ABSTRACT
Cardiac channelopathies are a group of heritable disorders that affect the heart's electrical activity due to genetic variations present in genes coding for ion channels. With the advent of new sequencing technologies, molecular diagnosis of these disorders in patients has paved the way for early identification, therapeutic management and family screening. The objective of this retrospective study was to understand the efficacy of whole-genome sequencing in diagnosing patients with suspected cardiac channelopathies who were reported negative after whole exome sequencing and analysis. We employed a 3-tier analysis approach to identify nonsynonymous variations and loss-of-function variations missed by exome sequencing, and structural variations that are better resolved only by sequencing whole genomes. By performing whole genome sequencing and analyzing 25 exome-negative cardiac channelopathy patients, we identified 3 pathogenic variations. These include a heterozygous likely pathogenic nonsynonymous variation, CACNA1C:NM_000719:exon19:c.C2570G:p. P857R, which causes autosomal dominant long QT syndrome in the absence of Timothy syndrome, a heterozygous loss-of-function variation CASQ2:NM_001232.4:c.420+2T>C classified as pathogenic, and a 9.2 kb structural variation that spans exon 2 of the KCNQ1 gene, which is likely to cause Jervell-Lange-Nielssen syndrome. In addition, we also identified a loss-of-function variation and 16 structural variations of unknown significance (VUS). Further studies are required to elucidate the role of these identified VUS in gene regulation and decipher the underlying genetic and molecular mechanisms of these disorders. Our present study serves as a pilot for understanding the utility of WGS over clinical exomes in diagnosing cardiac channelopathy disorders.
ABSTRACT
Delhi, the national capital of India, experienced multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks in 2020 and reached population seropositivity of >50% by 2021. During April 2021, the city became overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases and fatalities, as a new variant, B.1.617.2 (Delta), replaced B.1.1.7 (Alpha). A Bayesian model explains the growth advantage of Delta through a combination of increased transmissibility and reduced sensitivity to immune responses generated against earlier variants (median estimates: 1.5-fold greater transmissibility and 20% reduction in sensitivity). Seropositivity of an employee and family cohort increased from 42% to 87.5% between March and July 2021, with 27% reinfections, as judged by increased antibody concentration after a previous decline. The likely high transmissibility and partial evasion of immunity by the Delta variant contributed to an overwhelming surge in Delhi.
