Re-evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam to decrease use of carbapenems in ESBL-producing Enterobacterales urinary tract infections (REDUCE-UTI).

Objectives: To re-examine the use of non-carbapenems (NCBPs), specifically piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) urinary tract infections (UTIs). Patients: Retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized between January 2016 and June 2020 with pyuria on urinalysis, a urine culture positive for ESBL-E treated with a study antibiotic (meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam) and did not meet criteria for study exclusion. Methods: To compare carbapenems (CBPs) with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of ESBL-E UTI. The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as complete resolution of signs and symptoms of infection. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, recurrence within 30 days and resistance emergence within 30 days. Results: One-hundred and thirty-three patients were included, based on definitive therapy received; 69 (51.9%) received CBP and 64 (48.1%) received NCBP therapy. Of the total patient population, 17 (12.8%) were admitted to the ICU, 84 (63.1%) had a complicated UTI and 64 (48.1%) had pyelonephritis. There was no difference in clinical cure between the CBP and NCBP groups (95.7% versus 96.9%, P = 0.999). Additionally, no differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Conclusions: When compared with CBPs, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam resulted in similar clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, recurrence and resistance emergence in the treatment of ESBL-E UTI.

Re-evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam to decrease use of carbapenems in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (REDUCE-BSI).

Objective: To re-examine the use of noncarbapenems (NCBPs), specifically piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (FEP), for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (ESBL-E BSIs). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care, academic medical center. Patients: The study included patients hospitalized between May 2016 and May 2019 with a positive blood culture for ESBL-E. Patients were excluded if they received treatment with antibiotics other than meropenem, ertapenem, PTZ, or FEP. Patients were also excluded if they were aged <18 years, received antibiotics for <24 hours, were treated for polymicrobial BSI, or received concomitant antibiotic therapy for a separate gram-negative infection. Methods: We compared CBPs with FEP or PTZ for the treatment of ESBL-E BSI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, microbiologic cure, infection recurrence, and resistance development. Results: Data from 114 patients were collected and analyzed; 74 (65%) patients received carbapenem (CBP) therapy and 40 (35%) patients received a NCBP (30 received FEP and 10 received PTZ). The overall in-hospital mortality was 6% (N = 7), with a higher death rate in the CBP arm than in the N-CBP arm, (8% vs 3%; P = .42). No difference in mortality was detected between subgroups with Pitt bacteremia score ≥4, those requiring ICU admission, those whose infections were cause by a nongenitourinary source or causative organism (ie, 76 had Escherichia coli and 38 had Klebsiella spp). We detected no differences in secondary outcomes between the groups. Conclusion: Compared to CBPs, FEP and PTZ did not result in greater mortality or decreased clinical efficacy for the treatment of ESBL-E BSI caused by susceptible organisms.