Evaluation of functional interaction masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles affected by TMJ dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To evaluate the functional connection and the bioelectrical state of the m.masseter and m. sternocleidomastoid using functional tests before and after treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 21 individuals with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Examinations were carried out before and after treatment using repositioning splint therapy and in seated/standing positions. RESULTS: Results: M. masseter - p=0.072 before treatment and p=0.821 after treatment. Symmetry is also maintained after treatment. After treatment, a significant difference is noted at the level of significance p<0.001 for the right chewing muscle. In seated and standing positions before treatment did not reveal a statistically significant difference (p=0.07, p=0.143) and after (p=0.272, p=0.623).M. sternocleidomastoid- p<0.001 when comparing right and left sides. After treatment, there was no difference between the right and left sides (p=0.169). No statistical difference was found when assessing indicators separately for the right and left muscles in seated and standing positions (p=0.304, p=0.611, p=0.089, p=0.869). When comparing the bioelectric potentials of the right muscle before, after treatment, a statistically significant difference was found p=0.001. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Biostatistical analysis of the indicators of bioelectrical activity of m. masseter and sternocleidomastoid indicates no changes in muscle microvolt indicators with changes in body position in patients. However, repositioning splint therapy is associated with reduced muscle tone in initially more spasmodic muscles. It is worth noting that the symmetry of interaction between muscles improves.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT STRUCTURES AFFECTED BY TMJ DYSFUNCTION.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To investigate the individual anatomical features of the temporomandibular joint structures affected by TMJ disorders and compare them with those of asymptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The sample consisted of 41 patients. The study group included 29 patients. The retroposition of the right mandibular head was observed in 16 patients, the anterior position of the right mandibular head - in 13 patients, the retroposition of the left mandibular head - in 19 patients, and the anterior position of the left mandibular head - in 10 patients. The control group consisted of 12 patients with an anterior or central position of the right and left mandibular heads. RESULTS: Results: In the study group, a comparative analysis of the ABC angle on the right and left sides found no statistically significant difference in Student's criterion (p=0.176). In the control group, a comparative analysis of the ABC angle on the right and left sides found no statistically significant difference in Student's criterion (p=0.131). To identify a possible difference in the inclination of the articular tubercle in the study and control groups (anterior position of the mandibular head), calculations were carried out and when comparing two related samples using Wilkinson's T-criteria, the difference is not statistically significant p=0.119. The mean values obtained using Student's criterion did not reveal any statistically significant difference between both groups, р*=0,811. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: A comparative analysis of the ABC angle in patients with TMJ dysfunction and the control group did not reveal any statistically significant difference. At the same time, there was no statistically significant difference between patients with the anterior and posterior position of the mandibular head.