Evaluation of the Paris System in atypical urinary cytology.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the Paris System for reporting urinary cytology, especially in the field of atypia. METHODS: During the last year, 104 urinary cases had atypical cytology. These cases were reviewed and reclassified by three cytopathologists using the Paris criteria. Cyto-histological correlation was performed in 47 cases. Additionally, all cytology diagnoses were correlated with double immunocytochemistry for p53 and CK20 result. Interobserver consistency was also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 104 atypical cases, 30 were classified as benign, 49 atypical and 25 suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). Diagnostic consistency between the three observers reached 93.27%. Using the new criteria, only 47.1% of the cases remained in the atypical category. The rate of HGUC histology was 14.3%, 26.7% and 96% in the benign, atypical and suspicious for HGUC cytological categories, respectively. Immunocytochemistry positivity was observed in 25.9%, 41.8% and 80% of the cases in the three diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology provides clear, easy to adopt criteria, which lead to diagnostic categories with clinical significance, facilitating patient management decisions.

Monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma in pleural effusion: A case report.

Dissemination of lymphomas in serous effusions is quite common. Cytology aims to contribute in the clinical management of haematologic patients, providing an accurate and rapid diagnosis. Ancillary techniques such as immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry are essential to classify the lymphoma entity. Comprehensive awareness of the clinical picture and previous histologic documentation are essential for a lymphomatous effusion diagnosis. We report an unusual case of monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma, formerly known as enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) type II, spreading in the pleural cavity. Cell morphology and immunohistochemistry of the pleural fluid were consistent with the histology of a jejunal tumor previously excised. Flow cytometry data were consistent, though not pathognomonic for the disease. Serous effusions with evidence of lymphoma involvement should be thoroughly examined with cytology and adjuvant techniques to provide diagnosis for proper therapeutic strategies.

Evaluation of double immunocytochemical staining for CK20 and P53 as a potential adjunct to cytology for urothelial cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate double immunocytochemical staining with p53 and CK20, as a tool for improving the accuracy of urinary cytology. The aim of the present study was to clarify the diagnostic significance of the expression of these markers and to investigate the possibility of using this information for better monitoring of bladder cancer patients during follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five urine cytology cases were retrieved with corresponding histology from our files. One ThinPrep® smear was available for each of them and dual immunocytological staining for p53 and CK20 was performed. Eleven cases were excluded from the study because of hypocellularity. The material comprised 58 malignant, 36 atypical and 20 negative for malignancy cases. Immunocytochemistry was evaluated by two cytopathologists, blinded to the histological diagnosis or follow-up data. A cut-off threshold of five stained atypical cells, according to the literature, was used for evaluation. RESULTS: Fifty-two out of 58 malignant cases were positive for at least one of the markers (89.6%). In the atypical and negative groups, 18 (50%) and 5 (25%) cases were positive, respectively. Accuracy parameters evaluation for cytology versus the combination of cytology with immunocytological staining were: sensitivity 73.4% versus 91.1%, specificity 100% versus 74.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% versus 88.9% and negative predictive value (NPV) 62.5% versus 78.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Double immunocytochemical staining for p53 and CK20 is easy to perform and evaluate and can improve cytology sensitivity. It is helpful in establishing a diagnosis of malignancy and may be used as a triage tool to select patients that require cystoscopy during clinical follow-up.