Evaluation of Pediatric Readiness Using Simulation in General Emergency Departments in a Medically Underserved Region.

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of pediatric care in the United States was developed to improve care by directing patients to hospitals with optimal pediatric resources and experience, leading to less pediatric-trained providers in medically underserved areas. Children with emergencies, however, continue to present to local general emergency departments (GEDs), where pediatric emergencies are low-frequency, high-risk events. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this project were to: increase exposure of GEDs in the southeast United States to pediatric emergencies through simulation, assess pediatric emergency clinical care processes with simulation, describe factors associated with readiness including volume of pediatric patients and ED location (urban/rural), and compare these findings to the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project. METHODS: This prospective in situ simulation study evaluated GED readiness using the Emergency Medical Services for Children Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and team performance in caring for 4 simulated pediatric emergencies. Comparisons between GED and pediatric ED (PED) performance and PRS, GED performance, and PRS based on pediatric patient volume and hospital location were evaluated. A Composite Quality Score (CQS) was calculated for each ED. RESULTS: Seventy-five teams from 40 EDs participated (39 GED; 1 PED). The PED had a significantly higher volume of pediatric patients (73,000 vs 4492; P = 0.003). The PRS for GEDs was significantly lower (57% [SD, 17] vs 98%; P = 0.022). The CQSs for all GEDs were significantly lower than the PED (55% vs 87%; P < 0.004). Among GEDs, there was no statistically significant difference in PRS or CQS based on pediatric patient volume, but urban GEDs had significantly higher CQSs versus rural GEDs (59.8% vs 50.6%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant disparity in the performance and readiness of GEDs versus a PED in a medically underserved area. More education and better access to resources is needed in these areas to adequately care for critically ill pediatric patients.

The Impact of a Multifaceted Simulation Education and Feedback Program for Community Emergency Departments on Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if general emergency departments (GEDs) were managing pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) correctly and if management could be improved using a multilayered educational initiative. We hypothesized that a multifaceted program of in situ simulation education and formal feedback on actual patient management would improve community GED management of pediatric DKA. METHODS: This study combined a prospective simulation-based performance evaluation and a retrospective chart review. A community outreach simulation education initiative was developed followed by a formal patient feedback process. RESULTS: Fifteen hospitals participated in simulation sessions and the feedback process. All hospitals were scored for readiness to provide care for critically ill pediatric patients using the Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Pediatric Readiness Assessment. Six of the 15 have had a second hospital visit that included a DKA scenario with an average performance score of 60.3%. A total of 158 pediatric patients with DKA were included in the chart review. The GEDs with higher patient volumes provided best practice DKA management more often (63%) than those with lower patient volumes (40%). Participating in a DKA simulated scenario showed a trend toward improved care, with 47.2% before participation and 68.2% after participation ( P = 0.091). Participating in the formal feedback process improved best practice management provided to 68.6%. Best practice management was further improved to 70.3% if the GED participated in both a DKA simulation and the feedback process ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted program of in situ simulation education and formal feedback on patient management can improve community GED management of pediatric patients with DKA.

Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: Bundled Extubation Readiness and Analgosedation Pathways Decrease Mechanical Ventilation Duration and Benzodiazepine Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies reported that children on mechanical ventilation who were managed with an analgosedation approach and standardized extubation readiness testing experienced better outcomes, including decreased delirium and invasive mechanical ventilation duration. METHODS: This was a quality improvement project in a 24-bed pediatric ICU within a single center, including subjects ≤ 18 years old who required invasive mechanical ventilation via an oral or nasal endotracheal tube. The aim was to decrease the invasive mechanical ventilation duration for all the subjects by 25% within 9 months through the development and implementation of bundled benzodiazepine-sparing analgosedation and extubation readiness testing clinical pathways. RESULTS: In the pre-implementation cohort, there were 274 encounters, with 253 (92.3%) that met inclusion for ending in an extubation attempt. In the implementation cohort, there were 367 encounters with 332 (90.5%) that ended in an extubation attempt. The mean invasive mechanical ventilation duration decreased by 23% (Pre 3.95 d vs Post 3.1 d; P = .039) after the implementation without a change in the mean pediatric ICU length of stay (Pre 7.5 d vs Post 6.5 d; P = .42). No difference in unplanned extubation (P > .99) or extubation failure rates (P = .67) were demonstrated. Sedation levels as evaluated by the mean State Behavioral Scale were similar (Pre -1.0 vs Post -1.1; P = .09). The median total benzodiazepine dose administered decreased by 75% (Pre 0.4 vs Post 0.1 mg/kg/ventilated day; P < .001). No difference in narcotic withdrawal (Pre 17.8% vs Post 16.4%; P = .65) or with delirium treatment (Pre 5.5% vs Post 8.7%; P = .14) was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary, bundled benzodiazepine-sparing analgosedation and extubation readiness testing approach resulted in a reduction in mechanical ventilation duration and benzodiazepine exposure without impacting key balancing measures. External validity needs to be evaluated in similar centers and consensus on best practices developed.