The effect of foot rotation on measuring ankle alignment using simulated radiographs: a safe zone for pre-operative planning.

AIM: To assess whether variation in foot rotation, in relation to camera position, affects the reliability of measurement of hindfoot alignment on radiographs and to define a "safe zone" where measurement of the alignment axis and thus preoperative planning is not affected by foot rotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers were recruited of whom double-sided lower-leg weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) was acquired. Weight-bearing was simulated by means of providing axial compression force equal to the weight of the healthy volunteers. The scans were uploaded into custom-made three-dimensional analysis software to create digitally reconstructed radiographs. For each CT examination, a coordinate system was determined, which defines the neutral position of the leg. Rotation about the z-axis of this coordinate system simulates endo- and exorotation of the foot. Subsequently, radiographs were reconstructed for the leg between 30° of endorotation and 45° of exorotation, and the relation between the observed alignment axis and foot rotation was determined. RESULTS: A total of 20 healthy volunteers were included, 10 males (mean age 37.7±11.1) and 10 females (mean age 34±10.3). Per 5° of leg rotation, the alignment axis translated with a mean of 6.86% (SD ±13.1). No significant difference in position of the alignment axis was seen between 10° of endorotation and 10° of exorotation compared to the neutral ankle position. CONCLUSION: The "safe zone" for imaging the hindfoot alignment axis, is between 10° endo- and 10° exorotation of the foot.

Anatomic stabilization techniques provide superior results in terms of functional outcome in patients suffering from chronic ankle instability compared to non-anatomic techniques.

PURPOSE: To determine the best surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI) a systematic review was performed to compare the functional outcomes between various surgical stabilization methods. METHODS: A systematic search was performed from 1950 up to April 2016 using PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were a minimum age of 18 years, persistent lateral ankle instability, treatment by some form of surgical stabilization, described functional outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were case reports, (systematic) reviews, articles not published in English, description of only acute instability or only conservative treatment, medial ankle instability and concomitant injuries, deformities or previous surgical treatment for ankle instability. After inclusion, studies were critically appraised using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: The search resulted in a total of 19 articles, including 882 patients, which were included in this review. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score ranged from 30 to 73 points on a scale from 0 to 90 points. The AOFAS and Karlsson Score were the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures to assess functional outcome after surgery. Anatomic repair showed the highest post-operative scores [AOFAS 93.8 (SD ± 2.7; n = 119); Karlsson 95.1 (SD ± 3.6, n = 121)], compared to anatomic reconstruction [AOFAS 90.2 (SD ± 10.9, n = 128); Karlsson 90.1 (SD ± 7.8, n = 35)] and tenodesis [AOFAS 86.5 (SD ± 12.0, n = 10); Karlsson 85.3 (SD ± 2.5, n = 39)]. Anatomic reconstruction showed the highest score increase after surgery (AOFAS 37.0 (SD ± 6.8, n = 128); Karlsson 51.6 (SD ± 5.5, n = 35) compared to anatomic repair [AOFAS 31.8 (SD ± 5.3, n = 119); Karlsson 40.9 (SD ± 2.9, n = 121)] and tenodesis [AOFAS 19.5 (SD ± 13.7, n = 10); Karlsson 29.4 (SD ± 6.3, n = 39)] (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Anatomic reconstruction and anatomic repair provide better functional outcome after surgical treatment of patients with CAI compared to tenodesis reconstruction. These results further discourage the use of tenodesis reconstruction and other non-anatomic surgical techniques. Future studies may be required to indicate potential value of tenodesis reconstruction when used as a salvage procedure. Not optimal, but the latter still provides an increase in functional outcome post-operatively. Anatomic reconstruction seems to give the best results, but may be more invasive than anatomic repair. This has to be kept in mind when choosing between reconstruction and repair in the treatment of CAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.