Comparative effects of losartan and irbesartan on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with hyperuricaemia and gout.

OBJECTIVE: Losartan has been shown to increase urinary uric acid excretion and hence to lower serum uric acid levels. The purposes of the present study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of losartan on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia and gout, (2) to compare the effects of losartan with those of irbesartan, another angiotensin II receptor antagonist and (3) to evaluate whether losartan 50 mg b.i.d. has a greater impact on serum uric acid levels than losartan 50 mg once a day. METHODS: Thirteen hypertensive patients with hyperuricaemia and gout completed this prospective, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Uric acid-lowering drugs were stopped 3 weeks before the beginning of the study. Patients were randomized to receive either losartan 50 mg or irbesartan 150 mg once a day, for 4 weeks. During this phase, a placebo was given in the evening. After 4 weeks, the dose was increased to losartan 50 mg b.i.d., or irbesartan 150 mg b.i.d. for another 4 week period. Subsequently, the patients were switched to the alternative treatment modality. Enalapril (20 mg o.d.) was given during the run-in period and between the two treatment phases. Serum and urinary uric acid were measured at the beginning and at the end of each treatment phase. RESULTS: Our results show that losartan 50 mg once daily decreased serum uric acid levels from 538 +/- 26 to 491 +/- 20 micromol/l (P < 0.01). Irbesartan had no effect on serum uric acid. Increasing the dose of losartan from 50 mg o.d. to 50 mg twice a day, did not further decrease serum uric acid. This may in part be due to a low compliance to the evening dose as measured with an electronic device. Indeed, whatever the prescribed drug, the mean compliance of the evening dose was always significantly lower than that of the morning dose. The uricosuric effect of losartan appears to decrease with time when a new steady state of lower serum uric acid is reached. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to irbesartan, losartan was uricosuric and decreased serum uric acid levels. Losartan 50 mg b.i.d. did not produce a greater fall in serum uric acid than losartan once a day. Losartan might be a useful therapeutic tool to control blood pressure and reduce serum uric acid levels in hypertensive patients with hyperuricaemia and gout.

Renal and neurohormonal responses to increasing levels of lower body negative pressure in men.

BACKGROUND: The stimulation of efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity induces sequential changes in renin secretion, sodium excretion, and renal hemodynamics that are proportional to the magnitude of the stimulation of sympathetic nerves. This study in men investigated the sequence of the changes in proximal and distal renal sodium handling, renal and systemic hemodynamics, as well as the hormonal profile occurring during a sustained activation of the sympathetic nervous system induced by various levels of lower body negative pressure (LBNP). METHODS: Ten healthy subjects were submitted to three levels of LBNP ranging between 0 and -22.5 mm Hg for one hour according to a triple crossover design, with a minimum of five days between each level of LBNP. Systemic and renal hemodynamics, renal water and sodium handling (using the endogenous lithium clearance technique), and the neurohormonal profile were measured before, during, and after LBNP. RESULTS: LBNP (0 to -22.5 mm Hg) induced an important hormonal response characterized by a significant stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system and gradual activations of the vasopressin and the renin-angiotensin systems. LBNP also gradually reduced water excretion and increased urinary osmolality. A significant decrease in sodium excretion was apparent only at -22.5 mm Hg. It was independent of any change in the glomerular filtration rate and was mediated essentially by an increased sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule (a significant decrease in lithium clearance, P < 0.05). No significant change in renal hemodynamics was found at the tested levels of LBNP. As observed experimentally, there appeared to be a clear sequence of responses to LBNP, the neurohormonal response occurring before the changes in water and sodium excretion, these latter preceding any change in renal hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the renal sodium retention developing during LBNP, and thus sympathetic nervous stimulation, is due mainly to an increase in sodium reabsorption by the proximal segments of the nephron. Our results in humans also confirm that, depending on its magnitude, LBNP leads to a step-by-step activation of neurohormonal, renal tubular, and renal hemodynamic responses.

[Selective inhibitors of type 2 cyclooxygenase: less renal effects than the classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents]. / Les inhibiteurs sélectifs de la cyclooxygénase de type 2: moins d'effets rénaux que les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens classiques?

Prostaglandins play an important role in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and sodium excretion. Thus, the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) induces a renal vasoconstriction and sodium and potassium retention. In some high risk patients, this may lead to acute renal failure. The anti-inflammatory and renal effects of conventional NSAIDs are mediated by the non-selective inhibition of two cyclo-oxygenases, COX-1 and COX-2. Recently, highly selective COX-2 inhibitors have been developed such as celecoxib (Celebrex) and rofecoxib (Vioxx). These drugs were designed to preserve the analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of NSAIDs while reducing their gastro-intestinal and renal side effects. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have indeed less gastro-intestinal side-effects. However, their renal profile is comparable to that of non-selective inhibitors as they induce a decrease in glomerular filtration rate and a sodium and potassium retention. Thus, despite the good gastro-intestinal safety profile of selective COX-2, one should be careful with the use of these agents in high risk patients as they may induce similar renal complications as non-selective NSAIDs.

Study of heterogeneity of lectins in mistletoe preparations by monoclonal antibodies to their A-subunits.

Monoclonal antibodies (monAbs) displaying diverse affinity to native and recombinant mistletoe lectins A-chains (ML I-A, ML II-A, ML III-A and rML-A) have been obtained. In accordance to specificity of monAb they have been classified into three groups: 1. monAb against MLI-A and MLII-A, 2. monAb against MLII-A and MLIII-A, 3. monAb against A-subunits of MLI, MLII and MLIII. The results indicate, that antigen determinants of mistletoe lectins recognized by monAb MNA4, MNA9 and MTC12 do not contain any carbohydrates. Assay of lectins in mistletoe preparations was based on enzyme-linked lectin assay to meet the requirements given in the guidelines for drug tests. In this paper a sandwich ELISA test-system is described which allows to identify each of three ML-toxins. With the detection limits below 3 ng/ml and a linear measuring range of 3-30 ng/ml, dosages of mistletoe lectins in therapeutic range can be assayed. The problems in mistletoe lectins determination, structural differences and nature of heterogeneity of this proteins are discussed.