To Maintain Formulation Composition Similarity of Coated Tablets of Different Strengths: Should Coating be Based on Core Tablet Weight or Surface Area?

PURPOSE: As per the Japanese or SUPAC guidance to maintain formulation composition similarity across tablet strengths, the coating should be applied based on the core tablet surface area or weight, respectively. These two coating approaches were compared by evaluating protective effects of coating on the light stability of three model compounds. METHODS: Core tablets of three light sensitive drugs, nifedipine, rosuvastatin calcium, and montelukast sodium were coated either with PVA-based Opadry® II white or Opadry® II beige. The coated tablets were exposed to light up to three ICH cycles. RESULTS: For Opadry® II white, the surface area based coating provided consistent light protection across tablet strengths when the coating amount was more than 0.1 mg/mm2 compared to that based on core tablet weights. For Opadry® II beige, both approaches gave comparable and better light protection due to presence of iron oxides. The light protection by Opadry® II white could be because of physical barrier of coating, which was uniform across the strengths when it was based on core tablet surface area. CONCLUSION: For a routine tablet formulation development with Opadry color coating, it does not matter whether the coating is applied based on the core tablet surface area or weight.

Quality by design (QbD) approach to match tablet glossiness.

A quality by design (QbD) approach was used for a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based coating to develop a 'look-alike' placebo tablet, which can match the glossiness (shine) of an innovator tablet. Critical coating parameters such as exhaust temperature, drying capacity, solid concentration in coating dispersion, and plasticizer concentration were studied using a full factorial design of experiment (DoE). Total of 20 experimental coating runs was executed on a pilot scale using a perforated pan coater. Coated tablets were evaluated visually against the innovator product by a panel of 13 volunteers using an individual questionnaire about the tablet appearance. The tablet appearance included factors such as tablet surface shine, surface roughness, and logo bridging. These data were analyzed using JMP software. Solid concentration in coating dispersion and drying capacity were found to be the key contributing parameters for tablet surface shine. Human observations were more discerning in spotting subtle differences in tablet appearance than Munsell evaluation. By the judicious selection of a solid concentration in coating dispersion and drying conditions, a look-alike placebo tablet was successfully developed. Change in tablet shape or size did not affect the tablet shine. However, replacement of PVA-based coating with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)-based coating resulted in reduced shine irrespective of tablet shape and size.