Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Sci Technol ; 52(4): 39-46, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16235744

ABSTRACT

It has been demonstrated that the combination of anaerobic-aerobic treatment is the best technological and economical solution for the treatment of high loaded wastewater. Where in the past aerobic treatment systems were still very acceptable due to the very good treatment efficiency, simplicity and robustness of the technology, this has, in most cases, been changed due to very stringent sludge disposal legislation. The anaerobic pretreatment takes care of approximately 80-90% of the overall treatment efficiency at high loading rates and low sludge production and low energy costs. The aerobic posttreatment takes care of the absolute high removal efficiency and nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Because of the low organic loading rate of the aerobic posttreatment also in this stage the sludge production is low. The combination of anaerobic-aerobic treatment results in a compact system capable of reaching high treatment efficiency at low sludge production and lower energy consumption. Waterleau Global Water Technology has developed LUCAS anaerobic-aerobic system that combines an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor with an aerobic, constant-level cyclic activated sludge system, which is very suitable for the treatment of high loaded wastewaters in general and brewery waste water in particular. It has been proven from several full scale upgrading projects that the UASB system is best suitable for implementation in the aerobic plants that have to be extended in capacity.


Subject(s)
Bioreactors , Waste Disposal, Fluid/instrumentation , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Bacteria, Aerobic/metabolism , Bacteria, Anaerobic/metabolism , Bioreactors/standards , Waste Disposal, Fluid/economics
2.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 42(1): 147-52, 1994 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7765814

ABSTRACT

The biological removal of ammonia and butanal in contaminated air was investigated by using, respectively, a laboratory-scale filter and a scrubber-filter combination. It was shown that ammonia can be removed with an elimination efficiency of 83% at a volumetric load of 100 m3.m-2.h-1 with 4-16 ppm of ammonia. During the experiment percolates were analysed for nitrate, nitrite, ammonium and pH. It was found that the nitrification in the biofilter could deteriorate due to an inhibition of Nitrobacter species, when the free ammonia concentration was rising in the percolate. It should be easy to control such inhibition through periodic analysis of the liquid phase by using a filter-scrubber combination. Such a combination was studied for butanal removal. Butanal was removed with an elimination efficiency of 80% by a scrubber-filter combination at a volumetric load of 100 m3.m-2.h-1 and a high butanal input concentration. Mixing the filter material with CaCO3 and pH control of the liquid in the scrubber resulted in an increase of the elimination efficiency. These results, combined with previous results on the biofiltration of butanal and butyric acid, allow us to discuss the influence of odour compounds on the removal efficiency of such systems and methods for control. The results were used to construct a full-size system, which is described.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/isolation & purification , Aldehydes/isolation & purification , Ammonia/isolation & purification , Filtration/instrumentation , Aldehydes/metabolism , Ammonia/metabolism , Biodegradation, Environmental , Biotechnology , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Odorants , Pseudomonas fluorescens/metabolism , Waste Disposal, Fluid/instrumentation , Water Purification/instrumentation
3.
Appl Opt ; 22(24): 4105, 1983 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18200320
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...