Responsiveness of Subjective and Objective Measures of Pain and Function Following Operative Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders affect ~50% of US adults and 75% of those over the age of 65, representing a sizable economic and disability burden. Outcome measures, both objective and subjective, help clinicians and investigators determine whether interventions to treat MSK conditions are effective. This narrative review qualitatively compared the responsiveness of different types of outcome measures, a key measurement characteristic that assesses an outcome measure's ability to detect change in patient status. METHODS: We evaluated elective orthopedic interventions as a model for assessing responsiveness because the great majority of patients improves following surgery. We searched for articles reporting responsiveness (quantified as effect size [ES]) of subjective and objective outcome measures after orthopedic surgery and included 16 articles reporting 17 interventions in this review. RESULTS: In 14 of 17 interventions, subjective function measures had an ES 10% greater than that of objective function measures. Two reported a difference in ES of <10%. The sole intervention that demonstrated higher ES of objective function used a composite measure. Sixteen interventions reported measures of subjective pain and/or mixed measures and subjective function. In nine interventions, subjective pain had a higher ES than subjective function by >10%, in three, subjective function had a higher ES than subjective pain by >10%, and in the remaining four, the difference between pain and function was <10%. CONCLUSION: These findings reinforce the clinical observation that subjective pain generally changes more than function following elective orthopedic surgery. They also suggest that subjective function measures are more responsive than objective function measures, and composite scores may be more responsive than individual performance tests.

Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures of the Knee: A Clinical Narrative Review.

¼ Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee (SIFKs) are subchondral plate fractures with a prevalence of 2% to 4% of all knee injuries.¼ Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for evaluating SIFK, while plain radiographs have limited the use in the diagnosis of SIFK.¼ Among patients with SIFK, 50% to 100% have meniscal pathology.¼ Medical therapies and standard treatments traditionally used in the management of knee osteoarthritis differ from recommended management of SIFK patients.¼ Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the optimal rehabilitation protocol, interventional therapy, and prognosis of SIFK patients.