Stroke reduction by cerebral embolic protection devices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been studied in several randomised trials. We aimed to perform a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised CEP trials, focusing on a clinically relevant reduction in disabling stroke. METHODS: A systematic search was applied to three electronic databases, including trials that randomised TAVI patients to CEP versus standard treatment. The primary outcome was the risk of disabling stroke. Outcomes were presented as relative risk (RR), absolute risk differences (ARDs), numbers needed to treat (NNTs) and the 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The minimal clinically important difference was determined at 1.1% ARD, per expert consensus (NNT 91). The principal Bayesian meta-analysis was performed under a vague prior, and secondary analyses were performed under two informed literature-based priors. RESULTS: Seven randomised studies were included for meta-analysis (n=3996: CEP n=2126, control n=1870). Under a vague prior, the estimated median RR of CEP use for disabling stroke was 0.56 (95% CrI 0.28 to 1.19, derived ARD 0.56% and NNT 179, I2=0%). Although the estimated posterior probability of any benefit was 94.4%, the probability of a clinically relevant effect was 0-0.1% under the vague and informed literature-based priors. Results were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: There is a high probability of a beneficial CEP treatment effect, but this is unlikely to be clinically relevant. These findings suggest that future trials should focus on identifying TAVI patients with an increased baseline risk of stroke, and on the development of new generation devices. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023407006.

Periprocedural continuation versus interruption of oral anticoagulant drugs during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: rationale and design of the POPular PAUSE TAVI trial.

About one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) use oral anticoagulants (OAC), mainly due to atrial fibrillation. General guidelines advise interrupting OAC in patients with a high risk of bleeding undergoing interventions. However, preliminary observational data suggest that the continuation of OAC during TAVI is safe and may reduce the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events. The Periprocedural Continuation Versus Interruption of Oral Anticoagulant Drugs During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (POPular PAUSE TAVI) is a multicentre, randomised clinical trial with open-label treatment and blinded endpoint assessment. Patients are randomised 1:1 to periprocedural continuation versus interruption of OAC and are stratified for vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant use. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality, all stroke, myocardial infarction, major vascular complications and type 2-4 bleeding within 30 days after TAVI, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints include separate individual and composite outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Since continuation of OAC is associated with the ancillary benefit that it simplifies periprocedural management, the primary outcome is first analysed for non-inferiority; if non-inferiority is proven, superiority will be tested. Recruitment started in November 2020, and the trial will continue until a total of 858 patients have been included and followed for 90 days. In summary, POPular PAUSE TAVI is the first randomised clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of periprocedural continuation versus interruption of OAC in patients undergoing TAVI.

Gender Disparities in Cardiogenic Shock Treatment and Outcomes.

Cardiogenic shock is associated with a high risk for morbidity and mortality. The impact of gender on treatment and outcomes is poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate whether gender influences the clinical management and outcomes of patients with prehospital cardiogenic shock. Consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock who were transferred to hospital by emergency medical services (EMS) between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019 in Victoria, Australia were included. Data were obtained from individually linked ambulance, hospital, and state death index datasets. The primary outcome assessed was 30-day mortality, stratified by patient gender. Propensity score matching was performed for risk adjustment. Over the study period a total of 3,465 patients were identified and 1,389 patients (40.1%) were women. Propensity score matching yielded 1,330 matched pairs with no differences observed in baseline characteristics, including age, initial vital signs, pre-existing co-morbidities, etiology of shock, and prehospital interventions. In the matched cohort, women had higher rates of 30-day mortality (44.7% vs 39.2%, p = 0.009), underwent less coronary angiography (18.3% vs 27.2%, p <0.001), and revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (8.9% vs 14.2%, p <0.001), compared with men. In conclusion, in this large population-based study, women with cardiogenic shock who were transferred by EMS to hospital had significantly worse survival outcomes and reduced rates of invasive cardiac interventions compared to men. These data underscore the urgent need for targeted public health measures to redress gender differences in outcomes and variation with clinical care for patients with cardiogenic shock.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Public and Private Hospital Settings: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the public and private hospital setting. DESIGN: Propensity-matched, retrospective analysis of a prospective registry. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI at a tertiary public hospital (n=507) and an experienced private hospital (n=436). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients that underwent TAVI in the public hospital were younger than patients in the private hospital (82±8 years vs 84±6 years, p<0.001), with lower estimated short-term mortality risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality [STS-PROM] score >4.0%: 43% vs 56%, p<0.001). There was no difference between public and private hospitals in 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 1.2%, p=1.0), and the rate of complications was similar. Long-term survival was similar in propensity-matched public (n=344) and private (n=344) patient cohorts. The 1-year, 2-year, 5-year and 7-year survival rates were 95%, 90%, 67% and 47% in public patients, and 92%, 86%, 67% and 51% in private patients (p=0.94). In multivariable analysis, the hospital setting was not a predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite increased age and predicted mortality in private hospital patients, short- and long-term outcomes after TAVI were comparable between public and private hospital settings. This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing TAVI in a private hospital with a dedicated and experienced team and questions the current restricted access to TAVI in the private sector.

Effectiveness of the 2014 European Society of Cardiology guideline on sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommended the use of a novel risk prediction model (HCM Risk-SCD) to guide use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We sought to determine the performance of HCM Risk-SCD by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles reporting on the prevalence of SCD within 5 years of evaluation in low, intermediate and high-risk patients as defined by the 2014 guidelines (predicted risk <4%, 4%-<6% and ≥6%, respectively). METHODS: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42017064203). MEDLINE and manual searches for papers published from October 2014 to December 2017 were performed. Longitudinal, observational cohorts of unselected adult patients, without history of cardiac arrest were considered. The original HCM Risk-SCD development study was included a priori. Data were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six (0.9%) out of 653 independent publications identified by the initial search were included. The calculated 5-year risk of SCD was reported in 7291 individuals (70% low, 15% intermediate; 15% high risk) with 184 (2.5%) SCD endpoints within 5 years of baseline evaluation. Most SCD endpoints (68%) occurred in patients with an estimated 5-year risk of ≥4% who formed 30% of the total study cohort. Using the random effects method, the pooled prevalence of SCD endpoints was 1.01% (95% CI 0.52 to 1.61) in low-risk patients, 2.43% (95% CI 1.23 to 3.92) in intermediate and 8.4% (95% CI 6.68 to 10.25) in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that HCM Risk-SCD provides accurate risk estimations that can be used to guide ICD therapy in accordance with the 2014 ESC guidelines. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42017064203;Pre-results.

Validation of the HCM Risk-SCD model in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy following alcohol septal ablation.

Aims: The HCM Risk-SCD model for prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy recommended by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines has not been validated after septal reduction therapy. The aim of this study was to validate the HCM Risk-SCD model in patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and to compare its performance to previous models. Methods and result: A total of 844 ASA patients without prior SCD event were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of SCD and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, identical to the HCM Risk-SCD endpoint. A distinction between periprocedural (≤30 days) and long-term (>30 days) SCD was made to discern procedure-related adverse arrhythmic events caused by the ASA-induced myocardial infarction from long-term SCD risk. Twenty patients reached the SCD endpoint within the first 30 days. During a follow-up of 6.5 ± 4.2 years, another 46 patients reached the SCD endpoint. The predicted 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD model was 5.1%, and the observed 5-year SCD risk was 4.0%. The C-statistics for the use of the HCM Risk-SCD model was 0.61 (P = 0.02), the C-statistics for the use of the 2003 American College of Cardiology/ESC guidelines was 0.59 (P = 0.051), and the C-statistic for the use of the 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines was 0.58 (P = 0.054). Maximal left ventricular wall thickness, syncope after ASA, and fulfilling the 2014 ESC recommendations for primary ICD implantation according to the HCM Risk-SCD model, respectively, predicted SCD during long-term follow-up. Conclusion: The HCM Risk-SCD model can be used for SCD prediction in patients undergoing ASA.

Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Word of Endorsement.

Twenty years after the introduction of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for the treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the arrhythmogenicity of the ablation scar appears to be overemphasized. When systematically reviewing all studies comparing ASA with myectomy with long-term follow-up, (aborted) sudden cardiac death and mortality rates were found to be similarly low. The focus should instead shift toward lowering the rate of reinterventions and pacemaker implantations following ASA because, in this area, ASA still seems inferior to myectomy. Part of the reason for this difference is that ASA is limited by the route of the septal perforators, whereas myectomy is not. Improvement may be achieved by: 1) confining ASA to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centers of excellence with high operator volumes; 2) improving patient selection using multidisciplinary heart teams; 3) use of (3-dimensional) myocardial contrast echocardiography for selecting the correct septal (sub)branch; and 4) use of appropriate amounts of alcohol for ASA.

Outcomes of Alcohol Septal Ablation in Younger Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the safety and outcomes of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in younger patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines reserve ASA for older patients and patients with serious comorbidities. Data on long-term age-specific outcomes after ASA are scarce. METHODS: A total of 1,197 patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years) underwent ASA for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Patients were divided into young (≤50 years), middle-age (51 to 64 years), and older (≥65 years) groups. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality and pacemaker implantation rates were lower in young compared with older patients (0.3% vs. 2% [p = 0.03] and 8% vs. 16% [p < 0.001], respectively). Ninety-five percent of young patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II at last follow-up. During a mean follow-up period of 5.4 ± 4.2 years, 165 patients (14%) died. Annual mortality rates of young, middle-age, and older patients were 1%, 2%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Annual adverse arrhythmic event rates were similar in the 3 age groups at about 1% (p = 0.90). Independent predictors of mortality in young patients were age, female sex, and residual left ventricular outflow tract gradient. Additionally, young patients treated with ≥2.5 ml alcohol had a higher all-cause mortality rate (0.6% vs. 1.4% per year in patients treated with <2.5 ml, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ASA in younger patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was safe and effective for relief of symptoms at long-term follow-up. The authors propose that the indication for ASA can be broadened to younger patients.

Value of Genetic Testing for the Prediction of Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Pathogenic gene mutations are found in about 50% of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Previous studies have shown an association between sarcomere mutations and medium-term outcome. The association with long-term outcome has not been described. The aim of this cohort study was to assess the long-term outcomes of patients with genotype positive (G+) and genotype negative (G-) HC. The study population consisted of 626 patients with HC (512 probands and 114 relatives) who underwent phenotyping and genetic testing from 1985 to 2014. End points were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, heart failure (HF)-related mortality, and sudden cardiac death/aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD/aborted SCD). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. A pathogenic mutation was detected in 327 patients (52%). G+ probands were younger than G- probands (46 ± 15 vs 55 ± 15 years, p <0.001), had more non sustained ventricular tachycardia (34% vs 13%; p <0.001), more often a history of syncope (14% vs 7%; p = 0.016), and more extreme hypertrophy (maximal wall thickness ≥30 mm, 7% vs 1%; p <0.001). G- probands were more symptomatic (New York Heart Association ≥II, 73% vs 53%, p <0.001) and had higher left ventricular outflow tract gradients (42 ± 39 vs 29 ± 33 mm Hg, p = 0.001). During 12 ± 9 years of follow-up, G+ status was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.15; p = 0.014), CV mortality (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.49 to 5.36; p = 0.002), HF-related mortality (HR 6.33, 95% CI 1.79 to 22.41; p = 0.004), and SCD/aborted SCD (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.71; p = 0.015). In conclusion, during long-term follow-up, patients with G+ HC are at increased risk of all-cause death, CV death, HF-related death, and SCD/aborted SCD.

Long-Term Outcome of Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Young and the Elderly.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in young and elderly patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines reserve ASA for elderly patients and patients with serious comorbidities. Information on long-term age-specific outcomes after ASA is scarce. METHODS: This cohort study included 217 HCM patients (age 54 ± 12 years) who underwent ASA because of symptomatic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Patients were divided into young (age ≤55 years) and elderly (age >55 years) groups and matched by age in a 1:1 fashion to nonobstructive HCM patients. RESULTS: Atrioventricular block following ASA was more common in elderly patients (43% vs. 21%; p = 0.001), resulting in pacemaker implantation in 13% and 5%, respectively (p = 0.06). Residual left ventricular outflow tract gradient, post-procedural New York Heart Association functional class, and necessity for additional septal reduction therapy was comparable between age groups. During a follow-up of 7.6 ± 4.6 years, 54 patients died. The 5- and 10-year survival following ASA was 95% and 90% in patients age ≤55 years and 93% and 82% in patients age >55 years, which was comparable to their control groups. The annual adverse arrhythmic event rate following ASA was 0.7%/year in young patients and 1.4%/year in elderly patients, which was comparable to their control groups. CONCLUSIONS: ASA is similarly effective for reduction of symptoms in young and elderly patients; however, younger patients have a lower risk of procedure-related atrioventricular conduction disturbances. The long-term mortality rate and risk of adverse arrhythmic events following ASA are low, both in young and elderly patients, and are comparable to age-matched nonobstructive HCM patients.

Effect of alcohol dosage on long-term outcomes after alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effects of alcohol dosage in alcohol septal ablation (ASA) on mortality and adverse arrhythmic events (AAE). BACKGROUND: ASA can be performed to reduce left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the effect of alcohol dosage on long-term outcomes is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes 296 HCM patients (age 60 ± 22 years, 58% male) who underwent ASA because of symptomatic LVOT obstruction. Twenty-nine patients (9.8%) were excluded because the alcohol dosage could not be retrieved. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and AAE. RESULTS: During 6.3 ± 3.7 years of follow-up, all-cause mortality and AAE rates were similar in patients who received ≤2.0 mL (n = 142) and >2.0 mL (n = 121) alcohol during ASA. Age was the only independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.1 95% CI 1.0-1.1, P < 0.001). Predictors of AAE were maximum CK-MB >240 U/L (HR 3.3 95% CI 1.5-7.2, P = 0.003), and sudden cardiac death survivor (HR 5.9 95% CI 1.7-20.3, P = 0.004). There was a mild to moderate correlation between CK-MB levels and amount of alcohol (Spearman's ρ 0.39, P < 0.001), cross-sectional area of the target septal branch ostium/ostia (Spearman's ρ 0.19, P = 0.003), and maximum ventricular wall thickness (Spearman's ρ 0.17, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol dosage appears not to have a long-term effect on mortality and AAE. A larger infarct size created by ASA increases the risk of AAE, and extended monitoring of these patients is advised. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes After Septal Reduction Therapy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare long-term outcomes after myectomy and alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). BACKGROUND: Surgical myectomy and ASA are both accepted treatment options for medical therapy-resistant obstructive HCM. Previous meta-analyses only evaluated short-term outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted for eligible studies with a follow-up of at least 3 years. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and (aborted) sudden cardiac death (SCD). Secondary outcomes were periprocedural complications, left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and New York Heart Association functional class after ≥3 months, and reintervention. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen myectomy cohorts (n = 2,791; mean follow-up, 7.4 years) and 11 ASA cohorts (n = 2,013; mean follow-up, 6.2 years) were included. Long-term mortality was found to be similarly low after ASA (1.5% per year) compared with myectomy (1.4% per year, p = 0.78). The rate of (aborted) SCD, including appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks, was 0.4% per year after ASA and 0.5% per year after myectomy (p = 0.47). Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed after ASA in 10% of the patients compared with 4.4% after myectomy (p < 0.001). Reintervention was performed in 7.7% of the patients who underwent ASA compared with 1.6% after myectomy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality and (aborted) SCD rates after ASA and myectomy are similarly low. Patients who undergo ASA have more than twice the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation and a 5 times higher risk of the need for additional septal reduction therapy compared with those who undergo myectomy.

Validation of the 2014 European Society of Cardiology guidelines risk prediction model for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The recently released 2014 European Society of Cardiology guidelines of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) use a new clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death (SCD), based on the HCM Risk-SCD study. Our study is the first external and independent validation of this new risk prediction model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of a consecutive cohort of 706 patients with HCM without prior SCD event, from 2 tertiary referral centers. The primary end point was a composite of SCD and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, identical to the HCM Risk-SCD end point. The 5-year SCD risk was calculated using the HCM Risk-SCD formula. Receiver operating characteristic curves and C-statistics were calculated for the 2014 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, and risk stratification methods of the 2003 American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology guidelines and 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines. During follow-up of 7.7±5.3 years, SCD occurred in 42 (5.9%) of 706 patients (ages 49±16 years; 34% women). The C-statistic of the new model was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82; P=0.008), which performed significantly better than the conventional risk factor models based on the 2003 guidelines (C-statistic of 0.55: 95% CI, 0.47-0.63; P=0.3), and 2011 guidelines (C-statistic of 0.60: 95% CI, 0.50-0.70; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The HCM Risk-SCD model improves the risk stratification of patients with HCM for primary prevention of SCD, and calculating an individual risk estimate contributes to the clinical decision-making process. Improved risk stratification is important for the decision making before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for the primary prevention of SCD.

Long-term benefit of myectomy and anterior mitral leaflet extension in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) may benefit from surgical myectomy. In patients with enlarged mitral leaflets and mitral regurgitation, myectomy can be combined with anterior mitral leaflet extension (AMLE) to stiffen the midsegment of the leaflet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of myectomy combined with AMLE in patients with obstructive HC. This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study included 98 patients (49 ± 14 years, 37% female) who underwent myectomy combined with AMLE from 1991 to 2012. End points included all-cause mortality and change in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. Mortality was compared with age- and gender-matched patients with nonobstructive HC and subjects from the general population. Long-term follow-up was 8.3 ± 6.1 years. There was no operative mortality, and New York Heart Association class was reduced from 2.8 ± 0.5 to 1.3 ± 0.5 (p <0.001), left ventricular outflow tract gradient from 93 ± 25 to 9 ± 8 mm Hg (p <0.001), mitral valve regurgitation from grade 2.0 ± 0.9 to 0.5 ± 0.8 (p <0.001), and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve from grade 2.4 ± 0.9 to 0.1 ± 0.3 (p <0.001). The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative survival rates were 98%, 92%, 86%, and 83%, respectively, and did not differ from the general population (99%, 97%, 92%, and 85%, respectively, p = 0.3) or patients with nonobstructive HC (98%, 97%, 88%, and 83%, respectively, p = 0.8). In conclusion, in selected patients with obstructive HC, myectomy combined with AMLE is a low-risk surgical procedure. It results in long-term symptom relief and survival similar to the general population.

Long-term outcomes after medical and invasive treatment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death [SCD]) after medical therapy, alcohol septal ablation (ASA), and myectomy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). BACKGROUND: Therapy-resistant obstructive HCM can be treated both surgically and percutaneously. But there is no consensus on the long-term effects of ASA, especially on SCD. METHODS: This study included 1,047 consecutive patients with HCM (mean age 52 ± 16 years, 61% men) from 3 tertiary referral centers. A total of 690 patients (66%) had left ventricular outflow tract gradients ≥ 30 mm Hg, of whom 124 (12%) were treated medically, 316 (30%) underwent ASA, and 250 (24%) underwent myectomy. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and SCD. Kaplan-Meier graphs and Cox regression models were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7.6 ± 5.3 years. Ten-year survival was similar in medically treated patients (84%), ASA patients (82%), myectomy patients (85%), and patients with nonobstructive HCM (85%) (log-rank p = 0.50). The annual rate of SCD was low after invasive therapy: 1.0%/year in the ASA group and 0.8%/year in the myectomy group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the risk for SCD was lower after myectomy compared with the ASA group (hazard ratio: 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 4.4; p = 0.04) and the medical group (hazard ratio: 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 5.2; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obstructive HCM who are treated at referral centers for HCM care have good survival and low SCD risk, similar to that of patients with nonobstructive HCM. The SCD risk of patients after myectomy was lower than after ASA or in the medical group.

Impact of adverse left ventricular remodeling on sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling predicts heart failure symptoms and overt LV dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but its influence on the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adverse LV remodeling on SCD risk in patients with HCM. HYPOTHESIS: Adverse LV remodeling increases SCD in HCM patients. METHODS: This study included 41 patients with HCM who experienced SCD; each case was matched with 3 controls based on age, gender, and time of first contact. In this population of 164 patients, predictors of SCD were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, such as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, left ventricular wall thickness, left atrial size, atrial fibrillation, and established risk factors for SCD were similar in cases and controls. Independent predictors of SCD during follow-up (median follow-up, 7.7 ± 6.5 years) were: increase in NYHA class (OR: 8.7 [95% CI: 2.5-30.5], P = 0.001), decrease of fractional shortening (per % decrease, OR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03-1.14], P = 0.001), and decrease of diastolic function (OR: 3.5 [95% CI: 1.2-10.2], P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that SCD risk in HCM increases when adverse remodeling occurs. Because cases and controls were similar at baseline, these findings emphasize the importance of vigilant follow-up of HCM patients and could aid clinical decision making concerning implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, especially in patients with moderate risk for SCD.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: patient outcomes, rate of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and complications.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most devastating complication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but this can be prevented by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The aim of this study is to evaluate HCM patients with ICDs for primary or secondary prevention of SCD. METHODS: The study population consisted of all HCM patients with an ICD in 2 tertiary referral clinics. End points during follow-up were total and cardiac mortality, appropriate and inappropriate ICD intervention, and device-related complications. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of outcome. RESULTS: ICDs were implanted in 134 patients with HCM (mean age 44 ± 17 years, 34% women, 4.2 ± 4.8 years follow-up). Annualized cardiac mortality rate was 3.4% per year and associated with New York Heart Association class III or IV (HR 5.2 [2.0-14, P = .002]) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR 6.3 [2.1-20, P = .02]). Appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 38 patients (6.8%/year) and was associated with implantation for secondary prevention of SCD (HR 4.0 [1.8-9.1], P = .001) and male gender (HR 3.3 [1.2-9.0], P = .02). Inappropriate ICD intervention occurred in 21 patients (3.7%/year) and in 20 patients device related complications were documented (3.6%/year). CONCLUSION: ICDs successfully abort life-threatening arrhythmias in HCM patients at increased risk of SCD with an annualized intervention rate of 6.8% per year. End-stage heart failure is the main cause of mortality in these patients. The annualized rate of inappropriate ICD intervention was 3.7% per year, whereas device-related complications occurred 3.6% per year.

Outcome and complications after implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies demonstrated that patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) may benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. A complete overview of outcome and complications after ICD therapy is currently not available. This study pools data from published studies on outcome and complications after ICD therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A PubMed database search returned 27 studies on 16 cohorts reporting outcome and complications after ICD therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In case of >1 publications on a particular cohort, the publication with the largest number of patients was included in the meta-analysis. ICD interventions, complications, and mortality rates were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. There were 2190 patients (mean age, 42 years; 38% women), most of whom (83%) received an ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Risk factors for SCD were left ventricular wall thickness ≥30 mm (20%), family history of SCD (43%), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (46%), syncope (41%), and abnormal blood pressure response (25%). During the 3.7-year follow-up, the annualized cardiac mortality rate was 0.6%, the noncardiac mortality rate was 0.4%, and the appropriate ICD intervention rate was 3.3%. The annualized inappropriate ICD intervention rate was 4.8% and the annualized ICD-related complication rate was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates a low cardiac and noncardiac mortality rate after ICD therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Appropriate ICD intervention occurred at a rate of 3.3%/year, thereby, most probably, preventing SCD. Inappropriate ICD intervention and complications are not uncommon.