific cut-off points improved the predictive accuracy of NC in women (AUC: 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The TMD, STMD, RHTMD and NC were found to be poor single predictors of difficult laryngoscopy, while a model including all four variables had a significant predictive accuracy. Among the studied tests, gender-specific cut-off points should be used for NC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...