Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in adults with coeliac disease exposed to gluten challenge: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is implicated in the pathophysiology of coeliac disease. AMG 714 is the first anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody to be investigated for the treatment of coeliac disease. We aimed to investigate the effects of AMG 714 in patients with coeliac disease who underwent gluten challenge. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2a trial was done at three clinical sites in Finland. Inclusion criteria included age 18-80 years, a confirmed diagnosis of coeliac disease, and adherence to a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months before screening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 150 mg AMG 714, 300 mg AMG 714, or placebo using permuted blocks and stratified by study site and sex. Patients and study staff were masked to treatment assignment. Treatments were administered by two subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 10 weeks (total six doses). Patients without severe villous atrophy at baseline received a gluten challenge (2-4 g daily) during weeks 2-12. Small bowel biopsy samples were obtained for histological assessments at baseline and week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change from baseline to week 12 in villous height-to-crypt depth (VHCD) ratio. Secondary endpoints were CD3-positive intraepithelial lymphocyte density; clinical symptoms measured by gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), coeliac disease GSRS, and Bristol stool form scale (BSFS); and changes in anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies from baseline. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol 1 population of patients who received at least one dose of study drug and who underwent the gluten challenge. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02637141 and EudraCT, 2015-003647-19. FINDINGS: Between April 13, 2016, and Nov 22, 2016, 64 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the 150 mg AMG 714 group (n=22), the 300 mg AMG 714 group (n=22), or the placebo group (n=20). Two patients did not start treatment and two did not provide post-treatment biopsy samples. 49 patients underwent the gluten challenge (per-protocol 1 population) and 11 patients did not because of baseline villous atrophy. AMG 714 did not prevent mucosal injury due to gluten challenge. The least square mean difference in the relative change from baseline in VHCD ratio was -2·49% (95% CI -16·82 to 11·83; p=0·73) between 150 mg AMG 714 and placebo and 6·39% (-7·07 to 19·85; p=0·34) between 300 mg AMG 714 and placebo. Neither comparison was statistically significant. The density of CD3-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes increased in all groups, with smaller increases in the 300 mg group (-41·24% [95% CI -79·28 to -3·20] vs placebo, nominal p=0·03) but not the 150 mg group (-14·32% [-54·39 to 25·74], nominal p=0·47). Clinical symptoms were ameliorated with AMG 714 treatment between baseline and week 12, particularly diarrhoea as measured by the BSFS (nominal p=0·01 for 150 mg vs placebo, and nominal p=0·0002 for 300 mg vs placebo). Serum antibody titres for anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies increased in all three treatment groups, with no significant difference between AMG 714 and placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 21 (95%) patients in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 0 (95%) in the 300 mg AMG 714 group, and 19 (100%) in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (17 [77%] participants in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 16 [76%] in the 300 mg AMG 714 group, and 13 [68%] in the placebo group). Injection site reactions were the most common individual adverse event, reported in eight (36%) patients in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 11 (52%) in the 300 mg group, and five (26%) in the placebo group. No serious adverse events occurred. INTERPRETATION: The primary endpoint, change in VHCD ratio from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with coeliac disease undergoing gluten challenge, was not significantly different between placebo and AMG 714 at either 150 mg or 300 mg. Effects on intraepithelial lymphocyte density and symptoms suggest that further research of AMG 714 may be warranted in patients with non-responsive coeliac disease. FUNDING: Celimmune and Amgen.

Glutenase ALV003 attenuates gluten-induced mucosal injury in patients with celiac disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gluten ingestion leads to small intestinal mucosal injury in patients with celiac disease, necessitating strict life-long exclusion of dietary gluten. Despite adherence to a gluten-free diet, many patients remain symptomatic and still have small intestinal inflammation. In this case, nondietary therapies are needed. We investigated the ability of ALV003, a mixture of 2 recombinant gluten-specific proteases given orally, to protect patients with celiac disease from gluten-induced mucosal injury in a phase 2 trial. METHODS: We established the optimal daily dose of gluten to be used in a 6-week challenge study. Then, in the intervention study, adults with biopsy-proven celiac disease were randomly assigned to groups given ALV003 (n = 20) or placebo (n = 21) together with the daily gluten challenge. Duodenal biopsies were collected at baseline and after gluten challenge. The ratio of villus height to crypt depth and densities of intraepithelial lymphocytes were the primary end points. RESULTS: A daily dose of 2 g gluten was selected for the intervention study. Sixteen patients given ALV003 and 18 given placebo were eligible for efficacy evaluation. Biopsies from subjects in the placebo group showed evidence of mucosal injury after gluten challenge (mean villus height to crypt depth ratio changed from 2.8 before challenge to 2.0 afterward; P = .0007; density of CD3(+) intraepithelial lymphocytes changed from 61 to 91 cells/mm after challenge; P = .0003). However, no significant mucosal deterioration was observed in biopsies from the ALV003 group. Between groups, morphologic changes and CD3(+) intraepithelial lymphocyte counts differed significantly from baseline to week 6 (P = .0133 and P = .0123, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in symptoms between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a phase 2 trial, the glutenase ALV003 appears to attenuate gluten-induced small intestinal mucosal injury in patients with celiac disease in the context of an everyday gluten-free diet containing daily up to 2 g gluten. Clinicaltrial.gov, NUMBERS: NCT00959114 and NCT01255696.

Serum myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio as a marker of reperfusion after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary patency is important for short- and long-term outcome after myocardial infarction. Serum myoglobin concentration is a sensitive marker of myocardial damage and its specificity can be improved by simultaneous measurement of carbonic anhydrase III, a skeletal muscle marker. In the present study we evaluated the role of myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio as a non-invasive marker of reperfusion. METHODS: We measured myoglobin, carbonic anhydrase III and creatine kinase MB-fraction release serially in 29 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis and in 28 patients treated with primary coronary angioplasty. RESULTS: Thrombolytic therapy was followed by a 9.1+/-2.2-fold increase in myoglobin and 10.8+/-3.3-fold increase in creatine kinase MB-fraction during the first hour of treatment, while carbonic anhydrase III remained unchanged. The peak value of myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio was found at 2 h and that of creatine kinase MB-fraction at 8 h after thrombolysis. Knowledge of the reperfusion time point during primary angioplasty and follow-up of cardiac markers revealed that cut-off points of 3 and 10 h for the peak values of myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio and creatine kinase MB-fraction can be used as indicators for reperfusion, respectively. Myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio measured before treatment and at 2 and 4 h after the onset of treatment screened 23 of those 25 patients with probable reperfusion after thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that measuring myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio during the first hours after initiation of thrombolysis may be useful in evaluating the success of reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction.

Serum myoglobin/carbonic anhydrase III ratio in the diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction during coronary bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the myoglobin/carboanhydrase III (Myo/CAIII) ratio in the diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass surgery. DESIGN: Thirty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were included in the series. The patients were randomized in two groups: one received conventional normothermic retrograde blood cardioplegia, while the other was subjected to a 5-min period of ischemic preconditioning before cardioplegia. Biochemical markers for myocardial and skeletal muscle injury were measured in serial blood samples taken postoperatively from 4 h after aortic declamp. RESULTS: Three patients were diagnosed to have suffered from perioperative myocardial infarction on the basis of significant elevations of troponin T and creatine kinase MB-isoenzyme (CK-MB) concentrations. In these particular patients the Myo/CAIII ratio increased rapidly after aortic declamping. In uncomplicated patients, the median value of the Myo/CAIII ratio remained within normal limits. There was a positive correlation between the net output of lactate during the aortic cross-clamping period and postoperative Myo/CAIII ratio. The Myo/CAIII ratio proved to be a more specific indicator for myocardial damage than myoglobin alone. The Myo/CAIII ratio was higher in the preconditioning group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Myo/CAIII ratio is a sensitive and specific marker for perioperative myocardial infarction increasing rapidly after aortic declamping. This ratio could also be used when assessing the extent of ischemic myocardial injury and comparing different surgical and cardioprotective techniques.