Effects of imipramine on cytokines panel in the rats serum during the drug treatment and discontinuation.

Time dependent sensitization (TDS) - phenomenon described originally by Chiodo and Antelman (1980) in context of dopamine receptors, refers to cascade of events that continue to develop in the organism, after the initiating stimulus is no longer available. Treatment could be recognized as such a initiating stimulus (in case of depression, example of electroconvulsive therapy would be obvious, but some aspects of pharmacotherapy too). The process leads to improvement, but, on the other hand, phenomena of kindling in recurrent depression is well known (more relapses and therapies make heavier and longer lasting subsequent episodes). Hence our interest in delayed effects of treatment. Here we report alterations in rat immune system after Imipramine (IMI) treatment cessation. Wistar male rats were treated with IMI (10 mg/kg i.p. in 2 ml/kg of saline) repeatedly for 21 days or once - on the last day of drug administration period. Then the 3 weeks discontinuation phase begun, during which, at certain time points (3 h, 72 h, 7days, 21days) the trunk blood was collected. Tissue concentrations of IMI and its metabolite desipramine (DMI), as well as ACTH and various cytokines were measured. The IMI and DMI was detectable only 3 h after the last i.p. injection of the drug. Ever since the second time point (72 h of discontinuation) the levels of either compound were below detection threshold.There was no significant changes in ACTH levels between rat groups, although IMI seemed to attenuate alterations of the hormone level comparing to control groups. We observed differences between groups regarding certain cytokines at certain time points. Namely: at 72 h of discontinuation IL-2 and IL-4 were elevated in sera of rats treated with IMI acutely; at 7d of discontinuation levels of IL-1α, IL-5, IL-10 and IL-12 were affected in both acutely and chronically treated animals. Presented data support, regarding some cytokines in serum, the TDS theory. Furthermore they refer to important aspect of antidepressants (ADs) action - antidepressant discontinuation syndrome (ADS). The most frequently, ADS has been described in context of ADs-disrupted monoamine homeostasis. Here, the other principle (i.e. immunomodulation) of the syndrome is proposed.

The effect of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and newer antidepressant drugs on the activity and level of rat CYP3A.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of tricyclic antidepressants (TADs: imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, and desipramine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine and sertraline) and novel antidepressant drugs (mirtazapine and nefazodone) on the activity of CYP3A measured as a rate of testosterone 2beta- and 6beta-hydroxylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of the antidepressants, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 1 day or 2 weeks with pharmacological doses of the drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, nefazodone 10 mg kg(-1) i.p.; desipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.; mirtazapine 3 mg kg(-1) i.p.), in the absence of the antidepressants in vitro. The investigated antidepressants added to control liver microsomes produced some inhibitory effects on CYP3A activity, which were very weak (most of TADs, K(i)=145-212 microM), modest (clomipramine and sertraline, K(i)=67.5 and 62 microM, respectively) or moderate (nefazodone and fluoxetine, K(i)=42 and 43 microM, respectively). Mirtazapine did not display this kind of properties. One-day exposure of rats to TADs substantially decreased the activity of CYP3A in liver microsomes, which was maintained during chronic treatment. The observed decreases in the enzyme activity were in contrast to the increased CYP3A protein level found after chronic treatment with TADs. On the other hand, sertraline increased the activity of the enzyme after its prolonged administration and its effect correlated positively with the observed elevation in CYP3A protein level. Fluoxetine, mirtazapine and nefazodone did not change the activity of CYP3A in liver microsomes after their administration to rats. Three different mechanisms of the antidepressants-CYP3A interaction are postulated: 1) a direct inhibition of CYP3A by nefazodone, SSRIs and clomipramine, shown in vitro, with the inhibitory effect of nefazodone being the strongest, but weaker than the effects of this drug on human CYP3A4; 2) in vivo inhibition of CYP3A produced by 1 day and maintained during chronic treatment with TADs, which suggests inactivation of the enzyme by reactive metabolites; 3) in vivo induction by sertraline of CYP3A produced only by chronic treatment with the antidepressant, which suggests its influence on the enzyme regulation.

Inhibition of rat liver CYP2D in vitro and after 1-day and long-term exposure to neuroleptics in vivo-possible involvement of different mechanisms.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of classic and atypical neuroleptics on the activity of rat CYP2D measured as a rate of ethylmorphine O-deethylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of neuroleptics, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 1-day or 2-weeks (twice a day) with pharmacological doses of the drugs (promazine, levomepromazine, thioridazine, perazine 10 mg kg(-1); chlorpromazine 3 mg kg(-1); haloperidol 0.3 mg kg(-1); risperidone 0.1 mg kg(-1); sertindole 0.05 mg kg(-1)), in the absence of the neuroleptics in vitro. Neuroleptics added in vitro to control liver microsomes decreased the activity of the rat CYP2D by competitive or mixed inhibition of the enzyme. Thioridazine (Ki=15 microM) was the most potent inhibitor of the rat CYP2D among the drugs studied, whose effect was more pronounced than that of the other neuroleptics tested: phenothiazines (Ki=18-23 microM), haloperidol (Ki=32 microM), sertindole (Ki=51 microM) or risperidone (Ki=165 microM). The investigated neuroleptics-when given to rats in vivo-also seemed to exert an inhibitory effect on CYP2D via other mechanisms. One-day exposure of rats to the classic neuroleptics decreased the activity of CYP2D in rat liver microsomes. After chronic treatment with the investigated neuroleptics, the decreased CYP2D activity produced by the phenothiazines was still maintained, while that caused by haloperidol diminished. Moreover, risperidone decreased the activity of that enzyme. The obtained results indicate drug- and time-dependent interactions between the investigated neuroleptics and the CYP2D subfamily of rat cytochrome P-450, which may proceed via different mechanisms: (1) competitive or mixed inhibition of CYP2D shown in vitro, the inhibitory effects of phenothiazines being stronger than those of haloperidol or atypical neuroleptics, but weaker than the effects of the respective drugs on human CYP2D6; (2) in vivo inhibition of CYP2D, produced by both 1-day and chronic treatment with phenothiazines, which suggests inactivation of enzyme by intermediate metabolites; (3) in vivo inhibition of CYP2D by risperidone, produced only by chronic treatment with the drug, which suggests its influence on the enzyme regulation.

Inhibition and possible induction of rat CYP2D after short- and long-term treatment with antidepressants.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine, sertraline) and novel antidepressant drugs (mirtazapine, nefazodone) on the activity of CYP2D, measured as a rate of ethylmorphine O-deethylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of the antidepressants, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally for one day or two weeks (twice a day) with pharmacological doses of the drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, nefazodone 10 mg kg(-1) i.p.; desipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.; mirtazapine 3 mg kg(-1) i.p.), in the absence of the antidepressants in-vitro. Antidepressants decreased the activity of the rat CYP2D by competitive inhibition of the enzyme, the potency of their inhibitory effect being as follows: clomipramine (K(i) = 14 microM) > sertraline approximate, equals fluoxetine (K(i) = 17 and 16 microM, respectively) > imipramine approximate, equals amitriptyline (K(i) = 26 and 25 microM, respectively) > desipramine (K(i) = 44 microM) > nefazodone (K(i) = 55 microM) > mirtazapine (K(i) = 107 microM). A one-day treatment with antidepressants caused a significant decrease in the CYP2D activity after imipramine, fluoxetine and sertraline. After prolonged administration of antidepressants, the decreased CYP2D activity produced by imipramine, fluoxetine and sertraline was still maintained. Moreover, amitriptyline and nefazodone significantly decreased, while mirtazapine increased the activity of the enzyme. Desipramine and clomipramine did not produce any effect when administered in-vivo. The obtained results indicate three different mechanisms of the antidepressants-CYP2D interaction: firstly, competitive inhibition of CYP2D shown in-vitro, the inhibitory effects of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs being stronger than those of novel drugs; secondly, in-vivo inhibition of CYP2D produced by both one-day and chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (except for desipramine and clomipramine) and SSRIs, which suggests inactivation of the enzyme apoprotein by reactive metabolites; and thirdly, in-vivo inhibition by nefazodone and induction by mirtazapine of CYP2D produced only by chronic treatment with the drugs, which suggests their influence on the enzyme regulation.

Intracellular distribution of psychotropic drugs in the grey and white matter of the brain: the role of lysosomal trapping.

1. Since the brain is not a homogenous organ (i.e. the phospholipid pattern and density of lysosomes may vary in its different regions), in the present study we examined the uptake of psychotropic drugs by vertically cut slices of whole brain, grey (cerebral cortex) and white (corpus callosum, internal capsule) matter of the brain and by neuronal and astroglial cell cultures. 2. Moreover, we assessed the contribution of lysosomal trapping to total drug uptake (total uptake=lysosomal trapping+phospholipid binding) by tissue slices or cells conducting experiments in the presence and absence of 'lysosomal inhibitors', i.e., the lysosomotropic compound ammonium chloride (20 mM) or the Na(+)/H(+)-ionophore monensin (10 microM), which elevated the internal pH of lysosomes. The initial concentration of psychotropic drug in the incubation medium was 5 microM. 3. Both total uptake and lysosomal trapping of the antidepressants investigated (imipramine, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, sertraline) and neuroleptics (promazine, perazine, thioridazine) were higher in the grey matter and neurones than in the white matter and astrocytes, respectively. Lysosomal trapping of the psychotropics occurred mainly in neurones where thioridazine sertraline and perazine showed the highest degree of lysosomotropism. 4. Distribution interactions between antidepressants and neuroleptics took place in neurones via mutual inhibition of lysosomal trapping of drugs. 5. A differential number of neuronal and glial cells in the brain may mask the lysosomal trapping and the distribution interactions of less potent lysosomotropic drugs in vertically cut brain slices. 6. A reduction (via a distribution interaction) in the concentration of psychotropics in lysosomes (depot), which leads to an increase in their level in membranes and tissue fluids, may intensify the pharmacological action of the combined drugs.

The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in the rat.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline, on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in a steady state in rats. Perazine (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) was administered twice daily for two weeks, alone or jointly with one of the SSRIs. Concentrations of perazine and its two main metabolites (N-desmethylperazine and 5-sulfoxide) in the plasma and brain were measured 30 min and 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs. Of the investigated SSRIs, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine significantly increased plasma and brain concentrations of perazine (up to 900% and 760% of the control value, respectively), their effect being most pronounced after 30 min and 6 h. Moreover, simultaneous increases in perazine metabolites concentrations and in the perazine/metabolite concentration ratios were observed. Sertraline elevated plasma and brain concentrations of perazine after 30 min. In-vitro studies with liver microsomes of rats treated chronically with perazine, SSRIs ortheir combinations showed decreased concentrations of cytochrome P-450 after perazine and a combination of perazine and fluvoxamine (vs control), and increased concentration after a combination of perazine and fluoxetine (vs perazine-treated group). Prolonged treatment with perazine did not significantly change the rate of its own metabolism. Chronic administration of fluoxetine or sertraline, alone or in a combination with perazine, accelerated perazine N-demethylation (vs control or perazine group, respectively). Fluvoxamine had a similar effect. The 5-sulfoxidation of perazine was accelerated by fluvoxamine and sertraline treatment, but the process was inhibited by administration of a combination of perazine and fluoxetine or fluvoxamine (vs control). Kinetic studies using control liver microsomes, in the absence or presence of SSRIs added in-vitro, demonstrated competitive inhibition of both N-demethylation and sulfoxidation by the investigated SSRIs. Sertraline was the most potent inhibitor of perazine N-demethylation but the weakest inhibitor of sulfoxidation. Results of in-vivo and in-vitro studies indicate that the observed interaction between perazine and SSRIs mainly involves competition for an active site of perazine N-demethylase and sulfoxidase. Moreover, increases in the concentrations of both perazine and metabolites measured, produced by the investigated drug combinations in-vivo, suggest simultaneous inhibition of another, yet to be investigated, metabolic pathway of perazine (e.g. aromatic hydroxylation).

Effects of antidepressant drugs on the activity of cytochrome P-450 measured by caffeine oxidation in rat liver microsomes.

Caffeine is a marker drug for testing the activity of CYP1A2 (3-N-demethylation) in humans and rats. Moreover, it is also a relatively specific substrate of CYP3A (8-hydroxylation). In the case of 1-N- and in particular 7-N-demethylation of caffeine, apart from CYP1A2, other cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes play a considerable role. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of imipramine, amitriptyline and fluoxetine on cytochrome P-450 activity measured by caffeine oxidation in rat liver microsomes. The obtained results showed that imipramine exerted a most potent inhibitory effect on caffeine metabolism. Imipramine decreased the rate of 3-N-, 1-N- and 7-N-demethylations, and 8-hydroxylation of caffeine, the effect on 3-N-demethylation being most pronounced (Ki = 33 microM). Amitriptyline showed distinct inhibition of 3-N- and 1-N-demethylation of caffeine, though its effect was less potent than in the case of imipramine (Ki = 57 and 61 pM, respectively). The influence of amitriptyline on 8-hydroxylation and especially on 7-N-demethylation of caffeine was weaker (Ki = 108 and 190 pM, respectively) than on 3-N- or 1-N-demethylation, suggesting a narrower spectrum of cytochrome P-450 inhibition by amitriptyline than by imipramine, involving mainly the subfamily CYP1A2, and--to a lesser degree--CYP3A. In contrast to the tested tricyclic antidepressants, fluoxetine did not exert any considerable effect on the 3-N- or 1-N-demethylation of caffeine (Ki = 152 and 196 microM, respectively), which indicates its low affinity for CYP1A2. However, fluoxetine displayed a clear inhibitory effect on caffeine 7-N-demethylation (Ki = 72 microM), the reaction which is catalyzed mainly by other than CYP1A2 isoenzymes. Fluoxetine diminished markedly the 8-hydroxylation of the marker drug; as reflected by Ki values, the potency of inhibition of rat CYP3A by fluoxetine was similar to that of imipramine (Ki = 40 and 45 microM, respectively). In summary, CYP1A2 was distinctly inhibited by imipramine and amitriptyline, CYP3A by imipramine and fluoxetine, while other CYP isoenzymes (CYP2B and/or 2E1) by imipramine and fluoxetine.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine during co-administration of tricyclic antidepressants.

1. Because of serious side-effects of thioridazine and tricyclic antidepressants (cardiotoxicity), a possible influence of imipramine and amitriptyline on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine was investigated in a steady state (2-week treatment) in rats. 2. Imipramine and amitriptyline (5 and 10 mg kg(-1) i.p., respectively) elevated 30 and 20 fold, respectively, the concentration of thioridazine (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and its metabolites (N-desmethylthioridazine, 2-sulphoxide, 2-sulphone, 5-sulphoxide) in blood plasma. Similar, yet weaker increases in the thioridazine concentration were found in the brain. Moreover, an elevation of thioridazine/metabolite ratios was observed. 3. Imipramine and amitriptyline added to control liver microsomes in vitro inhibited the metabolism of thioridazine via N-demethylation (an increase in K(m)), mono-2-sulphoxidation (an increase in K(m) and a decrease in V(max)) and 5-sulphoxidation (mainly a decrease in V(max)). Amitriptyline was a more potent inhibitor than imipramine of the thioridazine metabolism. 4. The varying concentration ratios of antidepressant/thioridazine in vivo appear to be more important to the final result of the pharmacokinetic interactions than are relative direct inhibitory effects of the antidepressants on thioridazine metabolism observed in vitro. 5. Besides direct inhibition of the thioridazine metabolism, the decreased activity of cytochrome P-450 towards 5-sulphoxidation, produced by chronic joint administration of thioridazine and the antidepressants, seems to be relevant to the observed in vivo interaction. 6. The obtained results may also point to inhibition of another, not yet investigated, metabolic pathway of thioridazine, which may be inferred from the simultaneous elevation of concentrations of both thioridazine and the measured metabolites.

Different effects of amitriptyline and imipramine on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in rats.

The aim of this study was to search for possible effects of imipramine and amitriptyline on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine at steady state in rats. Perazine (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) was administered to rats twice daily for two weeks, alone or jointly with imipramine or amitriptyline (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.). Concentrations of perazine and its two main metabolites (5-sulphoxide and N-desmethylperazine) in the plasma and brain were measured at 30 min (Cmax), 6h and 12h (slow disposition phase) after the last dose of the drugs. Liver microsomes were prepared 24 h after withdrawal of the drugs. Amitriptyline increased the plasma and brain concentrations of perazine (up to 300% of the control) and N-desmethylperazine, while not affecting those of 5-sulphoxide. Imipramine only tended to increase the neuroleptic concentration in the plasma and brain. Studies with control liver microsomes showed that amitriptyline and imipramine added to the incubation mixture in-vitro, competitively inhibited N-demethylation (Ki (inhibition constant) = 16 microM and 164 microM, respectively) and 5-sulphoxidation (Ki = 57 microM and 86 microM, respectively) of perazine, amitriptyline being a more potent inhibitor of perazine metabolism, especially with respect to N-demethylation. Studies with microsomes of rats treated chronically with perazine or tricyclic antidepressants, or both, did not show significant differences in the rate of perazine metabolism between perazine- and perazine+antidepressant-treated rats. The data obtained were compared with the results of analogous experiments with promazine and thioridazine. It was concluded that elevations of perazine concentration were caused by direct inhibition of the neuroleptic metabolism by the antidepressants. Similar interactions, possibly leading to exacerbation of the pharmacological action of perazine, may be expected in man. Since the interactions between phenothiazines and tricyclic antidepressants may proceed in two directions, reduced doses of both the neuroleptic and the antidepressant are recommended when the drugs are administered jointly.

Distribution interactions between perazine and antidepressant drugs. In vivo studies.

Perazine belongs to the most frequently chosen neuroleptics for a combination with antidepressants in the therapy of complex or "treatment-resistant" psychiatric illnesses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the distribution interaction between perazine and antidepressants in vivo. Experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats. Animals received perazine and an antidepressant drug (imipramine or fluoxetine), separately or jointly, at a dose of 10 mg/kg ip. Concentrations of perazine, imipramine, fluoxetine and their metabolites in the blood plasma and tissues were measured at 1 h after administration of the drugs (HPLC). Effects of distribution interactions were estimated on the basis of the calculated tissue/plasma and lysosome-poor/lysosome-rich tissue concentration ratios, considering the heart and muscles as lysosome-poor and the lungs, liver and kidneys as lysosome-rich ones. Both imipramine and fluoxetine diminished the tissue/plasma concentration ratios of perazine for the lungs and kidneys (not for the liver), but elevated those ratios for the brain, muscles and heart. On the other hand, perazine lowered the lungs/plasma concentration ratio of both antidepressants and the liver/plasma concentration ratio of imipramine. Simultaneously, perazine elevated the brain/plasma and heart/plasma concentration ratios of both antidepressants. Consequently, the perazine concentration ratios of lysosome-poor/lysosome-rich tissue significantly increased in the presence of the investigated antidepressants, with an exception of the muscles/liver concentration ratio. At the same time, perazine raised the heart/lysosome-rich tissue concentration ratios of imipramine and fluoxetine, not changing significantly the muscles/lysosome-rich concentration ratios of the antidepressants. In conclusion, the presented results provide evidence that the observed in vitro distributive interactions between perazine and the antidepressants occur also in vivo, leading to a shift of the drugs from organs rich in lysosomes to those poor in these organella, in particular to the heart. Perazine and the antidepressants mutually increased the drug concentration ratios of heart/plasma and heart/lysosome-rich tissue, i.e. the heart/lung, heart/liver and heart/kidneys ratios. Similar results were obtained with lysosome-poor muscles in the case ofperazine. Moreover, the obtained results indicate that, apart from the lysosome density in the investigated tissues, the potential metabolic interactions in the liver and the order of drug circulation in a body have an important impact on the calculated drug concentration ratios.

The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the pharmacokinetics of thioridazine and its metabolites: in vivo and in vitro studies.

Due to its psychotropic profile, thioridazine is a neuroleptic suitable for a combination with antidepressants in a number of complex psychiatric illnesses. However, because of its serious side-effects, such a combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) which inhibit cytochrome P-450 may be dangerous. The aim of the present study was to investigate a possible impact of SSRIs on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine in a steady state in rats. Thioridazine (10 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally, twice a day, for two weeks, alone or jointly with one of the antidepressants (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine or sertraline). Concentrations of thioridazine and its main metabolites (2-sulfoxide = mesoridazine; 2-sulfone = sulforidazine; 5-sulfoxide = ring sulfoxide and N-desmethylthiorid-azine) were assessed in the blood plasma and brain at 30 min, 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs using an HPLC method. Fluoxetine potently increased (up to 13 times!) the concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites in the plasma, especially after 6 and 12 h. Moreover, an increase in the sum of concentrations of tioridazine + metabolites and thioridazine/metabolite ratios was observed. In vitro studies with control liver microsomes, as well as with microsomes of rats treated chronically with fluoxetine show that the changes in the thioridazine pharmacokinetics may be attributed to the competitive (N-demethylation, Ki = 23 microM) and mixed inhibition (2- and 5-sulfoxidation, Ki = 60 microM and 34 microM, respectively) of thioridazine metabolism by fluoxetine, and to the adaptive changes produced by chronic administration of fluoxetine, as reflected by inhibition of N-demethylation and formation of sulforidazine. Sertraline seemed to have a tendency to decrease thioridazine concentration in vivo, though in vitro studies showed that - like fluoxetine - it competitively or via mixed mechanism inhibited the three metabolic pathways of thioridazine (Ki = 41 microM, 64 microM and 47 microM, respectively). Chronic treatment with sertraline stimulated thioridazine 2- and 5-sulfoxidation, which may be responsible for the observed tendency of sertraline to decrease concentrations of the neuroleptic. In the case of fluvoxamine, a tendency to increase the thioridazine level was observed, which may be connected with the competitive or mixed inhibition of thioridazine N-demethylation and 2-sulfoxidation by the antidepressant (Ki = 17 microM and 167 microM, respectively). Repeated administration of fluvoxamine did not produce any changes in the activity of thioridazine-metabolizing enzymes. In conclusion, of the SSRIs studied, only fluoxetine produces a substantial increase in the thioridazine level in the plasma and brain. In the case of fluvoxamine, a tendency to increase the thioridazine level should be considered. Coadministration of thioridazine and sertraline seems to be safe, though a tendency to decrease the thioridazine level may be expected.

The role of lysosomes in the cellular distribution of thioridazine and potential drug interactions.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the contribution of lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake of thioridazine and to potential drug distribution interactions between thioridazine and tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, amitriptyline) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; fluoxetine, sertraline). The experiment was carried out on slices of various rat tissues as a system with intact lysosomes. Thioridazine and antidepressants (5 microM) were incubated separately or jointly with the tissue slices in the absence or presence of "lysosomal inhibitors," i.e., ammonium chloride or monensin. The results show that the contribution of lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake of thioridazine is as important as phospholipid binding. A high degree of dependence of thioridazine tissue uptake on the lysosomal trapping is the cause of substantial distributive interactions between thioridazine and the investigated antidepressants at the level of cellular distribution. Thioridazine and the antidepressants, both tricyclic and SSRIs, mutually decreased their tissue uptake. The potency of antidepressants to decrease thioridazine uptake was similar to that of lysosomal inhibitors. In general, the observed interactions between thioridazine and antidepressants occurred only in those tissues in which thioridazine showed lysosomotropism (the lungs, liver, kidneys, brain, and muscles) but were not observed in the presence of ammonium chloride. The above finding provides evidence that the interactions proceeded at the level of lysosomal trapping. In the adipose tissue and heart no lysosomal trapping of thioridazine was detected and those tissues were not the site of such an interaction. Since the organs and tissues involved in the distributive interactions constitute a major part of the organism and take up most of the total drug in the body, the interactions occurring in them may cause a substantial shift of the drugs to organs and tissues poor in lysosomes, e.g. the heart and muscles. An in vivo study into the thioridazine-imipramine interaction showed that joint administration of the drugs under study (10 mg/kg ip) increased drug concentration ratios of lysosome-poor tissue/plasma and lysosome-poor/lysosome-rich tissue. Considering serious side effects of thioridazine and tricyclic antidepressants (cardiotoxicity, anticholinergic activity), the thioridazine-antidepressant combinations studied should be approached with respect to the appropriate dose adjustment.

The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the plasma and brain pharmacokinetics of the simplest phenothiazine neuroleptic promazine in the rat.

The aim of the present study was to investigate a possible impact of the three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline on the pharmacokinetics of promazine in a steady state in rats. Promazine was administered twice a day for 2 weeks, alone or jointly with one of the antidepressants. Concentrations of promazine and its two main metabolites (N-desmethylpromazine and sulfoxide) in the plasma and brain were measured at 30 min and 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs. All the investigated SSRIs increased the plasma and brain concentrations of promazine up to 300% of the control value, their effect being most pronounced after 30 min and 6 h. Moreover, simultaneous increases in the promazine metabolites' concentrations and in the promazine-metabolite concentration ratios were observed. In vitro studies with liver microsomes of rats treated chronically with promazine, SSRIs or their combination did not show any significant changes in the concentrations of cytochromes P-450 and b-5. However, treatment with fluoxetine, alone or in a combination with promazine, decreased the rates of promazine N-demethylation and sulfoxidation. A similar effect was observed in the case of promazine and fluvoxamine combination. Kinetic studies into promazine metabolism, carried out on control liver microsomes in the absence or presence of SSRIs added in vitro, demonstrated competitive inhibition of both N-demethylation and sulfoxidation by the antidepressants. The results of in vivo and in vitro studies indicate the following mechanisms of the observed interactions: (a) competition for an active site of promazine N-demethylase and sulfoxidase; (b) adaptive changes in cytochrome P-450, produced by chronic treatment with fluoxetine or fluvoxamine; (c) additionally, increases in the sum of concentrations of promazine+ metabolites, produced by fluoxetine and sertraline in vivo, suggest simultaneous inhibition of another, not investigated by us, metabolic pathway of promazine, e.g. hydroxylation. In conclusion, all the three SSRIs administered chronically in pharmacological doses, increase the concentrations of promazine in the blood plasma and brain of rats by inhibiting different metabolic pathways of the neuroleptic. Assuming that similar interactions occur in humans, reduced doses of phenotiazines should be considered when one of the above antidepressants is to be given jointly.

Lysosomal trapping as an important mechanism involved in the cellular distribution of perazine and in pharmacokinetic interaction with antidepressants.

Perazine, a piperazine-type phenothiazine neuroleptic, is the most frequently chosen drug for combination with antidepressants in the therapy of complex or 'treatment-resistant' psychiatric illnesses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the contribution of lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake of perazine, and the pharmacokinetic interaction between the neuroleptic and antidepressants. Experiments were carried out on slices of different rat organs regarded as a system with functional lysosomes. To distinguish between lysosomal trapping and tissue binding, the experiments were performed in the absence or presence of 'lysosomal inhibitors', i.e. the lysosomotropic compound ammonium chloride or [H+] ionophore monensin, which abolish the pH-gradient of lysosomes. Under steady-state conditions, the highest tissue uptake of perazine was observed for the adipose tissue, which descended in the following order: the adipose tissue>lungs>liver>heart=brain>kidneys>muscles. The contribution of lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake amounted to about 40% in the liver, brain and muscles, to 30% in the kidneys, and to 25% in the heart and lungs. In the adipose tissue, no lysosomotropism of perazine was observed. Of the psychotropics studied, perazine was the only drug showing such a high degree of lysosomal trapping in muscles and distinct lysosomotropic properties in the heart. Perazine and the antidepressants used, both tricyclic (imipramine, amitriptyline) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, sertraline), mutually decreased their tissue uptake. The potency of imipramine to decrease perazine uptake was similar to that of the 'lysosomal inhibitors'. Other antidepressants seemed to exert a somewhat weaker effect. The above interactions between perazine and antidepressants were not observed in the presence of ammonium chloride, which indicates that they proceeded at the level of lysosomal trapping. The adipose tissue in which the drug uptake was not affected by the 'lysosomal inhibitors' was not the site of such an interaction. Ammonium chloride did not affect the drug metabolism in liver slices; other tissues displayed only a negligible biotransformation of the psychotropics studied. A parallel metabolic interaction between perazine and tricyclic antidepressants took part in liver slices (i.e. perazine and antidepressants mutually inhibited their metabolic pathways), but the influence of such an interaction on the lysosomal uptake of the parent compounds in liver slices did not seem to be great. A substantial decrease in concentrations of the drugs in lysosomes (depot form) observed in vitro may lead to an increase in the concentration in vivo of the neuroleptic and antidepressants at the site of action, which, in turn, may increase the risk of cardiotoxic and anticholinergic side-effects of tricyclic antidepressants and sedative and extrapyramidal effects of the neuroleptic.

Pharmacokinetics of phenothiazine neuroleptics after chronic coadministration of carbamazepine.

The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of the two phenothiazine neuroleptics thioridazine and perazine in rats. The obtained results are compared with the results of analogical experiments concerning promazine. Thioridazine or perazine (10 mg/kg i.p.) were administered twice a day for two weeks alone or jointly with carbamazepine (15 mg/kg i.p. during the 1st week, and 20 mg/kg i.p. during the 2nd week of treatment). Concentrations of the neuroleptics and their main metabolites in the plasma and brain were measured at 30 min, 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs. Carbamazepine decreased the concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites (especially mesoridazine and sulforidazine) in plasma at 30 min and 6 h after the last dose of the drugs. Similar changes in the concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites were observed at 6 h in the brain. Carbamazepine did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of perazine. In vitro studies with liver microsomes of control rats revealed that carbamazepine added to the incubation mixture inhibited N-demethylation of thioridazine via mixed mechanism, but it did not influence significantly 2- or 5-sulfoxidation of the neuroleptic. In the case of perazine, no distinct inhibition of its N-demethylation or sulfoxidation by carbamazepine was observed. Neither carbamazepine nor the neuroleptics, administered separately or jointly for two weeks, significantly influenced the concentrations of cytochromes P-450 and b-5 in the liver. Carbamazepine++ given chronically decreased the rate of N-demethylation and had a tendency to accelerate 2-sulfoxidation of thioridazine, both when given alone (as compared to the control) and when coadministered with thioridazine (as compared to the thioridazine-treated group). In contrast, chronic treatment with carbamazepine alone, significantly increased the rate of perazine N-demethylation. When carbamazepine was coadministered with perazine, the effect was less pronounced. In conclusion, carbamazepine given jointly with thioridazine or promazine at pharmacological doses to rats accelerates the metabolism of the neuroleptics, which is not the case with perazine. The observed induction proceeds by metabolic pathways other than N-demethylation or sulfoxidation. The different effect of carbamazepine on the N-demethylation of thioridazine and perazine in liver microsomes of control and carbamazepine-treated rats implicates that the two reactions are not catalyzed by the same enzyme. Such an induction of neuroleptic metabolism by carbamazepine in patients may worsen psychotic symptoms.

Contribution of lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake of psychotropic drugs.

The present study was aimed at assessing individual contributions of the phospholipid binding and lysosomal trapping to the total tissue uptake of psychotropic drugs with different chemical structures, such as promazine, imipramine, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, sertraline (basic lipophilic drugs) and carbamazepine (lipophilic, but not basic). We also tried to find out whether lysosomal trapping may be involved in the pharmacokinetic interactions in clinical combinations of psychotropics. Uptake experiments were carried out on slices of various rat tissues as a system with intact lysosomes. Initial concentration of each drug was 5 microM. The results were compared with those obtained in the presence of the "lysosomal inhibitors", ammonium chloride or monensin. The basic lipophilic psychotropics showed high uptake in tissues known for the abundance of lysosomes, mainly the lungs. The highest drug accumulation was found for promazine and amitriptyline. "Lysosomal inhibitors" significantly decreased the uptake of the basic lipophilic drugs, particularly in the lungs and liver. The most potent effect was observed for amitriptyline, imipramine and promazine. The brain showed moderate accumulation of basic lipophilic psychotropics and the effect of the "lysosomal inhibitors" was significant only in the case of amitriptyline, imipramine and sertraline. The only exception to the above regularity were imipramine and sertraline which were taken up more extensively by the adipose tissue than by lysosome-rich tissues such as the lungs or liver. Carbamazepine did not show lysosomotropism. Amitriptyline and promazine mutually decreased their uptake by lung slices when the drugs were incubated jointly. In the presence of ammonium chloride the interaction did not occur. In conclusion, the obtained results show that (1) the lysosomal trapping is an important factor determining the distribution of the basic lipophilic psychotropics; however (2) their tissue uptake depends more on the phospholipid binding than on the lysosomal trapping; (3) the lysosomal trapping may be involved in the pharmacokinetic interactions between psychotropics.

Interactions between promazine and antidepressants at the level of cellular distribution.

The pharmacokinetic interactions in clinical combinations of a phenothiazine neuroleptic and antidepressants at the level of cellular distribution were investigated. Uptake experiments were performed on slices of various rat tissues as a system with intact lysosomes. Promazine and antidepressants (imipramine, amitriptyline, sertraline, fluoxetine) were incubated separately or jointly with tissue slices for 1 hr. Initial concentration of each drug was 5 microM. The interaction studies were carried out in the absence and presence of ammonium chloride (20 mM), a lysosomotropic compound which increases the internal pH value of lysosomes. All the tissues known for their abundance of lysosomes (the lungs, liver, kidneys) were the site of an interaction between promazine and antidepressants. The neuroleptic and antidepressants mutually inhibited their tissue uptake. The potency of interference of each antidepressant with the lysosomal uptake of promazine was similar. The interactions did not occur in the presence of ammonium chloride, which indicates involvement of the lysosomal trapping. Carbamazepine, a lipophilic but non-lysosomotropic drug, did not interfere with the promazine uptake, and the adipose tissue containing very few lysosomes was never the site of interaction in our experiment. Distribution interactions were also observed in the brain and in some cases in muscles (the tissues less abundant of lysosomes), the effect of the inhibitory drug being usually more potent than that of ammonium chloride. Most of the interactions occurring in these two tissues were also observed in the presence of ammonium chloride. Most of the interactions occurring in these two tissues were also observed in the presence of ammonium chloride, which suggests involvement, at least partially, of a non-lysosomal trapping mechanism. The consequences of the observed distributive interactions at the level of lysosomal trapping in vitro are diminished intralysosomal concentration of the basic lipophilic psychotropic and its increase in cell membranes and fluids. In vivo, a shift from the organs or tissues rich in lysosomes to those less abundant in these organella, and an increase in the free drug concentration in body fluids may be expected. In conclusion, the obtained results show that, regardless of the previously known metabolic interactions between psychotropics, interactions at the levels of cellular and body distribution are also feasible.

Promazine pharmacokinetics during concurrent treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.

The aim of the present study was to search for a possible effect of tricyclic antidepressants on the pharmacokinetics of promazine. Male Wistar rats received promazine and/or an antidepressant (amitriptyline, imipramine) at a dose of 10 mg/kg i.p. twice a day for two weeks. Amitriptyline increased the plasma concentrations of promazine and N-desmethylpromazine. The concentration of promazine sulfoxide was lowered after 30 min, but later it was raised after 6 and 12 h. The interaction was pronounced after 6 and 12 h when the concentration of promazine was 3 times as high, that of N-desmethylpromazine 25 times as high, and that of sulfoxide 22 times as high as those observed after administration of promazine alone. Similar results were obtained in the brain. Imipramine produced less distinct changes in promazine pharmacokinetics. It did not produce any significant changes in promazine concentration (a tendency to raise it after 30 min was observed) in plasma, but it significantly increased the concentration of N-desmethylpromazine and decreased that of promazine sulfoxide. Changes in the brain did not follow closely those in the plasma. In the brain, significant increases in the levels of promazine and its metabolites were observed after 6 and 12 h. In vitro studies with liver microsomes showed that chronic co-administration of the antidepressants did not significantly influence the rate of promazine demethylation and sulfoxidation. Instead, the Lineweaver-Burk's analysis showed that both amitriptyline and imipramine competitively inhibited the two metabolic pathways of the neuroleptic. The potency of imipramine to inhibit the promazine metabolism in vitro was lower than that of amitriptyline, which was in line with its weaker effect on the pharmacokinetics of promazine in vivo. The observed increase in the sum of concentrations of the measured compounds (promazine + metabolites) in the plasma suggests additional inhibition by amitriptyline of another, metabolic pathway of promazine (e.g. hydroxylation). It is concluded that amitriptyline and imipramine which interfere with the metabolism (and probably distribution) of promazine produce potent increases in the brain (in the case of amitriptyline also in the plasma) concentrations of the neuroleptic.

Pharmacokinetics of thioridazine and its metabolites in blood plasma and the brain of rats after acute and chronic treatment.

This study was aimed at investigation of the pharmacokinetics of thioridazine and its metabolites after a single and repeated administrations. Male Wistar rats received thioridazine as a single dose (10 mg/kg i.p.) or they were treated chronically with the neuroleptic (10 mg/kg i.p., twice a day for two weeks). Plasma and brain concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites (N-desmethylthioridazine, mesoridazine, sulforidazine, and the ring sulfoxide) were determined using the HPLC method. The obtained data showed that sulfoxidation in position 2 of the thiomethyl substituent and in the thiazine ring are main metabolic pathways of thioridazine, and showed that, in contrast to humans, in the rat N-desmethylthioridazine is formed in appreciable amount. The biotransformation of thioridazine was rather fast yielding plasma peak concentrations of metabolites lower than that of the parent compound. The maximum concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites in the brain appeared later than in plasma. The peak concentrations and AUC values of thioridazine and its metabolites were higher in the brain than in plasma and this corresponded well with their longer half-lives in the brain as compared to plasma. The drug was not taken up by the brain as efficiently as other phenothiazines. Chronic treatment with thioridazine produced significant increases (with the exception of thioridazine ring sulfoxide) in the plasma concentrations of the parent compound and its metabolites which was accompanied with the prolongation of their plasma half-lives. The observed plasma levels of thioridazine were within 'therapeutic range' while the concentrations of its metabolites were relatively lower as compared to those observed in psychiatric patients. The increased plasma concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites observed in plasma after chronic treatment were not followed by parallel changes in the brain.

Effect of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of promazine.

Combinations of neuroleptics and carbamazepine are administered to psychiatric patients in the therapy of mania, manic-depressive illness and schizophrenia. The present study was aimed at assessing the influence of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of promazine. Male Wistar rats received promazine and/or carbamazepine twice daily for two weeks (promazine, 10 mg/kg ip; carbamazepine, 15 mg/kg ip during the 1st, and 20 mg/kg ip during the 2nd week of treatment). In a short time (1 h) after administration, carbamazepine had a tendency to increase the concentration of promazine in the blood plasma and brain. Lineweaver-Burk's analysis showed that carbamazepine added in vitro competitively inhibited the N-demethylation of promazine in liver microsomes, without affecting the sulphoxidation process. The effect was reflected in vivo (1 h) by an increased promazine/desmethylpromazine ratio. After a long time interval (6 h, 12 h), carbamazepine decreased the concentration of promazine and its metabolites. In vitro studies into the promazine metabolism, conducted on microsomes from rats treated with promazine and/or carbamazepine, did not show acceleration of its demethylation or sulphoxidation by carbamazepine. The obtained results suggest that induction of promazine metabolism by carbamazepine involves metabolic pathways other than N-demethylation or sulphoxidation. It has been concluded that when a phenothiazine neuroleptic, such as promazine, is administered jointly with carbamazepine, a slight increase in the neuroleptic concentration may be expected in a short time after administration, followed by its significant decrease.