Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 198(9-11): 566-572, 2022 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36005955

ABSTRACT

A proof-of-concept study of a new detector based on a thin plastic scintillator monitored by a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) camera designed for monitoring and characterisation of Linac photon beams is presented. The response of the detector is compared with radiochromic film using 6 and 18 MV radiotherapeutic beams. We have observed: (i) all instruments survived the secondary radiation fields during Linac operation, (ii) it was possible to process the measured data using statistical techniques and (iii) the processed data from the CCD camera qualitatively correspond to film dosimetry results. A statistical technique based on the selection of minimal values provides the clearest results. Quantitatively, CCD and film results can only be compared as 6 to 18 MV response rates. We have observed that the rates from the CCD data are systematically higher than the rates from film dosimetry. Differences are not too high, namely 1.9-2.4 times the combined standard deviation.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators , Plastics , Film Dosimetry/methods , Radiometry
3.
Health Phys ; 117(2): 193-201, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31022011

ABSTRACT

An international intercomparison was organized by Working Group 7, Internal Dosimetry, of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group in collaboration with Working Group 6, Computational Dosimetry, for measurement and Monte Carlo simulation of Am in three skull phantoms. The main objectives of this combined exercise were (1) comparison of the results of counting efficiency in fixed positions over each head phantom using different germanium detector systems, (2) calculation of the activity of Am in the skulls, (3) comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with measurements (spectrum and counting efficiency), and (4) comparison of phantom performance. This initiative collected knowledge on equipment, detector arrangements, calibration procedures, and phantoms used around the world for in vivo monitoring of Am in exposed persons, as well as on the Monte Carlo skills and tools of participants. Three skull phantoms (BfS, USTUR, and CSR phantoms) were transported from Europe (10 laboratories) to North America (United States and Canada). The BfS skull was fabricated with real human bone artificially labeled with Am. The USTUR skull phantom was made from the US Transuranium and Uranium Registries whole-body donor (case 0102) who was contaminated due to an occupational intake of Am; one-half of the skull corresponds to real contaminated bone, the other half is real human bone from a noncontaminated person. Finally, the CSR phantom was fabricated as a simple hemisphere of equivalent bone and tissue material. The three phantoms differ in weight, size, and shape, which made them suitable for an efficiency study. Based on their own skull calibration, the participants calculated the activity in the three European Radiation Dosimetry Group head phantoms. The Monte Carlo intercomparison was organized in parallel with the measurement exercise using the voxel representations of the three physical phantoms; there were 16 participants. Three tasks were identified with increasing difficulty: (1) Monte Carlo simulation of the simple CSR hemisphere and the Helmholz Zentrum München high-purity germanium detector for calculating the counting efficiency for the 59.54 keV photons of Am, in established measurement geometry; (2) Monte Carlo simulation of particular measurement geometries using the BfS and USTUR voxel phantoms and the Helmholz Zentrum München high-purity germanium detector detector; and (3) application of Monte Carlo methodology to calculate the calibration factor of each participant for the detector system and counting geometry (single or multidetector arrangement) to be used for monitoring a person in each in vivo facility, using complex skull phantoms. The results of both exercises resulted in the conclusion that none of the three available head phantoms is appropriate as a reference phantom for the calibration of germanium detection systems for measuring Am in exposed adult persons. The main reasons for this are: (1) lack of homogeneous activity distribution in the bone material, or (2) inadequate shape/size for simulating an adult skull. Good agreement was found between Monte Carlo results and measurements, which supports Monte Carlo calibration of body counters as an alternative method when appropriate physical phantoms are not available and the detector and source are well known.


Subject(s)
Americium/analysis , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Skull/radiation effects , Adult , Algorithms , Europe , Female , Humans , North America
4.
Health Phys ; 99(4): 495-502, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838090

ABSTRACT

A group of workers internally contaminated with Am have been followed for about 12 years. The source of contamination was AmO2 powder used for production of AmBe neutron sources and other applications. The production of some radionuclide sources included chemical treatment of the original material, which transformed the americium into the nitrate, but mostly powder metallurgy was used for production of sources for smoke detectors. In vivo measurement of the workers was performed with two LEGe detectors placed near the head of the measured person. Calibration was performed with four different physical skull phantoms of different origin and a voxel phantom with Monte Carlo simulation, which was developed to fit the head sizes of individual persons. Samples of urine and feces were analyzed by means of radiochemical separation followed by alpha-spectrometry. Separation of 241Am from mineralized excreta was performed by combined anion exchange and extraction chromatographic techniques. As a tracer, 243Am was used. When the measured data (83 data on skeletal activity, activity in 389 bioassay samples) were compared with International Commission on Radiological Protection's and Leggett's biokinetic models of americium, it was found that in most cases, after more than 15 y since the intake, the excretion rate was lower (or skeletal activity higher) than predicted. On the other hand, the ratio of excreted activity in urine and feces agrees well with model predictions.


Subject(s)
Americium/pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Aged , Americium/urine , Biological Assay , Calibration , Computer Simulation , Czech Republic , Feces/chemistry , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Risk Assessment , Scintillation Counting , Skeleton , Time Factors , Whole-Body Counting/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...