Impact of hyperlipidaemia on the orbital bone cefotaxime levels in rats.

Facial injuries are critical conditions, leading to serious complications, such as occult facial infections. Infectious endophthalmitis occurs despite of antibiotics use during implantation of intraocular lenses and is generally resistant to antibiotic therapy. It is a crucial situation in ophthalmology, since it often induces a substantial reduction of visual acuity and in some cases the loss of the eye despite treatment. It is, therefore, important to obtain drug levels able to exert antimicrobial effect in the diseased organ. The distribution of a drug depends on the binding extent to both plasma proteins and tissues and only the free drug is capable to be transported/diffused across membranes from blood vessels into tissues, in order to achieve its effect on the target organ. Hyperlipidaemia and consequent enhanced concentration of free fatty acid can modify binding pharmacokinetics of antibiotics through antagonism for the same binding sites. Cefotaxime, the third generation cephalosporin with easy penetration in a variety of tissues and body fluids and low incidence of adverse effects, can obtain adequate concentration in blood, eye bulb, and in the orbital bones. Its levels are influenced by hyperlipidaemia with clinical impact.

Anticoagulant-induced changes on antibiotic concentrations in the serum and bones.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the co-administration of acenocoumarin as anticoagulant and certain quinolones, i.e., cefapirin, pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin increased the levels of the given antibiotics and whether this resulted in a prolongation of prothrombin time. Seventy male albino Wistar rats aged 8-10 weeks and weighed 170 +/- 14 g were used and divided into seven groups (I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII: n=10). The rats in group I received cefapirin via 1 g/kg/8h im injection. Group II received cefapirin via of 1 g/kg/8h im injection and 0.1 mg/kg/24h p.o. acenocoumarin. Group III received ciprofloxacin 0.18 mg/kg/24h im. Group IV received ciprofloxacin 0.18 mg/kg/24h im and 0.1 mg/kg/24h p.o. acenocoumarin. Group V received 10 mg/kg/24h pefloxacin im. Group VI received 10 mg/kg/24h pefloxacin im and 0.1 mg/kg/24h p.o. acenocoumarin while Group VII received only acenocoumarin 0.1 mg/kg/24h p.o. Drug administration was performed over a total of 5 doses in order to obtain steady state concentrations in the plasma and tissues. The animals were sacrificed by decapitation 2 h after the last antibiotic administration. Prothrombin time and antibiotic concentrations in the serum, femur and mandible were assessed. In the study, all the antibiotics were found to prolong prothrombine time following acenocoumarin administration. In addition, perfloxacin and ciproflaxin concentrations were increased in the serum and mandible after acenocoumarin treatment. Cepafirin levels remained unaffected after the administration of this anticoagulant. In conclusion, anticoagulant and quinolone co-administration led to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. Thus particular attention should be paid in the case of these drugs being used in combination in clinical practice.

In vitro binding of lidocaine to liver tissue under the influence of propranolol: another mechanism of interaction?

The co-administration of lidocaine and propranolol leads to significant drug-drug interactions. Beta-blockers decrease liver perfusion and inhibit the activity of hepatic microsomal lidocaine metabolizing enzymes of the P450_2D subfamily. Hence, there is a resulting reduction in the hepatic breakdown of lidocaine and an increase in its serum concentrations. In this study the ability of propranolol to displace lidocaine from its binding sites in liver tissue has been examined through an in vitro model. Rat liver slices were incubated together with propranolol and/or lidocaine in human serum and the percentage of the bound fraction of lidocaine in the experimental mixture was assessed. The present results indicate that propranolol significantly decreases the binding process of lidocaine in liver tissue. This effect develops only when blood is used as incubation medium and the incubation period lasts 60 min. In conclusion, propranolol can displace lidocaine from liver proteins and therefore the co-administration of the two drugs may increase the free fraction of lidocaine excreted by the liver. However, this result arises from an in virro model and thus further investigation is needed.