NAFLD/MASLD and the Gut-Liver Axis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment Options.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) poses an emerging threat topublic health. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is reported to be the most rapidly rising cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in the western world. Recently, a new term has been proposed: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The introduction of this new terminology has sparked a debate about the interchangeability of these terms. The pathogenesis of NAFLD/MASLD is thought to be multifactorial, involving both genetic and environmental factors. Among these factors, alterations in gut microbiota and gut dysbiosis have recently garnered significant attention. In this context, this review will further discuss the gut-liver axis, which refers to the bidirectional interaction between the human gut microbiota and the liver. Additionally, the therapeutic potential of probiotics, particularly next-generation probiotics and genetically engineered bacteria, will be explored. Moreover, the role of prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and phages as well as fecal microbiota transplantation will be analyzed. Particularly for lean patients with NAFLD/MASLD, who have limited treatment options, approaches that modify the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota may hold promise. However, due to ongoing safety concerns with approaches that modulate gut microbiota, further large-scale studies are necessary to better assess their efficacy and safety in treating NAFLD/MASLD.

The Predictive Value of Aortic Calcification on Computed Tomography for Major Cardiovascular Events.

As the prevalence of cardiovascular disease continues to increase, early identification of patients at high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) using reliable diagnostic modalities is important. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure used to replace the aortic valve with a bioprosthetic one, often without the need for surgery. Extra coronary calcification in the ascending and/or descending thoracic aorta, aortic arch, and abdominal aorta has recently been identified as a method to quantify the extent of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, its definitive role in the prediction of MACE remains unclear. We performed a comprehensive review to summarize the current literature on the diagnostic and predictive value of thoracic and abdominal aortic calcification, as quantified in computed tomography, for the association, risk stratification, and prediction of MACE and after TAVI procedures. Despite increasing evidence, the predictive role of thoracic calcification still remains unproven, with a need for carefully tailored studies to confirm these findings.

Diffuse LAD and LV Thrombus as Possible Manifestation of Protein-S Deficiency in a Young Patient.

Patients with inherited hypercoagulopathies such as protein-S deficiency commonly present with venous thrombosis. However, there are rare cases of arterial thrombosis. We describe a rare case of a diffuse left anterior descending and left ventricular thrombus in a young patient with protein-S deficiency complicated with mid cerebral artery occlusion. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Randomized comparison of Glidesheath Slender with conventional 5Fr arterial sheaths for coronary angiography through the distal radial artery.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of the thin-walled 5F Glidesheath Slender sheath in the distal transradial access (dTRA) have not been investigated. This study aimed to compare the Glidesheath Slender versus conventional 5Fr arterial sheaths in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) through the dTRA. METHODS: A total of 352 consecutive patients with an indication for CAG were randomized (1:1) to Glidesheath Slender 5Fr versus a conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for dTRA. The primary endpoint was the rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removal. Follow-up ultrasound of the right radial and distal radial artery was performed 7-10 days after the procedure. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients where a 6Fr sheath or crossover of access site was required, 108 patients in the Glidesheath Slender and 105 patients in the conventional 5Fr arterial sheath group were included in the analysis. The crossover rate to conventional radial access and the rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removal were similar between the two groups (18.9% in the Glidesheath slender vs. 22% in the control group; P=0.460, and 62% vs. 51.4%; P=0.118, respectively). The level of pain associated with the procedure was significantly lower in the Glidesheath Slender group (2.69 vs. 3.29 in the control group; P=0.02). No significant difference was recorded between the two groups in the rate of access-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Glidesheath Slender for dTRA did not increase the rate of early hemostasis compared with conventional arterial sheath.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review.

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.