A multi-centred randomised trial of radical surgery versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision for early rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer surgery is accompanied with high morbidity and poor long term functional outcome. Screening programs have shown a shift towards more early staged cancers. Patients with early rectal cancer can potentially benefit significantly from rectal preserving therapy. For the earliest stage cancers, local excision is sufficient when the risk of lymph node disease and subsequent recurrence is below 5 %. However, the majority of early cancers are associated with an intermediate risk of lymph node involvement (5-20 %) suggesting that local excision alone is not sufficient, while completion radical surgery, which is currently standard of care, could be a substantial overtreatment for this group of patients. METHODS/STUDY DESIGN: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with an intermediate risk T1-2 rectal cancer, that has been locally excised using an endoluminal technique, will be randomized between adjuvant chemo-radiotherapylimited to the mesorectum and standard completion total mesorectal excision (TME). To strictly monitor the risk of locoregional recurrence in the experimental arm and enable early salvage surgery, there will be additional follow up with frequent MRI and endoscopy. The primary outcome of the study is three-year local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes are morbidity, disease free and overall survival, stoma rate, functional outcomes, health related quality of life and costs. The design is a non inferiority study with a total sample size of 302 patients. DISCUSSION: The results of the TESAR trial will potentially demonstrate that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an oncological safe treatment option in patients who are confronted with the difficult clinical dilemma of a radically removed intermediate risk early rectal cancer by polypectomy or transanal surgery that is conventionally treated with subsequent radical surgery. Preserving the rectum using adjuvant radiotherapy is expected to significantly improve morbidity, function and quality of life if compared to completion TME surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02371304 , registration date: February 2015.

Repair of a coccygeal hernia with a biological mesh.

Coccygeal herniation after coccygectomy is rare. Little is known about the management of this complication. We present a case of a 44 year old women with a coccygeal herniation 7 years after coccygectomy. She was treated two times for an infected pilonidal sinus with incision and drainage. After the last incision and drainage she had complaints of a painful swelling in the sacral area and difficulty with evacuation of her stools. A defaecography showed a coccygeal herniation. An additional MRI of the pelvic region showed a defect with a diameter of approximately 38mm. We performed a hernia repair with a biological mesh (Strattice™ surgical mesh, LifeCell Corporation USA) via a sacral approach. Her recovery was complicated by a small wound dehiscence without clinical signs of infection. The sacral wound healed per secundam. Her complaints had completely disappeared. A defaecography 2 months after surgery showed no residual herniation. To our knowledge, it is the first reported case of a coccygeal hernia repair with a biological Strattice™ surgical mesh.

Sentinel lymph node investigation in melanoma: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with melanoma reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SLN examination. METHODS: The study comprised 29 patients with one or more positive SLN after a successful SLN procedure for clinical stage I/II melanoma. SLNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SLN positive patients increased from 79%, 83%, 83%, 90% to 93% in the H&E sections through levels 1-5, and with IHC these values were 83%, 86%, 90%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. One of six patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 2-5 only had metastases in the subsequent additional lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple level sectioning of SLNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level in melanoma SLNs. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.

Clinical outcome of stage I/II melanoma patients after selective sentinel lymph node dissection: long-term follow-up results.

PURPOSE: Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is part of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, there is no final proof that the SLN procedure in melanoma patients influences outcome of disease. This study investigated the accuracy of the SLN procedure and clinical outcome in melanoma patients after at least 60 months of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1996, 209 patients with stage I/II cutaneous melanoma underwent selective SLN dissection by the triple technique. If the SLN contained metastatic disease, a completion lymphadenectomy was performed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The success rate was 99.5%. Median follow-up was 72 months. Forty patients (19%) had a positive SLN. The false-negative rate was 9%. Five-year overall survival was 87% for the entire group and 92% and 67% for SLN-negative and SLN-positive patients (P <.0001), respectively. All patients with a positive SLN and a Breslow thickness < or = 1.00 mm survived, and SLN-positive patients with a Breslow thickness less than 2.00 mm tend to have a better prognosis compared with SLN-negative patients with a Breslow thickness greater than 2.00 mm. SLN status (P =.002), Breslow thickness (P =.002), and lymphatic invasion (P =.0009) were all found to be independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: With a success rate of 99.5% and a false-negative rate of 9% after long-term follow-up, the triple-technique SLN procedure is a reliable and accurate method. Survival data seem promising, although a therapeutic effect is still questionable. As shown in this study, not all SLN-positive patients have a poor prognosis.